(05-14-2019 04:20 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

(05-14-2019 03:48 PM)PantyPeeler Wrote:  I think what needs to be mentioned is that we live in a world in which its getting easier to build a nuke. Rouge nations like Iran, who supports terrorism, need to be ground in to dust.

Nah we don't need to fight Iran, unless you're just another neocon warmonger.

Guess you forgot how the US destabilized Iran back in the day, weird.

If my enemy had fucking nukes you damn well know I'll be trying my best to create nukes to defend myself with MAD.

Rogue nations like X (US & Israel) who support terrorism need to be ground in to dust.

(See what I did there?)

Quote:We were hit on 9/11 with an attack that killed 3,000 Americans. We do not need a suitcase or container ship nuke attack that could kill 300,000.

What does this have to do with anything? Besides that it was done by the Saudi's and hundreds of thousands of civilians were killed in Iraq & Afghanistan?

Yeah apples to apples right there

Quote:I understand Iraq turned into a shit show with Obama and the cost in dollars and cents is staggering. That does not in any way mean that war is never necessary.

Under Obama? Guess you conveniently forgot that Bush and Neocons invaded Iraq, oh AND Afghanistan, did I mention we're still in the Stan' ?

Obama did his fair share with Libya, Egypt, Syria, and the Arab spring, oh and Ukraine.

Please explain in detail why the war in Iraq was "necessary", I'd love to hear your answers on this.

Quote:I thought it was obvious back in 2008 or there abouts that we needed to roll into Iran (while we had the equipment and troops already there) and let Iraq burn. They are responsible for hundreds of American service members deaths.

Our troops were mismanaged, misused, and leaders were misguided.

That's why needed the surge after the "MiSSioN AcComPliShEd" speech.

Not to mention we fucked the Iraqi hierarchy up so bad that we let roving death squads kill eachother in sectarian violence for years.

Oh did I mentioned it ended with us leaving Iraq and then ISIS coming to power to which the US helped ISIS destabilized Syria and that shit show?

Quote:Fuck them. the world needs to know that we aint fucking around. If you start building nukes and have a bunch of terrorists fucking shit up, you get ground to dust.

Fuck NK too. I'd give China one more chance to get them under control. If they dont, than they can suck ass when it comes time to see who will control the New Korea.

FuCk IrAn & ChInA & nK (unless I have to go to war myself and fight them!).

Get the fuck out of here with your warmongering BS - noones buying it - unless you're bought and paid for by Isreal and the Saudis.

Don't be too hard on Mr. PantyPeeler, kaotic.

He just wants to 'rock the casbah' one more time!







The king called up his jet fighters
He said you better earn your pay
Drop your bombs between the minarets
Down the Casbah way
As soon as the Shareef was
Chauffeured outta there
The jet pilots tuned to
The cockpit radio blare
As soon as the Shareef was
Out of their hair
The jet pilots wailed



Not sure what they were trying to say, but thank fuck at least they didn't wear those 'Che' T-Shirts.

Probably still smoked dope though, the pinko commie faggots.

"Degenerate the faithful"



(bonus points for spotting nomadbrah moonlighting from RVF in his time-travel machine!)

Anyone that cares about 2016 Trump policies should watch the following video. In it, Nick Fuentes does a compare and contrast between Trump and Victor Orban of Hungary on 4 specific bullet points that really highlight the weaknesses of Trump.

Goto 54:24 in the video (should see a whiteboard chart). Watch until 1:17 for the full bit. I tried to do a direct link to the specific time but it didn't work for whatever reason.





Summary: Orban is the real deal when it comes to protecting the cultural integrity of a country.

He has specific concrete policies that are well thought out and address fundamental root issues. Trump in contrast merely pays lip service to these root issues and in some cases, actively does things that are counter to a desirable outcome (ex: like supporting homosexual initiatives).

