I just love that Trump HAD to be there for Brexit. He couldn't let anything upstage him. He had to be part of the conversation. He couldn't give the spotlight up to anyone. I love it.

Brexit is bad enough for the sea hag, but who's a part of that conversation now? Who exists today?

Out shitlording in my Trump hat

I head to a mini golf course

Walking in theres a latino drinking a milkshake. He stares me down and starts scowling at me. I'll see you again faggot when I'm an officer in Trump's deportation force.

Nice grandpa with his grandson are playing behind me. He kind of stares for a second. He catches up the next hole, looks me dead in the eye with a shit eating grin and says "I love your hat."

There needs to be an experiences while wearing a Trump hat thread

(06-24-2016 11:53 AM)Libertas Wrote:  I just love that Trump HAD to be there for Brexit. He couldn't let anything upstage him. He had to be part of the conversation. He couldn't give the spotlight up to anyone. I love it.

Brexit is bad enough for the sea hag, but who's a part of that conversation now? Who exists today?

That's a hell of a point.

Clinton makes a blithe, downright anemic statement on her website, somewhere far away.

Trump makes sure well in advance that he's at ground zero for history in the making.

That's really what it comes down to. One candidate is content to look like a passenger in history. The other has a burning drive to be a participant.

(06-24-2016 12:24 PM)Canopus Wrote:  

(06-24-2016 11:53 AM)Libertas Wrote:  I just love that Trump HAD to be there for Brexit. He couldn't let anything upstage him. He had to be part of the conversation. He couldn't give the spotlight up to anyone. I love it.

Brexit is bad enough for the sea hag, but who's a part of that conversation now? Who exists today?

That's a hell of a point.

Clinton makes a blithe, downright anemic statement on her website, somewhere far away.

Trump makes sure well in advance that he's at ground zero for history in the making.

That's really what it comes down to. One candidate is content to look like a passenger in history. The other has a burning drive to be a participant.

I will agree and amplify - he is neither mere participant or passenger --> he is a creator of history.

(06-24-2016 11:58 AM)MiscBrah Wrote:  There needs to be an experiences while wearing a Trump hat thread

Title: "There I was, wearing my Trump hat, when..."

(06-24-2016 12:24 PM)Canopus Wrote:  

(06-24-2016 11:53 AM)Libertas Wrote:  I just love that Trump HAD to be there for Brexit. He couldn't let anything upstage him. He had to be part of the conversation. He couldn't give the spotlight up to anyone. I love it.

Brexit is bad enough for the sea hag, but who's a part of that conversation now? Who exists today?

That's a hell of a point.

Clinton makes a blithe, downright anemic statement on her website, somewhere far away.

Trump makes sure well in advance that he's at ground zero for history in the making.

That's really what it comes down to. One candidate is content to look like a passenger in history. The other has a burning drive to be a participant.

"Woke up at 11 am to learn..."

A thread just for Trump hat adventures, while strictly speaking not necessary, would drive forum members to more spectacular achievents in trolling leftists.

If started, I would repost the Trump hat memories I put up here, as well as others I have written but not posted.

Celebrating the Brexit victory with my Donald Pump tank top at the gym tonight.

MAKE THE WORLD GREAT AGAIN !

Not sure if this has been discussed in the thread yet, but I saw it on Twitter today.

Christopher Hitchens Wrote:Indifferent to truth, willing to use police-state tactics and vulgar libels against inconvenient witnesses, hopeless on health care, and flippant and fast and loose with national security: The case against Hillary Clinton for president is open-and-shut. Of course, against all these considerations you might prefer the newly fashionable and more media-weighty notion that if you don't show her enough appreciation, and after all she's done for us, she may cry.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_p...inton.html

I was thinking about that last statement in bold. Although Hitchens is clearly being cheeky there, I think there's some lucid analysis going on. I think when the hag recently said "Sigh" out loud in her terrible teleprompter-assisted speech, what she is essentially doing is threatening to cry, and this is how she moblilizes her SJW army. You heard these libtard interviewers asking Bernie things like, "Doesn't it make you feel bad to know that you might be standing in the way of the first woman President?" The key words there are "feel bad". It all really boils down to, "Won't you feel bad if she doesn't get to be President? Aren't you concerned that you might make her cry? Are you a monster?" This is the angle Hitlery and her zombie army are attacking on. I hope Trump is considering this and planning accordingly. Personally I think the best counter is to go hard at her emotions, just like it appears Trump is doing. If Trump can make her actually cry and get it over with, the threat will be removed and we can start talking about how unstable and unfit for office she is. It really pisses me off that she is using this angle and that it has traction, but hey... it's current year.

(06-24-2016 01:55 PM)Ghost Tiger Wrote:  Not sure if this has been discussed in the thread yet, but I saw it on Twitter today.

