That's right, kids. It's just a logical hop, skip and a jump... and a hop and a skip and another hop... and another skip and another jump, and voila! Checkmate bucko!

If you read my post history you'll see my stance is that trying to outbreed 80IQ Africans and 90IQ Mestizos when automation is already reducing the number of jobs required is flat out retarded.

"Derpa derp well if you want the white race to suvive you should be having 9 kids while paying enough taxes to support Laquisha's nine kids and Juanita's nine kids as well derpa derp! Then you'll only be 9 kids behind, derpa derp!"

It's time-worn strawman against race realists perpetuated by butthurt civnat morons, typically non-whites with inferiority complexes who have no evidence or sound points of debate to bring to the table but who make a hobby of lecturing the 10% of whites that dare wander off the civnat plantation rather than lecturing the 90% of their co-ethnics that can't sit, shit or spit without siring or birthing an illegitimate child.

I've got a better plan than breeding like savages.

Stop living with savages.

How's that for an answer Wu-Tang?

p.s. My racist latino wife agrees.

(01-22-2019 11:41 AM)TravelerKai Wrote:  Wrong. The party already knows the ladies are trashcan quality right now. Tulsi Gabbard might be decent (kind of too young), but they want to win. An American version of Justin Trudeau is more than enough to compensate. He has a figurative vagina and is a complete soyboy that is beholden to bullshit. That's what they need. All the women are openly sexist, one is openly racist, two have been caught in huge embarrassing lies, and all of them have very poor positions on policy.

Obama chose Beto to coach at his house. Not any of those hardheaded, knowitall women. A tall good looking cuck clown like Justin. He will be stumping on the road with him. Obama *might* do some travel if those women get the nod. Maybe Kamala, but his wife will likely travel 100% with her.

Remember they know how racist their own liberal white women are. Those women do not want Tulsi a Samoan mixed Hindu or Harris a black woman to beat them to the White House or the VP position first. They are going to go for a safe pick and get more liberal next time.

Yeah, I think you're right about that lol.

In reality I think a Justin Trudeau would be the absolute best option for the Dems, aka Beto, who would have crossover appeal to older white women.

(01-22-2019 07:15 AM)nomadbrah Wrote:  You got it all wrong, Beto will be VP of course. The white Chad at the groveling feet of the brown woman, it's like a dream come true for every frumpy brown girl.

No, they will pick someone from Virgina/NorthCarolina or midwest. Texas is too early to turn blue.

My guess is that Bloomberg will be the one leading the 2020 charge for the Democrats, if Conservative Treehouse is to be believed.

Anyway, someone in this thread asked for it, and here it is:

(01-22-2019 12:31 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  "Derpa derp well if you want the white race to suvive you should be having 9 kids while paying enough taxes to support Laquisha's nine kids and Juanita's nine kids as well derpa derp! Then you'll only be 9 kids behind, derpa derp!"

Not only are you "9 kids behind", you're actually actively pushing higher the number of non-white kids. It's one thing to simply not have kids since you don't feel the need to "outbreed" anyone, but going out of your way to have mixed children while going on about race realism and ethnic nationalism is whole other level. Seems pretty contradictory, especially for a guy that was constantly on the Peterson thread talking about he's not practicing what he preaches and constantly punching right. Having mixed children is the ultimate punching to the right under the ethnic nationalist ideology. You are increasing the number of non-white kids in your own society which presumably will be competing against white Australian kids for the jobs that will remain after automation, the ultimate self-cucking.

Also strange was you talking about "80 IQ" Mestizos when you literally have Mestizo kids. How is actively creating Mestizos in your nation any better than bringing them over via immigration? If genetics is a huge part of race racialism and if it sets hard limits on the potential of a person, then your wife no matter how much of a "racist Latina" she is and no matter how much of her positions are red-pilled, she'll always be limited. That is the whole debate about ethnic nationalism vs civic nationalism. Under your system, no matter how many of the right civic opinions she has and how much she attempts to Westernize, she'll never be the same as you, her DNA has placed immovable boundaries on her. Believing all of this about genetic destiny and still choosing to forever join your DNA with hers, that's is bewildering.

(01-21-2019 05:26 PM)TravelerKai Wrote:  Kamala Harris is a racist, openly sexist, and an idiotic god damned clown. She has zero chance of winning past the party nomination against Trump.