Orban is pushing things like making it where if a woman has 4 kids, she will NEVER EVER pay personal income taxes again. He also rejects all forms of immigration, including legal immigration, as the answer to native population decline.

At best, Trump is "phase 1" of the nationalist movement in America and a American version of Orban will come later. In the worst (and far more likely) case, Trump is the best America can do given the current environment (demographics, media, lack of free speech, history, etc).

Question: Does anyone think that places like Hungary and a few other European nations (Czech Republic, Poland, and maybe Italy) that are aggressively fighting back on the immigration front NOW are going to be the only places in the world going forward that will have strong pro-white/pro-traditional family values majorities?

I just don't see how in America the following happens post-Trump under the current environment:

1. Deport ALL illegals.
2. Strip voting rights for children born to illegals.
3. Do the Wall, merit immigration, and have real enforcement going forward.
4. End birthright citizenship.
5. Reduce legal immigration tremendously to only the true foreign elite for a generation.

That means the demographic war is already over unless Trump goes Super Saiyan between now and when he leaves (not likely).

I'm not a white nationalist at all but the "fuck whitey" hate in the USA seems to have grown very rapidly since Trump's election. I live in a "enriched" area and there definitely seems to be more tension in the air than in the past; especially since the 2018 mid-terms. And then there is the 2020 DEM field that seems to filled with almost all overt anti-white people; including self-hating white people like Sanders and Warren. I actually like living in diverse places on many fronts but I'm not going to tolerate living among a bunch of "fuck whitey" types, while being taxed into the next dimension, AND having to live in constant fear of accidentally committing one "thought-crime." We are petty much there already but I just got a feeling in my gut that it's going to get really bad very soon.

The only way out of this peacefully now is maybe (and I stress MAYBE) getting someone like Yang in who is largely anti-identity politics and will discourage the "fuck whitey" culture. But given the way the current DEM population seems to act and treat white people, I think it's going to come down to USA separation eventually. That's in the best case; the worst case is genocide and living under overt anti-white tyranny at the hands of the democrat super-majority.

Frankly, the next GOP contender after Trump should run on that platform: "Peaceful separation." Everything else is small potatoes and secondary in the long-run and it's just going to get harder and harder each election cycle to pull off. That said, we are gonna need a real deal visionary for that to even have a remote chance though.

Goddamn it... I just wish I could get Trump and the GOP cucks to wake the fuck up.

(05-14-2019 06:12 PM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  I wonder what tribe PantyPeeler subscribes to.

Come on Foolsgold, admit it. You're really (((Foolsgold))).

Fuck off PantyPeeler. Is it that psyop guy again?

This sucks. The only silver lining is we will see the media start to love "Dat Nazi Drumpf" and all the sad sacks of shit liberals will call him the messiah...to think I campaigned for the guy too. Like I said about a week ago:

We got money for wars but no money for a wall.

Invade Iran and I won't get fooled again. I have to deal with my career and it doesn't help that we have to go into yet another pointless war.

(05-14-2019 11:19 AM)kaotic Wrote:  Looks like the whole Iran shitshow is going to happen.

-First it was saber rattling like usual
-Then "credible threats" from who knows where
-Deployment of more navy groups
-Bombers being moved into the theater,
-Then "sabotage" of ships local to the region
-Now he wants to deploy troops?

Fuck that, we do not need another middle east shit show on behalf of Israel & Saudis.

Left-wing outlet the Guardian complained about President Trump and Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán “manspreading” during their White House meeting today.

https://summit.news/2019/05/13/guardian-...e-meeting/

I've just forensically studied that video.

Backtraced their IPs.

Consequences will never be the same again.

What I found wasn't funny!

Atlanta Man on the hound for white pussy - trying to fit in with his cool shades! Running 'music video game'.




Still not quite getting the hang of this 'Alcohol Prohibition' thing. But every one loves a tryer.




But who is that RVF wingman brother I see covering him there?



