This article was funny here :

https://www.henrymakow.com/2019/02/is-ra...thing.html

Quote:Is "Racism" a Bad Thing?

Quote:"We will destroy every collective force but our own,"
say the Protocols of Zion. 16.4

"Collective force" = Nation, Religion (God), Family (gender) & Race
They deny other races altogether.
This is why only Jews are allowed to have a racist ethnostate.

Quote:Race and culture are inseparable. An attack on one is an attack on the other.

Quote:Racism Is Natural and Doesn't Need To Be Taught. Ethnicities That Aren't Racist Are Predictably Genocided By Ethnicities That Are. Racism Is A Good Thing.


Anyone trying to tell you that your ethnicity shouldn't protect its own interests is either an idiot or trying to sabotage your ethnic group.

NATURE DIDN'T MAKE A MISTAKE BY MAKING PEOPLE RACIST. If you're not racist, you let other groups of people take your land and resources. Without a means to exist, your ethnic group dies out.

In my experience most other ethnicities are far more ethnic-centered than Whites.

Either way - most White Western countries are going to have their nations taken away under their ass and that is one of the reasons why Trump won the way he did despite being attacked by all mainstream sides. And the worst part is that the ones replacing them will be lower in intelligence, more violent and far more dysfunctional than the tribe which created the US and European countries. Denial of basic facts and realities of life, denial of ethnic-specific crime stats and other behavioral patterns is firmly set in lala-land.

And I don't think that even disagreeing black guys here are really racist - it's just the viewpoints that are off in my opinion. But you have to differentiate between major stats and massive groups vs individual cases. I can be friends with a Muslim Afghani or a half-black Skandinavian - willing to die for him and their families, but I am not forgetting the Afghani crime stats in Europe over it. Ultimately all of those arguments are not personal - even the ones raised by Travelerkai.

And this is what people on the left don't get with Trump supporters - they prefer to keep it European-dominated and created vs becoming Brazil. Meanwhile the other side is firmly in lala-land thinking that the US with Brazilian demographics will be identical to the current state but only better. Of course that is utterly deluded.

(02-26-2019 05:42 AM)worldwidetraveler Wrote:  Well, some good news. I didn't see this posted earlier but may have missed it.

Next should be an EO or similar to implement the bill that just failed (the one to prevent post birth abortions).

(02-26-2019 06:37 AM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  This article was funny here :

https://www.henrymakow.com/2019/02/is-ra...thing.html

Quote:Is "Racism" a Bad Thing?

Quote:"We will destroy every collective force but our own,"
say the Protocols of Zion. 16.4

"Collective force" = Nation, Religion (God), Family (gender) & Race
They deny other races altogether.
This is why only Jews are allowed to have a racist ethnostate.

Quote:Race and culture are inseparable. An attack on one is an attack on the other.

Quote:[b]Racism Is Natural and Doesn't Need To Be Taught. Ethnicities That Aren't Racist Are Predictably Genocided By Ethnicities That Are. Racism Is A Good Thing.[b]

So genocide is . . good?

Looks like some kind of controlled opposition to make the right look bad. Let's see, a group of people doesnt want racists to be in charge because they dont want to be genocided. Then this fucking guy explains that racism is good because racist people have a higher propensity to genocide non racist people. Genius.

Why are people coming out of the woodwork to try to redefine racism to make it a good thing. I think this is a psy op to help Democrats and people are falling for it.

Too much in-fighting going on here and it looks pretty divided. Meanwhile the left lunatics move as one mass like the Blob from the movies.

Cant fight them toe to toe if your own side is fighting itself guys.

(02-26-2019 08:49 AM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  Too much in-fighting going on here and it looks pretty divided. Meanwhile the left lunatics move as one mass like the Blob from the movies.

Cant fight them toe to toe if your own side is fighting itself guys.

The forum is a place for discussion and arranging meetups.

We're not a political lobby or activist group. We have no relevant effect on the world outside of this digital space. We don't need to agree on anything except to abide by the forum rules.

Besides, "fighting" in the figurative sense is largely irrelevant, now. All our respective states in the West are uni-party controlled from the top down. The dialogue is meaningless. What we learn and debate here is for personal reference only.

