Why are we arguing about Woodrow Wilson?

I'm sure you can find some Jewish congressional group or white christian congressional group if you look, or at least find some very influential and wealthy lobbyist groups for white-americans. They have a bunch of freedom caucuses as well which are mostly white guys.

(02-25-2019 12:28 AM)Uprising Wrote:  

(02-24-2019 04:21 PM)TravelerKai Wrote:  He is a racist piece of shit because he viewed black people and others as inferior to white men. Showed the film Birth of a Nation in the White House openly. He was also a Klansman. Like other pieces of shit white nationalists, he was a white knight for women on behalf of "keeping the black man down". Putting the white woman on a pedestal sure was smart now, wasn't it?

If that offends you, please let me know so that I can add you to my ignore list. I have absolutely zero time these days to debate with trash like that.

Also, you should do more research on Wilson. He was not "pro ancestral homeland" like you think he was. He was easily one of the first Globalist presidents. He was one of the first to break from the Isolationist style of American power doctrine. He engineered America into getting into foreign European wars when public opinion wanted nothing to do with Europe. He claimed that Americans did not know better, than their betters (paraphrasing).

Also do not mock my educational background like that. There are plenty of historians more educated than you or me that hold values opposite of you and I. Feminist shaming language has no need here.

TravelerKai, I wasn't mocking your education background. That wasn't my intent and I'm sorry if it came off that way.

I have no issue with you stating facts about Woodrow Wilson or anybody else for that matter. For the record, no I don't support the KKK or any groups like them.

My issue, was your use of the word "racist". That was my only issue with what you posted.

I found a comment on YouTube a couple of days ago that puts into words better than what I ever could in regards to leftist language such as racist, white supremacist, bigot, ext. ext.

Quote:Well this has got more views than I ever expected.

SNIP..........

A few words on 'white supremacy'. White supremacy is a misnomer. That is to say, it is a label used to slur people of European ethnicity (aka white people) who try to stand up for their own interests. That's all it is.

Yes okay there are a few idiots who think that whites reign supreme over others and hate everyone else. You get idiots of all races. I don't hate any other race or nationality. But whites are being dehumanized daily and backed into a corner. Cry me some white tears, you may say. You deserve it for all the bad things your white ancestors did!

And you will only serve to make my point for me. Whites matter too.

Every race of people has their own homelands, except Europeans. Only we are expected to share our countries with everyone, while giving them special rights, which is never enough, we still get called racist every day just for existing.

It can't go on.

Now, obviously the USA is not the homeland of Europeans, but this country has historically been built up on European institutions with traditionally 85 - 90% of the country being European for most of its history, with Africans always at a steady 10 - 15% of the historical population. And yes, Africans who descend from the slaves have just as every right to reside in America as the Europeans do.

With that being said, before the usual suspects come out of the woodwork after reading that quoted YouTube comment to throw the normal leftists slurs at me such as racist, bigot, supremacist, white race troll, ponder this:

The Congressional Black Caucus (CBC)
- https://cbc.house.gov/

The Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus (CAPAC)
- https://capac-chu.house.gov/

Congressional Native American Caucus
- https://mccollum.house.gov/about-betty/c...can-caucus

The Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute
- https://chci.org/

You'll notice, that these American political caucuses, are racial political caucuses. Yes, you can find political caucuses that represent their people on the ethnic level and those caucuses also include people of European ethnicity, Asian ethnicities, ext. ext.

However, the examples that I just listed, were political racial caucuses. Put in the search engine The White Congressional Caucus. You will find nothing. Absolutely nothing.

Now black Americans aside from the recent arrivals, I will give them slack, they don't know what their ethnic groups are. But what are the excuses for the Hispanics, Asians and Native Americans for organizing as a race of people at the political level?

These groups, are clearly putting the interests of their people, their racial group of people, at the forefront. Every single group in America is allowed to organize and advocate for their interests politically on the racial level, except for whites.

The word "racist" is not just a word, it's a weapon.

Do you know how whites in America said the N word openly for the longest time? The whites used that word to hold the blacks down. The N word was a form of power, it subjugated the blacks and held them down.

Today, leftists and people on the right as well openly use the R word, "racist". That word, for at least the past decade or so, has been used to hold the whites down. The R word is a form of power, it subjugates the whites and holds them down, in the same way that the N word was used to hold blacks down.

