(04-24-2017 07:59 PM)Player_1337 Wrote: Heartiste: Best All-Purpose Alpha Male Text Responses
(04-27-2017 07:29 AM)Jack_Smith Wrote: Let's have some fun...
Just got opened by a 19 YO Tinder match (Jack = 50+). Solid 7. My bio playfully references daddy issues.
BabyGirl: I have daddy issues
Jack:_______?_________
...
(04-27-2017 07:56 AM)NordicTom Wrote: JACK_SMITH - On your tinder match:
I had a similar conversation a week or so ago. I don't know what your girl looks like, but if she hasn't got the typical look (blue hair, choker, tattoos, pierced nose...) I'd play around that, making her qualify herself. Something along the lines of "Do you really? Where's your cliche choker necklace and nose piercing?". Girls love talking about their looks and how you perceive them, in my experience.
The worst response would be to comply with her statement, saying something like "Then you've found you man" or something like that.
Let me know how it goes.

Quote:[...]saw a girl with a book sitting, couldn’t figure out if she was a tourist, waiting for a friend(s)/family, or something else? She just moved in for her internship. A Portuguese chick with a sexy choker and nice hair. Good chat, was smiling, welcoming body language but then she said her boyfriend was going the next day away for business to another country. Ignored, stacked, suggested coffee, she seemed keen. [...] Sent a feeler a few hours later. No reply.
(05-11-2017 06:28 AM)ksbms Wrote: I re-texted, hail-mary style a portugese girl from two weeks ago:
Good text game or bad text game?
Did I save myself time chasing a girl who didn't want to get caught or not?
What's your take on it?
(05-11-2017 06:28 AM)ksbms Wrote: I re-texted, hail-mary style a portugese girl from two weeks ago:
Quote:[...]saw a girl with a book sitting, couldn’t figure out if she was a tourist, waiting for a friend(s)/family, or something else? She just moved in for her internship. A Portuguese chick with a sexy choker and nice hair. Good chat, was smiling, welcoming body language but then she said her boyfriend was going the next day away for business to another country. Ignored, stacked, suggested coffee, she seemed keen. [...] Sent a feeler a few hours later. No reply.
It was straight up, cut-to-the-chase whatsapp msg asking when she's up to for either coffee or drinks. Surprisingly, she replied quickly asking when. My take was either she was bored or things with her boyfriend changed dynamic quite a bit. Either way, suggested next day - Sunday. She couldn't, then we settled on Thursday. Just to keep it going, I'd text her once or twice a day, she'd always reply, though she didn't seem overly eager. The last exchange, was as per the screenshot below upon which she immediately blocked me.
Good text game or bad text game?
Did I save myself time chasing a girl who didn't want to get caught or not?
What's your take on it?
(05-12-2017 05:59 PM)duedue Wrote: I have a question: if your last text is lame and the girl doesn't respond, but it's not something that she has to answer (so not a question or an invitation, just a remark) then should you still "punish" her with silence for a while?
but sent it later. No response yet. Don't know.(05-12-2017 10:38 PM)Jack_Smith Wrote:(05-12-2017 05:59 PM)duedue Wrote: I have a question: if your last text is lame and the girl doesn't respond, but it's not something that she has to answer (so not a question or an invitation, just a remark) then should you still "punish" her with silence for a while?
If you are the one left with your dick in your hand, both figuratively, by your poor text game, and literally, by not asking her out, whom are you really punishing?
(05-14-2017 10:45 AM)duedue Wrote: I did so though; one of them agreed on a date, the other not.
(05-14-2017 10:45 AM)duedue Wrote: Well the risk is that this may raise her value relative to mine.
(05-18-2017 07:12 PM)DallasDan Wrote: Alright so I have a pretty rough start with this girl from tinder that I added on snapchat. My online game isn't strong (as in, before I meet someone in person, I'm pretty shit). Anyway, we had a conversation about how attractiveness (both mine and hers) isn't really unique... there are plenty of hotties out there. But good personalities are. And she mentioned getting called stuck up before by a guy who got mad because she didn't want to chill with him. She said she was far from stuck up. I replied "As I get to know you, I'm sure I will learn that." She then said "of course" with a smiley.
That convo kind of died so I didn't txt back again and its been a few days. I want to open up another conversation and was wondering if you guys had any advice
(05-18-2017 09:34 PM)BrandonCodi Wrote:(05-18-2017 07:12 PM)DallasDan Wrote: Alright so I have a pretty rough start with this girl from tinder that I added on snapchat. My online game isn't strong (as in, before I meet someone in person, I'm pretty shit). Anyway, we had a conversation about how attractiveness (both mine and hers) isn't really unique... there are plenty of hotties out there. But good personalities are. And she mentioned getting called stuck up before by a guy who got mad because she didn't want to chill with him. She said she was far from stuck up. I replied "As I get to know you, I'm sure I will learn that." She then said "of course" with a smiley.
That convo kind of died so I didn't txt back again and its been a few days. I want to open up another conversation and was wondering if you guys had any advice
Lmao why would you say that?? You're implying she's stuck up already. She replied with a smiley at least so it isn't totally lost. I also wouldn't have waiting a few days. I would have opened another conversation the next day or something and moved on.
Whenever a girl sends you a text, you want to change up the amount of time it takes for you to respond. Why? Because you don’t want to be "predictable", and you want to establish the frame that you are a busy guy and aren’t sitting around waiting for her to text you.
Sometimes you’ll reply back within a minute or two; sometimes after an hour… maybe longer. Sometimes you’ll shoot a text back immediately.
By changing up your response time you’re creating suspense. It’s going to hit one of those emotional buttons like we’ve been discussing. You want her to experience a wide range of emotions to keep her interested.
When you’ve just spent 10 minutes in “Rapid Fire Reply”(RFR) mode, & then sort of drop off for a little while, she’s going to feel a bit of uncertainty; wondering things like, “Is he mad? Did he lose interest? Did I say something wrong? Did I send the text to the wrong person??” etc…
This is good! Seriously. Because, when you DO text her back again maybe 20 minutes later, or an hour later, she’ll feel that sense of relief & excitement. She’ll get butterflies from the adrenaline rush that your text delivers. It’s that kind of pleasure you feel, ONLY AFTER you’ve had a feeling of loss (or at least “potential” loss).
Yes it IS totally OK to respond right away. In fact, you SHOULD from time to time. It’s also perfectly fine to go into “RFR” for a while. So don’t make the mistake of thinking you always have to wait a long time to reply. She’ll just get tired of texting you altogether if she knows she’s going to have to wait forever to hear back.
Just be unpredictable, & you’ll be golden!
Cheers, brother
(05-18-2017 11:00 PM)DallasDan Wrote: Hmm yeah I mean I tend to switch it up kind of. Like I do RFR then wait a while. Maybe I wait too long is what you're saying. What I was going for was that I didn't know her enough yet to determine that she wasn't stuck up and kind of opening the door to prove herself to me. Did I fuck up?