(07-10-2016 11:49 PM)Tenerife Wrote:  Call me crazy, I think race is a big factor in the quality of a culture. Of course, there are always within-group differences, and in my personal life I judge people on the quality of their character and their actions, not their race. But I believe that people are either on one side of the fence or the other when it comes to these issues: racial realists, or race deniers.

You're fully entitled to your opinion, but I'm a little shocked that Quintus went full liberal on race right there.

It definitely speaks volumes to the mood on the EE section that a well-reasoned spiel by QC in response to Requiem's racial hissy fit — while an unintentional slip, is reflective of not a few voices within the manosphere — could be lambasted as having "went full liberal".

Too often, the chatter on EE is quick to shut down the concept of "racism" as a Trotskyist, leftist suppressive tactic rooted in base feeeeelings. These same sentiments will in the next breath white-knight (pun intended) hard for the "White race", harrumphing about even the faintest transgressions against it; to the extent that not just once has it been declared that "the existence of white people is at stake", "white people are the most persecuted group in history", or some such nonsense, a soundbyte that has been repeated on this very thread — an Asian perp is evidence enough that "Whitey has been declared war upon".



Furthering this double standard on racism, the "no-holds barred, say it as it is" nature of RVF is championed for owing to how this very raison d'être is used to legitimise deep-seated chips on the shoulder that posters now feel that have a non-judgemental outlet to air, even garner some rep points for doing so.
To catechise the virtues and goodness of non-white races, as QC had waxed lyrical upon, is deemed to be liberal blue-pilled twaddle. It seems that the "White is right" Weltanschuung needs to be preserved at the expense of painting other civilisations in a flattering light. Not much seems to be said in favour of Eastern creeds like Buddhism, and routine Two-Minutes-Hate-esque threads need to pop up every now and then to remind us how much Islam sucks.

This ties in with the overt mental masturbation about ethno-nationalism rampant on EE. The idea of pledging allegiance to a "supra-tribe" as defined by skin colour is chiefly a North American one, and a very recent one at that. A Roman legionary, a Kievan Rus' boyar, a Boer Voortrekker, a Prussian Junker, a Boston Brahmin, and many other individuals are what we consider "White", but scarcely would any of these figures over a two millenia stretch of white history subscribe to a common tribal fealty, no necessarily recognise their own societies as forming part of a continuous identity of White history.

Is it also doubly ironic that this dyslexic view of ethno-nationalism could command such a following in the United States, arguably the most multicultural nation to ever exist? It's a surprise that this belief could have sprung from the loins of a society that is a result of the blood, endeavours and practices of people of colours and creeds from all over the world. I'll reiterate that non-White peoples have contributed tothe Anglosphere societies, indeed have been integral to their development, and the Western World in general, because it sure as hell isn't blue pilled to say so.

(07-10-2016 10:51 PM)Tenerife Wrote:  

(07-10-2016 10:40 PM)Phoenix Wrote:  ^ Agreed, the racial purity ranting is crossing the line. Maybe racial purity is a valid concern, maybe it isn't. But ranting about hating the site of mixed couples just doesn't fit in a forum like this, which is basically founded on a core of "international relationships". It is entering stormfront territory, and to preserve distance between that bunch and us means this stuff shouldn't be tolerated. There is no reason you should be participating in this forum if your position is solidly in stormfront territory.

You can't have nationalism without some level of concern of one ethnic/racial group over another. It's just not possible.

This forum is as much a political forum at this point as a game forum.

EDIT: Referring specifically to ethno-nationalism.

It has been said before that any self-improvement game forum is inevitably going to attract its share of kooks and weirdos; and these sorts of personalities are the ones that easily well to extreme ideology. I guess you could draw analogies to how losers and the mentally ill invariably become SJW's/feminists. Or how the power of spiritual comfort is the sort of succour that many wallowing in despair turn to. Interestingly, on that topic, two identical threads created a few years apart report a seismic increase in Christianity among RVFers.

But yeah, the corollary being that pushing these ideologues on preserving "racial purity" lest we compromise the qualities of the White race and lead to its extinction — creepy Nazi-esque eugenics straight out of Mein Kampf — is really a outward manifestation of such social maladjustment. I think it's an even easier vehicle by which to push this God-fearing, far-Right, Aryan whitebread fantasy that seems to hold sway on EE and repel otherwise intelligent posters from contributing. The obsession with racial miscegenation has reached full retard levels in the past.

