(01-21-2019 10:31 PM)TheBMan Wrote:  Biden/Beto could be a threat. I dont think highly of Biden but he's well liked and could play well in middle (white) America.

I don't think Biden stands a chance. I am not saying he's a pedo but those videos make it look like there's a high probability. I don't think he would want this exposed to the masses.
Biden is also quite old.

I think Beto has a much better shot than Biden.

Just heard Kamala's response about how she would "strive to consult all of our military experts in conjunction with our allies in making military decisions".

It was functionally an open air pledge of allegiance to the deep state and the alien lobby.

(01-21-2019 12:23 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

(01-20-2019 10:43 PM)The Lizard of Oz Wrote:  ...
It is better to shrug one's shoulders and say, I know a few things about the world but I don't know the future; let me delight in what there is and enjoy the spectacle for all it's worth and for as long as I'm privileged to see it. There has never been a better or more interesting time to be alive -- and for as long as one Donald J. Trump is on the scene, there has certainly never been a more entertaining time. Take it all in and, as the man himself likes to say, we'll see what happens.

How are your kids, LOZ?

Aren't you the guy with the Hispanic kids?

(01-20-2019 12:18 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  Clap like trained seals when this turd is dumped on the table:

Anyone still applauding at this point is the butt of a dark joke.

p.s. I could breach that shitty fence with a pocketful of home made thermite and a box of matches. With a smalll backpack full I could cut a section large enough to drive a cartel F150 through. Pathetic.

It doesn't need to be inpregnable, just more trouble than it is worth getting through before being apprehended by border security.

This is the Hungarian barrier that stopped almost all invaders.


You've shown the strongest part of the Israeli wall, but neglect to show that much of it is like this


You raised a brilliant point about border guards not wanting any wall that'd leave their jobs obscelete. But that still doesn't change that any wall is gamechangingly more effective than no wall.

(01-22-2019 01:45 AM)Wutang Wrote:  

(01-21-2019 12:23 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  How are your kids, LOZ?

Aren't you the guy with the Hispanic kids?

Australia doesn't have any wall to keep the Mexicans away. WA has a fence, but that only works for emus.

(01-22-2019 02:18 AM)Transsimian Wrote:  It doesn't need to be impregnable, just more trouble than it is worth getting through before being apprehended by border security.

I beg to differ. Both Hungary and Israel have the strong will to keep people out. I suppose that if you had that and could rely on it, then you probably don't even need a wall but sensors and a border patrol. That was essentially the modus operandi of the United States vis-a-vis Mexico since the inception. Presently, on the other hand, we have an anti-white party that is using population replacement to import a foreign electorate and become a one party state - and a traitorous Republican party controlled by the very same elites who are anti-white and want cheap labor. We have a ridiculous legal structure where we have to release anyone and ask them to return to appear in court for a hearing if they set foot on US soil - and that is to say nothing of asylum requests or the ludicrous interpretation of the 14th amendment granting birthright citizenship to anyone who stumbles across the border and gives birth. If anything, we need an impenetrable structure more than anyone else. Not that it matters much anyway if we are unwilling to deport the tens of millions of people who are residing here illegally and out reproducing us.

Australia has a wall to stop. . .rabbits!

In terms of stopping humans, you just have to delay them long enough for a response team to arrive. I'm ex-military, combat engineer in fact. Basic doctrine is that all obstructions must be observed and covered by fire. The only exception is booby traps which use a different philosophy. Otherwise, you need eyes, ears and rifles on the ground to make barriers effective.

Of course, this is not wartime and so what works is probably a little different. You don't want to kill the f***ers dead, you ultimately want to dissuade them from crossing the border at some point other than a legal crossing. A/n FAV (fast attack vehicle - think "dune buggy with machine guns") with two personnel can cover 20 kilometres in 15 minutes. A Huey takes about 5 minutes to warm up but cruises at 200 KMH: that is a 12-man team in a 100 km radius in under 40 minutes. The border is 3145 km long. Roughly 150 two-man teams and 30 12-man teams could cover it. That's 660 active people; quadruple that to 2640 for 24/7 coverage and add another few hundred to handle electronic monitoring and you are up to maybe 4000 people.

But guess what, the Border Patrol employs over 21,000 people.

Our wall is an ocean and our border patrol is the Australian navy with backup from our beloved great white sharks. We don't do catch and release, at least not while the globalist lackeys in parliament at the time are the law&order types.