The left said the exact some thing about Trump before he won, that he was a racist, openly sexist, idiot clown and Hillary will win in a landslide. It would be a mistake to underestimate Kamala, especially if she gets backing from Goldman Sach's and the rest of the deep state and they send her 5 billion dollars to her campaign(Hillary got 1 billion and it wasn't enough)

I know it's wrong, but every time I hear "Kamala" I think of "Kimala the Ugandan Giant from 1980s wwf.



This has some serious meme potential therefore I hope Kamala Harris wins the nomination.

You guys do realize that there's white Latinos, right? I mean blond hair, blued eyed types, even the odd ginger. I've dated Colombian chicas who were as fair skinned or lighter than me and my Scottish blooded ass is pretty pale, when we go to the beach we rub each other down with SPF 50 and hide under parasols all day.

(01-22-2019 04:10 PM)scotian Wrote:  You guys do realize that there's white Latinos, right? I mean blond hair, blued eyed types, even the odd ginger. I've dated Colombian chicas who were as fair skinned or lighter than me and my Scottish blooded ass is pretty pale, when we go to the beach we rub each other down with SPF 50 and hide under parasols all day.

The last 2 posts here...

I'm crying. Haven't watched the MSM in years. This site is in the top 3 for right wing news in my book.


Edit:

WTFF?????!!!!!

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi Blocks President Trump Entry into Capitol Building – Confirms State of Union Speech Cancellation…

Quote:It looks like Speaker of The House Nancy Pelosi has no intention of allowing the House chamber to be used for a State of the Union address.

Speaker Pelosi has informed the House Sergeant at Arms that no executive branch official will be permitted entry into the Capitol building.

Earlier Fox News reported Pelosi cancelled a walkthrough last week, and a second request for reconsideration from the White House is expected to meet the same fate. The House Speaker controls who is, and who is not, permitted entry to the House floor. Until Speaker Pelosi calls for a vote to support a joint session of congress, the President cannot enter the chamber.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/201...cellation/

(01-22-2019 02:23 PM)Wutang Wrote:  

(01-22-2019 12:31 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  "Derpa derp well if you want the white race to suvive you should be having 9 kids while paying enough taxes to support Laquisha's nine kids and Juanita's nine kids as well derpa derp! Then you'll only be 9 kids behind, derpa derp!"

Not only are you "9 kids behind", you're actually actively pushing higher the number of non-white kids. It's one thing to simply not have kids since you don't feel the need to "outbreed" anyone, but going out of your way to have mixed children while going on about race realism and ethnic nationalism is whole other level. Seems pretty contradictory, especially for a guy that was constantly on the Peterson thread talking about he's not practicing what he preaches and constantly punching right. Having mixed children is the ultimate punching to the right under the ethnic nationalist ideology. You are increasing the number of non-white kids in your own society which presumably will be competing against white Australian kids for the jobs that will remain after automation, the ultimate self-cucking.

Also strange was you talking about "80 IQ" Mestizos when you literally have Mestizo kids. How is actively creating Mestizos in your nation any better than bringing them over via immigration? If genetics is a huge part of race racialism and if it sets hard limits on the potential of a person, then your wife no matter how much of a "racist Latina" she is and no matter how much of her positions are red-pilled, she'll always be limited. That is the whole debate about ethnic nationalism vs civic nationalism. Under your system, no matter how many of the right civic opinions she has and how much she attempts to Westernize, she'll never be the same as you, her DNA has placed immovable boundaries on her. Believing all of this about genetic destiny and still choosing to forever join your DNA with hers, that's is bewildering.

Just put LDN on ignore like any forum troll who hasn't yet been caught by the moderators. This is the same guy who claims he's a farmer in Australia with multiple kids a latina wife, and rants and raves all day long on the forum about the USA and has never to my knowledge addressed the issue that being a farmer does not jive in any way shape or form with the sheer quantity of posts he puts out day after day after day.

Then he goes on to make borderline personal attacks on membership by asking them about their kids in a passive aggressive way. The ignore feature is a wonderful thing.

Also completely on topic, Ben Garrison's take on the Covington Kids:

(01-22-2019 04:10 PM)scotian Wrote:  You guys do realize that there's white Latinos, right? I mean blond hair, blued eyed types, even the odd ginger. I've dated Colombian chicas who were as fair skinned or lighter than me and my Scottish blooded ass is pretty pale, when we go to the beach we rub each other down with SPF 50 and hide under parasols all day.

