(04-05-2017 12:01 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  

(04-04-2017 06:52 PM)AManLikePutin Wrote:  Mike is truly rattling them now. DJT Jr endorsement is just cherry on the cake.

I'd bet that there's a nice false pedo/nazi/rape accusation being cooked up against Mike by some MSM editor even as we speak. Hope he's ready and doesn't fold when the time comes...

Most likely they'll start digging up that false rape accusation that was thrown at him years and years ago. I suspect he's been ready for that for quite a while.

Quote:

(04-05-2017 12:01 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  

(04-04-2017 06:52 PM)AManLikePutin Wrote:  Mike is truly rattling them now. DJT Jr endorsement is just cherry on the cake.

I'd bet that there's a nice false pedo/nazi/rape accusation being cooked up against Mike by some MSM editor even as we speak. Hope he's ready and doesn't fold when the time comes...

The perfect game of cat and mouse. Too bad Mike is a raging cat who's backed up with a million traps set for the little MSM rats around the house. A trained lawyer who has no interest in being a stiff lawyer suit anymore but knows every little nook and cranny to protect himself from BS media attacks. They won't find any dirt on Mike and if they try to smear he will have the best legal trained Joos in California to go after them in court.

This may be the straw that breaks the MSMs back. The complete silence from them was appalling. They really thought this would blow over, or the under-estimated the ability for Mike to actually break a scoop. If an MSM media member ends up in jail over this it would be monumental and historic.

I noticed Mike changed his profile pic on Twitter, now there is a pictures of his wife and kid, I think it helps to fight the stereotype created by the MSM of lonely guy who can't get a woman.



I agree they must be working something against Mike, he lives in California, a hostile environment, democrat operatives like Gloria Allred must be preparing some false rape accusation against him now just like they did with Trump, it does not have to be real, but is some character assassination they will try.

(04-05-2017 04:33 AM)Latinopan Wrote:  I noticed Mike changed his profile pic on Twitter, now there is a pictures of his wife and kid, I think it helps to fight the stereotype created by the MSM of lonely guy who can't get a woman.

120% intentional. Much harder to attack a guy with a newborn, if they do give him attention they'll choose the least flattering pics possible. The MSM drama with Mike is now the gift that keeps on giving.

   

(04-04-2017 04:08 PM)budoslavic Wrote:  

(04-03-2017 12:33 PM)durangotang Wrote:  

(04-03-2017 08:35 AM)Turnus Wrote:  Any response from Trump about the bombing in Russia or will that anger the anti-Trumpers even more?

This could be useful...

President Trump already spoke to President Vladimir Putin on the same day of the St. Petersburg attack. From the White House Press Release:

Quote:The White House
Office of the Press Secretary
For Immediate Release
April 03, 2017

Readout of President Donald J. Trump’s Call with President Vladimir Putin of the Russian Federation

President Donald J. Trump spoke with President Vladimir Putin of the Russian Federation to condemn today’s attack in St. Petersburg. President Trump expressed his deepest condolences to the victims and their loved ones, and to the Russian people. President Trump offered the full support of the United States Government in responding to the attack and bringing those responsible to justice. Both President Trump and President Putin agreed that terrorism must be decisively and quickly defeated.

Meanwhile, if any RVFers are in, around or near Berkeley California, gear up!


Of course, Berkeley Antifags will be there as well.

Notice that the Freedom rally starts at noon and the Antifa shit shindig starts at 10 a.m? That's not an accident. The commies will try to occupy the park and block the Freedom ralliers from their event space. The Berkeley police probably need to rope off some space for the Freedom rally and guard it, or else it's going to quickly degenerate into a free-for-all.

Pepsi's tone deaf response to their demented & tone deaf advertisement :

“The creative showcases a moment of unity, and a point where multiple storylines converge in the final advert. It depicts various groups of people embracing a spontaneous moment, and showcasing Pepsi’s brand rallying cry to ‘Live For Now,’ in an exploration of what that truly means to live life unbounded, unfiltered and uninhibited.”


So much unity, we forget to depict any fat folk in our advert.
Wouldn't want to associate our shitty product with shitty lifestyles of course...

Quote:President Donald Trump reorganized his National Security Council on Wednesday, removing his chief strategist, Stephen Bannon, and downgrading the role of his Homeland Security Adviser, Tom Bossert, according to a person familiar with the decision and a regulatory filing.

National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster was given responsibility for setting the agenda for meetings of the NSC or the Homeland Security Council, and was authorized to delegate that authority to Bossert, at his discretion, according to the filing.

Under the move, the national intelligence director, Dan Coats, and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Marine Corps General Joseph Dunford, are again "regular attendees" of the NSC’s principals committee.

Bannon, the former executive chairman of Breitbart News, was elevated to the National Security Council’s principals committee at the beginning of Trump’s presidency. The move drew criticism from some members of Congress and Washington’s foreign policy establishment.

https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/artic...in-shakeup

Interesting move with Bannon. Does anyone know how much this will diminish Bannon's overall power within the administration? I never really think of him as a NatSec guy but he's probably in the top-3 most important people that have Trump's ear and will be important in the culture wars.

However at this point, you'd be a fool to doubt Trump's judgment.