The pittance of people attempting to boat their way into Australian territory get shipped back to a camp on some shithole island. If it weren't for our retardedly high levels of legal immigration then we'd be in pretty good shape.

There you go. Faggot progressives don't want a wall? Build a canal a mile wide and fill it with great white sharks or whatever shrimpy American brand shark you'd prefer.

Although I’d love to have a big beautiful Wall, I will accept a moat under one condition: it’s filled with sharks with lasers on their heads.

(01-22-2019 01:45 AM)Wutang Wrote:  Aren't you the guy with the Hispanic kids?

Why would it matter if his kids are Hispanic or not? He still wants the best life for them. We don't need to agree on what way is best way to understand why a man would want the best for his kids, right?

(01-22-2019 02:18 AM)Transsimian Wrote:  It doesn't need to be inpregnable, just more trouble than it is worth getting through before being apprehended by border security.

Is any wall really impregnable if given enough time? That is why Border Control will never be made redundant.

A concrete wall can be climbed.

(01-22-2019 06:54 AM)worldwidetraveler Wrote:  

(01-22-2019 01:45 AM)Wutang Wrote:  Aren't you the guy with the Hispanic kids?

Why would it matter if his kids are Hispanic or not? He still wants the best life for them. We don't need to agree on what way is best way to understand why a man would want the best for his kids, right?

And keep in mind that Hispanic is a cultural, not a racial, label. There are white, black, Asian, and mestizo Hispanics.

IIRC he mentioned that she doesn't think very highly of most of her countrymen. She doesn't sound like the average Latin American. She be genetically 100% European for all we know.

(01-21-2019 08:31 PM)doc holliday Wrote:  I have a hard time believing that any white guy is going to be the nominee for the democrats. Maybe it's me but I don't get the hype over Beto. He lost his senate race and was only close because he was running against Ted Cruz who people still haven't forgiven for his stupidity during the GOP convention and generally don't like. He's like the white maie Ocasio-Cortez who, by the way, ain't gonna sit by and be quiet while the Dems nominate another white dude. Kamala being a half black women would be more formidable but her personality will sink her just like it did for Hillary. Really not seeing some multi term back bencher congressman who lost a senate race becoming president (even Obama won his senate seat before running and was a novelty as the first black president).

The Dems seem all over the place.

The hate for heterosexual males is YUGE. I also think this is going beyond whites and starting to include black males. Dems may not have said they are against black males out loud, but they are definitely concentrating on everyone but black males.

Then you have Beto who they tried to make the next Rockstar, aka Obama. They were somewhat successful and it wouldn't surprise me if they continued that push as TK talked about. I do think it is plausible even though they sort of painted themselves into a corner as the party of women.

It sounds like Kamala has a history of putting people in jail in order to advance her career. I can't see that sitting well with the main black demographics the dems need to turnout.

Beto, on the other hand, wouldn't have any issues.

(01-22-2019 06:58 AM)worldwidetraveler Wrote:  Is any wall really impregnable if given enough time? That is why Border Control will never be made redundant.

A concrete wall can be climbed.

No worries.
To remove the climbing risk, just build some windows, and inprison some lousy celebrities inside in the wall.
Batman shows the way:

You got it all wrong, Beto will be VP of course. The white Chad at the groveling feet of the brown woman, it's like a dream come true for every frumpy brown girl.

(01-22-2019 06:58 AM)worldwidetraveler Wrote:  

(01-22-2019 02:18 AM)Transsimian Wrote:  It doesn't need to be inpregnable, just more trouble than it is worth getting through before being apprehended by border security.

Is any wall really impregnable if given enough time? That is why Border Control will never be made redundant.

A concrete wall can be climbed.

A metal buffer at the top makes scaling a proper wall dicey at best. Look at the wall prototypes. That big tube at the top is designed to stop grappling hooks as well as to make getting over the "hump" at the top really difficult. That's a long way to fall and most people can't climb ten feet vertically, much less 30 up and 30 down.

Anyway, the very idea of Border Control is absurd. It's become normalized under globalist orthodoxy that borders are a police(ish) issue but since when specifically did the job of defending a nation's borders from illegal intruders cease to be a military concern? That's supposed to be the first job on the military's list of "stuff we're supposed to be doing".

Pension off Border Control or fold them into a special branch of the military and tell them to sit in a big, beautiful air-conditioned watchtower atop a 30ft big beautiful rebar reinforced concrete wall rather than trucking around waiting to be shot by a cartel through their shitty see-through-shoot-through fence.

One useless F35 costs a mile of proper wall and the people required to man it for a lifetime.