I hope to god that the Game aspect of the Forum will always remain, and provide a beacon of support to young men all over that wish to better themselves socially and elsewhere. In spite of the fact that there will always be gentlemen like Requiem (and I quote), whose "heart falls through his a-hole everytime he sees a White-mixed couple". As I linked above, he isn't the first. But it won't stop me and others from gaming attractive white women, because defiling Aryan maidens with my subhuman coloured blood won't lead to the extinction of the "White race".

QC is a great poster and a brilliant guy. I didn't mean to disrespect him, but I do disagree with the thrust of his main post here.

JWLZG's post above is pretty indicative of the type of shaming language thrown at white people who stand up for their own people. "Creepy, weirdo, Nazi, kook..."

The United States hasn't been multicultural for very long. It was built by northern European men who enslaved black people and ethnically cleansed the indigenous populations (Indian Removal Act), and had anti-miscegenation laws up until recently. Like it or not, those are the policies that America was built upon. The white people who founded America make most white nationalists today look soft in comparison.

Multiculturalism is a modern experiment that is, in many ways, crippling America and Europe as well.

But if white people complain about it, guess what you're gonna get called...wait for it....a Nazi!

Good entry today on Henry Makow's site about the events in Dallas, Black homicides and BLM. I really liked this gif (sorry if it's mentioned earlier, it's worth reposting in any case):



http://henrymakow.com/2016/07/Blacks-Mos...lacks.html

This post however doesn't go into the details and root causes of Black on Black violence, the planned destruction of Black family structures and communities through drugs, pop culture and aggressive anti-male social engineering/welfare programs.

Actually, if you guys heard the shit the cops write on their own forum you will see they are pissed. Pissed at Obama, Clinton and Deblowsio. They even think it is time to give the BLM what they want.
Pull the boots out of the hood and just surround the GOOD areas to keep them out. Some even say STOP giving them food stamps, welfare, etc and let them go wild.

(07-12-2016 10:00 AM)Tenerife Wrote:  QC is a great poster and a brilliant guy. I didn't mean to disrespect him, but I do disagree with the thrust of his main post here.

JWLZG's post above is pretty indicative of the type of shaming language thrown at white people who stand up for their own people. "Creepy, weirdo, Nazi, kook..."

The United States hasn't been multicultural for very long. It was built by northern European men who enslaved black people and ethnically cleansed the indigenous populations (Indian Removal Act), and had anti-miscegenation laws up until recently. Like it or not, those are the policies that America was built upon. The white people who founded America make most white nationalists today look soft in comparison.

Multiculturalism is a modern experiment that is, in many ways, crippling America and Europe as well.

But if white people complain about it, guess what you're gonna get called...wait for it....a Nazi!

I'm reluctant to post anything about race lately, but I feel like I should step up and say multicultural is not the same thing as multiracial. I'm not intending to single you out for your sentiment. You're just the most recent one I can quote.

Culture is as much a function of environment as it is genetics, so a nation composed of healthy, complete families with patriotic values and a respect for the rule of law can give birth to new citizens who are culturally united despite differences in race. Irish and Italian immigrants bred with the German, British, Scottish, etc. people who were in America, and we call their successors white even when they still have lingering features that identify their mixed ancestry. How much hate between British-Americans and Scottish-Americans do you see lately? Compare that to relations in their native lands.

We can call someone with thick, dark hair and olive skin American and someone with curly red hair and pale-freckled skin American, but somehow we believe dark-skinned people will never be able to fit in with white Americans? Fuck that. European whites did not always have a shared history and culture. It was allowed to develop through a more natural intermingling, as alluded to earlier, rather than forced. No one got to join the tribe just for showing up. They proved themselves a good fit (or conquered).

We must hold onto our culture, but it would be foolish to never allow it to change for the better. Just as we improve our bodies and minds constantly, we should accept that even a great culture has room for improvement. New ideas need to be tested though, and we're currently allowing too many in too quickly for them to be tested and then accepted or rejected properly.

We must also throw away what does not work, like much of the welfare state that has destroyed the black community and will erode the white community within just a few decades if it is not turned back. "Changing our culture for the better" right now means ending mass immigration, enforcing immigration laws, and getting rid of the welfare state. Our culture is unhealthy, and only a healthy culture has any capacity to absorb minority races into a united citizenship, and even then it must be done in drastically smaller doses than we are currently trying to take. The problems of race-mixing are problems because our culture supports degeneracy over morals and weakness over strength. Agitators are dividing us into tribes when we should be united under pride in our great nation.