Nice example of the range of chicas in Brazil in this game show (skip to 7 minutes for oil-soccer-in-thongs).

I'm neither a civic nationalist nor a race realist, but throwing snarky comments at TLOZ is just wrong. He's not a childless cunt like Angela Merkel.

(01-22-2019 05:05 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

(01-22-2019 04:10 PM)scotian Wrote:  You guys do realize that there's white Latinos, right? I mean blond hair, blued eyed types, even the odd ginger. I've dated Colombian chicas who were as fair skinned or lighter than me and my Scottish blooded ass is pretty pale, when we go to the beach we rub each other down with SPF 50 and hide under parasols all day.

Nice example of the range of chicas in Brazil in this game show (skip to 7 minutes for oil-soccer-in-thongs).

Imagine the inferior, low IQ mutts us superior Anglo-Saxons and Celts would produce by breeding with those disgusting Latinas!

(01-22-2019 09:54 AM)ChicagoFire Wrote:  HAHA!

SCOTUS Upholds Trump's Transgender Military Ban

Quote:In a decision that is bound to 'trigger' millions across America (while the majority go about their days giving exactly zero f*cks), the U.S. Supreme Court cleared President Donald Trump’s administration to start barring most transgender people from serving in the armed forces.

As Bloomberg reports, transgender troops have been serving openly since June 2016, when President Barack Obama’s administration began lifting a longstanding prohibition. Opponents of the ban say reinstating it would violate the Constitution’s equal protection clause.

“This case is about whether men and women who want to serve in the United States Armed Forces to protect their country and who are able and otherwise qualified to do so should be barred from military service because they are transgender,” according to court filings on behalf of current and prospective military members.

The justices, voting 5-4, put on hold lower court decisions that had blocked the administration’s planned ban from taking effect. Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan dissented.

The administration’s policy is less absolute than Trump’s original tweet suggested. It lets people continue to serve if they began transitioning their gender in reliance on the Obama policy. But it would bar anyone from starting gender transition while in the armed forces. And the policy would block people from joining the military if they have already transitioned.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-01-2...litary-ban

What's that? A bit of sanity in these crazy times?

(01-22-2019 04:29 PM)ChicagoFire Wrote:  The last 2 posts here...

I'm crying. Haven't watched the MSM in years. This site is in the top 3 for right wing news in my book.


Edit:

WTFF?????!!!!!

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi Blocks President Trump Entry into Capitol Building – Confirms State of Union Speech Cancellation…

Quote:It looks like Speaker of The House Nancy Pelosi has no intention of allowing the House chamber to be used for a State of the Union address.

Speaker Pelosi has informed the House Sergeant at Arms that no executive branch official will be permitted entry into the Capitol building.

Earlier Fox News reported Pelosi cancelled a walkthrough last week, and a second request for reconsideration from the White House is expected to meet the same fate. The House Speaker controls who is, and who is not, permitted entry to the House floor. Until Speaker Pelosi calls for a vote to support a joint session of congress, the President cannot enter the chamber.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/201...cellation/

ROFL
The butthurt of that little marxist is a joy to behold.
She would revoke everyone's bathroom privileges too if it meant Trump couldn't take a piss. Keep your floor bitch, no one's coming to your party.

(01-22-2019 04:29 PM)ChicagoFire Wrote:  

Quote:It looks like Speaker of The House Nancy Pelosi has no intention of allowing the House chamber to be used for a State of the Union address.

Speaker Pelosi has informed the House Sergeant at Arms that no executive branch official will be permitted entry into the Capitol building.

Earlier Fox News reported Pelosi cancelled a walkthrough last week, and a second request for reconsideration from the White House is expected to meet the same fate. The House Speaker controls who is, and who is not, permitted entry to the House floor. Until Speaker Pelosi calls for a vote to support a joint session of congress, the President cannot enter the chamber.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/201...cellation/

The 2019 state of the union speech is supposed to be held on Tuesday, January 29, 2019 (a week from now).
There's a wikipedia page on it here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_State...on_Address

I may be wrong, but I don't think a sitting president has ever been blocked from giving this annual speech since the tradition was started.

Paul Joseph Watson states Trump will meet with the Covington kids.

Prepare for levels of reee-steria previously unheard of...

As per other parts of the internet, which shall not be named:

Kamala Harris has an indian mother, a black father, is married to a jew and is childless.