But the guys selling the F35s run the US government, so good luck with that.

(01-22-2019 07:38 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

(01-22-2019 06:58 AM)worldwidetraveler Wrote:  

(01-22-2019 02:18 AM)Transsimian Wrote:  It doesn't need to be inpregnable, just more trouble than it is worth getting through before being apprehended by border security.

Is any wall really impregnable if given enough time? That is why Border Control will never be made redundant.

A concrete wall can be climbed.

A metal buffer at the top makes scaling a proper wall dicey at best. Look at the wall prototypes. That big tube at the top is designed to stop grappling hooks as well as to make getting over the "hump" at the top really difficult. That's a long way to fall and most people can't climb ten feet vertically, much less 30 up and 30 down.

Anyway, the very idea of Border Control is absurd. It's become normalized under globalist orthodoxy that borders are a police(ish) issue but since when specifically did the job of defending a nation's borders from illegal intruders cease to be a military concern? That's supposed to be the first job on the military's list of "stuff we're supposed to be doing".

Pension off Border Control or fold them into a special branch of the military and tell them to sit in a big, beautiful air-conditioned watchtower atop a 30ft big beautiful rebar reinforced concrete wall rather than trucking around waiting to be shot by a cartel through their shitty see-through-shoot-through fence.

One useless F35 costs a mile of proper wall and the people required to man it for a lifetime.

But the guys selling the F35s run the US government, so good luck with that.

Still better than your wimpy shark idea!!!

-

You're right. Soros would inevitably just arm the wetbacks with shark repellent bat spray.

p.s. Caduceus is just too damn quick.

What the fuck are these retard-Batman gifs that don't seem either animated or live?

(01-22-2019 07:07 AM)worldwidetraveler Wrote:  

(01-21-2019 08:31 PM)doc holliday Wrote:  I have a hard time believing that any white guy is going to be the nominee for the democrats. Maybe it's me but I don't get the hype over Beto. He lost his senate race and was only close because he was running against Ted Cruz who people still haven't forgiven for his stupidity during the GOP convention and generally don't like. He's like the white maie Ocasio-Cortez who, by the way, ain't gonna sit by and be quiet while the Dems nominate another white dude. Kamala being a half black women would be more formidable but her personality will sink her just like it did for Hillary. Really not seeing some multi term back bencher congressman who lost a senate race becoming president (even Obama won his senate seat before running and was a novelty as the first black president).

The Dems seem all over the place.

The hate for heterosexual males is YUGE. I also think this is going beyond whites and starting to include black males. Dems may not have said they are against black males out loud, but they are definitely concentrating on everyone but black males.

Then you have Beto who they tried to make the next Rockstar, aka Obama. They were somewhat successful and it wouldn't surprise me if they continued that push as TK talked about. I do think it is plausible even though they sort of painted themselves into a corner as the party of women.

It sounds like Kamala has a history of putting people in jail in order to advance her career. I can't see that sitting well with the main black demographics the dems need to turnout.

Beto, on the other hand, wouldn't have any issues.

You do realize that Robert Francis O'Rourke is a straight, Irish man, don't you? His nickname Beto doesn't change that. I don't think he is the kind of alternate demographic the Dems would prefer.

HAHA!

SCOTUS Upholds Trump's Transgender Military Ban

Quote:In a decision that is bound to 'trigger' millions across America (while the majority go about their days giving exactly zero f*cks), the U.S. Supreme Court cleared President Donald Trump’s administration to start barring most transgender people from serving in the armed forces.

As Bloomberg reports, transgender troops have been serving openly since June 2016, when President Barack Obama’s administration began lifting a longstanding prohibition. Opponents of the ban say reinstating it would violate the Constitution’s equal protection clause.

“This case is about whether men and women who want to serve in the United States Armed Forces to protect their country and who are able and otherwise qualified to do so should be barred from military service because they are transgender,” according to court filings on behalf of current and prospective military members.

The justices, voting 5-4, put on hold lower court decisions that had blocked the administration’s planned ban from taking effect. Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan dissented.

The administration’s policy is less absolute than Trump’s original tweet suggested. It lets people continue to serve if they began transitioning their gender in reliance on the Obama policy. But it would bar anyone from starting gender transition while in the armed forces. And the policy would block people from joining the military if they have already transitioned.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-01-2...litary-ban

(01-22-2019 09:36 AM)RoastBeefCurtains4Me Wrote:  You do realize that Robert Francis O'Rourke is a straight, Irish man, don't you? His nickname Beto doesn't change that. I don't think he is the kind of alternate demographic the Dems would prefer.