Christopher Hitchens Wrote:Indifferent to truth, willing to use police-state tactics and vulgar libels against inconvenient witnesses, hopeless on health care, and flippant and fast and loose with national security: The case against Hillary Clinton for president is open-and-shut. Of course, against all these considerations you might prefer the newly fashionable and more media-weighty notion that if you don't show her enough appreciation, and after all she's done for us, she may cry.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_p...inton.html

I was thinking about that last statement in bold. Although Hitchens is clearly being cheeky there, I think there's some lucid analysis going on. I think when the hag recently said "Sigh" out loud in her terrible teleprompter-assisted speech, what she is essentially doing is threatening to cry, and this is how she moblilizes her SJW army. You heard these libtard interviewers asking Bernie things like, "Doesn't it make you feel bad to know that you might be standing in the way of the first woman President?" The key words there are "feel bad". It all really boils down to, "Won't you feel bad if she doesn't get to be President? Aren't you concerned that you might make her cry? Are you a monster?" This is the angle Hitlery and her zombie army are attacking on. I hope Trump is considering this and planning accordingly. Personally I think the best counter is to go hard at her emotions, just like it appears Trump is doing. If Trump can make her actually cry and get it over with, the threat will be removed and we can start talking about how unstable and unfit for office she is. It really pisses me off that she is using this angle and that it has traction, but hey... it's current year.

Unpossible. Reptoids can't cry.

Last night UK voters shocked the world.

I'm sure you saw the news. Voters in the United Kingdom chose to leave the flawed and failing European Union and reassert control over their borders, politics and economy, taking a brave stand for freedom and independence. It's been dubbed "Brexit" in the media.

These voters stood up for their nation – they put the United Kingdom first, and they took their country back.

With your help, we're going to do the exact same thing on Election Day 2016 here in the United States of America.

I am fighting to upend the failed Big Government status quo in Washington, so that Americans can start believing in the future of our country again. And if elected President of the United States, I will strengthen our ties with a free and independent Britain.

Will you stand with me at this critical time?

Yesterday UK voters exercised their right to self-determination for all the world to see. And today, our friends across the Atlantic are looking forward to a return to greater freedom and a better future for their children and grandchildren.

Voters here face the same choice on Election Day.

The political elites didn't see this coming. Wall Street and the media didn’t have a clue. And they want to believe just as badly that we cannot win in November.

Let's send another shockwave around the world. Let's take back our country from the corrupt career politicians and put Americans first. Let’s re-declare our independence.

Please stand with me today to reclaim freedom from the corrupt Washington establishment and Make America Great Again.

Thank you.

Best Wishes,

Donald J. Trump
Candidate for President of the United States

Can't Barrage the Farage (New CSTT):

(06-24-2016 09:07 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

(06-24-2016 07:42 AM)iop890 Wrote:  

Is Brexit a harbinger for a November Trump victory?

I keep hearing that polling data didn't reflect the Brexit results and politicians were surprised. People came "out of the woodwork," apparently.

I've written on here that I think citizens are lying to pollsters out of paranoia and fear. Both Trump's primary landslides and Brexit seem to confirm that.

Ït most certainly is.

The Saxon has awakened, don't make me quote that fine Kipling poem (Wrath of the Awakened Saxon), instead let's try it on with some Yeats, I am not sure it is proper in this context, but lets try for a change:

Turning and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.

Surely some revelation is at hand;
Surely the Second Coming is at hand.
The Second Coming! Hardly are those words out
When a vast image out of Spiritus Mundi
Troubles my sight: a waste of desert sand;
A shape with lion body and the head of a man,
A gaze blank and pitiless as the sun,
Is moving its slow thighs, while all about it
Wind shadows of the indignant desert birds.

The darkness drops again but now I know
That twenty centuries of stony sleep
Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,
And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?

(06-24-2016 11:53 AM)Libertas Wrote:  I just love that Trump HAD to be there for Brexit. He couldn't let anything upstage him. He had to be part of the conversation. He couldn't give the spotlight up to anyone. I love it.

Brexit is bad enough for the sea hag, but who's a part of that conversation now? Who exists today?

Well, he was in Scotland who wanted to remain in by a large margin so I guess he wanted to rub it in a bit more.

A Washington Post article consisting of only one paragraph of journalist-writing, and a full transcript of Mr. Trump's speech, is entitled, "Donald Trump's Brexit press conference was beyond bizarre".

There's no explanation why the press conference was bizarre. And the first sentence begins, "Donald Trump is in the midst of a two-day trip to Scotland, a visit that happened to coincide with Britain voting on Thursday to leave the European Union..."

happened to coincide with

happened to coincide with



It's almost July, and this journalist still doesn't get it.