The R word is used to to shame whites, as a racial group, of the right to organize racially on the political level and as a cohesive group. This is at a time when every other racial group in America is allowed to organize, advocate and lobby for themselves on the racial level, politically.

TravelerKai, in 1984 America, you are allowed to use the R word openly and without fear of economic, monetary and societal consequences. But just know that every time you use that word, whether knowingly or unknowingly, you are complicit in helping to keep whites down and helping to subjugate us, in the same way that the N word was used against your people for so long in this country.

(02-25-2019 01:26 AM)eradicator Wrote:  Why are we arguing about Woodrow Wilson?

Same question here.

Not 100% sure, but um, isn't he dead?

(02-25-2019 12:57 AM)Uprising Wrote:  5 times. In 9 sentences, you used the word racism/racist 5 times. You have learned nothing from my post.

MMX2010...is that you ?

Woodrow Wilson was a globalist puppet of course - his "racial views" being the least of the problems - Federal Reserve act being the biggest act of treason.

But it's telling that words like the Leninist "racist" and "White Nationalism" are being thrown around and applied to historical figures and past times where the views of that person were actually liberal.

The fact is that by that label even Booker T Washington would be racist because he supported racial segregation. The US itself similar to most countries in the West were "White Nationalist" states for having clear European favoring immigration and preference policies. But of course - muh racism - the US would have become just as strong if you had settled it with citizens of the Congo and given them the US constitution and legal system. Just like Liberia had received in the past - it's a land of milk and honey now.

But yeah - this discussion is useless here - still it's interesting how quickly those social justice terms and definitions are thrown around. The mental trap is indeed easy to fall into. Oh - and don't look at reality - be firmly embedded in anecdote land.

(02-24-2019 09:32 PM)worldwidetraveler Wrote:  What many people here have been saying.

Bannon looks old. Did he always look that old?

He is into gramps territory.

Better get a young mistress.

(02-24-2019 09:20 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

(02-24-2019 08:09 PM)Caduceus Wrote:  ...
I have a feeling Trump already knows this, and Kushner has advised him to trade in his Christian voters, for buttfucking faggot voters as we speak.

It seems difficult to imagine why Trump would go for this but we have to remember that Kushner is literally the kid from the Omen and has probably gained a greater mastery of his demonic powers by now.

Damn.

I think you're right.

RE: the current presidential field:

Ive heard it posited that the candidates being stupid is now considered a feature rather than a bug.

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world...eep-state/

With no "comedian" host bashing Trump for an opening monologue, the Oscars' ratings were actually up this year. Also, America is a bunch of hate-filled racists because, and I'm only guessing, Spike Lee is upset he only got one Oscar.

(02-25-2019 09:57 AM)Easy_C Wrote:  RE: the current presidential field:

Ive heard it posited that the candidates being stupid is now considered a feature rather than a bug.

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world...eep-state/

Some times voters prefer the unknown to the politician they are sick of already. Being naive and a dreamer can allow someone to say and think they can change the government. While the old realists are much less enthusiastic about change or their ability to make changes to society.

(02-24-2019 04:21 PM)TravelerKai Wrote:  He is a racist piece of shit because he viewed black people and others as inferior to white men. Showed the film Birth of a Nation in the White House openly. He was also a Klansman. Like other pieces of shit white nationalists, he was a white knight for women on behalf of "keeping the black man down". Putting the white woman on a pedestal sure was smart now, wasn't it?

If that offends you, please let me know so that I can add you to my ignore list. I have absolutely zero time these days to debate with trash like that.

Can we just take a moment to admire the effort and dedication TravelerKai puts into his racial grievances? Other, lesser lights might be satisfied with saying "Whites are racist" or "Old politicians were racist", but he actually takes the time to go learn about which presidents did which specially awful things, right down to what movies they showed during their term, so that he knows exactly WHY he's angry at white people.

I mean, I don't like Angela Merkel, but if you asked me what movies Angela Merkel showed during her last term, I'd draw a total blank. And she didn't even die before I was born, she's alive right now!

It's this sort of obsessive dedication towards digging up ancient hatreds that makes multi-cultural America such a fun and healthy place to be.

Ok, Woodrow Wilson viewed, showed, possessed membership and white knighted. But what did he actually do? Did he beat up a black employee, confiscated African American property, raped black women, stripped African Americans of their voting rights? Give me anything. I honestly want to know.

