Here's a big shout-out to all the gals who put their Myers-Briggs listing on the OKC profile . . . no one gives a FUCK.

(07-17-2015 12:43 AM)Mess O. Wrote:  Here's a big shout-out to all the gals who put their Myers-Briggs listing on the OKC profile . . . no one gives a FUCK.

Got an example?

(07-17-2015 12:43 AM)Mess O. Wrote:  Here's a big shout-out to all the gals who put their Myers-Briggs listing on the OKC profile . . . no one gives a FUCK.

The ones who do are usually one of those extremely socially retarded introvert types anyway, and "personality types" are basically pseudoscientific starsign replacements for college-educated women who are just too enlightened to believe in the the usual nonsense

(07-17-2015 12:49 AM)Druber Wrote:  

(07-17-2015 12:43 AM)Mess O. Wrote:  Here's a big shout-out to all the gals who put their Myers-Briggs listing on the OKC profile . . . no one gives a FUCK.

Got an example?

It'd be far easier to simply post the 3 profiles that don't have that shit at the header.

(07-19-2015 11:35 AM)LouEvilSlugger Wrote:  

IDK what im looking at here? Does +2 means she got spit rosted

(07-19-2015 11:35 AM)LouEvilSlugger Wrote:  

She looks like she's got her dildo suction-cupped to a bedside table and is working it for the camera. Bitch, webcam shows require you get your clothes off and make sure the audience can see what's going on.

^^ You're looking at a woman who is so attention hungry that she uploads 7 photos of herself posing sexually when she tells everyone that she's going to watch Magic Mike.

The stats on the OKC that invoke the sharpest horror are the perfectly inverse proportions of message stockpiles. A given dude could send 100 messages and get 0 replies, while the chick (even one of mediocre quality) can sit back and receive an equivalent amount in the form of a bombardment of unsolicited inquiries, and quite likely reply to 0 of them. Oh, the raging epidemic of thirst.

I most assuredly tip my hat to the gents who are making a go of online game. So much to learn . . .

(07-20-2015 01:43 AM)britchard Wrote:  ^^ You're looking at a woman who is so attention hungry that she uploads 7 photos of herself posing sexually when she tells everyone that she's going to watch Magic Mike.

I love the girls who post "powerful" quotes who then take selfies to add to the tag. It makes 0 sense but I see over 75 "likes" and a ton of ass kissing. Ah, I love the smell of thirst in the morning.

No words...

Yep. May your quest continue. Apparently, it's taking a while.

I considered giving this one a go, but nah, the time would be better spent uploading it here.

In all fairness to her, she's in the top 1% for 42 year old women, physique wise.

I don't think she belongs on this thread.

In regards to the 42 year old, at least you are not raising another man's kid. Her kid is older enough to go to college. I bet her kid is attractive, work your way in with the mom and bang the 18 year old.

She said she won't won't settle until she meets the man god created for her. Gonna be an interesting ride, where she seems to think she is owed so much and yet she is old. The guy she wants probably doesn't want her.

I don't think I match her long wish list, but I don't want her either.

Imagine some guy that is matches her wish list, and you think he will?

Edit: Haha she says her mind never stops. Man that would suck to date her.

(07-25-2015 05:45 PM)CrashBangWallop Wrote:  In all fairness to her, she's in the top 1% for 42 year old women, physique wise.

I don't think she belongs on this thread.

If she was such a catch she would be on a mans arm making him happy.

(07-25-2015 07:45 PM)samsamsam Wrote:  

You don't get to decide if you're awesome sister...
It doesn't work like that

(07-25-2015 08:08 PM)Aquiles_Baesta_Parada Wrote:  

(07-25-2015 07:45 PM)samsamsam Wrote:  

You don't get to decide if you're awesome sister...
It doesn't work like that

My short experience in online dating has indicated to me that these chicks are pretty much an utter waste of time. I think one is far more likely to have success with a "normal" girl in the 6-7 range than one of these "kinky" chubsters

At least that's how I feel currently with my admittedly small "success" sample size.

(07-25-2015 05:45 PM)CrashBangWallop Wrote:  In all fairness to her, she's in the top 1% for 42 year old women, physique wise.

I don't think she belongs on this thread.

I agree. What's her daughter's profile like?

(07-19-2015 11:46 AM)pheonix500000 Wrote:  

(07-19-2015 11:35 AM)LouEvilSlugger Wrote:  

IDK what im looking at here? Does +2 means she got spit rosted

The +2 means there are two more photos uploaded to Facebook in that batch. For a woman, this is almost superhuman restraint. I see +42s every time I log in.

(07-25-2015 07:45 PM)samsamsam Wrote:  

(07-19-2015 11:35 AM)LouEvilSlugger Wrote:  

Would wreck even with the shitty tattoos.

Wouldn't save number.

(07-25-2015 08:30 PM)XPQ21 Wrote:  My short experience in online dating has indicated to me that these chicks are pretty much an utter waste of time. I think one is far more likely to have success with a "normal" girl in the 6-7 range than one of these "kinky" chubsters

At least that's how I feel currently with my admittedly small "success" sample size.

I'm not sure banging that would count as a "success".

Freakiest chick I've ever banged was actually a chubby thrift shop startup owner and part-time costume designer. Nope, not as kinky as me, and the chubby-guilt afterwards just wasn't worth it. That's Tinder for ya.

It's been awhile, I've got some GREAT ONES but that will have to wait.

Here is a insane text convo I decided to nuke because she's a cunt

She talked about how she loves hot wings and video games.

It all started with a joke to confirm is she was was real:

"So how do I know you aren't some 7'2 400 lb dude named X"

Apparently it's sexist and she read between the lines, yup you got me

Reads left to right:

[attachment=27301] [attachment=27302]
[attachment=27303] [attachment=27304]
[attachment=27305]

TL;DR: