Although, being Australian.
When I did rustle jimmies of Hillary hacks on Twitter.
I simply told them, the only way I could vote for Trump, was to hop the American border illegally & vote as an illegal.

Epic as in the WINNING is just BEGINNING!

Alex Jones breaks down the Senate Judiciary Committee probe announced today into former Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s efforts to influence the FBI’s investigation into Hillary Clinton.
https://www.infowars.com/live-senate-ann...tta-lynch/

And;

WATCH NOW: DOJ PREPARING CLINTON / LYNCH INDICTMENT?
Senate Judiciary Committee looks into Lynch's actions during FBI Clinton probe
https://www.infowars.com/watch-live-doj-...ndictment/

Our rules about posting nudity hasn't change. YOu can link to it, but don't embed.

(06-24-2017 01:15 AM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  Re: Johnny Depp.

Geez.
Between a crazy, cunt of an ex-wife, a disastrous divorce dragged through the paparazzi mud & distinct financial problems due to poor management / affiliations.
You'd think the last thing he needs is an easily avoided PR disaster.

Some folk just attract drama, like moths to a flame...
Or worse, they feel "compelled" to generate their own drama.

Probably most of you have got the irony, but when Johnny Depp asked "When's the last time an actor assassinated a President?" he perhaps didn't know his history: April 14, 1865. Specifically, Ford Theatre. The said President was Abraham Lincoln. The said actor was John Wilkes Booth. Booth was a member of the prominent 19th-century Booth theatrical family from Maryland and, by the 1860s, was a well-known actor. Thus why he was confident enough to leap to the stage and scream "Sic semper tyrannis!" after shooting the first Republican President in the head.

(06-23-2017 10:38 AM)SamuelBRoberts Wrote:  

(06-23-2017 10:01 AM)RoastBeefCurtains4Me Wrote:  I still say build the wall and put panels on it, but purely as a troll for the eco-socialists. Solar panels can never make a dime using current technology. It's all a huge leftist fraud.

I agree, but you're missing a critical point here.
The problem with solar panels is that they don't make enough money to recoup their initial investment cost. If however, someone else was paying for the solar panels, I.E. the initial investment cost to America is zero, they suddenly become an extraordinarily good bargain because the maintenance costs compared to the output energy are so low.

Now, who's going to pay for the wall again?

(06-23-2017 01:23 PM)Transsimian Wrote:  Solar panels will make it harder to justify a new government tearing down the wall.

That is the plan Trump has, remember the democrats have plan to just let the wall deteriorate itself if they come in power in the future, and any future democrat president will love to tear it down.

Huge part of the wall will go around California, one of the most democrat states in the USA, but by putting solar panels in it he forces democrats and liberals in California to not let the wall deteriorate and ensure future democrat president and congress will fund its maintenance.

Trump is using the solar panels as a insurance.

(06-23-2017 03:09 PM)RaccoonFace Wrote:  

Is there is a better way to display the American dream than this picture?

Future shitlord in the Polo shirt!

(06-24-2017 01:20 AM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  ...

Although, being Australian.
When I did rustle jimmies of Hillary hacks on Twitter.
I simply told them, the only way I could vote for Trump, was to hop the American border illegally & vote as an illegal.

You Aussies truly are the masters of shitposting.

I don't know what it is about Ivanka, but 'ear me now.

My wife is a typical latina when it comes to being catty about other women, particularly pretty ones.

She knows very little about politics but back when Trump was running I was talking about the campaign and she says to me:

"Have you seen his daughter?"

"Yeah", I say, "what's her name, Ivanka or something...?"

She sighs with appreciation. "She is just so beautiful."

And I'm sitting there thinking...

That Burlington College shit just don't die for the Sanders. Bernie's wife should be in a jail cell for running that place into the ground.

President Trump might be naming a new Suprem Court judge soon:

Hopefully Ruth Buzzie Ginsburg keels over soon too.

dupe

(06-24-2017 11:23 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  I don't know what it is about Ivanka, but 'ear me now.

My wife is a typical latina when it comes to being catty about other women, particularly pretty ones.

She knows very little about politics but back when Trump was running I was talking about the campaign and she says to me:

"Have you seen his daughter?"

"Yeah", I say, "what's her name, Ivanka or something...?"

She sighs with appreciation. "She is just so beautiful."

And I'm sitting there thinking...

This is quite funny and touching. Women are awed by Ivanka, because they know that she does every female thing perfectly: the way she speaks, the way she walks, her poise, her body language, the way she applies makeup, the way she has her hair done. To them she is essentially superwoman, and they feel that men must worship her even more than they do. In reality, men like her of course but not especially more than they like many other very hot bitches; it takes a woman to really appreciate her qualities. It's similar to how a guy like Tom Brady is perceived -- men that are awed by all his male perfections exaggerate just how much women must love him. Women do love him, obviously, but they are not awed in quite the way a normal dude will be. The whole thing is very endearing.

(06-24-2017 12:36 PM)Dusty Wrote:  President Trump might be naming a new Suprem Court judge soon:

Hopefully Ruth Buzzie Ginsburg keels over soon too.

I remember a few pages back somebody posted something Cernovich tweedted about a rumor of a judge in the SCOTUS stepping out, and the rumor was Kennedy was the one.

Good thing I didn't put any money down on Ginsburg on PredictIt.

(06-24-2017 12:43 PM)The Lizard of Oz Wrote:  

(06-24-2017 11:23 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  I don't know what it is about Ivanka, but 'ear me now.

My wife is a typical latina when it comes to being catty about other women, particularly pretty ones.

She knows very little about politics but back when Trump was running I was talking about the campaign and she says to me:

"Have you seen his daughter?"

"Yeah", I say, "what's her name, Ivanka or something...?"

She sighs with appreciation. "She is just so beautiful."

And I'm sitting there thinking...

This is quite funny and touching. Women are awed by Ivanka, because they know that she does every female thing perfectly: the way she speaks, the way she walks, her poise, her body language, the way she applies makeup, the way she has her hair done. To them she is essentially superwoman, and they feel that men must worship her even more than they do. In reality, men like her of course but not especially more than they like many other very hot bitches; it takes a woman to really appreciate her qualities. It's similar to how a guy like Tom Brady is perceived -- men that are awed by all his male perfections exaggerate just how much women must love him. Women do love him, obviously, but they are not awed in quite the way a normal dude will be. The whole thing is very endearing.

I beg to differ.

Ivanka has gone to some finishing school or camp. She understands and embodies what it means to fulfill wifely duties.

A man married to Ivanka would never stray or divorce her. She knows how to stay classy through out the ages.

Women know this is what keeps a man around and know this deep down in their psyche.

Men are attracted to her understated beauty. She doesn't need to be basic or show off. She's pretty and just let's it speak for herself as she cooks you dinner, raises your kids, and stands by you as a good wife should.

Women can learn something from Ivanka. Whether they try to emulate that is left to be seen.

(06-24-2017 02:20 PM)The Beast1 Wrote:  

(06-24-2017 12:43 PM)The Lizard of Oz Wrote:  

(06-24-2017 11:23 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  I don't know what it is about Ivanka, but 'ear me now.

My wife is a typical latina when it comes to being catty about other women, particularly pretty ones.

She knows very little about politics but back when Trump was running I was talking about the campaign and she says to me:

"Have you seen his daughter?"

"Yeah", I say, "what's her name, Ivanka or something...?"

She sighs with appreciation. "She is just so beautiful."

And I'm sitting there thinking...

This is quite funny and touching. Women are awed by Ivanka, because they know that she does every female thing perfectly: the way she speaks, the way she walks, her poise, her body language, the way she applies makeup, the way she has her hair done. To them she is essentially superwoman, and they feel that men must worship her even more than they do. In reality, men like her of course but not especially more than they like many other very hot bitches; it takes a woman to really appreciate her qualities. It's similar to how a guy like Tom Brady is perceived -- men that are awed by all his male perfections exaggerate just how much women must love him. Women do love him, obviously, but they are not awed in quite the way a normal dude will be. The whole thing is very endearing.

I beg to differ.

Ivanka has gone to some finishing school or camp. She understands and embodies what it means to fulfill wifely duties.

A man married to Ivanka would never stray or divorce her. She knows how to stay classy through out the ages.

Women know this is what keeps a man around and know this deep down in their psyche.

Men are attracted to her understated beauty. She doesn't need to be basic or show off. She's pretty and just let's it speak for herself as she cooks you dinner, raises your kids, and stands by you as a good wife should.

Women can learn something from Ivanka. Whether they try to emulate that is left to be seen.

She definitely has a nanny. I would be shocked if she does much cooking or other at-home duties.

Finishing school doesn't teach a woman to have the easy grace and femininty that Ivanka displays so effortlessly.

She inherited that effortlessness from her dad and made it her own.

All the Trump children display it in their on way.

Don Jr goes out doing outdoors activities without a care in the world often with his kids and family.

Re Ivanka, women pick up on this and are naturally attracted to her.

Well I got bad news...

The fourth unit I've made an offer on at Trump Waikiki was just flat out rejected. No counter.

Not this one, but look at this: https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/223-S...9512_zpid/

It was really great. The view was the Pacific ocean, of course, and then down on this:


Its an old fortress and now a museum. They have all kinds of events there.

I'm just giving up trying to get a place in Trump. Its just too expensive. Sad.

Aloha!

(06-24-2017 08:06 AM)Roosh Wrote:  Our rules about posting nudity hasn't change. YOu can link to it, but don't embed.

Apologies. I must have missed that change.

My point was: it's far more psychologically-destructive and contemptuous of her extreme class privilege to reduce a crusading Liberal Actress to a (sadly, now-faded) nice pair of tits than to argue against her basic bitch Socialist talking points.

This is a woman so terrible at her chosen craft that they only way she could get attention as an adult actress was by repeatedly-showing her tits in soft-core movies in the 90's. Obviously, someone recognised it as a good investment: the still is apparently from a 1995 movie called 'Embrace of the Vampire', made on a $500,000 budget with a return of $15 million. That's 7.5 million a breast. That's female privilege for you.

Look at the memorable quotes from the movie and see the thirst in action:

Quote:Charlotte: [Changing clothes and standing naked, her butt and the side of her breast are shown] You know, she didn't have a choice
Chris: [Notices Charlotte naked and smiles] Let's just put the knives in your father's back where they belong.
Charlotte: [Putting on a shirt, her right breast and butt are visible] Yeah, that might be more appropriate.
Chris: You know, I can't help wishing you had inherited a little bit of his promiscuity.
Charlotte: [Buttoning up the shirt, still naked from the waist down with her butt visible] Yeah, but look where it got him. I wish I'd seen him at least once before he died.

Obviously, someone recognised sexually-exploiting a former child actress is a good investment. That would be Producer Matthew Ferro, the son of famous opera coach Daniel Ferro, who changed his name from (((Eisen))) upon arrival in America. Note the originating writer - before it was given a second draft by two women - had a long history in soft-core: (((Rick Bitzelberger))).

Note that by sexually-acting out in this and another softcore movie, she gained enough attention to be cast a year later in 'Charmed', produced by (((Aaron Spelling))).

I wonder what exactly the interview required.

My point about her hatred of Older (((White)))) men stands.

All of Trumps seem to be totally masculine or totally feminine, a blessed family.

(06-24-2017 04:39 PM)Samseau Wrote:  All of Trumps seem to be totally masculine or totally feminine, a blessed family.

Quote:Eric Trump, Hard Core K

Unbelievable:

Quote:President Trump’s son Eric Trump on Tuesday said Democrats are “not even people” to him after their obstruction of his father’s agenda.

“I’ve never seen hatred like this,” he said on Fox News’s “Hannity” Tuesday night. “To me, they’re not even people. It’s so, so sad. Morality’s just gone, morals have flown out the window and we deserve so much better than this as a country.”

“You see the Democratic Party, they’re imploding. They’re imploding. They became obstructionists because they have no message of their own.”

Trump additionally criticized the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) leadership without directly naming Chairman Tom Perez.

“You see the head of the DNC, who is a total whack job,” he told host Sean Hannity. “There’s no leadership there.”

You can see how the K-shift is approaching in his mindset. “Not even human” has to be an epic amygdala-trigger to leftists, because of what it portends.

I have to say, I am very impressed. Put billions in my bank account today, and I am not sure in a few months I wouldn’t be on a beach surrounded by babes and booze, maybe even huffing through a bong and telling everyone to chill out. I couldn’t imagine what I might have been like if I was raised with all that cash. I could have been like some strange cross between Paris Hilton and young Mike Tyson.

I don’t know whether the Trumps have some sort of super-K genes, or if their family has some sort of coming of age ceremony where they have to survive alone in the African bush for six months, but it is very impressive the whole family seems so incorruptible. And even more so when you consider what I am sure the establishment has offered them to just give up the fight and go along with all the cucks.

Quote:Yeah, Don Junior is an impressive piece of work. I remember both Trump sons describing how summers at Ivana’s parents really molded them, because her parents were avid hunters and fishermen, so their summers were one big hunting and fishing trip from the moment their feet hit the ground. You could see it put a lot of rural America in them, and they really appreciated the input.

http://www.anonymousconservative.com/blo...rd-core-k/

CNN reduced to sending in a sketch artist to White House press briefings because cameras are not allowed.





http://money.cnn.com/2017/06/23/media/wh...index.html

Ivana's family raised the boys. Trump didn't event talk to Don Jr much until he was around 18-19 years old. I'm just putting this out there for clarity. Ivanka is the splitting image of her father as he had constable influence on her upbringing versus the boys.

(06-24-2017 05:03 PM)kosko Wrote:  Ivana's family raised the boys. Trump didn't event talk to Don Jr much until he was around 18-19 years old. I'm just putting this out there for clarity. Ivanka is the splitting image of her father as he had constable influence on her upbringing versus the boys.

I myself would prefer a high achieving father who talks to me rarely over a "close" father who is doing the dishes.

If the father is a high achiever with high morale like Trump does, that sets an example for the boys automatically no need to spend too much time together. And the time spent together should be when the child is a young man not a boy - that's when the most crucial lessons need to be thought.

Fathers need to be present but the idea that they should be as present as much as women is feminist bullshit.

Father is more like something to strive for and maybe whom to surpass to. He may even be dead but you will take pride all life if he was a great man.

Greatness is more important than family for men and even children know that.