(06-24-2016 05:17 PM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  

(06-24-2016 11:53 AM)Libertas Wrote:  I just love that Trump HAD to be there for Brexit. He couldn't let anything upstage him. He had to be part of the conversation. He couldn't give the spotlight up to anyone. I love it.

Brexit is bad enough for the sea hag, but who's a part of that conversation now? Who exists today?

Well, he was in Scotland who wanted to remain in by a large margin so I guess he wanted to rub it in a bit more.

While he upgraded a fabulous golf destination property creating many great local Scots jobs in the process and mentioning how a lower GBP will spur massive tourism to the UK this summer.

The mega-cucking media manginas of course refused to mention this... they really are cucking hard for Hillary - now there is a meme... #CuckingHardOnHillary

(06-24-2016 06:17 PM)Deepdiver Wrote:  

(06-24-2016 05:17 PM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  

(06-24-2016 11:53 AM)Libertas Wrote:  I just love that Trump HAD to be there for Brexit. He couldn't let anything upstage him. He had to be part of the conversation. He couldn't give the spotlight up to anyone. I love it.

Brexit is bad enough for the sea hag, but who's a part of that conversation now? Who exists today?

Well, he was in Scotland who wanted to remain in by a large margin so I guess he wanted to rub it in a bit more.

While he upgraded a fabulous golf destination property creating many great local Scots jobs in the process and mentioning how a lower GBP will spur massive tourism to the UK this summer.

The mega-cucking media manginas of course refused to mention this... they really are cucking hard for Hillary - now there is a meme... #CuckingHardOnHillary

To be fair to the press they could have exploited the fact a lot of the local citizens, including several Scottish MPs dislike Trump over this golf course.

Before his campaign kicked off big time he had issues with one of the gremlin Scottish MPs about the wind farm nearby and some locals taking issue with him.

The man wants to put millions into the area and all they can think of is his ego. Yes the man isn't perfect but your shitty little country is the arse-end of the world and should welcome something like this.

They behaved as if he was building a Skyscraper in the middle of their village.

(06-24-2016 03:45 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

(06-24-2016 09:07 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

(06-24-2016 07:42 AM)iop890 Wrote:  

Is Brexit a harbinger for a November Trump victory?

I keep hearing that polling data didn't reflect the Brexit results and politicians were surprised. People came "out of the woodwork," apparently.

I've written on here that I think citizens are lying to pollsters out of paranoia and fear. Both Trump's primary landslides and Brexit seem to confirm that.

Ït most certainly is.

The Saxon has awakened, don't make me quote that fine Kipling poem (Wrath of the Awakened Saxon), instead let's try it on with some Yeats, I am not sure it is proper in this context, but lets try for a change:

Turning and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.

Surely some revelation is at hand;
Surely the Second Coming is at hand.
The Second Coming! Hardly are those words out
When a vast image out of Spiritus Mundi
Troubles my sight: a waste of desert sand;
A shape with lion body and the head of a man,
A gaze blank and pitiless as the sun,
Is moving its slow thighs, while all about it
Wind shadows of the indignant desert birds.

The darkness drops again but now I know
That twenty centuries of stony sleep
Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,
And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?

Enter to win a trip to have dinner with Trump! No donation needed to enter.

Contest

I'm hearing lots of chatter on the wire about Trump supporters in unlikely places. More to follow. Until then...
[attachment=32274]

Trump's Turnberry presser deserves to be watched in full. It was one of his very best:





Trump was so happy and relaxed, so utterly relaxed here -- and so right about everything. It was a joy to watch. His very relaxation rubbed it in more than any gloating could possibly do. Year Zero scum were scandalized by this and called it "bizarre" because Trump "did not comprehend the gravity" of what had happened. They are so bitter, so tight, and so anxious that they instinctively regard relaxation as almost tantamount to mental illness, and they fear it. You could hear that fear in the journalists' voices.

Also, Ivanka was looking simply stunning here. Her tits loomed extremely large in the Scottish sun and wind and their heft warped the happy field of post-Brexit reality surrounding them. They were serious and unanswerable tits.

A truly great presser to cap a great great day. Please give it a watch.

Quote: it will burst the higher education bubble and free people from debt and get people into having home mortgages, not just mortgage sized student loan debt. It'll reduce the national debt too. Just think of it...tell me what you think.

I think it's a good idea, especially since Hillary (as Senator) voted for the bankruptcy reform law which extended the bankruptcy exemption (protection) to privately issued student loans.

Antisemitism has infected Disney

   

(07-06-2016 11:02 AM)Dusty Wrote:  Antisemitism has infected Disney

Trump's six-pointed star tweet is actually a hell of a lot more brilliant than I first realized.