(02-25-2019 03:54 PM)SamuelBRoberts Wrote:  Can we just take a moment to admire the effort and dedication TravelerKai puts into his racial grievances? Other, lesser lights might be satisfied with saying "Whites are racist" or "Old politicians were racist", but he actually takes the time to go learn about which presidents did which specially awful things, right down to what movies they showed during their term, so that he knows exactly WHY he's angry at white people.

I mean, I don't like Angela Merkel, but if you asked me what movies Angela Merkel showed during her last term, I'd draw a total blank. And she didn't even die before I was born, she's alive right now!

It's this sort of obsessive dedication towards digging up ancient hatreds that makes multi-cultural America such a fun and healthy place to be.

It's dishonest to assume why TK knows a particular part of history. None of us are mind readers here.

As for him being angry at white men, I've never got that from his posts. Not sure what you've been reading and what I've missed. Or maybe he just thinks some of you guys are racists and you don't like that he thinks that way?

(02-25-2019 04:36 PM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  Ok, Woodrow Wilson viewed, showed, possessed membership and white knighted. But what did he actually do? Did he beat up a black employee, confiscated African American property, raped black women, stripped African Americans of their voting rights? Give me anything. I honestly want to know.

Wilson royally fucked up black Americans, one of the most destructive legacies for black America, along with Johnson's "Great Society" welfare scheme. He did that by setting up the Fed, as SS pointed out. This incidentally also fucked up white America just as much.

Moral of the story: race-based victimhood culture is there to obscure that fact and to divert susceptible minds and minorities away from the real source of their problems, which affect the rest of the population nearly just as much; divide and conquer.

So unfortunately vast swaths of minorities still cling to notions of KKK white hoods, rope and bleach midwinter night honkie gangs, "white privilege", "The Man", and the notion that blacks are victims of racial violence rather than disproportionately being the perpetrators due to their societies being obliterated by some of the forces also ruining the rest of society.

(02-25-2019 05:31 PM)911 Wrote:  So unfortunately vast swaths of minorities still cling to notions of KKK white hoods, rope and bleach midwinter nights honkie gangs, "white privilege", "The Man", and the notion that blacks are victims of racial violence rather than disproportionately being the perpetrators due to their societies being obliterated by some of the forces also ruining the rest of society.

Many of those ideas are brought to them 24/7 through liberal media. Both parties seek to divide and enrage people in order to get them to vote them into power.

In the real world, you don't get into these types of topics when talking to people. I am in a very mixed neighborhood and these types of topics never come up. We are too busy helping each other and having a beer here and there. You'd be surprised at how much bullshit people actually see.

(02-25-2019 06:22 AM)nomadbrah Wrote:  Bannon looks old. Did he always look that old?

He is into gramps territory.

Better get a young mistress.

I can't remember which interview it was, but the company changed the lighting and made him look really bad.

Still, we are talking Trump and one year of Trump is like 10 years of normal reality.

(02-25-2019 01:26 AM)eradicator Wrote:  Why are we arguing about Woodrow Wilson?

Because calling someone that was a legit racist from 1919 apparently triggers certain white males in 2019. I guess it is taboo to use that word now, due to overuse by SJWs.

Uprising it's a fucking history lesson, get over yourself.

I'm not responding to that wall of text that reeks of autism and MMX2010.

You would think someone like me, that has a long history of calling out shines and ignorant misbehaving blacks and others would get the benefit of the doubt, but contexts are meant to be misunderstood it appears by people of our generation.

(02-25-2019 05:30 PM)worldwidetraveler Wrote:  

(02-25-2019 03:54 PM)SamuelBRoberts Wrote:  Can we just take a moment to admire the effort and dedication TravelerKai puts into his racial grievances? Other, lesser lights might be satisfied with saying "Whites are racist" or "Old politicians were racist", but he actually takes the time to go learn about which presidents did which specially awful things, right down to what movies they showed during their term, so that he knows exactly WHY he's angry at white people.

I mean, I don't like Angela Merkel, but if you asked me what movies Angela Merkel showed during her last term, I'd draw a total blank. And she didn't even die before I was born, she's alive right now!

It's this sort of obsessive dedication towards digging up ancient hatreds that makes multi-cultural America such a fun and healthy place to be.

It's dishonest to assume why TK knows a particular part of history. None of us are mind readers here.

As for him being angry at white men, I've never got that from his posts. Not sure what you've been reading and what I've missed. Or maybe he just thinks some of you guys are racists and you don't like that he thinks that way?

