Post: #5801

(01-26-2017 06:32 PM)Razor Beast Wrote:  

(01-26-2017 02:41 PM)Euphoria Wrote:  I have three pictures on Tinder. I am 7/10, i get ZERO matches. I repeat, ZERO. I am not saying '' few matches,, close to zero..'' , i am saying literally ZERO. Maybe my account flagged by Tinder,, but im sure my phone is working as it should, since fake account i created as a female got 20 matches in 5 minutes. My Tinder acc either flagged as spam or im just ugly. But i think even ugliest people get match, even if it is bot account.

Believe it or not the bar is actually set that high right now with tinder in the U.S. All it takes is a few hundred 8+'s, celebrities, models, and athletes in a major city to occupy the interest of thousands of women. Something new and better will come take it's place eventually. I've left it for dead. Some type of instagram like app with a dating spin will replace its popularity I think. Or instagram itself.

I think for average looking guys with game, everything will start to funnel to international game. Which is why I've directed my focus this year instead to getting my finances to the point where I can generate passive income and travel the world and game full time. No point in wasting my time gaming women I have no real attraction for. I'd rather position myself to get access to 7's and 8's with LTR potential abroad a few years from now in cities with favorable ratios rather than devote a lot of time to get ONS with 4's and 5's here and there.

With anything in life, following the herd doesn't do anything but guarantee mediocre at best results.

Been to like 20 countries and 10 US states in the last year and a half and my dating experience has been markedly better outside of the US. At 35 it has been much easier to get hot women below 25 abroad.
If you are location independent it doesn't make sense to live in the USA for women because the only good places (NY and LA) are too expensive.

If you can live anywhere in the world, it def shouldn't be a super expensive city.
So your strategy is correct if you want to increase your odds at a quality LTR.

Post: #5802

(01-26-2017 02:41 PM)Euphoria Wrote:  I have three pictures on Tinder. I am 7/10, i get ZERO matches. I repeat, ZERO. I am not saying '' few matches,, close to zero..'' , i am saying literally ZERO. Maybe my account flagged by Tinder,, but im sure my phone is working as it should, since fake account i created as a female got 20 matches in 5 minutes. My Tinder acc either flagged as spam or im just ugly. But i think even ugliest people get match, even if it is bot account.

Did you swipe right too much? Mass swiping lands you in bot purgatory and your profile won't even show up to women or it will only show up on other profiles in bot purgatory (bots, fat/ugly/trans women, etc)

Post: #5803

(01-26-2017 08:48 PM)NerdyNomad Wrote:  

(01-26-2017 06:32 PM)Razor Beast Wrote:  

(01-26-2017 02:41 PM)Euphoria Wrote:  I have three pictures on Tinder. I am 7/10, i get ZERO matches. I repeat, ZERO. I am not saying '' few matches,, close to zero..'' , i am saying literally ZERO. Maybe my account flagged by Tinder,, but im sure my phone is working as it should, since fake account i created as a female got 20 matches in 5 minutes. My Tinder acc either flagged as spam or im just ugly. But i think even ugliest people get match, even if it is bot account.

Believe it or not the bar is actually set that high right now with tinder in the U.S. All it takes is a few hundred 8+'s, celebrities, models, and athletes in a major city to occupy the interest of thousands of women. Something new and better will come take it's place eventually. I've left it for dead. Some type of instagram like app with a dating spin will replace its popularity I think. Or instagram itself.

I think for average looking guys with game, everything will start to funnel to international game. Which is why I've directed my focus this year instead to getting my finances to the point where I can generate passive income and travel the world and game full time. No point in wasting my time gaming women I have no real attraction for. I'd rather position myself to get access to 7's and 8's with LTR potential abroad a few years from now in cities with favorable ratios rather than devote a lot of time to get ONS with 4's and 5's here and there.

With anything in life, following the herd doesn't do anything but guarantee mediocre at best results.

Been to like 20 countries and 10 US states in the last year and a half and my dating experience has been markedly better outside of the US. At 35 it has been much easier to get hot women below 25 abroad.
If you are location independent it doesn't make sense to live in the USA for women because the only good places (NY and LA) are too expensive.

If you can live anywhere in the world, it def shouldn't be a super expensive city.
So your strategy is correct if you want to increase your odds at a quality LTR.

It's a misconception that LA is good for pick-up. I say it's atrocious for pick-up.