Perfect rootless cosmopolitan, yet another Barack Obama, with no allegiance, no roots and no future.

(01-22-2019 04:38 PM)AneroidOcean Wrote:  

(01-22-2019 02:23 PM)Wutang Wrote:  

(01-22-2019 12:31 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  "Derpa derp well if you want the white race to suvive you should be having 9 kids while paying enough taxes to support Laquisha's nine kids and Juanita's nine kids as well derpa derp! Then you'll only be 9 kids behind, derpa derp!"

Not only are you "9 kids behind", you're actually actively pushing higher the number of non-white kids. It's one thing to simply not have kids since you don't feel the need to "outbreed" anyone, but going out of your way to have mixed children while going on about race realism and ethnic nationalism is whole other level. Seems pretty contradictory, especially for a guy that was constantly on the Peterson thread talking about he's not practicing what he preaches and constantly punching right. Having mixed children is the ultimate punching to the right under the ethnic nationalist ideology. You are increasing the number of non-white kids in your own society which presumably will be competing against white Australian kids for the jobs that will remain after automation, the ultimate self-cucking.

Also strange was you talking about "80 IQ" Mestizos when you literally have Mestizo kids. How is actively creating Mestizos in your nation any better than bringing them over via immigration? If genetics is a huge part of race racialism and if it sets hard limits on the potential of a person, then your wife no matter how much of a "racist Latina" she is and no matter how much of her positions are red-pilled, she'll always be limited. That is the whole debate about ethnic nationalism vs civic nationalism. Under your system, no matter how many of the right civic opinions she has and how much she attempts to Westernize, she'll never be the same as you, her DNA has placed immovable boundaries on her. Believing all of this about genetic destiny and still choosing to forever join your DNA with hers, that's is bewildering.

Just put LDN on ignore like any forum troll who hasn't yet been caught by the moderators. This is the same guy who claims he's a farmer in Australia with multiple kids a latina wife, and rants and raves all day long on the forum about the USA and has never to my knowledge addressed the issue that being a farmer does not jive in any way shape or form with the sheer quantity of posts he puts out day after day after day.

Then he goes on to make borderline personal attacks on membership by asking them about their kids in a passive aggressive way. The ignore feature is a wonderful thing.

I don't see any rebuttal of the points - just ignore and attack on a personal level. Sure - it's a slightly off-topic, but the outbreeding argument is brought up again and again just as the "fatherless-households-are-to-be-blamed-for-everything" - oh and best are the accounts of anecdote-land that avoid speaking about actual FBI crime stats.





We're done apologizing. It's not only about MAGA. It's about everything that is thrown into the brown mud of cultural marxist dogma - dogmas that also blur the reality of simple evolutionary science. Jeez - the funny part is that those things will be laughed at in future generations as insane ramblings of Lysenkoist "2019-level-of-political-science". Following the anti-scientific social ideas of 1960s Jewish scientists like Boas who deliberately faked racial data for purely political and marxist ideas - that shit is not going to fly. Happily enough the Chinese, Korean and Japanese scientists are not encumbered by that same PC-crap.

(01-22-2019 04:38 PM)AneroidOcean Wrote:  

(01-22-2019 02:23 PM)Wutang Wrote:  

(01-22-2019 12:31 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  "Derpa derp well if you want the white race to suvive you should be having 9 kids while paying enough taxes to support Laquisha's nine kids and Juanita's nine kids as well derpa derp! Then you'll only be 9 kids behind, derpa derp!"

Not only are you "9 kids behind", you're actually actively pushing higher the number of non-white kids. It's one thing to simply not have kids since you don't feel the need to "outbreed" anyone, but going out of your way to have mixed children while going on about race realism and ethnic nationalism is whole other level. Seems pretty contradictory, especially for a guy that was constantly on the Peterson thread talking about he's not practicing what he preaches and constantly punching right. Having mixed children is the ultimate punching to the right under the ethnic nationalist ideology. You are increasing the number of non-white kids in your own society which presumably will be competing against white Australian kids for the jobs that will remain after automation, the ultimate self-cucking.

