Skinny shirtless guy: Brexit
Green shirt guy: Donald Trump
Fat black shirt guy: Marine Le Pen, April 2017
All the dancers that follow: the world
Movement would not have started without Nigel and Brexit, but it would not have been defined as a movement without Donald Trump. The dominoes will keep falling.
Quote: Donald Trump’s success or failure as the next US president will largely depend on his ability to keep his independence from the (((“shadow government”))) and elite structures that shaped the policies of previous administrations, former presidential candidate Ron Paul told RT.
Trends
US Elections 2016
Trump, 70, enters the US presidency a political virgin, whose policies will be shaped by advice offered by his political cabinet.
“Unfortunately, there has been several (((neoconservatives))) that are getting closer to Trump. And if gets his advice from them then I do not think that is a good sign,” Paul told the host of RT’s Crosstalk show Peter Lavelle.
Trump sure as hell doesn't seem like he's already freaking 70 yo. That in itself is a great sign. We see presidents age incredibly while in office, it will be interesting to see - barring natural aging - how he comes out on the other side.
(11-11-2016 05:53 PM)Hannibal Wrote: What is it with these fucking retards blocking highways?
These are protestors of Soros using the Arab spring and Ukraine playbook. I don't know enough, but I think their tactics must be coordinated and tactical.
One guess, it's about threathening government monopoly on force with going as far as they can 'non violently'. Blocking a highway is blocking transportation, a low grade act of war, stop your enemy moving. The more they can get away with, the less power = strength = legitimacy the government looks to have. Remember from Ukraine, that it was the inability to remove the thugs because they barricaded, which made the government look weak and without support.
When the BLM thugs take over highways without repercussion then they essentially establish themselves as a separate wielder of applied force = strength = legitimacy.
This is the interesting thing about these color revolutions and 'springs' from Soros, they claim democracy and free speech, but their tactics are extremely violent, not randomly violent mind you, rather sophisticated violence which uses the image of antifa-anarchism to achieve military occupation, such as taking the main square or occupying highways and other infrastructure.
I watched a video of some Russian officials discussing this topic in detail some time ago, they fully understand what it is and therefore outright ban these organisation.
The key difference between those colour revolutions and the US highways being blocked is this;
The drivers of those cars stuck on highways are only stuck because they don't want to kill or seriously injure the people and end up in prison.
Should the law declare it perfectly ok to run through protest lines on highways and intersections is the day this tactic dies a violent, blood splattered death.
It's not that Obama won't look him in the eye, it's that he can't... not carrying the level of guilt he has, even as a now-well-trained actor. That look is undeniable.
My favorite leftist delusion post-election is that they think Sanders would have beaten Trump.
The scraggly little pussy-fag socialist cunt who dutifully carried water for Hillary after she dumped his campaign, and who couldn't even control a stage from two fat-ass inner city Soros BLM trolls.
This really needs to be addressed during the next four years. When did it become so cool to be a dyed in the wool socialist again?
Quote:Whatever your political views are, just take a moment to marvel at the fact that Hillary Clinton was less relatable to working class people in the rust belt than a man who lives in a golden skyscraper emblazoned with his name in the middle of Manhattan
Yep, I said this in one of these threads a while ago.
I have actually been keeping up with what Ron Paul has been saying over the last year, and he is afraid of the ((Deep State)) getting into the Trump administration just like it did with the Reagan administration.
I think that removing Christie is a good first step, but I don't think he's really that big of a fish (intentional wordplay).
I wonder whom he is referring to when he speaks of the deep state amongst Trump's closest advisers. Newt? Some of the intelligence agency and banking leaders?
(11-11-2016 09:10 PM)nomadbrah Wrote: Ron Paul is woke:
Quote: Donald Trump’s success or failure as the next US president will largely depend on his ability to keep his independence from the (((“shadow government”))) and elite structures that shaped the policies of previous administrations, former presidential candidate Ron Paul told RT.
Trends
US Elections 2016
Trump, 70, enters the US presidency a political virgin, whose policies will be shaped by advice offered by his political cabinet.
“Unfortunately, there has been several (((neoconservatives))) that are getting closer to Trump. And if gets his advice from them then I do not think that is a good sign,” Paul told the host of RT’s Crosstalk show Peter Lavelle.
I know Cernovich has said he will never go on mainstream media again.
I just had a thought of him going on CNN live, telling them in the most calm way possible why the polls were so inaccurate, and then taking a phone call from his wife on air to talk about something trivial like how his dog is acting up or that his mother in law is coming for dinner. Draw it out for at least 30 seconds and then go back like, "ahh what were we talking about?".
Because that is how little I think of the main stream media right now.
In Sessions we trust
Chris Christie, not so much. It appears - appears - as if the God-Emperor Ascendant may not be interested in business as usual.
"Chris Christie's fall from grace is now complete.
Months after Christie, having lost his presidential primary to Donald Trump, had ambitions for becoming Trump's vice presidential candidate, Christie just suffered another dramatic fall from grace after President-elect Donald Trump shuffled his transition team three days after his surprising victory, and increased the influence of Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions, one of Washington’s most vocal critics of illegal immigration, while diluting that of Christie.
According to the WSJ, Chris Christie was removed as Trump campaign transition chairman on Friday, a position that will now be filled by Vice President-elect Mike Pence, the transition team confirmed. Christie will remain on the transition team’s executive committee as a vice chairman, along with Ben Carson, both largely figured positions; they will be also joined by retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani and Mr. Sessions.