Chicago, Miami, and a whole bunch of medium-sized cities (Atlanta, Charlotte, Houston, Dallas, Minneapolis, etc) are FAR better where you won't have as much traffic, the women are far less flaky, and you're not "competing" against male models/celebrities/multi-millionaires.

As matter of fact, when you factor in logistics (extreme traffic and sprawl) and the Hollywood flaky attitude of the women, I would argue that LA is the worst city for game in America. You'd likely get more women in a small 300k population city where there's zero competition and the women get porked like once every five years.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-ali-bin...79298.html

Post: #5804

(01-27-2017 03:50 AM)Naughty By Nature Wrote:  

(01-26-2017 08:48 PM)NerdyNomad Wrote:  

(01-26-2017 06:32 PM)Razor Beast Wrote:  

(01-26-2017 02:41 PM)Euphoria Wrote:  I have three pictures on Tinder. I am 7/10, i get ZERO matches. I repeat, ZERO. I am not saying '' few matches,, close to zero..'' , i am saying literally ZERO. Maybe my account flagged by Tinder,, but im sure my phone is working as it should, since fake account i created as a female got 20 matches in 5 minutes. My Tinder acc either flagged as spam or im just ugly. But i think even ugliest people get match, even if it is bot account.

Believe it or not the bar is actually set that high right now with tinder in the U.S. All it takes is a few hundred 8+'s, celebrities, models, and athletes in a major city to occupy the interest of thousands of women. Something new and better will come take it's place eventually. I've left it for dead. Some type of instagram like app with a dating spin will replace its popularity I think. Or instagram itself.

I think for average looking guys with game, everything will start to funnel to international game. Which is why I've directed my focus this year instead to getting my finances to the point where I can generate passive income and travel the world and game full time. No point in wasting my time gaming women I have no real attraction for. I'd rather position myself to get access to 7's and 8's with LTR potential abroad a few years from now in cities with favorable ratios rather than devote a lot of time to get ONS with 4's and 5's here and there.

With anything in life, following the herd doesn't do anything but guarantee mediocre at best results.

Been to like 20 countries and 10 US states in the last year and a half and my dating experience has been markedly better outside of the US. At 35 it has been much easier to get hot women below 25 abroad.
If you are location independent it doesn't make sense to live in the USA for women because the only good places (NY and LA) are too expensive.

If you can live anywhere in the world, it def shouldn't be a super expensive city.
So your strategy is correct if you want to increase your odds at a quality LTR.

It's a misconception that LA is good for pick-up. I say it's atrocious for pick-up.

Chicago, Miami, and a whole bunch of medium-sized cities (Atlanta, Charlotte, Houston, Dallas, Minneapolis, etc) are FAR better where you won't have as much traffic, the women are far less flaky, and you're not "competing" against male models/celebrities/multi-millionaires.

As matter of fact, when you factor in logistics (extreme traffic and sprawl) and the Hollywood flaky attitude of the women, I would argue that LA is the worst city for game in America. You'd likely get more women in a small 300k population city where there's zero competition and the women get porked like once every five years.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-ali-bin...79298.html

Maybe I've been lucky in LA but my sample size is small.

The point I was trying to make... a 2nd tier city in the USA like Houston or Charlotte won't come close to 8+ girl attainability and city value for what you can get somewhere outside of the USA.

Post: #5805

I hate to nitpick but medium sized cities, second tier doesn't not describe Chicago or Houston. They're the #3 and #4 largest cities in the US! Dallas is top ten. Medium sized city would be Minneapolis or New Orleans.

Post: #5806

(01-27-2017 06:52 AM)Oilrig Wrote:  I hate to nitpick but medium sized cities, second tier doesn't not describe Chicago or Houston. They're the #3 and #4 largest cities in the US! Dallas is top ten. Medium sized city would be Minneapolis or New Orleans.

I wasn't lumping Chicago and Miami with the others (I was separating those as being dense, walking cities with perfect logistics) but you're right. Houston and Dallas are definitely large cities. Actually, Charlotte and Minneapolis are the only ones I listed that would probably be considered medium, since they're outside the top 10 in terms of metropolitan area population.

Post: #5807

(01-27-2017 06:52 AM)Oilrig Wrote:  I hate to nitpick but medium sized cities, second tier doesn't not describe Chicago or Houston. They're the #3 and #4 largest cities in the US! Dallas is top ten. Medium sized city would be Minneapolis or New Orleans.

I was referring to cities like Houston and Charlotte as 2nd tier cities in terms of women quality not in size.
I should have made that more clear.