Don't feed that dishonest race troll. He's been on my ignore list for two plus years for a reason. His post was so confusing to you because it was completely fictitious. Back dudes on rvf, except for maybe 8 guys think I am an uncle Tom or a coon. This troll and the regular WN which are more than ten and less than 15 think I hate white people, when I have personally done more for the white men on this forum over the years than their race trolling and rants have ever done. Most of them haven't met a soul and never coached anyone on game.

When you do the math, jealous ends up being the answer. Hating people over dumb things like skin color is quite the effeminate behavior is it not?

(02-25-2019 06:29 PM)TravelerKai Wrote:  Don't feed that dishonest race troll. He's been on my ignore list for two years for a reason. His post was so confusing to you because it was completely ficticious. Back dudes on rvf, except for maybe 8 guys think I am an uncle Tom or a coon. This troll and the regular WN which are more than ten and less than 15 think I hate white people, when I have personally done more for the white men on this forum over the years than their race trolling and rants have ever done. Most of them haven't met a soul and never coached anyone on game.

When you do the math, jealous ends up being the answer. Hating people over dumb things like skin color is quite the effeminate behavior is it not?

Yeah, I was confused. You and Kosko are consistent when calling out bad behavior no matter the race.

The race baiting has always been an issue here. I can understand the frustration. Each person will have their own experiences and then you have someone telling you what you experienced is bullshit or made up.

I guess it just shows how much we are susceptible to propaganda no matter how red pill we think we are.

(02-25-2019 06:21 PM)TravelerKai Wrote:  Because calling someone that was a legit racist from 1919 apparently triggers certain white males in 2019. I guess it is taboo to use that word now, due to overuse by SJWs.

Uprising it's a fucking history lesson, get over yourself.

I'm not responding to that wall of text that reeks of autism and MMX2010.

You would think someone like me, that has a long history of calling out shines and ignorant misbehaving blacks and others would get the benefit of the doubt, but contexts are meant to be misunderstood it appears by people of our generation.

(02-25-2019 06:29 PM)TravelerKai Wrote:  Don't feed that dishonest race troll. He's been on my ignore list for two plus years for a reason. His post was so confusing to you because it was completely fictitious. Back dudes on rvf, except for maybe 8 guys think I am an uncle Tom or a coon. This troll and the regular WN which are more than ten and less than 15 think I hate white people, when I have personally done more for the white men on this forum over the years than their race trolling and rants have ever done. Most of them haven't met a soul and never coached anyone on game.

When you do the math, jealous ends up being the answer. Hating people over dumb things like skin color is quite the effeminate behavior is it not?

My previous two posts were long, I'm sorry if they were confusing. The gist of my two posts:

The black, hispanic, Asian and Native American races are allowed to organize and lobby for their political interests as a racial group in the USA, as provided with the links I gave.

Whites are not.

The reasoning for whites not being allowed to have a political caucus would almost certainly be (by the general public) because "it's racist".

Racist do not exist. Racism does not exist. They are words made up in the past 100 years or so and at the moment are used to prevent whites and Europeans from organizing and lobbying for their groups interests like every other racial group is freely allowed to do.

In the future, the word racist will be used to prevent blacks, Asians, Hispanics and Native Americans from organizing and lobbying for their groups interests as well.

Misogynist is a made up word used to hold men down and to prevent them from organizing.

Transphobic is a made up word used to hold straight people down and to prevent them from organizing.

Islamophobe is a made up word used to hold non-Muslims down and to prevent other religions from organizing.

Racist, transphobic, Islamaphobe, misogynist are all words that are cut from the same marxist cloth. If you cannot see that, that's on you.

Roosh said as much in one of his past YouTube shows, that these words do not mean anything and to not give them power.

For the record, no I am not some previous banned member that was mentioned a few posts back. No, I have never met any men off from an internet forum. No, I have never given advice to other men on how to talk to girls. I must be lucky that most people I have known throughout my life have been well adjusted.

Finally, while my two previous posts were a bit long, I only stated a fact that every other racial group is allowed to lobby for themselves as a racial group politically, except for whites.

And because I stated a fact, I had the slurs of race troll, effeminate and autistic thrown at me, along with the accusation that I hate people of other skin color and that I am jealous of them. All of which are untrue.

