(03-04-2019 02:45 PM)RexImperator Wrote: I read that Elliot Abrams is pushing to get TPS declared for Venezuelan migrants to the USA.
“Invade the world, invite the world” really is a brilliant summation of neoconservatism.
Abrams is a neocon Jewish supremacist, who after being discredited in the Iran Contra affair went into retirement from politics, and wrote some personal memoirs about his philosophy for his own community, clearly laying out the double standard.
Here below are some excerpts from and comments about his book, "Faith or Fear", which show the double standards on two levels, both in his belief that American culture is encroaching on Judaic values (with ironically, liberal Judaism driving that culture), and on his level as a high-level neocon political operative who has been actively fueling mass immigration from Latin America by destabilizing countries like Nicaragua and Honduras, which weakens and dilutes heritage American culture, just as his neocon colleagues have destabilized the middle east in order to flood Europe with migrants, weakening European culture.
He's strongly against intermarriage with goyim, which he views as "pollution of Jewish identity":
Quote:the accommodationists are wrong. Intermarriage is both inevitable in our open society, and immensely threatening to Jewish continuity here. The Jewish community must avoid excuses and circumlocutions, and recognize that only a powerful Jewish identity built on the faith and practice of Judaism can enable young American Jews to resist the temptation of intermarriage. Only that faith can explain to them why they should resist the melting pot and build a family that takes its place in the covenant of Abraham.
Quote:Elliott Abrams’s book, Faith or Fear. He wrote it a dozen years ago, during his lion in winter phase, when he probably thought he’d never get back into power. Its credo: Jewish "separatism," which Abrams openly praises. He suggests that Jews should sit shiva (mourn as dead) Jews who marry out.
"Scolding, rejection, and exclusion" worked, he says. Now’s the time to elevate "separatism and particularism, group identity and group survival, above social integration, individualism, and liberal ideals." Strong medicine? "Wrenching changes" are necessary in the Jewish community to avert the pollution of Jewish identity and community. The walls have to go back up.
It’s not just intermarriage, it’s Christian values, "in which personal faith is the key and community membership and solidarity are of much less importance." These individualistic Christian "traditions" leak into intermarried households. Whereas the Jewish "covenant with God… imposes special obligations upon [Jews]" to inculcate that aforesaid "community membership and solidarity." The Jewish community has been "wrecked" by intermarriage, and every Jew must "instruct his or her children in Judaism, not in the virtues of free thinking. Judaism imposes obligations binding on one and on one’s offspring."
Quote: CounterPunch magazine ran an extensive article on one of the leading neoconservatives, Elliot Abrams. The article shows clearly the thoroughly Jewish roots and currents that make the neocon movement nothing more than a Jewish supremacist apparatus. One of the more revealing quotes shows that Abrams had even written a paper on how American secularism is a threat to Jewish identity. Yes, Jewish identity is paramount, and Jewish success and power is dependent on destroying the “identity” of those who might oppose the Jewish identity and agenda. Abrams and all the Jewish neocons operate under the guiding principle that the more fractured and multicultural a society is the more amenable it is to Jewish ultra-ethnicism. One fascinating area is how many of the Liberals who opposed the war are now in lockstep with the Neocons. But, then when you examine the ethnic identity of those liberals you find again the one linking, powerful factor in the world’s political dynamics: Jewish supremacism. Even if support of Israel’s ultra-racist agenda is a violation of every liberal taboo, so be it, for it is not about liberalism or conservatism at all, it is simply about Jewish supremacism.
Quote: Jews are "above all members of a religious community," he wrote in that book, his emphasis. "Outside the land of Israel, there can be no doubt that Jews, faithful to the covenant between God and Abraham, are to stand apart from the nation in which they live. It is the very nature of being Jewish to be apart–except in Israel–from the rest of the population."
Knowing precisely how Abrams feels about the danger of the melting pot "polluting" his tribe, it's fairly clear what his goal is when he destabilizes Central America, and advocates for letting in refugees from Latin America and other places like Haiti (see his article below). So if Venezuela is thrown into a Syria-like 10 year civil war with 5 million refugees, look for Abrams and his fellow neocons to advocate for open borders.