Breitbart Wrote:Donald Trump’s ‘Star of David’ Just Punked the Media into Spreading an Attack Ad for Free

If you read establishment or left-wing political news this weekend, you know the big story is that Donald Trump obviously made a big mistake by tweeting an anti-Semitic meme — an iconic Hillary Clinton campaign photo in front of piles of cash, next to a Star of David. He’s under fire from the press, Republicans have nothing to say in his defense, and he’s sending out erratic statements denying that the shape is a Star of David.

But what if that’s not what happened at all?

What if Trump sent out something patently offensive to a couple hundred journalists who are Verified on Twitter — so they would blow up its reach to an audience that might not take such great offense?

He’s done it before.

Right now, the Clinton campaign is boasting of spending money to define Trump with advertisements in battleground states. But where are those ads going? Television, where ads are increasingly irrelevant thanks to Netflix and DVR? Radio, for the people who don’t have an aux input in their cars?

Trump, whether intentionally or not, instead sent out an attack ad to social media, where most voting-age people get their news. And he did it without spending a cent.

And Trump prolonged the story by deleting the original tweet, reposting the tweet with the star changed to a circle, tweeting about the media reading too much into the star shape, and then putting out a press release not only attacking the media but also comparing this “scandal” to a scandal about Hillary Clinton’s FBI investigation. This kept these news organizations sharing the “Crooked Hillary” meme all through the weekend and the Independence Day holiday.

On Facebook, these publishers all posted the story with the “Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!” Hillary image:

CBS News

ABC News

CNN

The Hill

Politico

New York Daily News

USA Today

The Daily Beast

Yahoo! News

The Guardian

MSN News

BuzzFeed News

Inside Edition

Mediaite

Esquire

Vox

(Tellingly, one left-wing outlet that refused to disseminate the picture on its Twitter or Facebook accounts is The Huffington Post. HuffPo doesn’t like to spread news that might hurt Hillary Clinton.)

Ask any friend or relative if the message of this image is: A) “Hillary Clinton is corrupt,” or B) “The Jews own Hillary Clinton.”

Odds are, you’re going to get a lot more people picking “A,” as they aren’t in metropolitan journalists’ social circles and don’t think alt-right shitposters in journalists’ Twitter mentions are a Big Scandal on the same level as, say, Clinton foundation donors processing the transfer of uranium to Putin’s Russia.

So, if Trump got this image widely disseminated, and the main takeaway for people outside of Hardcore Political Junkie World is “Hillary Clinton: Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!” … then he just manipulated the media outrage machine to define his opponent for an even wider audience than she’s spending millions of dollars to reach.

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidenti...ium=social

Trump is playing the media like a damn fiddle. Rosin up that bow Trump. Play that fiddle hard. Cuz hell's broke loose in Washington and the devil deals her cards.

(07-06-2016 09:51 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 08:33 AM)[email protected] Wrote:  Many berners on reddit are disgusted with HRC. Most are thinking of third party but I think Mr Trump only needs to do one thing to have them tripping over each other to vote for him.

Going left on trade is good but it's not enough. His health care policy is shrouded in mystery.

What he needs to do is simple and costs him nothing. He should go left of Hillary on education. Just needs to promise to reintroduce bankruptcy protection for student loan debt. Not only will this bring in Berners by the droves it will burst the higher education bubble and free people from debt and get people into having home mortgages, not just mortgage sized student loan debt. It'll reduce the national debt too. Just think of it...tell me what you think.

Not sure what would happen there. It'd be like tossing two random chemicals together not knowing the outcome.

That's a lot of debt we're talking about. A LOT. Bursting bubbles of any kind isn't something to take lightly. I mean, all this debt is going to come crashing down sooner or later, but I don't think Trump wants to be the guy that kicks off financial armageddon.

It sits at about $1.3 TRILLION!

NY FED Microeconomics
NY Fed Student Borrowing Trend Report
Cleveland Fed: Student Loan Crisis?
Federal Student Aid

Quote:-$1.26 trillion in total U.S. student loan debt
-43.3 million Americans with student loan debt
-Student loan delinquency rate of 11.6%
-Average monthly student loan payment (for borrower aged 20 to 30 years): $351
-Median monthly student loan payment (for borrower aged 20 to 30 years): $203

Quote:-Direct Loans – $840.7 billion; 29.9 million borrowers
-FFEL Loans – $363.6 billion; 17.9 million borrowers.
-Perkins Loans – $8.1 billion; 2.8 million borrowers.
-Stafford Subsidized Loans – $264.8 billion; 29.1 million borrowers
-Unsubsidized – $404.9 billion; 27.1 million borrowers
-Stafford combined – $669.7 billion; 32.1 million unique recipients
-Grad PLUS – $46.8 billion; 1.0 million borrowers
-Parent PLUS – $71.1 billion; 3.3 million borrowers
-Perkins – $8.1 billion; 2.8 million borrowers
-Consolidation – $416.7 billion; 11.9 million borrowers