Why, if it isn't our very own nomadbrah, breaking cover.

Rare Ron Jeremy in background.

Everyone having a good time!


nomadbrah driving to the gig:




nomadbrah 'moshe(ng)' at the front of the gig:



"Let me go, I have to ROCK THE CASBAH! ROCK THE CASBAH! - yeahehahaeahee"



But it's the young Sherman on guitar I like the most:




Ready to take on the world. With his 'Che' T-Shirt under his Commie Khaki.


But never mind all that, it's the young and angry, gifted and white Foo1sgold that really caught my attention:




A rare insight in to how times were back then.



A young nomadbrah saying to himself 'The jews did this!':







Normal service is now resumed...

(05-14-2019 07:22 PM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  

Left-wing outlet the Guardian complained about President Trump and Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán “manspreading” during their White House meeting today.

https://summit.news/2019/05/13/guardian-...e-meeting/

This works if you want to resize your image:

Rigsby and CynicalContrarian:

(05-14-2019 03:48 PM)PantyPeeler Wrote:  I think what needs to be mentioned is that we live in a world in which its getting easier to build a nuke. Rouge nations like Iran, who supports terrorism, need to be ground in to dust. We were hit on 9/11 with an attack that killed 3,000 Americans. We do not need a suitcase or container ship nuke attack that could kill 300,000.

A C minus princeton student built an atom bomb with publicly available information in 1976. I read about this in Readers Digest in the early 80s.

https://www.knowol.com/information/princ...omic-bomb/

Ricin and some bio weapons are even easier.

Governments have easy access to chemical weapons.

The genie left the bottle a long time ago.

(05-14-2019 07:56 PM)Rigsby Wrote:  This works if you want to resize your image:

Works fine on a PC. Are you using a phone?

(05-14-2019 07:06 PM)The Black Knight Wrote:  Frankly, the next GOP contender after Trump should run on that platform: "Peaceful separation." Everything else is small potatoes and secondary in the long-run and it's just going to get harder and harder each election cycle to pull off. That said, we are gonna need a real deal visionary for that to even have a remote chance though.

Goddamn it... I just wish I could get Trump and the GOP cucks to wake the fuck up.

Can you expand on this, The Black Knight? I'm geniunely curious as I like reading your posts, what should "Peaceful Separation" mean?

That anybody with American citizenship who is "conservative" should be allowed into the new country that the GOP will control after their "Peaceful Separation" is successful?

Or is your view that people of European descent should make up the vast majority of the population?

Charles De Gaulle specifically said back in the the day that France is not French anymore if there are no more actual French people (or very few of them) living there. I can't find the quote but if somebody can, please, post it, it's been a while since I've read it.

Charles De Gaulle, by today's standards, would absolutely be mercilessly crucified based on that one quote that France is not French without a strong ethnic French majority.

The Black Knight, if this "Peaceful Separation" did not take on the Civic Nationalist form, would you be ok telling friends, maybe even from this very forum, that them and their families couldn't join the new country? And I'm not talking in absolutes, I'm talking about if this "Peaceful Separation" involved, lets say, a 15% minority population to be allowed to join and some of your friends just didn't make the cut? Would you be ok, telling them no they can't join?

I'm just wondering, and I don't say this disparagingly, if you thought the idea of "Peaceful Separation" through before you suggested a politician should run on that platform. But I'm also interested in what you think a "Peaceful Separation" should include as far as demographics go?

I don't want to answer for TBK but try to avoid thinking about it in terms of autistic moral quibbles which have no capacity to come about in a real geo-political jungle.

The reality is that a state or group of states would sue for secession and everyone in them when the curtains came down would be part of that new country. In all likelihood those who wished to leave would be allowed to do so while those who wished to enter would have to make their case on a basis of lineage or local holdings or perhaps merit.