Are you a white-and-proud-of-it RvF member and hate seeing dark skin on your soccer players? Or have you wondered how to keep your race free of epidermis pigmentation through insemination of pure, heavenly white princesses?

Then do I have the RVF thread for YOU!

Oh wait, hold on, it’s here somewhere. Just going back to the home page of our Commander-in-Chief (http://www.rooshv.com) for a search.

Ok, let’s have a look at some of the All Time Top 50 Articles.

Hmmm, let’s see, where could it be... well there's 10 Reasons Why Heterosexual Men Should Leave America, 8 Things American Women Must Do To Make Themselves More Attractive For Men, The Decimation Of Western Women Is Complete, 15 Reasons Why Toronto Is The Worst City In North America For Men, If I Was Born An American Girl, 42 Things Wrong With American Women, Western Culture Poisons Women, 7 Ways Feminism Is Destroying American Women, and The Decline Of American Women… ummm, no, no, NO!

Ok, don’t worry I’m gonna—oh yessss! Found it. Gentlemen, head straight HERE: https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-48284.html

It seems this thread is going off the rails and tempers are flaring.

I suggest to everyone here to stop, think and calm down before posting anything else. We are better than this and should set an example of being good stewards on highly emotional topics.

Just a friendly reminder gentleman.

Multiculturalism isn't the same thing as multiracial, because culture isn't the same thing as race.

(07-12-2016 11:53 AM)Artiste Wrote:  Are you a white-and-proud-of-it RvF member and hate seeing dark skin on your soccer players? Or have you wondered how to keep your race free of epidermis pigmentation through insemination of pure, heavenly white princesses?

Then do I have the RVF thread for YOU!

Oh wait, hold on, it’s here somewhere. Just going back to the home page of our Commander-in-Chief (http://www.rooshv.com) for a search.

Ok, let’s have a look at some of the All Time Top 50 Articles.

Hmmm, let’s see, where could it be... well there's 10 Reasons Why Heterosexual Men Should Leave America, 8 Things American Women Must Do To Make Themselves More Attractive For Men, The Decimation Of Western Women Is Complete, 15 Reasons Why Toronto Is The Worst City In North America For Men, If I Was Born An American Girl, 42 Things Wrong With American Women, Western Culture Poisons Women, 7 Ways Feminism Is Destroying American Women, and The Decline Of American Women… ummm, no, no, NO!

Ok, don’t worry I’m gonna—oh yessss! Found it. Gentlemen, head straight HERE: https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-48284.html

This might be the worst post I've ever read on the forum.

Passive aggressive, no testosterone, no personality, and no humor, using link spamming to substitute for an argument.

0/10 would not read troll again.

JWLZG: Your post is as bad of a strawman as Requiem's post was!

(07-12-2016 10:52 AM)jimukr104 Wrote:  Actually, if you guys heard the shit the cops write on their own forum you will see they are pissed. Pissed at Obama, Clinton and Deblowsio. They even think it is time to give the BLM what they want.
Pull the boots out of the hood and just surround the GOOD areas to keep them out. Some even say STOP giving them food stamps, welfare, etc and let them go wild.

It's an interesting thought. I read that cops have limited their policing of Ferguson by a lot. As they predicted the crime rate spiked, violence and property crime has soared, and people kept complaining as usual.

Unfortunately, the people who rioted and politicized the issue ultimately had a hand at driving out law enforcement leaving the decent people left to fend for themselves. Along with this comes depressed property values and flight of businesses. That's how neighborhoods turn into blighted areas.

Below is a recent article which talks about Chicago PD withdrawing from policing parts of Chicago too. Those neighborhoods now see "epidemic" levels of violence. Quite honestly if this is what the most vocal members of the black community want then why try to force policing on them? If they want their neighborhoods to resemble mogadishu then who is to deny them their ultimate wish.

This article is pretty long so I can't post it all. It's a decent read.

http://nypost.com/2016/07/09/how-the-fer...g-chicago/

Quote:The ‘Ferguson effect’ is destroying Chicago

By Heather Mac Donald

July 9, 2016 | 1:22pm
The ‘Ferguson effect’ is destroying Chicago

Violence in Chicago is reaching epidemic proportions. In the first five months of 2016, someone was shot every 2¹/₂ hours and someone murdered every 14 hours, for a total of nearly 1,400 nonfatal shooting victims and 240 fatalities.