The fighting might become less figurative in future but for now yakking about Republicans and Democrats is an exercise done for it's own sake. It has no effect on the outside world.

It's not fighting in my mind - you can take things out of context easily here.

The litmus test however is simple - when you can meet a highly different guy in real life and get along well despite having somewhat different opinions, when you can embrace that other guy as a solid bloke, then it's all good.

I sometimes talk with a neighbor of mine who is a normal Polish dude. He honestly claims that Merkel is a wonderful politician and that the EU is fantastic. He considers the few more firmly believing Catholics in Europe the far bigger threat to Europe's future. Of course we disagree on all of that, but then we talk about women and it's all good. He is a mainstream bloke who barely ventures beyond the mental plantation. Guys like Travelerkai are black thinkers who came to their own conclusions and I respect that.

Maybe some guys consider my viewpoints as racist despite them being shared by other black guys, but I don't care anymore. I still respect guys who met scores of other Red Pill men and helped them, so obviously they are fine upstanding men.

The problem sometimes start when you take those things too personal or believe that the other guy obviously must hate other tribes for having some of those views. No - I am personally interested just in truth and like the real diversity of cultures and ethnicities on Earth - not a globohomo New World Order of divided and conquered individuals.

Now back to The Donald Trump station - that's too far a deviation from the thread.

Back on track, will President Trump go scorched Earth when he wins again in 2020?

(02-26-2019 11:22 AM)Kid Twist Wrote:  Back on track, will President Trump go scorched Earth when he wins again in 2020?

Did he go scorched earth when he got in and had a republican congress? Nope.
Did he go scorched earth when it was clear that his time with a republican congress was running out? Nope.

So why would he suddenly start going scorched earth later?

(02-26-2019 01:29 PM)SamuelBRoberts Wrote:  

(02-26-2019 11:22 AM)Kid Twist Wrote:  Back on track, will President Trump go scorched Earth when he wins again in 2020?

Did he go scorched earth when he got in and had a republican congress? Nope.
Did he go scorched earth when it was clear that his time with a republican congress was running out? Nope.

So why would he suddenly start going scorched earth later?

Because traditionally that's a thing President's tend to do in their 2nd term, Go all out on their agenda with nothing else to lose.

(02-26-2019 01:34 PM)DamienCasanova Wrote:  

(02-26-2019 01:29 PM)SamuelBRoberts Wrote:  

(02-26-2019 11:22 AM)Kid Twist Wrote:  Back on track, will President Trump go scorched Earth when he wins again in 2020?

Did he go scorched earth when he got in and had a republican congress? Nope.
Did he go scorched earth when it was clear that his time with a republican congress was running out? Nope.

So why would he suddenly start going scorched earth later?

Because traditionally that's a thing President's tend to do in their 2nd term, Go all out on their agenda with nothing else to lose.

Agreed, Damien makes a great point here. I'm certainly no fan of Team Wait and See, but the shift from the center to the far, far left with the SJW lunacy was largely done in Obama's 2nd term. It's probably hard to forget now but Obama and society in general weren't that much over the top with this SJW shit during his 1st term, compared to his 2nd term. Obama was actually against gay marriage believe it or not, a fact that most people on the right and the left seem to overlook.

Obama turned out to be a snake in the grass. Time will tell what will happen with Trump.

(02-26-2019 02:05 PM)Uprising Wrote:  Agreed, Damien makes a great point here. I'm certainly no fan of Team Wait and See, but the shift from the center to the far, far left with the SJW lunacy was largely done in Obama's 2nd term. It's probably hard to forget now but Obama and society in general weren't that much over the top with this SJW shit during his 1st term, compared to his 2nd term. Obama was actually against gay marriage believe it or not, a fact that most people on the right and the left seem to overlook.

What Obama initiatives are you thinking of specifically here? There was a big cultural shift, but I don't really remember anything coming out of Obama in his second term.
His biggest leftwing initiative was Obamacare (2010), and his biggest SJW initiative was the Title IX guidance (2011) that empowered the campus rape tribunals, and both of those were first term.

Am I just forgetting something?

