The Mooch put the BBC reporter on the spot when she avoided answering his "Do you want a great trade deal?" question (around :45 mark). Her pussy probably got wet by being manhandled by an "I don't give a shit" Alpha.

Game recognised.

What Scaramucci did right there was great. Throw the questions back at the "reporters". Turn the tables and call them on their bullshit. Insist that they answer. Turn it into a reverse interview and expose them for the hack political activists they are. Quit being on the defense, go on offense.

Skinny repeal of Obamacare is dead, courtesy of John "should-have-died-as-a-POW" McCain.

They loved him until he ran against Obama, then he was Hitler. Then he lost and they went back to patting him on the head, he was so much better than those Tea Partiers. Save a hiccup in 2012 (remember how indignant they got when he actually questioned Obama on Benghazi), he was their picture of how Republicans should act.

Then he got cancer and they loved him again. Then he voted for the procedural vote on this "skinny" Obamacare repeal, and he was Hitler again. Now he's the deciding vote that killed it, and my Facebook newsfeed is overjoyed and calling him a hero.

I fucking hate these people with every inch of my body.

(07-26-2017 08:50 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  ...

Hydrogonian, would you kindly fuck off? I'm sure there's a digital camera forum somewhere needing to hear all about Trump's days are numbered, and I say this as someone who is skeptical of the man.

I apologise to mobile users in advance, but I have to do this.



Meanwhile at the Trump thread...



"Good day gentlemen. Might I interest you in some sinophilia?"



"Get out of here, Hydro!"



"Who is this 'Hydro' you speak of. My name is Liberty Sea."



"Oh my God!"



"This Gamma has the exact same autism as me!"

^ It's cool, Leonard. Let it go.

The blackmail the dems have on McCain and Lindsey Graham must be of epic proportions.

Maybe it's just me but some of this Aussie humor flies right over my head. Whether it's Leonard, AB, or Paracelsus etc. a lot of it is very cerebral, dry as hell, and/or ultra-sarcastic. I feel like it's a lot of inside jokes or something. Or maybe I just don't have the necessary IQ to "get it". You guys definitely have your own style, I'll give you that.

But some of it comes off as very try-hard. Like you're trying to garner likes or something. Just say what you wanna say without all the cheeky references and simpsons gifs.

Anyway, back to Scaramucci

(07-28-2017 08:15 AM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  Maybe it's just me but some of this Aussie humor flies right over my head. Whether it's Leonard, AB, or Paracelsus etc. a lot of it is very cerebral, dry as hell, and/or ultra-sarcastic. I feel like it's a lot of inside jokes or something. Or maybe I just don't have the necessary IQ to "get it". You guys definitely have your own style, I'll give you that.

But some of it comes off as very try-hard. Like you're trying to garner likes or something. Just say what you wanna say without all the cheeky references and simpsons gifs.

Anyway, back to Scaramucci

Aussies have that tough guy swag (regardless of how soft they may actually be) and everyone knows it's harder to be funny and tough at the same time.

It's not worse than Canadian humor, so at least they have that going for them.

^ It's pretty simple, mate. Americans take the piss out of anyone they think is beneath them. Australians take the piss out of anyone they think thinks they're above them. You can see the inevitable culture clash.

Obligatory:

(07-28-2017 08:15 AM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  Maybe it's just me but some of this Aussie humor flies right over my head. Whether it's Leonard, AB, or Paracelsus etc. a lot of it is very cerebral, dry as hell, and/or ultra-sarcastic. I feel like it's a lot of inside jokes or something. Or maybe I just don't have the necessary IQ to "get it". You guys definitely have your own style, I'll give you that.

But some of it comes off as very try-hard. Like you're trying to garner likes or something. Just say what you wanna say without all the cheeky references and simpsons gifs.

Anyway, back to Scaramucci

Nah, we're just ten years behind the culture curve, and out in the sticks we're ten years further behind that.

What are the cool American kids joking about these days. Bronies? I dunno.

Anyway, if anyone has some happy-pants or hypercolor t-shirts they want to send me I'd sure appreciate it. They're going to be coming in any second now.

This is the thing though. Trump, Bannon, Scaramucci, Donald Jr, and Assange are - functionally - acting like Aussie Shitposters. Bannons litany of insults towards Hillary are basically my mate Bill talking about 'The Lady Of The House'. It's not the right or left that are winning the culture war... it's the Aussies. Please, please, Trump, call McCain, McCunt before he croaks. Let your Inner Aussie out mate.