Elliott Abrams: Let more Haitians move to U.S.
Elliott Abrams | senior fellow at National Council on Foreign Relations Jan 23, 2010
The outpouring of pledges to “rebuild” Haiti has spurred debate about how much aid will be needed, for how long and who could administer such a large program efficiently. In 2008, the last year for which statistics are available, Haiti received more than $900 million in all forms of aid, and many analysts suggest that total must be doubled if “recovery” is to happen. But it is doubtful whether such additional commitments will be made — and kept — as Haiti moves off the front pages.
“Rebuilding” and “recovery” would merely take Haiti, this hemisphere’s poorest country, back to where it stood before the Jan. 12 earthquake. Surely, our goal is to do better. We must increase aid but also allow Haitians to help themselves, and there is no way they can do that sitting in a devastated nation. A substantial number of Haitians must be allowed to move to richer countries -- including ours.
Haiti has approximately 9 million citizens, and 1 million to 2 million Haitians live outside their country. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, half a million people born in Haiti live in the United States, and estimates put several hundred thousand in Canada and as many as 100,000 in France. Those migrants send home $1.9 billion in remittances -- double the official aid flows and equal to 30 percent of Haiti’s gross domestic product.
These sums are greatly exceeded by some of Haiti’s neighbors. The 1.3 million Dominicans living in the United States send home $3 billion in remittances, an amount 20 times as much as official aid flows. A million Hondurans living abroad send home $2.7 billion, providing eight times the global foreign aid Honduras receives. The 1.5 million Salvadorans living here send home $3.8 billion, 15 times official aid flows.
A larger Haitian diaspora would be a far better base for the country’s economic future than aid pledges that may or may not be met. If several hundred thousand more Haitians were able to migrate, those Dominican, Honduran or Salvadoran numbers suggest that remittances to Haiti would give its economy a huge and continuing jolt.
This would require Canada, France and the United States -- the First World countries with the largest Haitian diaspora communities -- to adopt a different and more liberal immigration policy toward Haiti. Canada has already stepped up, expediting immigration applications from Haitians with family members living there. Canada’s immigration minister noted that “we anticipate there will be a number of new applications, which we will treat on a priority basis.”
But France and the United States have so far agreed only to no longer send Haitians back to Haiti. Washington has granted “temporary protected status,” or TPS, meaning that deportation of Haitians already in the United States is stayed for 18 months. In fact, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano has suggested that Haitians must stay where they are despite conditions on the island, saying in a Jan. 15 statement: “At this moment of tragedy in Haiti it is tempting for people suffering in the aftermath of the earthquake to seek refuge elsewhere. But attempting to leave Haiti now will only bring more hardship to the Haitian people and nation.”
The secretary went on: “The Department of Homeland Security continues to extend sympathy to our Haitian neighbors and support the worldwide relief effort under way in every way we can.”
As Madison as it gets: Get Cap Times' highlights sent daily to your inbox
Well, not every way we can -- for one of the best ways to help Haiti is to allow some Haitians to move abroad. It is ridiculous to argue that leaving Haiti in the coming year or two “will only bring more hardship to the Haitian people and nation.” Migration would mean that Haiti needs to provide fewer hospital beds, schools, meals and jobs -- and migrants’ remittances will be key to Haiti’s economic recovery for decades to come.
President Obama said that the disaster in Haiti “is one of those moments that calls out for American leadership.” He should be asking Congress not only to provide aid funds but also to allow a significant increase in the number of Haitians legally admitted to the United States -- to several times the roughly 25,000 per year in the past decade. Canada and France should do the same. There are no panaceas for Haiti’s recovery, but any sensible approach must include migration from the island. If the United States is committed to giving Haiti hope for the future, enlarging the Haitian diaspora is a sure-fire way to succeed.
Elliott Abrams, a senior fellow for Middle Eastern studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, was assistant secretary of state for inter-American affairs in the Reagan administration and a deputy national security adviser to President George W. Bush. This column first appeared in the Washington Post.