I dunno, the last Irishman they put in the White House opened America's arse wide to immigration from Latin America:

Can you guess the book ?

   

(01-21-2019 06:13 PM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  @ Travelerkai

They are aiming for children because they are 1: white 2: male 3: Catholic 4: aren't demented pedophile food that parade in front of adult men.

If they can get a free pass from facebook, twatter, the MSM and the majority of good honest folk then they can keep pushing. They need to be stomped on like a cockroach.

I agree they need to get stomped on and Trump went ahead and did the deed this morning. The way I see it, I kind of like seeing the left openly hating white males like this. Those high schoolers are almost or just about 18 years old now. They will be shaving soon if not already. They will be voting for Trump in 2 years. I said this probably almost a year ago in this thread before, that if the Republican party could find a way to get younger, that would hurt the Democrats for a very very long time. Usually in America kids are liberal until 30 or so, like old Winston Churchill spoke about. Unfortunately an open border and illegals voting will nullify these gains, so the fight will remain tight.

(01-21-2019 08:31 PM)doc holliday Wrote:  

(01-21-2019 06:06 PM)Gmac Wrote:  

(01-21-2019 05:26 PM)TravelerKai Wrote:  Trump does not need to comment on every little dust up or fake news piece out there. Carson Wentz got fake news'd today. Trump isn't a parrot. In fact I wish he would comment less sometimes. Sometimes people need to see the dysfunctional shit for themselves without all the hand holding. If a white kid with a Jewish sounding last name that goes to a Catholic school gets attacked for wearing a MAGA hat, what else needs to be said that has not already been said? Mueller BTFO that trash rag Buzzfeed that nobody under 28 that is not mentally retarded, knew that they get fooled into newstories from places like 4 Chan all the time.

Let the shit marinade fellas.

Kamala Harris is a racist, openly sexist, and an idiotic god damned clown. She has zero chance of winning past the party nomination against Trump. White moderate female voters are too jealous to let even a litebright shine like Harris win before another white woman. Only way she wins is if Hispanics are somewhere around 25% of the population in two years. I do not think she can even get 90% of black male vote. She is the black Hillary Clinton. Very polarizing.

The real threat is Beto O Rourke. When that Abraham Lincoln looking wanna be, dipshit throws his hat into the ring, we are in for a serious fucking war. Obama is already working with him in private.

He likely will announce in a year or so. Probably Summer at the earliest, but I could be wrong. They likely do not want to announce too soon, but waiting too late has risks too. They know Dems and liberals, along with a sizable majority of moderates are slow as fuck to catch on to bad or negative coverage on a candidate. Low information and susceptible to fake news.

Beto has zero experience in anything and is merely a bleeding heart with no solutions for the economy, and liberals still do not care about that. He wants Canada's healthcare and that is what his base wants. We need to make him the next John Kerry, but be forewarned, Kerry actually had a very good chance of winning so it will probably look close in many polls the entire time. Get used to this now and set your expectations accordingly (ie do not freak the fuck out)

Well I disagree on a few points. The Covington story isn't going away (due to some very prominent people in media not allowing it to), and I think it's far from a minor story.

Beto on the other hand, seems like a very weak candidate to me, despite his popularity in Texas. There's no way a white man will be the Dem's candidate. Not in this political climate. They're the party of women (and hate) now. Kamala may be all of those things but she is getting all the attention on CNN, twitter, elsewhere. Once I learned how the media works I had a much greater understanding of the timing, coordination, and reasons for what they do.

Highly recommend the book "Amusing Ourselves to Death" by Neil Postman, timeless.

I have a hard time believing that any white guy is going to be the nominee for the democrats. Maybe it's me but I don't get the hype over Beto. He lost his senate race and was only close because he was running against Ted Cruz who people still haven't forgiven for his stupidity during the GOP convention and generally don't like. He's like the white maie Ocasio-Cortez who, by the way, ain't gonna sit by and be quiet while the Dems nominate another white dude. Kamala being a half black women would be more formidable but her personality will sink her just like it did for Hillary. Really not seeing some multi term back bencher congressman who lost a senate race becoming president (even Obama won his senate seat before running and was a novelty as the first black president).

