(07-26-2017 10:58 PM)infowarrior1 Wrote:  Rolling Stone magazine just came out with a feature story about him.

"Why can't he be our president?"

This is what happens when you let a pop culture magazine think it's news.

After the wonderful news of this tranny ban, I have been tripping the light fantastic on the job site today like its...



Goddamn He is Glorious!



Me right now (in my head, its really cold here at the moment)







Good cheer to you all!!

(07-27-2017 05:06 AM)budoslavic Wrote:  

For some reason, websites that quote a lot of tweets to show how the conversation or tweet storm unfolded always show the tweet, then repeat the text from the tweet. I always end up reading every tweet twice. Once I recognize a particular page's layout, I try to skip the repeated text, but then I still have to look at it so I catch the page's commentary.

If you're going to embed the tweet, there's no reason to repeat what it says. [/hate]

Anyway, the tweets make a good point. War tests everybody's psychological weak points, and when somebody is working through this kind of issue, they're not combat effective, and are a danger and liability to their team mates. People with major issues, such as a tranny, are way too much of a liability in combat.

I think the reason for the repetition is that sometimes Tweets will be deleted.

Just saw Dan Bongino on Fox & Friends ripping Republicans a new one: "They are liars, they are useless, they are frauds--we expect that from Democrats and we are never disappointed, but Republicans!!!" It went like this for solid 5 minutes, without interruption from the hosts.

This is still going on, so no video just yet, but it was immensely satisfying to hear someone say that out loud and with conviction.

(07-26-2017 09:48 PM)Latinopan Wrote:  

(07-24-2017 09:22 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  

Posting this because it's funny, not because I endorse it.

Gun range clothing? also good if you take a clipboard and pencil with sunglasses, take your phone and also take some pictures, make sure the illegals see you, don't wear any clothing with some law enforcement logo, laters or symbol, that would be illegal. Keep it legal.

You should look something like this.

This is how it's done.

Donald J. Trump Retweeted

@townhallcom 2h

Quote:ABC, NBC, And CBS Pretty Much Bury IT Scandal Engulfing Debbie Wasserman Schultz's Office

(07-26-2017 10:36 PM)Liberty Sea Wrote:  I have talked about other issues on this forums before. I just talk about China more frequently now. I talk about China often because I'm interested in China's rise as a geopolitical event. I'm also a Sinophile and Sinospherical traditionalist. I've an obsession with China. No disputing that. If that makes me come off as a weirdo, so be it.

This pretty much explains everything I assumed and needed confirmation on.

(07-27-2017 09:09 AM)Fortis Wrote:  

(07-26-2017 10:36 PM)Liberty Sea Wrote:  I have talked about other issues on this forums before. I just talk about China more frequently now. I talk about China often because I'm interested in China's rise as a geopolitical event. I'm also a Sinophile and Sinospherical traditionalist. I've an obsession with China. No disputing that. If that makes me come off as a weirdo, so be it.

This pretty much explains everything I assumed and needed confirmation on.

Is he even Chinese? Why bother being obsessed with a culture and people who view you as a second class citizen and would never allow you to be apart of their country anyway?

At least suits has a realistic attitude from being on the ground. This just comes off as cucky to me.

(07-27-2017 10:05 AM)The Beast1 Wrote:  

(07-27-2017 09:09 AM)Fortis Wrote:  

(07-26-2017 10:36 PM)Liberty Sea Wrote:  I have talked about other issues on this forums before. I just talk about China more frequently now. I talk about China often because I'm interested in China's rise as a geopolitical event. I'm also a Sinophile and Sinospherical traditionalist. I've an obsession with China. No disputing that. If that makes me come off as a weirdo, so be it.

This pretty much explains everything I assumed and needed confirmation on.

Is he even Chinese? Why bother being obsessed with a culture and people who view you as a second class citizen and would never allow you to be apart of their country anyway?

At least suits has a realistic attitude from being on the ground. This just comes off as cucky to me.

Ethnoshilling ain't easy.

Honestly, though, this sort of anti-nationalism from an Asian is weird. Usually Asians are diehards for their respective countries. it's very rare that I meet an Asian who isn't chinese who yucks and shucks this hard for China. It's almost amusing in a cringy, beta way.

The deepstatesoy is real here.

I wonder if the chinese thralls thousands of years ago shucked this hard for their massas?

I don't even think it's shilling: no shill would call themselves a "sinospherical traditionalist".

I think he's like that guy we all knew in middle school who was big into Japanese samurai and ninjas, and thought that katanas could cut through tank armor and if a Japanese person got mad, they could power up like a super saiyan from Dragon Ball. Except in his case it's China instead of Japan, and the 12 year old who won't shut up about the arts of the samurai is way less cringeworthy.

Pfft. Everyone knows that katanas can only cut through tank armour if they're wielded by someone proficient in ka-ra-te

Agreed, SamB. It's probably autism more than anything.

Perhaps we all cringe since he reminds us of our 12-year-old selves and our respective interests at that age.

(07-27-2017 10:35 AM)SamuelBRoberts Wrote:  I don't even think it's shilling: no shill would call themselves a "sinospherical traditionalist".

