(11-17-2013 09:51 PM)MikeCF Wrote: OK, here's some game/life advice.
I’m NOT sure about whether any advice about life or game is warranted in these circumstances, but sure, no problem, I am receptive to hearing what guys suggest.
(11-17-2013 09:51 PM)MikeCF Wrote: You are being passive aggressive.
This seems like labeling my activity, rather than advising, and to me, it seems you got your label wrong. It is my assessment that I was adding a perspective to a discussion regarding a drink. That is NOT passive aggressive.
(11-17-2013 09:51 PM)MikeCF Wrote: Here is what happened. A guy posted this question:
Quote:After some motivation from this thread, I've finally ordered myself a juicer. It just came in, I got the Hamilton Beach Big Mouth mentioned here.
One thing I haven't seen in this thread yet and has come to my mind: What should you avoid juicing?
So what did you point about blending have to do with the guy's question?
You, Mike, answered the guy’s question, and then I added to your answer to suggest that those ingredients could be placed into a Vitamix, if such a guy were inclined to make a drink that is composed of the suggested ingredients that you were saying could NOT be effectively juiced (which I agree, and I said that I agree with you). Further I added that those ingredients could be blended.
(11-17-2013 09:51 PM)MikeCF Wrote: He ordered a juicer - one that many guys have used. He wanted to know what foods not to use in it.
Then you come in talking about blending. (Blending, again, is great.) You wanted to make a point about blending.
But your point about blending had nothing to do with the question the guy asked, nor with my answer.
I’m NOT sure if I agree completely with your rendition of the facts or your conclusion about what was a fair related topic for the thread.
Nonetheless, for the purposes of “argument,” let us assume that all of your above facts are correct and it is the right conclusion that I butted into a conversation with information that was NOT adequately related to the topic being discussed.
In the end, does it really matter that I may have added that non-related information? I jumped in because I thought that I was contributing to what guys may be interested in knowing, and if they were NOT interested, they could ignore it.
Let’s say that I was wrong, and guys really do NOT want to know what I stated, then, I am NOT sure whether I recognize any real major problem with my attempting to contribute because I did NOT jump into this with any mal-intention, as you seem to be becoming more and more adamant that I have some kind of ill will or that I am butting in without adding value.
Even if I were to concede to you that I did NOT add value, I am NOT going to concede that my intent was to be a malicious intervener or whatever you are suggesting that I supposedly did.
(11-17-2013 09:51 PM)MikeCF Wrote: Now you want to act like I am just starting an argument.
I’m NOT trying to act like you are starting an argument. I merely stated to you in my previous post that it appears to me that you are making a BIG deal to attempt to argue some issues in which you are all over the place. Accordingly, I directly stated that it appears to me that you are just arguing for the sake of arguing. Maybe I am coming to the wrong conclusion, but I am just pointing out what seems to be taking place.
(11-17-2013 09:51 PM)MikeCF Wrote: Incidentally, I don't even care if guys want to argue. I think most health arguments are pretty whack. If you're doing something that is healthy, it just seems lame to say, "But this is healthier."
Maybe I am wrong, but out of the two of us, YOU seem to be the ONLY one that wants to argue? I am merely explaining in the context of your various statements directed at the content of my various posts. Another possibility is that we could extend this to PM, because it seems to be getting somewhat off topic.. regarding whether I supposedly maliciously butted into this topic or NOT.
Anyhow, you are saying that you do NOT care if guys want to argue..… and then you are saying that health arguments are whack, which you also said in the other post... But then in your recent post and then in the one prior to that, you go to show various assertions about health and the benefits of juicing. It seems to me that these assertions are a bit all over the place, yet there is nothing wrong with your being all over the place, except in the meantime you are criticizing my content as taking away from the discussion.
(11-17-2013 09:51 PM)MikeCF Wrote: [As an aside: Juicing in my opinion is better than blending.
Thanks for stating your preference directly.
(11-17-2013 09:51 PM)MikeCF Wrote: The nutrients most of us need are the micronutrients and phytonutrients contained in vegetables.
NOT everyone agrees with your assumption that vegetables are needed for our health and well-being.