I do not think Covington is a minor story at all. It's just an everyday story in our new reality. They more they push this agenda, the more redpills get handed out. My point is that Trump does not have to say anything about most of these kinds of stories. Alot of it is doing it's own work, like that Gilette story. I am seeing nerdy liberals even breaking their mold and getting upset on Youtube. I talking about dudes that run channels dedicated to video games or other nerd shit that never ever made a single political video making a reaction video about Gilette. That's really something.

Beto is actually in a prime position to be the nominee. He is running against Trump a man that never held a public office before. Beto has held a small state office but the issue is that he isn't running against someone that has decades of office experience. That cancels out.

Beto has good looking hair and a mug (no homo). He is also tall. 90 something percent of presidents in the television era have all had those traits. America has never had a bald president since TV was invented.

Beto has a alot of charisma with liberal women and minorities. He speaks very well. He has goofy ideas and sometimes sounds like Ocasio with amateurish soundbytes, but he does not sound like her all the time, just sometimes.

The most important feature of Beto is that he has Soros backing him. He raised ridiculous amounts of money in the Texas election. That race was much closer than it should have been. It was a bit unnerving for your average Republican pollster. Even Karl Rove marveled at how well he did despite being so far leftist on positions.

Here is the issue to sum it all up. It's not about the issues. It's about Trump. They want him out. Any way possible. Liberal blacks and whites hate Trump so much that they are even willing to lose their own jobs and economy for it. As soon as Trump leaves office, General Motors will not be the only company that will immediately head to China or Vietnam permanently. All the H1Bs will come back and Beto would order the wall torn down like some sick Ronald Reagan parody. That's what these people want. The war is over the moderate voter and whether or not Trump can maintain his cool and present the case to the moderates or undecided because the Republican base is too small and the liberals outnumber us in raw numbers.

Beto is the only competitive guy they have. They will field him and he will beat those others. He might end up VP to a woman, but I doubt it. I see it the other way around. They want to run him now, because they can run him again in 4 years if he loses, perhaps in a combination with another man or lady that rises up the ranks.

Obama and Beto have the most in common. He is training him because they know that Soros money + Beto is the best chance to win. Moderate white voters, moderate Latinos, and blacks don't know shit about Soros nor do they give a fuck. That is why this is a massive threat. If Beto sounds sweet enough to them and they feel tired of Trump's antics they will vote Beto.

(01-22-2019 07:15 AM)nomadbrah Wrote:  You got it all wrong, Beto will be VP of course. The white Chad at the groveling feet of the brown woman, it's like a dream come true for every frumpy brown girl.

Wrong. The party already knows the ladies are trashcan quality right now. Tulsi Gabbard might be decent (kind of too young), but they want to win. An American version of Justin Trudeau is more than enough to compensate. He has a figurative vagina and is a complete soyboy that is beholden to bullshit. That's what they need. All the women are openly sexist, one is openly racist, two have been caught in huge embarrassing lies, and all of them have very poor positions on policy.

Obama chose Beto to coach at his house. Not any of those hardheaded, knowitall women. A tall good looking cuck clown like Justin. He will be stumping on the road with him. Obama *might* do some travel if those women get the nod. Maybe Kamala, but his wife will likely travel 100% with her.

Remember they know how racist their own liberal white women are. Those women do not want Tulsi a Samoan mixed Hindu or Harris a black woman to beat them to the White House or the VP position first. They are going to go for a safe pick and get more liberal next time.

(01-22-2019 09:36 AM)RoastBeefCurtains4Me Wrote:  

(01-22-2019 07:07 AM)worldwidetraveler Wrote:  

(01-21-2019 08:31 PM)doc holliday Wrote:  I have a hard time believing that any white guy is going to be the nominee for the democrats. Maybe it's me but I don't get the hype over Beto. He lost his senate race and was only close because he was running against Ted Cruz who people still haven't forgiven for his stupidity during the GOP convention and generally don't like. He's like the white maie Ocasio-Cortez who, by the way, ain't gonna sit by and be quiet while the Dems nominate another white dude. Kamala being a half black women would be more formidable but her personality will sink her just like it did for Hillary. Really not seeing some multi term back bencher congressman who lost a senate race becoming president (even Obama won his senate seat before running and was a novelty as the first black president).

The Dems seem all over the place.

The hate for heterosexual males is YUGE. I also think this is going beyond whites and starting to include black males. Dems may not have said they are against black males out loud, but they are definitely concentrating on everyone but black males.

Then you have Beto who they tried to make the next Rockstar, aka Obama. They were somewhat successful and it wouldn't surprise me if they continued that push as TK talked about. I do think it is plausible even though they sort of painted themselves into a corner as the party of women.