Over Memorial Day weekend, 69 people were shot, nearly one per hour, dwarfing the previous year’s tally of 53 shootings over the same period. The violence is spilling over from the city’s gang-infested South and West sides into the downtown business district; even Lake Shore Drive has seen drive-by shootings and robberies.

“I’ve been in Chicago all my life. It’s never been this bad. Mothers and grandchildren are scared to come out on their porch.” - Chicago resident


The growing mayhem is the result of Chicago police officers’ withdrawal from proactive enforcement, making the city a dramatic example of what I have called the “Ferguson effect.”

Since the fatal shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Mo., in August 2014, the conceit that American policing is lethally racist has dominated the national airwaves and political discourse, from the White House on down.

In fact, this sentiment appears to be what fueled the slaying of five officers in Dallas after white cops shot black men in Baton Rouge, La., and Minnesota last week.


In response to this feeling, cops in minority neighborhoods in Chicago and other cities around the country are backing off pedestrian stops and public-order policing — and criminals are flourishing in the resulting vacuum.


Chicago mayor Rahm Emanuel warned in October 2015 that officers were going “fetal,” as shootings in the city skyrocketed. Residents of Chicago’s high-crime areas are paying the price.


Felicia Moore, a wiry middle-aged woman with tattoos on her face and the ravaged frame of a former drug addict, says: “I’ve been in Chicago all my life. It’s never been this bad. Mothers and grandchildren are scared to come out on their porch.”

Through the end of May, shooting incidents in Chicago were up 53 percent over the same period in 2015, which already had seen a significant increase over 2014. Compared with the first five months of 2014, shooting incidents in 2016 were up 86 percent. Shootings in May citywide averaged nearly 13 a day, a worrisome portent for summer.

Anti-police animus is nothing new in Chicago, of course. An Illinois state representative, Monique Davis, told a Detroit radio station in 2013 that people in her South Side community believed that the reason so few homicide cases were solved is that it was the police who were killing young black males. Davis later refused to repudiate her statement: “We can’t say that it is not happening.”

The “no-snitch” ethic of refusing to cooperate with the cops is the biggest impediment to solving crime, according to Chicago commanders. But the Black Lives Matter narrative about endemically racist cops has made the street dynamic much worse. A detective says: “From patrol to investigation, it’s almost an undoable job now. If I get out of my car, the guys get hostile right away and several people are taping [with cellphones].”

Bystanders and suspects try to tamper with crime scenes and aggressively interfere with investigations. Additional officers may be needed during an arrest to keep angry onlookers away. “It’s very dangerous out there now,” a detective tells me.

If you were a cop who had to work in this environment would you even bother? Hell no, unless you were some kind of ideological crusader.

(07-12-2016 11:07 AM)Bear Hands Wrote:  European whites did not always have a shared history and culture. It was allowed to develop through a more natural intermingling, as alluded to earlier, rather than forced. No one got to join the tribe just for showing up. They proved themselves a good fit (or conquered).

Europeans share a long history of fight each other. This just did end after world war II. Since then some people had the idea to talk instead to go to war.

(07-12-2016 11:07 AM)Bear Hands Wrote:  We must also throw away what does not work, like much of the welfare state that has destroyed the black community and will erode the white community within just a few decades if it is not turned back.

If you want to ask what did destroy the black community and did create so much single moms and ghetto culture, ask the CIA. They did support the Nicaragua contras that did push drugs into the black community. It lead to the crack epidemic.


About the issue that the lack of religion lead to a downfall of society, I disagree. In the US its different but who had be the first settlers? The more radical christians where we had no space for in Europe in the time of enlightenment. Science just could develop after we got rid of the rule of the church. Look about how fanatic religious people hold down the middle east? Values do not need religion. Look at our modern rights, the human rights, they maybe have a christian spirit but they had be created by man. Not by a book from a crazy prophet.

Quote:It's an interesting thought. I read that cops have limited their policing of Ferguson by a lot. As they predicted the crime rate spiked, violence and property crime has soared, and people kept complaining as usual.