Most minorities would be looking to exit rather than enter. They've gotten used to having a vast raft of welfare and legal/workplace/college protections that wouldn't exist by default in a new nation. Given that it would also be a time of extremely heightened tensions in-group preferences for hiring/service would be savage.

But tedious moralising about "is my 1/1024th black friend not invited" is a waste of time. Any secessionist movement is going to built on practicality, not moralistic autism, and any purges are almost guaranteed to be religiously based rather than racially.

hat tip to Anonymous Conservative.com

(05-15-2019 06:29 AM)Hypno Wrote:  hat tip to Anonymous Conservative.com

Let's wait and see on this one. AC, who I know is reading this is, while better than the MSM is kind of inconsistent. Don't get me wrong AC does some decent work and I heard from him about how Texas Arcane was wiped off Google. It's obvious he reads the chans. I could be wrong about this but I doubt AC is making money from his site. There's no doubt there is a deep state but some of his ideas like how he pushes for Q is silly.

Another Example:
https://www.anonymousconservative.com/bl...struction/
Yes, any day now we will round up deep state assets. Or maybe we will play another game of whack a mole in the middle east by fighting Iran.

Yet another example:
"But if you have a Costco there, you can have people in plainclothes walking around all day through the parking lot and nobody will ever look at them twice. Toss on a Costco vest, and now you are an employee, and you don’t even have to swap people out."
Deep state assets aren't going to hang around Costco to do shady stuff. I can believe government bunkers and selling close to expired food at discounts but assets masquerading as Costco employees is ridiculous.

Not trying to start something with AC but we really have to wait and see on this one. I know diGenova said Hillary broke the law during the election so why move the goal posts again? He comes across as a textbook lawyer but when in reality some people just aren't going to be prosecuted. My guess is there's some Quid pro quo backroom deals going on that the public will never see.

(05-14-2019 07:22 PM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  

Left-wing outlet the Guardian complained about President Trump and Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán “manspreading” during their White House meeting today.

https://summit.news/2019/05/13/guardian-...e-meeting/

...the Guardian’s Lauren Aratani...

HB2.5 angry about male parts she will never encounter

(05-14-2019 07:22 PM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  

Left-wing outlet the Guardian complained about President Trump and Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán “manspreading” during their White House meeting today.

https://summit.news/2019/05/13/guardian-...e-meeting/

There is literally no one else around them looking to sit! They're not bothering anyone!

(05-14-2019 03:48 PM)PantyPeeler Wrote:  I think what needs to be mentioned is that we live in a world in which its getting easier to build a nuke. Rouge nations like Iran, who supports terrorism, need to be ground in to dust. We were hit on 9/11 with an attack that killed 3,000 Americans. We do not need a suitcase or container ship nuke attack that could kill 300,000.

I understand Iraq turned into a shit show with Obama and the cost in dollars and cents is staggering. That does not in any way mean that war is never necessary.

I thought it was obvious back in 2008 or there abouts that we needed to roll into Iran (while we had the equipment and troops already there) and let Iraq burn. They are responsible for hundreds of American service members deaths.

Fuck them. the world needs to know that we aint fucking around. If you start building nukes and have a bunch of terrorists fucking shit up, you get ground to dust.

Fuck NK too. I'd give China one more chance to get them under control. If they dont, than they can suck ass when it comes time to see who will control the New Korea.

The arrogant sanctimonious ignorance is epic.

So PP,

Could you tell me how many of the 9/11 hijackers identified by the US government (within hours miraculously) are still walking the earth? Seriously. You do know this right?

Obama is at fault for Iraq? How? Anyone else responsible?

On the deaths thing. How many was the US responsible for? Do those even matter to you?

"the world needs to know that we aint fucking around."
Who is this "WE"? If YOU want to go do something about your delusional world view, have fun. Leave the rest of the thinking and sane world out of your arrogant, ignorant stupidity.

"If you start building nukes and have a bunch of terrorists fucking shit up,".
Gee, I wonder which countries that could be applied to that you clearly are ignoring.