I think he's like that guy we all knew in middle school who was big into Japanese samurai and ninjas, and thought that katanas could cut through tank armor and if a Japanese person got mad, they could power up like a super saiyan from Dragon Ball. Except in his case it's China instead of Japan, and the 12 year old who won't shut up about the arts of the samurai is way less cringeworthy.

Yeah, no different than the Train Collector guy, the Civil War collector fanatic, European battles expert, Salior Moon weeaboo dude, or even that guy in the news that collects pictures of female real estate agents and pastes them on his tool shed in his backyard for everyone in his town to see.

Aspies are gonna do aspie things and obsess over inane things, the rest of us do not give two shits about.

Maybe he is a Chinese-Vietnamese mixed guy from North Vietnam, like some of those rich families over there that own the factories etc. Maybe he just admires all things Chinese. In the grand scheme of things, it really doesn't matter. He isn't hurting anyone, I would let it slide. For now at least...

Clearly you guy's haven't seen Liberty's rebuttal to this video on the Forum Lounge





Somehow the animals above was translated into "vitality".

Talk about autistically triggered schilling word vomit.

https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-9856-...pid1619530

(07-27-2017 11:07 AM)kaotic Wrote:  Clearly you guy's haven't seen Liberty's rebuttal to this video on the Forum Lounge





Somehow the animals above was translated into "vitality".

Talk about autistically triggered schilling word vomit.

https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-9856-...pid1619530

I read the first 3 sentences and my shill alarm went off and I had to watch several japanese war movie montages to shake the feeling that I was turning into a commie shill.

Just for your guys reference,here is the list of disqualifying conditions: http://www.military.com/join-armed-force...ions.html. Here is where it disqualifies trans *note, this reference disqualifies transexuals not transgenders, they are different but I am sure it will be update with the new changes*:

Quote:Psychosexual Conditions
The causes for rejection for appointment, enlistment, and induction are transsexualism, exhibitionism, transvestitism, voyeurism, and other paraphilias.

I have some liberal friends of facebook. They are up in soy arms over this as expected.

I have so far been responding with the current list of military disqualifying conditions. There are some very minor things in there, and some very funny things (do a ctrl-f for "mental" and click around for a bit, they list some random sexual deviant shit as disqualifying).

I then ask them "Why is this transgender disqualification a more important issue than the rest of disqualifying issues on the list. Why is being a transgender less disqualifying than say (insert some random disqualifying item from the list)".

None have had a good answer, they normally counter with something along the lines of "well a trans is perfectly capable of service, it is actually weakening the service". Maybe they even link to the clickbait articles about trans X in service Y or some shit.

Then you can respond with something along the terms of "Well you don't actually care about the strength of the military. If you did, wouldn't you be up in soy arms up about (insert disqualifying factor), which I'm sure disqualifies more prospective service members than being trans?"

Again no good answer. This is usually the point they realize they are being baited into a logical discussion they are bound to lose, so they start hurling the trans-phobe insults and what not. They like to bring up discrimination here. So then you respond with "If it is discrimination to disqualify trans, wouldn't it then be discrimination to disqualify for (insert whatever here, I like bringing up the psychosexual conditions such as exhibitionism)? Should we petition to have that removed as well?

Again no good answer.

Anyways I've had some fun with that line of questioning today. Kills some boredom. Basically using the Socratic Method against them. Ask a liberal enough questions and eventually they will talk themselves into disagreeing with themselves, it's great entertainment.

Roosh, I'll take my 20% low-post warning now.

Is Reince the leaker? If he is, this will go down as one of the greatest betrayals of a sitting president by his own team. I really hope Reince is clean because if he isn't he will be doomed to be the Mitt Romney dick fluffer forever.

(07-27-2017 11:35 AM)rpg Wrote:  Is Reince the leaker? If he is, this will go down as one of the greatest betrayals of a sitting president by his own team. I really hope Reince is clean because if he isn't he will be doomed to be the Mitt Romney dick fluffer forever.

More likely it's someone on Reince's personal staff, but you never know.

The Mooch was in rare form this morning. He called in unannounced to CNN's morning show and went off. Sure sounds like he and Trump have figured out it's Reince telling younger staff members to do the leaking.

http://www.mediaite.com/online/scaramucc...head-down/

Rare Emperor.. is there nothing this man cannot do ??

The swamp about to get some drainage

Quote:Republicans, you had one job! One job!

Does anyone know anything about this guy?

https://www.facebook.com/ladygaga/posts/...5950149574

Quote:Many of these young people are transgender & suffer daily from the exact types of social isolation & targeting ur message encourages. Sincerely, did you know of the group you singled out today, 45% of them ages (18 to 24) have attempted suicide already? Within the Trans Community are many also who are strong & brave

These leftists are fucking dense. 45% of a population has attempted suicide before the age of 24. Here are our options

a) Allow transgenders to serve in the military, which would only increase the risk of suicide, not to mention endanger the lives of other soldiers. Or

b) Bar them from the military, which may hurt their feelings slightly

Lady Gaga and likeminded people are going with the "logic" that hurting their feelings is more likely to increase the suicide rate than putting them in a literal warzone. Anything for the narrative I guess