(07-28-2017 08:34 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  Anyway, if anyone has some happy-pants or hypercolor t-shirts they want to send me I'd sure appreciate it. They're going to be coming in any second now.

My Teenage Gamma Friend - the one whose prom date gave me a blowjob instead of him - thought Hypercolour was cooler than a Colette single.

I never got why it was supposed to be a good thing. "So you're drawing everyone's attention to your sweat stains?"

He's also the only guy I ever knew who wore Happy Pants... ...with K-Mart Grey Zip-Up Shoes. We could never talk him out of thinking this was a good thing. He'd say "I don't follow trends, I set them." No-one ever believed him.

His Dutch mother used to snort-laugh all through Gillian's Island. Fucker never stood a chance.

(07-28-2017 08:12 AM)rpg Wrote:  The blackmail the dems have on McCain and Lindsey Graham must be of epic proportions.

As desensitized as I am to so much of what is on the internet.
I'm not sure I'd really want to know what McCain & Graham have done behind closed doors.

If 'Eyes Wide Shut' was the version ready for public consumption. Reality must be much worse.

(07-27-2017 11:48 PM)budoslavic Wrote:  The Mooch put the BBC reporter on the spot when she avoided answering his "Do you want a great trade deal?" question (around :45 mark). Her pussy probably got wet by being manhandled by an "I don't give a shit" Alpha.

'chlorine-rinsed chicken, that's the big question that's going on in the uk...'

Losers.

He responds w/ 'why would i know about shit that doesn't matter?'

The way that clip is cut is perfect. The last line is 'we don't have time to rinse our chicken in anything besides chlorine'.

I had to look up what Hypercolor was, since I'm not from the land of 23 snakes. Good lord, what a bunch of ugly shirts. Even account for typical 70s/80s camera lighting they look atrocious.

More winning!

The article references gun industry, but FDIC went after porn industry as well. Instapundit back then talked about "targeting businesses they don't like."

FDIC Ordered to Turn Over Documents in Operation Choke Point Lawsuit

Quote:District Court Judge Gladys Kessler told the government agency it had to begin working with the plaintiffs in the case for a nine-month discovery period beginning on June 20, 2017. "There is no justification whatsoever for not granting Plaintiffs' Motion to Commence Discovery Immediately," Judge Kessler said in her order.

...

"‘Operation Choke Point' is an Obama Administration initiative that encourages federal financial services regulators to harass and intimidate banks and financial institutions that work with firearm and ammunition retailers," the National Rifle Association said in February 2016. "By leaning on the banks, regulators hoped to bring an end to those relationships thereby choking off their cash flow and forcing them out of business. A 2015 Congressional Investigation revealed that ammunition and firearm sales and dealers had, in fact, been targeted."

(07-28-2017 08:56 AM)SamuelBRoberts Wrote:  I had to look up what Hypercolor was, since I'm not from the land of 23 snakes. Good lord, what a bunch of ugly shirts. Even account for typical 70s/80s camera lighting they look atrocious.

The shirts changed colour with heat.
A mere gimmick sure, yet one that became somewhat pervasive for a year or two.

Otherwise, as to any frequency of Australian commentary on U.S. politics?

Take it as a representation of just how boring & retarded our / Australian politics is...

^ that 1 min could be a condensed game seminar. DHV, Kino, invading her space. Methinks Scaramucci knows how to escalate quickly.

Wife: http://wagpolitics.com/deidre-scaramucci...ccis-wife/

Game recognized.

Quick question on healthcare, is Trump simply waitinf for 2018 and counting on a larger majority to pass another HC bill instead of Obamacare-lite?

(07-28-2017 09:26 AM)Enoch Wrote:  ^ that 1 min could be a condensed game seminar. DHV, Kino, invading her space. Methinks Scaramucci knows how to escalate quickly.

Wife: http://wagpolitics.com/deidre-scaramucci...ccis-wife/

Game recognized.

Noticed from that (super sayian ad popping ) link that the Mooch is 53. He looks really sharp for that age. I bet he has no problem pulling hotties in their 20's. It probably doesn't hurt that he's rich and famous, but even if he wasn't famous, he'd definitely be able to pull.

Good role model.

(07-28-2017 08:12 AM)rpg Wrote:  The blackmail the dems have on McCain must be of epic proportions.

Epic like the fire that killed 130 crewmen on the USS Forrestal... Oh and wasn't McCain commanding the plane from which (oooops) 2 bombs fell on the deck?... Doing wet starts like NTP at his best, mister McCain?