"I'd give China one more chance to get them under control."
Arrogance of the highest order. Who put you in charge?

Madlad

Regarding Secession - a direct breakup of the USA - would be alien to the vast Majority of Oath Taking Veterans to protect and defend the entire USA from all enemies both foreign and domestic...

Rather than retreat from clusters of Marxist Socialist Communist treason in dominance in primarily Sanctuary Cities and States... I submit that forming new Freedom Loving Constitution supporting power centers in States that are already Live Free or Die Freedom lovers and expand nationwide is a more peaceful long-range plan for Freedom Loving Patriots:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_State_Project

All organizations are subject to human flaws yet the FSP seems to be comprised of Ron Paul style Freedom Lovers and few if any White Power extremists whose presence was used to crush many militias during the Obamunists Marxist Socialist hate whitey reign.

(05-15-2019 01:09 PM)Deepdiver Wrote:  Regarding Secession - a direct breakup of the USA - would be alien to the vast Majority of Oath Taking Veterans to protect and defend the entire USA from all enemies both foreign and domestic...

Rather than retreat from clusters of Marxist Socialist Communist treason in dominance in primarily Sanctuary Cities and States... I submit that forming new Freedom Loving Constitution supporting power centers in States that are already Live Free or Die Freedom lovers and expand nationwide is a more peaceful long-range plan for Freedom Loving Patriots:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_State_Project

All organizations are subject to human flaws yet the FSP seems to be comprised of Ron Paul style Freedom Lovers and few if any White Power extremists whose presence was used to crush many militias during the Obamunists Marxist Socialist hate whitey reign.

From the Wikipedia:

Quote:The Free State Project (FSP) is a political migration founded in 2001 to recruit at least 20,000 libertarians to move to a single low-population state (New Hampshire, selected in 2003) in order to make the state a stronghold for libertarian ideas.

And of course they chose New Hampshire, which is 94% white. Of course.

Any idea why they didn't choose someplace like Delaware, Deepdriver? Delaware is a North Eastern state, very small population like New Hampshire. Why not Delaware instead of New Hampshire?

Delaware is only 68% white. I'm sure that had nothing to do with their state selection. New Hampshire is just naturally more "Ron Paul style Freedom Lovers" than what Delaware is. Give me a break.

(05-15-2019 05:38 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  I don't want to answer for TBK but try to avoid thinking about it in terms of autistic moral quibbles which have no capacity to come about in a real geo-political jungle.

The reality is that a state or group of states would sue for secession and everyone in them when the curtains came down would be part of that new country. In all likelihood those who wished to leave would be allowed to do so while those who wished to enter would have to make their case on a basis of lineage or local holdings or perhaps merit.

Most minorities would be looking to exit rather than enter. They've gotten used to having a vast raft of welfare and legal/workplace/college protections that wouldn't exist by default in a new nation. Given that it would also be a time of extremely heightened tensions in-group preferences for hiring/service would be savage.

But tedious moralising about "is my 1/1024th black friend not invited" is a waste of time. Any secessionist movement is going to built on practicality, not moralistic autism, and any purges are almost guaranteed to be religiously based rather than racially.

Come on Leonard. See, I even said I wasn't talking in absolutes when I suggested that perhaps this new "Peaceful Separation" state might involve a 15% minority population, but you went ahead and threw the 1/1024 crap in there as if I was talking in absolutes. Don't do that Leonard.

Ok. So going off from what you say Leonard, that "purges" will be religious based.

No, that might apply in Europe given the religious migration patterns over there but that certainly does not apply to the US, where our immigrants, even post 1960's Hart-Cellar Act, have always been largely Christian. The US is 75% Christian and 20% atheist. Who exactly is there to purge based on religion in the US Leonard, the measly 5% of the population? You are so far off base with that remark.