It sounds like Kamala has a history of putting people in jail in order to advance her career. I can't see that sitting well with the main black demographics the dems need to turnout.

Beto, on the other hand, wouldn't have any issues.

You do realize that Robert Francis O'Rourke is a straight, Irish man, don't you? His nickname Beto doesn't change that. I don't think he is the kind of alternate demographic the Dems would prefer.

They certainly have created a party of mostly women and minorities now. The open season bullhorn on straight men is great. I hope more Gilette situations occur. The more the better. Only thing that could take air out of those sails would be another Elliot Rodgers event. If someone goes to the next Women's March or Pussyhat meet up and lays out 20+ feminists we are going to have major image issues....aside from the gun issues. The reason why I say this, is because we are way past overdue for another rage out from some MGTOW omega reject. It's been too quiet, but I know better. Women are pushing men too hard and too far. Some kid out there is not going to take perceived slights on the chin and do nothing about it aside from voting.

Harris work as a prosecutor putting black men in jail will have zero effect on black vote. Her far left feminism and black male shaming might shave off some votes from black men. Any black man that voted for Trump hates her and would not vote for her. She being even more white mixed than Obama may give skepticism, but not enough to probably notice on poll data. She would have more problems with white women for the plethora of reverse racism gaffs and statements she has made over the years. I don't see her getting even 40% of white male vote in a general spread. She is a fucking bigot. The feminism is something moderates overlook alot. The obvious racism and racebaiting? No way. She only gets away with it because of her homestate, like Cory Booker does. Trump could debate her and Booker call either of them a racist, with proof, and get away with it pretty easily.

Beto is Irish yes. Some Democrat voters in Texas come to find out did not know that Beto was a fake Mexican nickname because they were low information voters and believed MSNBC, local, and CNN news reports that were stating that Republicans were attacking Beto's heritage and name in low ball attacks. The Republicans attack got turned back on them to an extent and it was not as helpful as it seemed, although we do not know how many changed their votes once figuring that out. If that had a low to nothing effect in Texas, Nationwide, I am not sure if it is worth harping on. I'm sure Trump would bring it up though at a rally.

(01-22-2019 07:06 AM)BlueMark Wrote:  

(01-22-2019 06:54 AM)worldwidetraveler Wrote:  

(01-22-2019 01:45 AM)Wutang Wrote:  Aren't you the guy with the Hispanic kids?

Why would it matter if his kids are Hispanic or not? He still wants the best life for them. We don't need to agree on what way is best way to understand why a man would want the best for his kids, right?

And keep in mind that Hispanic is a cultural, not a racial, label. There are white, black, Asian, and mestizo Hispanics.

IIRC he mentioned that she doesn't think very highly of most of her countrymen. She doesn't sound like the average Latin American. She be genetically 100% European for all we know.

I was responding to his "How are your kids" comment to TLOZ where he seems to be implying that because TLOZ most likely has no offspring, he doesn't have a stake in the continued survival and thriving of western civilization and can therefore maintain his ever cheery and optimistic outlook on the future of the west - as opposed to ingesting the black pill. A huge part of the survival of western civilization entails white people continuing to have more children to keep up with the pace that non-whites are reproducing as I'm sure LDN and the other forum posters on the ethnic nationalism end of the spectrum would agree with. I've seen these sort of sentiments get expressed here a lot along with laments that a lot of the dissident right talk a good game but aren't doing what really matters - having more white children. Not only has LDN not have had white children, which is already seen as a negative within those circles, he has non-white children. According to the ethnic nationalism view, the former is already bad enough since it's doing nothing while western civilization is declining but the latter is worse since it's actually actively contributing to that decline. So I just find it curious that he felt like he could make that comment to TLOZ on the basis of TLOZ not having kids while he himself has done more harm according to the ethnic nationalist view by having mixed non-white children. And as for him wanting the best for his kids, I'm guessing him and his family wouldn't be faring well in the sort of ethnic state that he wants. Miscegnation isn't looked upon too highly in those societies.

And as for his wife not being the average Latina, if you buy into the ethnic nationalist view then there's also the idea of the "regression to the mean". There's also the idea that civics nationalism is a dead-end because racial genetic makeup determines a person to a large degree and it's extremely difficult to overcome it so the idea of a bunch of people who come from foreign cultures immigrating and being able to adapt to their host nation is laughable. If you maintain that view then it also follows then it seems to imply that his wife is going to be doomed by her genetics to never be able to fully adapt to Western culture no matter what sort of civic opinions she has.