Also strange was you talking about "80 IQ" Mestizos when you literally have Mestizo kids. How is actively creating Mestizos in your nation any better than bringing them over via immigration? If genetics is a huge part of race racialism and if it sets hard limits on the potential of a person, then your wife no matter how much of a "racist Latina" she is and no matter how much of her positions are red-pilled, she'll always be limited. That is the whole debate about ethnic nationalism vs civic nationalism. Under your system, no matter how many of the right civic opinions she has and how much she attempts to Westernize, she'll never be the same as you, her DNA has placed immovable boundaries on her. Believing all of this about genetic destiny and still choosing to forever join your DNA with hers, that's is bewildering.

Just put LDN on ignore like any forum troll who hasn't yet been caught by the moderators. This is the same guy who claims he's a farmer in Australia with multiple kids a latina wife, and rants and raves all day long on the forum about the USA and has never to my knowledge addressed the issue that being a farmer does not jive in any way shape or form with the sheer quantity of posts he puts out day after day after day.

Then he goes on to make borderline personal attacks on membership by asking them about their kids in a passive aggressive way. The ignore feature is a wonderful thing.

Also completely on topic, Ben Garrison's take on the Covington Kids:

TFW You have your first healthy boy who is mestizo (Spaniard/Apache Native) and come on here to read politics and see this shit.
I'm a die hard fucking american who represents no other flag or country and my skin happens to be brown, my woman looks like fucking pocahontas, my son is a big chubby papoose moccasin-wearing badass and could care less about anybody who does not have America and her interest square in their sights every fucking morning they wake up. We are out there, we're not low-IQ morons, we bleed red,white & motherfucking blue, we have our preparation kits, our guns and I will strategize like a man when and if this civilization falls, so don't think we're all jackasses that lurk here.

Let's get back to politics and take race to the demographics threads.

So with Beto, what I see happening with him if he is the nominee is that Trump will define and ultimately destroy him with the fake Hispanic persona that he goes around with. Just like Trump absolutely got deep into Elizabeth Warren's head with the Pocahontas taunts and got her to fuck herself in the ass by taking that ill-advised DNA test. The 1/1024 fraction is now so deeply embedded that Warren is toast, she won't ever be the nominee. Trump won because he devastatingly defined his opponents, found their weak spots and mercilessly attacked it until they all cried uncle.

Remember most politicians are very self-conscious and take themselves very seriously so any ridicule they encounter that hits hard at their weaknesses and insecurities usually ends up ruining them. Trump isn't a politician and has a thick skin which results in stuff just rolling off of his back. I'm guessing Trump would exploit the fake Hispanic persona along with his elitist background, O'Rouke using his elitism to skate from a DUI when he was young and other things that will surely come out as time goes on. Cruz isn't remotely as good as Trump at this and has an ass of a personality but still managed to beat Beto, albeit by a small margin. Honestly what scares me the most isn't who the Dems put up but the massive amount of voter fraud that they will try and perpetrate, as they did in the mid-terms. Trump has to get a handle on this, it will be his biggest challenge in winning reelection. Beto will get defined as a soft metrosexual white liberal who does what white liberals do which is to culturally appropriate from minorities for their own personal benefit.

I got a look at the Covington kids video and I gotta say it was pretty funny and awesome what they did. The Black Israelites used to sit at 16th and Chestnut in Philadelphia every Friday and basically just yell racist, absurd shit at everyone. Since everyone is just on their way home from work, they're pretty much just ignored. It was about time someone mocked them a bit.

(01-22-2019 04:10 PM)scotian Wrote:  You guys do realize that there's white Latinos, right? I mean blond hair, blued eyed types, even the odd ginger. I've dated Colombian chicas who were as fair skinned or lighter than me and my Scottish blooded ass is pretty pale, when we go to the beach we rub each other down with SPF 50 and hide under parasols all day.

What?!

I went into the deepest jungles of South America to find mine. Pure uncut Colombian, not that she'd ever seen a flag before.

You'd think teaching her english was the hardest part, but no, actually it was convincing her not to kill and eat the neighbors.

Anyway, fuck all the haters and their typical social justice warrior slander. Like Simeons says. They got no facts. They got no debate. They talk a big game about fighting the globohomo regime but at the end of the day they still want their special globohomo protections against free speech for no other reason than it hurts their feelings from time to time.

Toughen up, snowflakes. Nobody wants to put you back on a plantation, but we're not going back to deliberately not noticing a heap of shit either. If you find yourself outside the circle then that's all on you.

Guys wanna slander me and misrepresent my views. Fine. Go ahead. You're losing anyway.