As for anybody voluntarily leaving, well what happens in conservative Southern states who vote Republican 100% of the time in presidential elections? The blacks, Hispanics and Asians of any political affiliation, as well as the white liberals, have not left these states that have conservative policies. In fact, according to 2018 statistics more Northerners move down South than Southerners moving up North.

So let's say that the Southern state of Georgia, or if we're not speaking in absolutes let's just say a group of Southern states since they are all red states, vote for the "Peaceful Seperation" platform. Basically, based on what I said about people not willingly choosing to leave these states despite the conservative policies, that means that the demographics of the Southern states stays the same in this new supposed "Peaceful Separation" platform that the GOP runs on.

Do you know what the demographics of the south look like, Leonard? The south, despite it being 100% red GOP in every Presidential election, is one of the most diverse regions of the USA. And guess what? Despite conservative policies, nobody is choosing to leave voluntarily.

"Peaceful Separation" is not as simple as it sounds and would probably end up being anything but peaceful.

I don't want to derail the thread. I was simply curious to TBK thoughts on it since he mentioned the GOP should run on a platform of "Peaceful Separation".

(05-14-2019 03:48 PM)PantyPeeler Wrote:  I think what needs to be mentioned is that we live in a world in which its getting easier to build a nuke. Rouge nations like Iran, who supports terrorism, need to be ground in to dust. *snip*

Iran war preparations

(05-15-2019 06:29 AM)Hypno Wrote:  hat tip to Anonymous Conservative.com

LOL:

Peaceful separations are costly even if it doesn’t happen; the Frogs in Quebec tried it a couple of times and the amount of cash the feds spent trying to convince them to stay was crazy.

(05-15-2019 01:30 PM)Uprising Wrote:  

(05-15-2019 01:09 PM)Deepdiver Wrote:  Regarding Secession - a direct breakup of the USA - would be alien to the vast Majority of Oath Taking Veterans to protect and defend the entire USA from all enemies both foreign and domestic...

Rather than retreat from clusters of Marxist Socialist Communist treason in dominance in primarily Sanctuary Cities and States... I submit that forming new Freedom Loving Constitution supporting power centers in States that are already Live Free or Die Freedom lovers and expand nationwide is a more peaceful long-range plan for Freedom Loving Patriots:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_State_Project

All organizations are subject to human flaws yet the FSP seems to be comprised of Ron Paul style Freedom Lovers and few if any White Power extremists whose presence was used to crush many militias during the Obamunists Marxist Socialist hate whitey reign.

From the Wikipedia:

Quote:The Free State Project (FSP) is a political migration founded in 2001 to recruit at least 20,000 libertarians to move to a single low-population state (New Hampshire, selected in 2003) in order to make the state a stronghold for libertarian ideas.

And of course they chose New Hampshire, which is 94% white. Of course.

Any idea why they didn't choose someplace like Delaware, Deepdriver? Delaware is a North Eastern state, very small population like New Hampshire. Why not Delaware instead of New Hampshire?

Delaware is only 68% white. I'm sure that had nothing to do with their state selection. New Hampshire is just naturally more "Ron Paul style Freedom Lovers" than what Delaware is. Give me a break.

Also from Wikipedia on the FSP:

State selection
In September 2003, the state vote was held and participants voted using the Condorcet method to choose the state.[18] New Hampshire was the winner, with Wyoming coming in second by a 57% to 43% margin.[18] Alaska, Delaware, Idaho, Maine, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota and Vermont were also on the list.[14]

New Hampshire was chosen because the perceived individualist culture of the state was thought to resonate well with libertarian ideals.[19] However, the Free State Project has drawn criticism from some New Hampshire residents concerned about population pressure and opposition to increased taxation. On the other hand, some Republicans have responded more favorably to the project because they also favor a small government.[20]

I am actually surprised Nevada was not on the list instead of Delaware which is Biden's home turf. Delaware is much more friendly to Democrat Radical Left Socialists than towards Freedom Loving Patriots.