Wonder if Bannon did something that pissed Trump off, or maybe Trump was pressured by the NSC to boot him.

I don't like where this is going. First appointing the ISIS-loving McMaster, then that ultra-cuck statement on Syria, now this....
[EDIT: probably overly concerned - see fake news alert below]

The problem with Bloomberg, NYT, and other liberal rags, is that you have to read carefully and all the way to the end of the article to get the actual situation.

Bannon has not been demoted. The privileges that were taken away from him are ones he never used and didn't need.

Quote:A White House official said that Bannon was placed on the committee in part to monitor Trump’s first national security adviser, Michael Flynn, and never attended a meeting. He’s no longer needed with McMaster in charge of the council, the official said.

I don't see anything wrong with removing Bannon from the National Security Council and allowing the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs to attend regularly again.

For all of Bannon's ability, he isn't military.

(04-05-2017 10:58 AM)MOVSM Wrote:  The problem with Bloomberg, NYT, and other liberal rags, is that you have to read carefully and all the way to the end of the article to get the actual situation.

Bannon has not been demoted. The privileges that were taken away from him are ones he never used and didn't need.

Quote:A White House official said that Bannon was placed on the committee in part to monitor Trump’s first national security adviser, Michael Flynn, and never attended a meeting. He’s no longer needed with McMaster in charge of the council, the official said.

And that brother, is why they call this shit fake news.

Good eye.

This is nothing more than a distraction from the real story, Russia....Wait Wait I mean Susan Rice

Trump has never been afraid to fire anyone who wasn't doing their job. He's always been transparent about that fact... so this is typical Trump. Of course the left will try to spin this as "chaos" in Trump's cabinet and he will counter. Business as usual.

If it comes out that this isn't even technically a "demotion", the left will still pounce but it's even less of a big deal for us.

(04-05-2017 11:00 AM)Truth Teller Wrote:  I don't see anything wrong with removing Bannon from the National Security Council and allowing the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs to attend regularly again.

For all of Bannon's ability, he isn't military.

I think it sounds like a concession to deep state globalists. I hear the rationalizations, but I also think if it didn't matter, there's no reason for the change. I don't like it.

I'd do a 180 on that if they also announced that Bannon was too busy for NSC because he is going to be focused on how to undo the h-1b guest worker mess without having it result in even more offshoring of tech jobs.

(04-05-2017 11:49 AM)Edmund Ironside Wrote:  

(04-05-2017 11:00 AM)Truth Teller Wrote:  I don't see anything wrong with removing Bannon from the National Security Council and allowing the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs to attend regularly again.

For all of Bannon's ability, he isn't military.

I think it sounds like a concession to deep state globalists. I hear the rationalizations, but I also think if it didn't matter, there's no reason for the change. I don't like it.

I'd do a 180 on that if they also announced that Bannon was too busy for NSC because he is going to be focused on how to undo the h-1b guest worker mess without having it result in even more offshoring of tech jobs.

Savage has had a take on this as well. Apparently some of the stupid decisions they've made so far were pushed by Bannon.

Bannon got fired because his ideas have blown up in Trump's face several times already. I think Trump already knows that there isn't any "concession" making to globalists because they won't be happy until he's out of office.

Looks like it was a "job completed."

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/steve-...le/2619400

Quote:"Susan Rice operationalized the NSC during the last administration," Bannon told the Wall Street Journal. "I was put on to ensure that it was de-operationalized. General McMaster has returned the NSC to its proper function."

Jack Posobiec released a Periscope that I haven't listened to yet: Paul Ryan encouraged Steve Bannon's removal from NatSec.

-----

One minute into Jack's periscope, "Jared Kushner has been leaking anti-Bannon information to Joe Scarborough."

Finished with the Periscope: Steve Bannon hasn't lost his security clearance, and can still attend NatSec meetings. He just isn't a member of NatSec.

To the guys above, read what MOVSM wrote....

Bannon NEVER attended a meeting, so nothing is being "taken away", basically to me it sounds like a "use it or lose it situation"

Or maybe it was a strategic move to keep an eye on Flynn and others for awhile.

He wasn't shitcanned.

Chill brahs.

(04-05-2017 11:55 AM)Easy_C Wrote:  

(04-05-2017 11:49 AM)Edmund Ironside Wrote:  

(04-05-2017 11:00 AM)Truth Teller Wrote:  I don't see anything wrong with removing Bannon from the National Security Council and allowing the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs to attend regularly again.

For all of Bannon's ability, he isn't military.

I think it sounds like a concession to deep state globalists. I hear the rationalizations, but I also think if it didn't matter, there's no reason for the change. I don't like it.

I'd do a 180 on that if they also announced that Bannon was too busy for NSC because he is going to be focused on how to undo the h-1b guest worker mess without having it result in even more offshoring of tech jobs.

Savage has had a take on this as well. Apparently some of the stupid decisions they've made so far were pushed by Bannon.

Bannon got fired because his ideas have blown up in Trump's face several times already. I think Trump already knows that there isn't any "concession" making to globalists because they won't be happy until he's out of office.

The "several" stupid ideas pushed by Bannon that have "blown up in Trump's face" would be ...?