Unfortunately, the people who rioted and politicized the issue ultimately had a hand at driving out law enforcement leaving the decent people left to fend for themselves. Along with this comes depressed property values and flight of businesses. That's how neighborhoods turn into blighted areas.

Crime has been on the rise in NYC also. Actually the union membership called for going "blu flu"(when everyone calls in sick) but the union president is a pussy and he has political aspirations( he is in the news or on radio/tv every other day).

The problem is the majority of people are good in the areas that would be effected. Majority want the police there. They just keep quiet and let the BLM and thugs have their way.

Obama's gun control themed speech hasn't gone down too well at the memorial service in Dallas.

A Nation Gathers to Honor 5 Slain Dallas-Area Police Officers

(07-12-2016 04:05 PM)rotekz Wrote:  Obama's gun control themed speech hasn't gone down too well at the memorial service in Dallas.

A Nation Gathers to Honor 5 Slain Dallas-Area Police Officers

The officers there should have booed Obama loudly instead of just refusing to applaud his idiotic anti 2nd amendment agenda

(07-12-2016 10:52 AM)jimukr104 Wrote:  Actually, if you guys heard the shit the cops write on their own forum you will see they are pissed. Pissed at Obama, Clinton and Deblowsio. They even think it is time to give the BLM what they want.
Pull the boots out of the hood and just surround the GOOD areas to keep them out. Some even say STOP giving them food stamps, welfare, etc and let them go wild.

Actually I think that is EXACTLY what they should be doing. There's no better cure for sanctimonious histrionics than a bitter dose of reality.

"911 operator - what is your emergency?"

"Help! Please send somebody right away. A gang of gangbangers broke into my house, shot the dog, raped my wife, and took most of our valuables!!!"

"What is your name and your address?"

"15 W. Garfield Blvd, West Englewood"

"Sorry sir - we don't serve that area anymore. Please turn to your local BLM representative."

CLICK

Obama during his speech at the memorial for the fallen Dallas police officers started ok but he could not help himself and reverted to form bringing up the specter of slavery and the "fact" that black parents still need to have "the talk". Then he decried the lack of jobs in minority communities <he has had 8 years to turn this around> and then he decried how it is easier for urban youth to get a Glock than a computer or a book - WTF... mentioned the two "victims" in Baton Rouge and Minnesota by name and how much more work needs to be done. He did not mention BLM by name but kept referring to the police protecting "peaceful protests" again WTF does he not see all the mega hate spewed by these BLM protesters???

Of course NO mention of how a black America Afghan war vet was turned to hate filled anti-white murderous rage by anti white anti police hate filled BLM rhetoric. Obama has blood on his hands in his support for BLM described as a domestic terrorism organization by Rudy Giuliani and funded with more than $30 Million by the retched evil bastard George Soros who has also donated more than $13 Million to Hillary Rotten Clinton and owns her phat arse. Soros is truly a despicable deviant degenerate anti-American and Anti Christian stirring up the pot in all the Arab spring states and across Europe backing the radical islamist sympathizers invasion of Europe. His goal is clearly to do the same to the USA with Hillary as his primary enforcer.

(07-12-2016 04:05 PM)rotekz Wrote:  Obama's gun control themed speech hasn't gone down too well at the memorial service in Dallas.

A Nation Gathers to Honor 5 Slain Dallas-Area Police Officers

Conyers did the same thing at Loretta Lynch's testifying before Congress. None of these clowns have any class anymore. They will get trying to flog the people of this country with that until they get it. At least Conyers was honest enough to admit during his stupid speech that he thinks anyone having any guns is something he wants ended.

There used to be a time when many cops liked gun control. This is not the right place and time for that and they were looking for something that would help them alot more than a few less people with guns walking around. They want their employer and bosses to support them on their jobs.

A welder or electrician would walk off a job if they were getting bitched at about their quality of work, but when they ask for more tools, leadership, or support, they get excuses. Excuses are like dirty socks. Everyone has them and they all stink. You can see the stink face on all those officers in attendance. They probably wished they could get up and leave during that speech.

Like Syrianguy said, Obama knows what he is doing. He isn't even trying to hide it anymore. He will use guilt manipulation all the way until he is out the door and try to appeal to the emotionally unstable liberals that will continue to fight the rest of the normal world. He won't diffuse it with leadership, it's partisan politics 24/7 for him. It's a business. He and Hillary only care about that bottom line.

Julian needs to hurry the fuck up with those emails. This country needs a massive reality check if it is to stand a chance to fight real tyranny.