EDIT: I'm trying to think of major initiatives Bush or Clinton pushed in their last terms, too, and I'm coming up short. If anything I remember them as being somewhat exhausted and not interested in doing much.

Obama went full on pro Tranny, examples being ending the tranny ban in the armed forces, and directing the Dept of Ed to write a letter to all public schools, explaining the right way to handle trannies in the bathroom. That's 2 off the top of my head. The man loved trannies, I have no idea why

The title IX shit was probably the most important single thing in creating this climate of hysteria, but the kind of totalitarian insanity that we've been living with didn't start until 2013. That was the tipping point year.

(02-26-2019 03:07 PM)Libertas Wrote:  The title IX shit was probably the most important single thing in creating this climate of hysteria, but the kind of totalitarian insanity that we've been living with didn't start until 2013. That was the tipping point year.

That sounds about right, but it's questionable how much of that was due to Obama's influence.

(02-26-2019 02:41 PM)SamuelBRoberts Wrote:  

(02-26-2019 02:05 PM)Uprising Wrote:  Agreed, Damien makes a great point here. I'm certainly no fan of Team Wait and See, but the shift from the center to the far, far left with the SJW lunacy was largely done in Obama's 2nd term. It's probably hard to forget now but Obama and society in general weren't that much over the top with this SJW shit during his 1st term, compared to his 2nd term. Obama was actually against gay marriage believe it or not, a fact that most people on the right and the left seem to overlook.

What Obama initiatives are you thinking of specifically here? There was a big cultural shift, but I don't really remember anything coming out of Obama in his second term.
His biggest leftwing initiative was Obamacare (2010), and his biggest SJW initiative was the Title IX guidance (2011) that empowered the campus rape tribunals, and both of those were first term.

Am I just forgetting something?

Good points Sam. You're right in that Obama was initiating these SJW policies in both his first and his second term. And yeah, Title IX was a big one. Others have mentioned policies that Obama initiated in his 2nd term as well.

My memory is hazy, but from what I remember the cultural shift started happening towards Obama's second term rather than his first. The second term is when shit went into over drive and race relations became the worst that they've ever been in this country since the 1970's. The handling of Trayvon Martin (which was actually 2012, end of his 1st term), Michelle Obama's "White house built on the backs of slaves" speech, white privilege, the evil patriarchy, Black Lives Matter, hatred of cops, all of these things were things Obama (in my opinion) mishandled and/or advocated for.

Obama didn't necessarily enact specific policies for these things that I listed (although some he probably did for some and I just can't remember), but he definitely started to speak more openly about these things and to advocate for them, shifting away from the center to the far left.

The thing about Obama was that he was a cult of personality, so his advocation for the far left globalist policies extended well beyond the shores of America. Obama not only influenced a half a generation of Americans, but also a half a generation of people living around the world to grow up to the far left and firmly entrenched in globalism. I cannot speak on his influence in Asia as my experience there is limited, but his influence in Western Europe and The Anglosphere was huge and still is.

That's my view of it anyways.

Yeah, there's no denying there was a big cultural shift that took place in Obama's second term, and that to some degree, his handling, or mishandling, of things like Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown played a role. (Lots of blacks wouldn't have needlessly died from the Ferguson effect, for one thing.)

But I don't think you can infer from his behavior that presidents are more aggressive about pursuing their agendas in their second term.

(02-26-2019 02:51 PM)Gimlet Wrote:  Obama went full on pro Tranny, examples being ending the tranny ban in the armed forces, and directing the Dept of Ed to write a letter to all public schools, explaining the right way to handle trannies in the bathroom. That's 2 off the top of my head. The man loved trannies, I have no idea why

Because he married one.






Famous TV host Joan Rivers revealed the Obama's inverted sexual orientations a few weeks before dying in 2014.

John Derbyshire offers his thoughts regarding the whole Wall / Immigration discussion on a recent broadcast. I still depend on him for perspective on what's going on in the world. He's always been a fairly pragmatic, libertarian-type conservative since his days at National Review...

As with all of his stuff, you can find the audio and transcripts online.

Quote:02 — Lethargy in the Executive. That funding bill is worse than bad: it's a catastrophe.