The most drastic change on staff was the elevation of Rick Dearborn, the staff chief of Mr. Sessions’ Washington office, into the role of transition director. The move sidelined Rich Bagger, a top ally of Mr. Christie’s who held that role for the last several months. Mr. Bagger couldn’t be reached for comment.
Aside from the now effective elimination of Chris Christie from any positions of power in the Trump team, what is notable is the rapid rise of Jeff Sessions, one of the handful of names tossed as Trump's candidate for Treasury Secretary.
It's hardly a fall from grace to remain on the team. Trump isn't the sort to cast loyalty away lightly, but he's also not going to let a man with questionable judgment in hiring and team-building remain in charge of his entire Cabinet. He might consider making Christie Secretary of Education; the man has a long history of dealing effectively with teachers.
This underlines something that was already very clear: the God-Emperor is absolutely ruthless when it comes to taking action on underperforming team members. He doesn't care how it looks, he just shuffles the deck and draws."
No need to doubt The Donald, folks!
This is important. Christie has a ton of weight (hah!) he is carrying that could easily be a scandal. Trump needs clean noses in his cabinet to minimize distractions and possible scandals.
I do also like the fact he owes nobody anything. He could dump KellyAnne tommrow for all we know. It is a shrewd way of doing business but it is what he is used to in the development world. Vendors and contractors fuck with you constantly and the only loyalty is the current project in front of you.
I just don't want any establishment hacks close by. CNBC keeps pumping out possible propaganda that Trump wants to hire Wall Street trash like Jamie Dimon which would be a total 180 from what he campaigned on.
(11-11-2016 11:01 PM)kosko Wrote: I just don't want any establishment hacks close by. CNBC keeps pumping out possible propaganda that Trump wants to hire Wall Street trash like Jamie Dimon which would be a total 180 from what he campaigned on.
It's not propaganda. Trump put together an economic advisory team several months ago and it's virtually all Wall Street hacks.
I'm hoping the Cabinet will be different but knowing the crowd Trump hung out with in his previous life I'm not holding my breath. The fact that Carl Icahn, the archetype of the parasitic financial raider is invoked by Trump only slightly less frequently than Bobby Knight is certainly telling. With that said, bringing Thiel onboard makes me happy so we'll have to wait and see.
(11-12-2016 12:09 PM)weambulance Wrote: So if Mr. Trump's kids are on the transition team and it's a conflict of interest with the family business, can someone explain how that's going to work? I am unfamiliar with this stuff, but a lot of liberals are freaking out about this blind trust business (because they're being told to) and I can't find an objective article on the subject. All the articles are from shit rags like politico.
Both transitions (His Corp and the WH) are going to take some time.
I believe he has already started the process to step down from TRUMP Inc immediately and in that time up until January and beyond, likely the Board will run the show before his kids take it over.
There has to be a process to get the Exec team fortified. His kids are all talented, but I think even for him he might think this is four years too early for them to lead. He mentioned that they were not close to being ready four years ago, but now he has more confidence, but with that, they will have a support team of hardened Execs in the C-Suite to assist them in managing and running the Corp.
In the meanwhile I don't think there is an issue. His kids are likely in advisory roles, and I believe he always just trusts his kids as a sounding board to bounce ideas.
I think the reality of this Corp being his own keeps him in check. He isn't going to pillage and raid Trump Inc for talent to bring to the WH. He wants them to stay there, and he will advance them up to make sure they stay there, so they keep doing good work. During the campaign, he favoured many Trump Inc people as he had working relationships with them and it cut down on costs. I don't think that will carry over into the WH aside from a few select people.
It does not matter whether his kids or his executives lead his company. The entire global businessworld will be falling head over heals to offer a Trump company some kind of business opportunity. Unless you stop doing any new projects you are going to make a shitload of money nonetheless. Even if quid pro quo is not involved, that is how the businessworld runs. I would be amazed if Trump and family is not worth 50 bio. within the next years.
But that in itself is fine as well so long as this does not influence his judgement. He is much much less liable to be influenced by money than someone like Clinton who has been stealing everything since early on or someone like Obama who grew up almost poor in comparison.
Whether Trump's wealth goes up by a factor of 2-3 within a decade is irrelevant. The changes of lifestyle going from 10 bio. to 50 bio. $ are zero.
JFK also came from a wealthy family, he was not about money at all.
Trump likes fame, he likes glory sure, but among other things he likes to achieve something more. He will work hard to be the best president he can be. He does not want to leave the presidency a failure. That will motivate him more than the thought whether his company can make a few measly billion more. He and his family could have achieved that on autopilot as well within the next 20 years.
He is 70 and this is his final life achievement. We will see where it can go.
I too think Trump needs to lay low, I also suggest he gets a Pope-Mobile made.
He could wave to his supporters behind the safety of the glass, and get a lapel mic and have speakers on the truck, he can say his "thank-you"s, "I love you too"s, while pointing at various crowd members.
The Pope has already done it, so it's already 'okay', but his would have to be industrial strength, the Popes looks a little flimsy.
Maybe get an extra long limo, have the Glass part in the middle, capable of lifting 10 feet via some scissor-lift machinery ( go full James Bond )