Obama doesn't give a shit, he doesn't have long left in office.

He's going ram as much as he can down everyone's throats until his last day in office.

A Trump presidency can't come soon enough FFS.

(07-12-2016 04:25 PM)Deepdiver Wrote:  Obama during his speech at the memorial for the fallen Dallas police officers started ok but he could not help himself and reverted to form bringing up the specter of slavery and the "fact" that black parents still need to have "the talk". Then he decried the lack of jobs in minority communities <he has had 8 years to turn this around> and then he decried how it is easier for urban youth to get a Glock than a computer or a book - WTF... mentioned the two "victims" in Baton Rouge and Minnesota by name and how much more work needs to be done. He did not mention BLM by name but kept referring to the police protecting "peaceful protests" again WTF does he not see all the mega hate spewed by these BLM protesters???

Of course NO mention of how a black America Afghan war vet was turned to hate filled anti-white murderous rage by anti white anti police hate filled BLM rhetoric. Obama has blood on his hands in his support for BLM described as a domestic terrorism organization by Rudy Giuliani and funded with more than $30 Million by the retched evil bastard George Soros who has also donated more than $13 Million to Hillary Rotten Clinton and owns her phat arse. Soros is truly a despicable deviant degenerate anti-American and Anti Christian stirring up the pot in all the Arab spring states and across Europe backing the radical islamist sympathizers invasion of Europe. His goal is clearly to do the same to the USA with Hillary as his primary enforcer.

Dallas has a large amount of black officers as does Houston. None are amused by his race hustling and baiting. When you have to work the streets and see the reality, the last thing you want to hear is an armchair quarterback, with manicured fingernails, telling you that you are not good at your job, as if you cannot read a simple 2-man blitz. They don't want to hear complaining. Give a real solution at least, not more gimmick gun control laws or seizure.

They won't forget this come the election. Obama has always turned his nose at us anytime he has to come to Texas for any reason. He knows the votes he got here both elections were practically the shittiest of all the states. Plenty volunteers and campaign workers left Texas early on in his first run because the projections were horrible and got even worse on re-election. As a result he almost never comes here and it shows. Too bad Perry is not in office right now otherwise the trolling he would give Obama would be comedy gold.

The numbers for blacks voting Rep next election here in Texas will be something to pay attention to. Men have switched over in very large numbers here. Texas will be the last conservative state when it is all said and done. Black Police officers might switch over in large numbers I suspect. That will be a start at breaking the old Democrat liberal chokehold they have on black voters. It's a start at least.

Our new squeeze Colion has another good new video out addressing Sharpton's idiotic race bait.

This endgame is looking more like "American History X Meets RoboCop" every day.

Quote:Dallas has a large amount of black officers as does Houston.

I just heard on a Tommy Sotomayor interview with some Dallas cops that the chief of police in Dallas is black, a third of the cops are black, a third white, and a third hispanic. Doubt that will be be mentioned in the mainstream.

(07-12-2016 07:15 AM)JWLZG Wrote:  

(07-10-2016 11:49 PM)Tenerife Wrote:  Call me crazy, I think race is a big factor in the quality of a culture. Of course, there are always within-group differences, and in my personal life I judge people on the quality of their character and their actions, not their race. But I believe that people are either on one side of the fence or the other when it comes to these issues: racial realists, or race deniers.

You're fully entitled to your opinion, but I'm a little shocked that Quintus went full liberal on race right there.

It definitely speaks volumes to the mood on the EE section that a well-reasoned spiel by QC in response to Requiem's racial hissy fit — while an unintentional slip, is reflective of not a few voices within the manosphere — could be lambasted as having "went full liberal".

Too often, the chatter on EE is quick to shut down the concept of "racism" as a Trotskyist, leftist suppressive tactic rooted in base feeeeelings. These same sentiments will in the next breath white-knight (pun intended) hard for the "White race", harrumphing about even the faintest transgressions against it; to the extent that not just once has it been declared that "the existence of white people is at stake", "white people are the most persecuted group in history", or some such nonsense, a soundbyte that has been repeated on this very thread — an Asian perp is evidence enough that "Whitey has been declared war upon".