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/2008...edy_at_sea

" Some of those who were on the Forrestal and other persons familiar with the ordnance told me that because the rocket did not hit McCain’s craft, only actions by the pilot could have caused any bomb to fall from McCain’s Skyhawk. These sources—who spoke under the condition that they not be publicly identified—agree with each other that, if any bomb fell from the McCain airplane, it was because of actions that he took either in error or panic upon seeing the fire on the deck or in his hasty exit from the plane. Two switches in the cockpit of a Skyhawk need to be thrown to drop such a bomb, according to the sources.

Whatever the circumstances of the fire’s origins, McCain did not stay on deck to help fight the blaze as the men around him did. With the firefighting crew virtually wiped out, men untrained in fighting fires had to pick up the fire hoses, rescue the wounded or frantically throw bombs and even planes over the ship’s side to prevent further tragedy. McCain left them behind and went down to the hangar-bay level, where he briefly helped crew members heave some bombs overboard. After that, he went to the pilot’s ready room and watched the fire on a television monitor hooked to a camera trained on the deck.

McCain has never been asked to explain why he claims that the Zuni rocket struck his plane. If a bomb or bombs subsequently fell from McCain’s plane as he has said, it seems to strongly suggests pilot error, and if a bomb or bombs did not fall from his plane, it suggests rash disregard for important facts in his accounts of the accident.

There is plenty more about this story that raises questions about McCain’s truthfulness and judgment. In the first hours after the fire, he apparently did not claim to have been injured. New York Times reporter R.W. Apple, who helicoptered out to the ship the day after the tragedy and sought out McCain as the “son and grandson of two noted admirals,” never mentioned him being wounded, although he reported on him more than on any other crew member. This would be an odd omission on Apple’s part if McCain indeed had been wounded, given that service wounds are usually highlighted in such reports "


^Mc Cain's plane on fire, dropping bombs onto his own plane carrier, but, he didn'n done it, "it was the plane next to me that sent me a missile sideways and detached my bombs"

I swear, the amount of bullshit that passes for accurate history on this site is ridiculous. McCain's plane was next to the one that dropped the bomb. His didn't. There are lots of things to despise McCain for, but let's not make shit up.

(07-28-2017 09:52 AM)Going strong Wrote:  

(07-28-2017 08:12 AM)rpg Wrote:  The blackmail the dems have on McCain must be of epic proportions.

Epic like the fire that killed 130 crewmen on the USS Forrestal... Oh and wasn't McCain commanding the plane from which (oooops) 2 bombs fell on the deck?... Doing wet starts like NTP at his best, mister McCain?

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/2008...edy_at_sea

" Some of those who were on the Forrestal and other persons familiar with the ordnance told me that because the rocket did not hit McCain’s craft, only actions by the pilot could have caused any bomb to fall from McCain’s Skyhawk. These sources—who spoke under the condition that they not be publicly identified—agree with each other that, if any bomb fell from the McCain airplane, it was because of actions that he took either in error or panic upon seeing the fire on the deck or in his hasty exit from the plane. Two switches in the cockpit of a Skyhawk need to be thrown to drop such a bomb, according to the sources.

Whatever the circumstances of the fire’s origins, McCain did not stay on deck to help fight the blaze as the men around him did. With the firefighting crew virtually wiped out, men untrained in fighting fires had to pick up the fire hoses, rescue the wounded or frantically throw bombs and even planes over the ship’s side to prevent further tragedy. McCain left them behind and went down to the hangar-bay level, where he briefly helped crew members heave some bombs overboard. After that, he went to the pilot’s ready room and watched the fire on a television monitor hooked to a camera trained on the deck.

McCain has never been asked to explain why he claims that the Zuni rocket struck his plane. If a bomb or bombs subsequently fell from McCain’s plane as he has said, it seems to strongly suggests pilot error, and if a bomb or bombs did not fall from his plane, it suggests rash disregard for important facts in his accounts of the accident.

There is plenty more about this story that raises questions about McCain’s truthfulness and judgment. In the first hours after the fire, he apparently did not claim to have been injured. New York Times reporter R.W. Apple, who helicoptered out to the ship the day after the tragedy and sought out McCain as the “son and grandson of two noted admirals,” never mentioned him being wounded, although he reported on him more than on any other crew member. This would be an odd omission on Apple’s part if McCain indeed had been wounded, given that service wounds are usually highlighted in such reports "


^Mc Cain's plane on fire, dropping bombs onto his own plane carrier, but, he didn'n done it, "it was the plane next to me that sent me a missile sideways and detached my bombs"

And his father admiral John McCain Sr was the main Navy figure behind the coverup for the USS Liberty false flag attack, so the cucking started at least one generation ago in the McCain household: