(06-25-2017 05:02 PM)komatiite Wrote:  

(06-25-2017 10:52 AM)Fisto Wrote:  Come on Sam, Kosko said "this isn't hard to understand" real condescendingly-like so it must be true and no proof is needed.

No ive read the same thing as Kosko -- his dad cheated on his mom, divorced her and then likely had minimal contact because he was pissed at his dad. Here is a quick thing that came up on google if you search "don jr didn't speak to dad" or whatever:

Quote:5. He didn’t speak to his father for a year after his split from Ivana.
Donald Jr., who was 12 when his father left second wife Ivana for third wife Marla Maples, didn’t speak to his father for a year following the highly publicized split. He blamed the divorce on his father. “And that’s, perhaps, not actually what it was,” Donald Jr. told New York magazine in 2004. “But when you’re living with your mother, it’s easy to be manipulated. You get a one-sided perspective.”

(people magazine)

Also I remember seeing in those Forum posts that Ashley Feinberg found with Gawker. Don Jr was posting on a gun forum and was like "hunting is my main escape now that I don't drink," I remembered that just because I'm also on the wagon and I was like "wow a fellow homie." So Kosko is likely right how Don must have been big on the booze when he was a college student, guy was definitely out of shape.

I completely agree with Kosko here

I'm not saying Kosko's assertions are untrue, I'm just asking for some more information and the guy starts lecturing me about how easy/hard something is to understand.

But let's also observe that Don Jr not talking to his dad for one year from 12 to 13 is worlds, universes even, from Trump Sr not talking to his sons until they were adults.

Also loving the outdoors is not evidence that the Don was abscent. It just means the sons found things they liked their fathed wasn't into. That is pretty common. I have hobbies my dad isn't into and vice versa. I couldnt give a shit about baseball for example.


Kona's article says they spent 6 weeks a year in Czech (not very much time) but the grandparents lived with the Trumps 6 months a year. It also very much says The Don was a part of their lives. Still reading but it doesn't support what Kosko has claimed so far.

Didn't that guy who introduced Trump at the RNC nomination tell a story about Trump taking his son to a Tyson fight? That doesn't sound like the action of an absentee father. Looks to me like he has a healthy relationship with all his kids.

^ Trump's sons saw their father making huge business moves.

Better than being at home playing board games or catch.

Sons need attention from their mothers and role models for fathers.

(06-24-2017 10:17 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  I certainly don't want this to turn into some sort of gruesome prediction, but Ivanka seems to be becoming the American Princess Diana.

There are differences for obvious reasons, but she seems to have become that almost ephemeral creature that effortlessly gathers celebrity and brings radiance wherever she goes.

I would go as far to say that if the American media were not so relentlessly anti-Trump then this post would be a recognition rather than a premonition.

I'm not personally as awestruck by her, but among the proles I can imagine her garnering that same kind of wide-scale adoration that the Princess of Wales held. Frankly if anything bad happens to the Diamond Don then perhaps it will be Ivanka that crusades apolitically and gathers enormous support as the people's princess of America.

One problem for the the British royal monarchy was they completely underestimated the appeal of Diana in the masses, up to this day she is the most well known member of the monarchy outside the UK, mostly in the USA.

Ivanka is everything feminists want in a woman, Ivanka really have it all. But sadly for them she is in the opposite political spectrum, even when Hillary lost, the media started to celebrate Chelsea as the greatest thing ever:



I rather have Ivanka than Chelsea, and the appeal of Ivakan was natural the American people liked, unlike the way the media push fr the American people to like someone.

Trumps > Clintons




I still have to chuckle with Hollywood/Media pushing Chelsea as a 'superstar' for the Democratic Party. Perhaps some of that cheerleading is going to lessen now, and they will slowly sober up, if only due to the Dem's getting their ass handed to them in the much publicized Georgia election ... but personally I want them to continue pushing Chelsea. It's hilarious, and will just continue to evoke just how out of touch the left has become. Which is just painfully obvious by now.

Hillary (and the Chelsea beast) are so much like Cristina F de Kirchner (and her fat, lazy son)... corrupt and crooked as hell, and -thanks God- beaten for presidency by Conservative male candidates (D. Trump, and Trump's former kinda apprentice M. Macri respectively, of course).

But, one frightening thing to bear in mind: Cristina, improbable as it may have seemed, might be on course for revenge and re-election... she's back, strongly, in polls, in Argentina... in spite of her numerous crimes and judicial cases (public-money systemic appropriation, planned assassination of Nisman and probably, lethal poisoning of Nestor), she might make her comeback to power!

It teaches us something: President Trump (next year?) should order his judiciary and intel services to seriously dig into the criminal activities of the Crooked One and so-called Obama, because, if he lets them alone, they might very well come back one day, on top!

Patriotic presidents Macri and Trump have no other choice than to jail CFK and Hillary. If they don't, Globalists will take that as a proof of weakness (and so will the common people too, maybe), and in a few years, send their commie pasionaras back for a revenge.

(06-25-2017 10:02 PM)Latinopan Wrote:  

Oh dear, if that's the best they can do even with infinite preparation time and Photoshop Enterprise Edition, then her situation must be truly grim.

3/10, would not bang.

Her exoskeleton is badly finished around the lower-left side of her face: Reptilian engineers doing a botched, low-energy job!... Sad.

Without the human exoskeleton, she's probably Oscar the Bald Cockatoo, anyway:

(06-25-2017 10:34 PM)Maga Man Wrote:  Trumps > Clintons




I still have to chuckle with Hollywood/Media pushing Chelsea as a 'superstar' for the Democratic Party. Perhaps some of that cheerleading is going to lessen now, and they will slowly sober up, if only due to the Dem's getting their ass handed to them in the much publicized Georgia election ... but personally I want them to continue pushing Chelsea. It's hilarious, and will just continue to evoke just how out of touch the left has become. Which is just painfully obvious by now.

Too mush money was spent on the Hillary campaign, those people lost lot of money, Hillary got around 2 billions, that is a lot of favors the Clintons own to a lot of people, Chelsea is seen as the best way to get a refund for all that money they paid.

Now the dumb dems are scheming how to crash the economy. Too bad they are going to throw themselves under the bus to do it. Nothing like going broke to advance your own cause you idiots! If we get another Scotus spot today they are so fucked.

(06-24-2017 08:26 PM)underboss Wrote:  Infowars is "mainstream" now. lol. Should tell you enough right there about the massive joke this whole psyOp is.

I'm intrigued by your ideas and would like to subscribe to your newsletter!

Travel ban injunction has been lifted, according to local radio. If this means what I think it does, it's likely Trump will win the court case on the travel ban when they finish arguing it.

How's it feel to be on the right side of history, guys?

Muslim travel ban: US Supreme Court to rule on Donald Trump's controversial policy

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/...07791.html

Quote:The US Supreme Court is set to make a ruling on Donald Trump's controversial travel ban on the last day of its current term.

The executive order had put a halt to all travellers from six Muslim-majority countries – Syria, Libya, Iran, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen – entering the US for 90 days.

The Trump administration said the ban was in the best interests of national security. Mr Trump repeatedly said on the campaign trail: "A complete shutdown of Muslims ... Until country's representatives can figure out what the hell is going on."

Judging by Don's tweets, is it safe to say that the administration now believes Assange and Wikileaks, are indeed, an instrument of Russian intelligence service ? Looks like he's bit the bullet to accept Assange is a Russian tool, but just that his campaign had nothing to do with it whatsoever.

Apparently SCOTUS just ruled that President Trump's travel ban can go into immediate effect, with the exception that visitors from the banned countries can enter if they can establish that they have a relationship with a US resident. Also, students from those countries who have been accepted by a US college should be allowed to enter. That's definitely a qualified victory for the President.

(06-26-2017 10:52 AM)C-Note Wrote:  Apparently SCOTUS just ruled that President Trump's travel ban can go into immediate effect, with the exception that visitors from the banned countries can enter if they can establish that they have a relationship with a US resident. Also, students from those countries who have been accepted by a US college should be allowed to enter. That's definitely a qualified victory for the President.

It's a good beginning.

The next step should be throwing the ones already here, along with their illegal alien compadres, the fuck out ASAFP!!!!!!

#makesmericasafeagain
#MAGA

“The government’s interest in preserving national security outweighs any hardship to people denied entry into the country.”

Islam has been at war with civilization for 1395 years.

Would we have been so accommodating to Nazism 75 years ago?

The best part of the overruling of the injunction is that the immigration ban can stay in place until its ruled on. The case starts in oct so the travel ban that would have lasted 3 months is now at least 6 months.

LOL

SCOTUS decision on the travel ban:



Eat shit 9th court Marxists!!

(06-26-2017 10:22 PM)budoslavic Wrote:  A very large percentage of Australians LOVE President Trump!

Could have fooled me. When I was in Australia that was the seemingly mandatory question for everyone to ask the Yank. Every time I said I was pro Trump it's like people looked at me like I had just kicked a puppy dog. Even in rural towns where I assumed people would be more conservative. I only recall one guy I worked with who was pro Trump just because he hated Islam.

(06-26-2017 10:00 PM)Belgrano Wrote:  [quote='911' pid='1600512' dateline='1498524045']

God damn, look at those freakishly long toes.

I actually only see one, to be honest. It is of the camel variety.



Also, sorry for yet another CC post. Hopefully the nightmare can end here!

Here's some eyebleach courtesy of the previous Australian Prime Minister's daughters.

Full Video:

Edit: Kosko, don't go full tinfoil on us bro, heed Fisto's advice.