It contains some meager funding for border fences in crucial places on our southern border; but the local authorities in those places are given a veto on the actual building of the fences! Since all the jurisdictions concerned are, at best, deep-blue Democrat, and at worst, bought-and-paid-for by the Mexican smuggling gangs, there will be no fences.

The more you look at the bill, the worse it gets. There is a flat-out amnesty provision in it for any illegal alien resident in the U.S.A. who says says they might sponsor a unaccompanied-minor border-jumper, or who lives in a household with one, or who lives in a household that includes a person who might sponsor one, or whose cousin has a dentist who plays golf with a guy whose wife thinks she might know one.

As Daniel Horowitz has tweeted:

Quote from Dan Stein at the Federation for American Immigration Reform, quote: "If this bill is enacted, expect the largest surge of unaccompanied minors this country has ever seen." End quote.

Enforcement is gutted by the bill, with a twenty percent reduction in detention beds and an expansion of catch-and-release.

It's not just illegal aliens who benefit. Legal immigration is stepped up, too. Numbers of H-2B visas — that's for non-agricultural, unskilled seasonal workers — are doubled. There's $3.4 billion for "refugee resettlement" so we can have more Somalis and Congolese to enrich us.

And so on. This bill is awful, unspeakably awful. It's an utter rebuff to everything Donald Trump campaigned on in 2016. Yet as we go to tape here at Radio Derb, we're getting confirmation that the President has signed the filthy thing.

Not to worry, says the President: I'll declare a national emergency and shuffle some funds over to pay for the fencing. He held a press conference Friday midday to tell us he was about to sign that declaration.

What's the point, Mr President? Friday midday you signed a declaration that will let you build a fence here and there. Friday afternoon you signed a bill that gives Sheriff Gonzalez in Wackapaloosa County a total veto on your using his land, while simultaneously ripping the guts out of immigration enforcement and showering the world with guest-worker visas.

Trump's national-emergency declaration will anyway be lawyered to death. Trump himself seems to foresee this, but he dismissed it breezily when announcing the national emergency declaration. Quote:

And we will have a national emergency, and then we will then be sued, and they will sue us in the Ninth Circuit, even though it shouldn't be there. And we will possibly get a bad ruling, and then we'll get another bad ruling. And then we'll end up in the Supreme Court, and hopefully we'll get a fair shake.
End quote. Uh-huh. How long will all that take, Mr President? What if the Supreme Court declines to take the case? What if they take it but rule against you? Have you noticed the Strange New Respect Chief Justice Roberts has been getting from our elites lately? And Justice Ginsburg's back on her exercise bike.

And what about the amnesties, and the increases in catch-and-release, and the H-2B visas? Will your national emergency take care of those?

To compound his offenses, Trump has thrown Ann Coulter off the sled, though in the nicest possible way. Quote: "I like her, but she's off the reservation … But I haven't spoken to her. I don't follow her. I don't talk to her." End quote.

The rule I heard was, you go home with the feller that brung you. Flipping the sexes round here, if there was one person more than any other than brung Donald Trump to the White House, it was Ann. Now she's "off the reservation," along with Steve Bannon and Jeff Sessions.

I'm reluctantly coming to the conclusion that the Z-man got it right: Trump's just a bag of wind, a bullshitter who got lucky. He has no political skills and no firm core of belief on political issues. By the latter I mean that if he says something today, six months on he may be saying the opposite thing, with just as much apparent conviction — as indeed he has done on legal immigration.

I'm also getting the impression of a guy who is lazy and timid. By lazy I mean he hasn't made much effort to improve his understanding of key issues, or to get properly to grips with staffing chores. By timid I mean reluctant to challenge, to throw down gauntlets — like an executive order ending birthright citizenship. Sure, it might fail at last, but at least battle would have been joined.

Trump doesn't want battle, he doesn't want challenge. He wants to tweet, watch TV, and make gassy speeches full of empty promises that he'll renege on after his next meeting with Jared.

Alexander Hamilton told us that, quote: "Energy in the Executive is a leading character in the definition of good government." End quote. What we have is lethargy in the executive. Congress, district court judges, and Deep State operators are calling the shots. Nero fiddled; Trump tweets.