For example, some people believe that a person can get a sufficient quantity of nutrients from meat, and that a person does NOT need to ingest vegetables in order to live a healthy life. In that regard, there exist essential fats and there exist essential proteins; however, there is no such thing as essential carbs, and vegetables are mostly carbs.. and to the extent that vegetables have fats and proteins, the essentials are more readily in meats.
But, fine, you have assumptions about various nutrients in vegetables)… and assumptions that we benefit from vegetables, and likely it is NOT going to kill anyone to include some vegetables in their diet. I do it myself to include about 10 to 30% carbs in my diet, which are mostly in the forms of vegetables. Out of all the carbs, it seems that vegetables are the least harmful, and there may be some benefits to eating them.. at least for the sake of variety in ones pallet, even though I question whether they are needed, as you suggest.
Also, I am NOT stating this to stop guys from juicing because guys can do what they want, especially if they are convinced that they are getting some kind of benefit from the practice.
(11-17-2013 09:51 PM)MikeCF Wrote: Go run 1 pound of kale through a blender and drink that. Good luck. Now go juice 1 pound of kale. That's easy to drink.
Go blend 2 pounds of carrots. Now go juice 2 pounds. Which can you actually take down consistently, on a daily basis?
Many of my juices contain 5 pounds of vegetables. If you blended that, assuming you could take it down without vomiting, you're now walking around with a log in your gut.
Yes, juicing is one way to accomplish drinking the liquid parts of these items, if guys want to drink the liquid parts of these items. Another possible way to imbibe these products is to blend them and to add a liquid, such as water or coconut juice or some other liquid to the mix so that the end product is NOT thick. If guys prefer to juice these items, then I have NO problem with that suggestion, and accordingly, you provide good examples.
(11-17-2013 09:51 PM)MikeCF Wrote: Where as I just drink the 24-32 ounces of juice. Now I'm nutrient charged, hydrated, ready to kill.
I am NOT sure whether you get that “charge” from some nutrients in the juice or NOT, but if it floats your boat to ingest your vegetables by separating the liquid portion in that way, then fine.
(11-17-2013 09:51 PM)MikeCF Wrote: Fiber is great, but you can get fiber in other foods. I am after the plant nutrients and seek to maximize my consumption of those.]
It may sound a little contradictory; however, I am of the sense that we are mislead about conceptions of fiber and getting fiber and whether there is any benefits to focusing on fibers. Nonetheless, I generally tend to believe in eating whole foods as is the recommendations of the Weston Price Foundation and NOT throwing parts out, and the reason for me is NOT about fiber but it is about eating foods in their natural form because we cannot always know if we are missing somethings in the food when we separate them out and process them.. and juicing seems to be more of a processing out items in the food as compared with blending.
(11-17-2013 09:51 PM)MikeCF Wrote: But really, is juicing so much better than I get into a bunker and go to war over it?
Or that I jump into a thread about smoothies and say, "You should be juicing. It's superior."
To follow your example here, I don't see any problem in the event that you were to jump into a thread about smoothies and to assert that juicing is better than blending, if you believe that the audience may be receptive to that. These different kinds of home made drinks products all fall into a similar category, so there may be some interest and benefit in talking about juicing in a blending conversation.
(11-17-2013 09:51 PM)MikeCF Wrote: No way. If guys are doing something great, it's one-upmanship to say, "My way is better."
There may have been times in this thread that I mentioned that I have a preference for blending with the Vitamix or that I may have made such assertions in another health-related thread, but my recent posts were NOT intended to distract from any meaningful conversation that may ONLY have to do with juicing. In that regard, I was NOT advocating that my way is better.
(11-17-2013 09:51 PM)MikeCF Wrote: And as I've said repeatedly: I juice, I blend, I eat veggies.
I have done each of these, also.
(11-17-2013 09:51 PM)MikeCF Wrote: But don't act like you're just some innocent party.
You came in looking for an argument. I gave you what you asked for.
I came looking to contribute to the subject that was being discussed, as I already described, and yes, you gave me a fairly extended confrontation about my motives in whether I was trying to derail the thread in my contribution in a subject that you seem to have strong opinions. I did NOT ask to argue, and I am open to PM on this point to the extent that we may be getting a little off topic.