Those slurs only stand to further prove the main point of the YouTube comment:

Quote:A few words on 'white supremacy'. White supremacy is a misnomer. That is to say, it is a label used to slur people of European ethnicity (aka white people) who try to stand up for their own interests. That's all it is.

(02-24-2019 08:56 AM)zigZag Wrote:  

(02-24-2019 05:52 AM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  

(02-23-2019 09:17 PM)zigZag Wrote:  

(02-23-2019 08:37 PM)rpg Wrote:  I am so tired of women imposing their neurosis on the rest of us. They were not liberated to be useless pains in the fucking ass.

American women are the product of american men. I just made that realization today. We basically live in a society where women are worshipped. Because american men in general are worthless pussy whipped bitches that have no standards and don't value themselves. This breeds worthless self obsorbed women who don't have to put any effort because they get results just for being women.

Yeah - but it hasn't happened on it's own. It took decades, massive planning, billions of dollars, constant brainwashing via media, academia and entertainment where men were constantly bashed and women were empowered. Then you create feminized male role models and voila - there you are after 70 years. But it was an amazing feat of massive investment - the women just react as was to be expected, being angered by feminism, lashing out in different ways how dogs use to do when the master is not doing it right.

Disagree. American men were cucked LONG before that. The minute men let the suffragette movement gain steam it was over. As an american man you must realize that everything happening now was put in motion long before you were born... and there is nothing you can do to stop it. Just be ready to rebuild something greater after things inevitably collapse. No point in worrying about it.

But back to what you said. No because It started with The amendment in 1913 to collect income tax but the most important thing in american history was giving women the right to vote in 1920. Why i say american men were cucked then. 1919 was when prohibition started. It was mostly pushed and influenced by women who COULDNT VOTE. So men let women who couldnt vote basically cuck them into giving up something that they loved. All this talk about the greatest generation is all bullshit.

I remember i saw some videos of women and they would joke about the love of their life going off to war.. but sprinkled in the woman would talk about the men she dated while he was away. So even in the 1940s Jodi was still fucking your chick while at the same time you were fighting Japs and Nazis. Then those same men would come back home and marry those women and shit out the boomer kids. Why do you think the Boomer generation is so pathetic?

To go back to a time when americans weren't cucked you have to go back to the 1800s.

The minute men let the suffragette movement gain steam it was over.

It was more complex than that, it was rich men let women. If you look at the first suffragettes, they were all the daughters of rich powerful men from the time, rich women that have been pampered their entire lives, the average women from the time did not care about the right to vote because she was too busy with one of her 8 kids that go polio while the rest work in factories.

Some thing happened 60s-70s, second waves was all college educated women from relatives well off families, even today you see that the more privileged a woman is the more hardcore feminists she becomes.

(02-25-2019 03:54 PM)SamuelBRoberts Wrote:  

(02-24-2019 04:21 PM)TravelerKai Wrote:  He is a racist piece of shit because he viewed black people and others as inferior to white men. Showed the film Birth of a Nation in the White House openly. He was also a Klansman. Like other pieces of shit white nationalists, he was a white knight for women on behalf of "keeping the black man down". Putting the white woman on a pedestal sure was smart now, wasn't it?

If that offends you, please let me know so that I can add you to my ignore list. I have absolutely zero time these days to debate with trash like that.

Can we just take a moment to admire the effort and dedication TravelerKai puts into his racial grievances? Other, lesser lights might be satisfied with saying "Whites are racist" or "Old politicians were racist", but he actually takes the time to go learn about which presidents did which specially awful things, right down to what movies they showed during their term, so that he knows exactly WHY he's angry at white people.

I mean, I don't like Angela Merkel, but if you asked me what movies Angela Merkel showed during her last term, I'd draw a total blank. And she didn't even die before I was born, she's alive right now!

It's this sort of obsessive dedication towards digging up ancient hatreds that makes multi-cultural America such a fun and healthy place to be.

100 years ago racism for whatever reason was the norm. Everyone was racist by today's standards. Blacks and whites and everyone else. Everyone.

Travelerkai's racialist screed is the same year-zero marxism as ANTIFA push, just coming from another angle. There is no figure in history that can't be selectively purged from the ranks of acceptability by the marxist cry of "racism!!!1!", and that's entirely the point.

(02-25-2019 08:43 AM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  

Graphic design fail. What are people going to see at first glance? Trump- Make America Great Again!

Well, some good news. I didn't see this posted earlier but may have missed it.