Wait, though: There is hope! William Weld has announced he'll challenge Trump in the GOP primaries next year!

Yes, he is indeed talking about an open border between Israel and Palestine. The dude is consistent, if nothing else.

(02-23-2019 06:52 PM)Uprising Wrote:  Enrichment comes to otherwise peaceful Massachusetts.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/woman-assault...the-victim

Quote:A Massachusetts woman upset that a patron at a Mexican restaurant in Cape Cod was wearing a “Make America Great Again” hat was arrested for allegedly assaulting him.

Rosaine Santos, a 41-year-old immigrant, from Brazil living in Falmouth, was charged with disorderly conduct, assault and battery after a confrontation at Casa Vallarta” Mexican restaurant last Friday.

According to police, Santos was upset that a man – later identified as 23-year-old Bryton Turner of Mashpee – had the audacity to wear the iconic red hat at the Mexican eatery, Boston 25 reported.

Turner told police that he was minding his own business when Santos started yelling at him because of his hat. Annoyed by the woman’s antics, he pulled out his phone and started recording her.

In the video, Santos is seen walking behind him and hitting his hat off his head.

“That’s the problem – the problem with American these days, people are just ignorant,” Turner said in the video.

When police arrived at the restaurant, Santos reportedly told them that Turner should not be allowed to eat at a Mexican restaurant because of his support for President Donald Trump, who is pushing to building a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border.

As police escorted Santos out of the restaurant, she allegedly took another swipe at Turner.

Santos told Boston 25 that while she regrets her actions, she was the victim in the whole incident and that she was provoked.

“I had a little bit to drink maybe that’s the reason that I couldn’t walk away but being discriminated for so many times in my life, I just had to stand up for myself,” she said. “He’s not a victim. I am the victim. I have been bullied, OK?”

That's right, the immigrant is the victim. So much so that she decides to stay in the vile and evil country of the United States, yet refuses go back to the utopia that is Brazil.

Diversity Is Our Greatest Strength.

And now the exciting conclusion!

Quote:Woman Charged With Attacking Falmouth Man Wearing MAGA Hat Now In ICE Custody

https://boston.cbslocal.com/2019/02/26/p...antos-ice/

Quote:The woman who was charged with confronting a man wearing a “Make America Great Again” hat inside a Falmouth Mexican restaurant is now in ICE custody. The department said she was in the country illegally.

(02-26-2019 05:03 PM)JohnKreese Wrote:  

Quote:Woman Charged With Attacking Falmouth Man Wearing MAGA Hat Now In ICE Custody

These illegals are brazen as hell. They have a false sense of security these days. I guess that is one good outcome to the Dems supporting illegals. Maybe more will come out and attack our citizens so they can be deported.

The MAGA hat seems to work pretty nicely as bait.

(02-26-2019 05:03 PM)JohnKreese Wrote:  

Quote:Woman Charged With Attacking Falmouth Man Wearing MAGA Hat Now In ICE Custody

Sweet sweet just bitch.

Quote:Santos was later released from ICE custody. She has been ordered to appear before an immigration judge for removal proceedings.

Gotta read the fine print.



Over under she doesn't show up to the court again?

Bet she goes on the run.

Hey Guys! The Walls are closing in! For realz this time!

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-...ce-n976046

Quote:During his much-anticipated public testimony before Congress on Wednesday, President Donald Trump's former longtime attorney Michael Cohen will provide evidence of his old boss's alleged criminal conduct since becoming president, a knowledgeable source told NBC News.

Since this reporting depends entirely on the word of an anonymous, unnacountable, unknown, "source" we can be very confident that the report is accurate.

Trump saying Coulter is "off the reservation" is wonderfully accurate in ways he doesn't even comprehend.

Conservatives really have become the new American Indians, overwhelmed by outsiders and confined to their designated political reservations irrelevant to the broader national direction.

Indians going off the reservation were seen as a rogue element arising from a situation that was otherwise comfortable for the people containing them like cattle, so when Trump accuses Coulter of going off the reservation what can you say except...



...good. May she take many scalps before they finally bring her down.