^ yes but she can make a mean soy latte.

I just came back with a chick from OKC
Shes a 28 year old hippy chick...I could tell by her pictures she was on the roll downhill..but I figured id get an easy lay.

Turns out..shes 29..caught her in charleston on her first week..she is couchsurfing with someone cause she has no job..shes actually never had a job...came to the city on a non paid internship as a graphic designer even though she had a completely other field degree.
She told me how she hitchhiked around europe...I could almost see desperation in her eyes..that she wants to find a nice guy.(her OKC profile hit her perfect. Wants to get married..but still fucks on the first date)
2 beers in and we were making out in an alley..But I couldnt bring myself to do it.
One of those days where i tell myself im better than that...it didnt even look like she washed her hair..and her b tits were deflated.

I almost feel bad for her...that she was so thankful that she met someone in the city to show her around..and bang her out.
I probably will...but i resisted the easy spinster lay

(09-18-2013 09:12 PM)Sourcecode Wrote:  I almost feel bad for her.

That's your innate protector inside you.

It is a noble thing, it is the cornerstone of what built civilisation and in an ascending society it is held in the highest esteem.

But likewise, it doesn't come for free,and women have to trade something off for it. It used to be a decent human being as a partner, and women building up social captial.

They wanted it for free, wanted something for nothing... so they forfeit it. They said they could rely on each other... "feminism has your back sister".

Feminism can salvage her unwashed hair, flat tits and 28 years of unemployment.

They don't deserve you as a protector and a provider because they don't feel they should exchange value for it.

Those woman tend to be abroad.

   

Your next "girl"-friend:

   

   

   

   

   

I always see these "non heteronotmative non binary pan sexual polyamorous" whateverthefuck girls on Okc that obviously spend way too much time on tumblr and wonder if they even live in reality anymore. It's almost like satire.

I assume these "girls" just want to be unique, so why can't they just be feminine? Each and every profile here is full of the same meaningless garbage.

(09-22-2013 05:07 PM)Valhalla Wrote:  I always see these "non heteronotmative non binary pan sexual polyamorous" whateverthefuck girls on Okc that obviously spend way too much time on tumblr and wonder if they even live in reality anymore. It's almost like satire.

I see their 'pansexuality' as meaning they have an increased chance of carrying HIV, as they're more likely to sleep with at risk populations.

That being said, I thought he was funny enough on 'The Wonder Years'.

(09-22-2013 05:55 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

(09-22-2013 05:07 PM)Valhalla Wrote:  I always see these "non heteronotmative non binary pan sexual polyamorous" whateverthefuck girls on Okc that obviously spend way too much time on tumblr and wonder if they even live in reality anymore. It's almost like satire.

I see their 'pansexuality' as meaning they have an increased chance of carrying HIV, as they're more likely to sleep with at risk populations.

For me all the demi/pan/cis/chewbaca-sexual individuals are just blabbing phrases from a hamster dictionary. They claim to fuck anything but when tje time comes to do a tranny or dirty dyke......

I just had to chime in real quick.

Is all this for real? I can't believe what i'm seeing, do women like this really exist? 300 lb behemoths that think they are sexy?

What? wtf? How is this possible...


Im just completely horrified at what passes off for women in this thread.

@ the chick's profile that Cattle Rustler posted.

So much fail here, and this is only one section of her profile. She's a feminist but she wants to be courted?? Plus she spends all that time harping on fat shaming. Her insecurity is jumping out of the computer screen. I came across a profile of a chick on OKC today that said she was a "fat activist". What in the fuck is a "fat activist"? Instead of advocating for fatness, these bitches need to take responsibility for their self-destructive behavior. Of course, that will not happen.

This is best posted in this thread.

After all the insane examples of "normal" female dating requirements posted in this thread, look what happens when a guy decides he too has requirements. He becomes a "delusional man child." His requirements are actually pretty reasonable IMO (except for black and glasses, those are kinda silly).

   

   

   

   

That whale will hit the ground (reality) soon enough...

And I bet she wonders why, at 29, she's still single.

   

   

^^^^^^^
This idiot is a legend in her own mind.

So worldly and wildly sophisticated. I wonder if she could rock a little black dress as well as jeans and a t-shirt? What a pretentious ass.

@Tuth, I am literally dying laughing (referring to the last post). This is just epic.

(09-29-2013 12:25 AM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  And I bet she wonders why, at 29, she's still single.

I found the above profile. And despite her claims of being too busy to read all the zillions of message she gets, her message indicator was the color green. That means "replies often."

So it looks like guys aren't exactly responding to a woman who carries juggling balls, won't use the word "purse," and makes you respond like you're writing SAT answers.

Gee, I wonder what the problem could be?

PS: Why are we so polite that we blank out usernames when we put profiles on here? Legal reasons? An inherent sense of morality? The "nice guys of OKCupid"-type female bloggers are not so kind.

(09-29-2013 02:35 AM)TheSlayer Wrote:  @Tuth, I am literally dying laughing (referring to the last post). This is just epic.

That said, would still bang. Probably after meeting her at a hostel somewhere.

(09-29-2013 02:54 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

(09-29-2013 12:25 AM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  And I bet she wonders why, at 29, she's still single.