Furthering this double standard on racism, the "no-holds barred, say it as it is" nature of RVF is championed for owing to how this very raison d'être is used to legitimise deep-seated chips on the shoulder that posters now feel that have a non-judgemental outlet to air, even garner some rep points for doing so.
To catechise the virtues and goodness of non-white races, as QC had waxed lyrical upon, is deemed to be liberal blue-pilled twaddle. It seems that the "White is right" Weltanschuung needs to be preserved at the expense of painting other civilisations in a flattering light. Not much seems to be said in favour of Eastern creeds like Buddhism, and routine Two-Minutes-Hate-esque threads need to pop up every now and then to remind us how much Islam sucks.

This ties in with the overt mental masturbation about ethno-nationalism rampant on EE. The idea of pledging allegiance to a "supra-tribe" as defined by skin colour is chiefly a North American one, and a very recent one at that. A Roman legionary, a Kievan Rus' boyar, a Boer Voortrekker, a Prussian Junker, a Boston Brahmin, and many other individuals are what we consider "White", but scarcely would any of these figures over a two millenia stretch of white history subscribe to a common tribal fealty, no necessarily recognise their own societies as forming part of a continuous identity of White history.

Is it also doubly ironic that this dyslexic view of ethno-nationalism could command such a following in the United States, arguably the most multicultural nation to ever exist? It's a surprise that this belief could have sprung from the loins of a society that is a result of the blood, endeavours and practices of people of colours and creeds from all over the world. I'll reiterate that non-White peoples have contributed tothe Anglosphere societies, indeed have been integral to their development, and the Western World in general, because it sure as hell isn't blue pilled to say so.

(07-10-2016 10:51 PM)Tenerife Wrote:  

(07-10-2016 10:40 PM)Phoenix Wrote:  ^ Agreed, the racial purity ranting is crossing the line. Maybe racial purity is a valid concern, maybe it isn't. But ranting about hating the site of mixed couples just doesn't fit in a forum like this, which is basically founded on a core of "international relationships". It is entering stormfront territory, and to preserve distance between that bunch and us means this stuff shouldn't be tolerated. There is no reason you should be participating in this forum if your position is solidly in stormfront territory.

You can't have nationalism without some level of concern of one ethnic/racial group over another. It's just not possible.

This forum is as much a political forum at this point as a game forum.

EDIT: Referring specifically to ethno-nationalism.

It has been said before that any self-improvement game forum is inevitably going to attract its share of kooks and weirdos; and these sorts of personalities are the ones that easily well to extreme ideology. I guess you could draw analogies to how losers and the mentally ill invariably become SJW's/feminists. Or how the power of spiritual comfort is the sort of succour that many wallowing in despair turn to. Interestingly, on that topic, two identical threads created a few years apart report a seismic increase in Christianity among RVFers.

But yeah, the corollary being that pushing these ideologues on preserving "racial purity" lest we compromise the qualities of the White race and lead to its extinction — creepy Nazi-esque eugenics straight out of Mein Kampf — is really a outward manifestation of such social maladjustment. I think it's an even easier vehicle by which to push this God-fearing, far-Right, Aryan whitebread fantasy that seems to hold sway on EE and repel otherwise intelligent posters from contributing. The obsession with racial miscegenation has reached full retard levels in the past.

I hope to god that the Game aspect of the Forum will always remain, and provide a beacon of support to young men all over that wish to better themselves socially and elsewhere. In spite of the fact that there will always be gentlemen like Requiem (and I quote), whose "heart falls through his a-hole everytime he sees a White-mixed couple". As I linked above, he isn't the first. But it won't stop me and others from gaming attractive white women, because defiling Aryan maidens with my subhuman coloured blood won't lead to the extinction of the "White race".

This is an excellent post, I agree with it 100%.

It's so frustrating how so many members want to harp on race. Every time I think, "Oh, RVF is a place that's standing up for all men against the tide of globalist immorality and mass consumption that's slowly destroying civilizations across the planet" someone here has to start a race thread and harp on how awful and evil and low IQ non-whites like me are. I suspect this is why so many of the black posters like Excelsior only post in a handful of threads, usually about sports or cute girls. The alt-right will never gain the traction that it could, as it alienates too many potential members. TBH, even the spread of Game will be limited as long as its associated--while Heartise has some good Game advice, think I'm going to send that site to my black friends/fam, or even any of my white/Asian blue/purple pill friends?

If you're on RVF, I doubt you're a low IQ individual. The average IQ is 105, and I wouldn't be surprised if the average RVF IQ is 115.