I found the above profile. And despite her claims of being too busy to read all the zillions of message she gets, her message indicator was the color green. That means "replies often."

So it looks like guys aren't exactly responding to a woman who carries juggling balls, won't use the word "purse," and makes you respond like you're writing SAT answers.

Gee, I wonder what the problem could be?

PS: Why are we so polite that we blank out usernames when we put profiles on here? Legal reasons? An inherent sense of morality? The "nice guys of OKCupid"-type female bloggers are not so kind.

For me, sometimes white knights lurking here might tell her and she'll check who visited her profile. And then....ta-da!

(09-29-2013 02:58 AM)Cattle Rustler Wrote:  

(09-29-2013 02:54 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

(09-29-2013 12:25 AM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  And I bet she wonders why, at 29, she's still single.

I found the above profile. And despite her claims of being too busy to read all the zillions of message she gets, her message indicator was the color green. That means "replies often."

So it looks like guys aren't exactly responding to a woman who carries juggling balls, won't use the word "purse," and makes you respond like you're writing SAT answers.

Gee, I wonder what the problem could be?

PS: Why are we so polite that we blank out usernames when we put profiles on here? Legal reasons? An inherent sense of morality? The "nice guys of OKCupid"-type female bloggers are not so kind.

For me, sometimes white knights lurking here might tell her and she'll check who visited her profile. And then....ta-da!

A while back there was an OKCupid profile that was analysed on this forum. I can't remember the details, but it was actually me who went on OKCupid and told her. It just so happens that she was a blogger on xojane or one of those sites and she wrote an article about it.

The reason why I told her was because I wanted her to know that people were talking about her. It's not white knighting, it was because I like the idea of them knowing that people think they're ridiculous. The fact that she also was a blogger was pure luck. I wasn't expecting that at all, and it was a very pleasant and hilarious coincidence. A lot of fun was had not only here but on the MGTOW forums too, as a result of her own article. I even went on the comments section and told her that it was me, and I joined in the trolling.

I never understand why people who criticise female profiles have such a problem with people telling them that they're being talked about. I don't know about you lot but I think it's hilarious that they get to know. If it wasn't for me, that whole episode wouldn't have happened. Don't assume that just because I told her that it means I'm on her side. I'm absolutely not.

I think it should happen more often. Tell them. They should know.

This is probably my favorite thread on this forum.

(09-29-2013 04:28 AM)Steve4 Wrote:  A while back there was an OKCupid profile that was analysed on this forum. I can't remember the details, but it was actually me who went on OKCupid and told her. It just so happens that she was a blogger on xojane or one of those sites and she wrote an article about it.

The reason why I told her was because I wanted her to know that people were talking about her. It's not white knighting, it was because I like the idea of them knowing that people think they're ridiculous. The fact that she also was a blogger was pure luck. I wasn't expecting that at all, and it was a very pleasant and hilarious coincidence. A lot of fun was had not only here but on the MGTOW forums too, as a result of her own article. I even went on the comments section and told her that it was me, and I joined in the trolling.

I never understand why people who criticise female profiles have such a problem with people telling them that they're being talked about. I don't know about you lot but I think it's hilarious that they get to know. If it wasn't for me, that whole episode wouldn't have happened. Don't assume that just because I told her that it means I'm on her side. I'm absolutely not.

I think it should happen more often. Tell them. They should know.

Excuse me sir, are you a white knight?

They don't need to know, it's for us to talk about between us. Do you tell others about your relationships?

Sometimes I encounter a hamster profile, but she caught my bait and is good looking. The last thing I want is for some white knight like you to go and tattle tale. Good work Steve, now my lay is ruined and time was wasted!

(09-29-2013 02:54 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  PS: Why are we so polite that we blank out usernames when we put profiles on here? Legal reasons? An inherent sense of morality? The "nice guys of OKCupid"-type female bloggers are not so kind.

I black out names for several reasons. One is the protection of the members and forum. You should know by now that ridiculing men and "cyber-bullying" women come with different consequences, even if they're the exact same thing.

Also, even though these fatties and weirdos often deserve a dose of reality-check, all it takes is one autistic newbie or lurker to go overboard and draw unwanted attention to the forum.

The goal of the thread is to ridicule and shake our heads at the hamster, not to "expose" these bitches.

(09-29-2013 04:28 AM)Steve4 Wrote:  A while back there was an OKCupid profile that was analysed on this forum. I can't remember the details, but it was actually me who went on OKCupid and told her. It just so happens that she was a blogger on xojane or one of those sites and she wrote an article about it.

The reason why I told her was because I wanted her to know that people were talking about her. It's not white knighting, it was because I like the idea of them knowing that people think they're ridiculous. The fact that she also was a blogger was pure luck.

How is it not white knighting if you're alerting her to her critics and giving her fodder for her xojane blog? Why do you even know xojane bloggers anyway?

It sounds more like you ran to your feminist friend to ingratiate yourself with her (because you probably want to bang her). You "didn't know" she was on xojane, but you knew that she was a vocal feminist--probably online and elsewhere. You were probably a lurker here, and only opened an account to further reconnoiter this and other threads. Is it any coincidence this is your first post, even though you've had an account since August 1st?