Post: #5808

(01-26-2017 11:24 PM)btz Wrote:  

(01-26-2017 02:41 PM)Euphoria Wrote:  I have three pictures on Tinder. I am 7/10, i get ZERO matches. I repeat, ZERO. I am not saying '' few matches,, close to zero..'' , i am saying literally ZERO. Maybe my account flagged by Tinder,, but im sure my phone is working as it should, since fake account i created as a female got 20 matches in 5 minutes. My Tinder acc either flagged as spam or im just ugly. But i think even ugliest people get match, even if it is bot account.

Did you swipe right too much? Mass swiping lands you in bot purgatory and your profile won't even show up to women or it will only show up on other profiles in bot purgatory (bots, fat/ugly/trans women, etc)

Honestly i was picky since i heard mass-swiping lands me in bot section. I would be happy if i see '' you are matched '' notification only once. i never seen it with my main acc. my fake girl acc is matches like crazy. it is depressing.

Post: #5809

Tinder: where an uneducated 400 pound woman covered in warts who wraps burgers for a living has more options than a 6'3 male model looking mofo who works at Google.

Post: #5810

(01-27-2017 05:04 PM)Euphoria Wrote:  

(01-26-2017 11:24 PM)btz Wrote:  

(01-26-2017 02:41 PM)Euphoria Wrote:  I have three pictures on Tinder. I am 7/10, i get ZERO matches. I repeat, ZERO. I am not saying '' few matches,, close to zero..'' , i am saying literally ZERO. Maybe my account flagged by Tinder,, but im sure my phone is working as it should, since fake account i created as a female got 20 matches in 5 minutes. My Tinder acc either flagged as spam or im just ugly. But i think even ugliest people get match, even if it is bot account.

Did you swipe right too much? Mass swiping lands you in bot purgatory and your profile won't even show up to women or it will only show up on other profiles in bot purgatory (bots, fat/ugly/trans women, etc)

Honestly i was picky since i heard mass-swiping lands me in bot section. I would be happy if i see '' you are matched '' notification only once. i never seen it with my main acc. my fake girl acc is matches like crazy. it is depressing.

It's complete garbage, bro.

It takes me like 1,500 swipes to get one in return, lol.

Post: #5811

(01-05-2017 04:22 AM)The Right Frame Wrote:  I am in Los Angeles San Fernando valley and tinder is turning into okcupid in results and quality. It has for the most part stopped being a hookup/dating app and more of a promotional check out my Snapchat/ instagram app for girls. Girls even say in bio " just here for laughs", " buy me weed", " only check this when I am bored." They love the validation of men liking them and then turn it off. Not saying it is completely dead but it is definitely in its decline.

Had the occasion to talk to some 17-19yr old girls. I brought up online dating and the results were not encouraging--they never even heard of okcupid, pof, match they had heard of but 1 girl said she would never use it because her mom is on it, regarding tinder most had accounts but never actually met anyone on it. They liked swiping men's pictures for entertainment and flirting. Regarding how they actually meet people it seemed to be mainly social circle/ friends. They were aware of other dating apps like happn but not serious about them. General consensus was that only desperate women were seriously doing online dating.

I'm a stonethrow from you. I've had a similar observation that the majority of girls don't take it seriously, especially true of girls <23yo. If they have an ig, snap, or kik in their bio you might as well move on.

LA is the worst city I've ever been for online. I get better results visiting my grandma in rural oregon. I still match with a lot of hotties (wilhemia/ford models) but getting them out is a joke. A theme that's happened more often over the last 2 years, and occurs nearly half the time I number close, is a girl asking for my social media. I fought it for a while and had an arsenal of Heartiste comebacks but it's an uphill battle. These girls have enough options that they can afford to make you jump through that hoop. I really advise LA guys, if you're adamant about online dating, to have a great IG page. This is also helpful to stay on her radar for the lull time post number close, as you'll rarely set up a date in under a week.

The vast majority of my friends get a fraction of the matches I do and have never been on an online date in LA. Several of these guys are decent to good looking. The one guy I know that crushes it online is Portugese with an 8+ face, trust-fund, and roams deeply in socialite circles.

Despite all this, I've met some cute short-term relationship worthy girls online. They don't come often and it's a poor time investment per meeting one of these girls but they're out there even in LA.

It's been beaten into the ground already but if online is not working for you, allocate your time elsewhere. These last several pages seem to be getting excessive in figuring out how to hack tinder and the algorithm where you could be expanding your social circle. Social circle is king in LA and after several months of re-allocating time their I've had a lot of options open up that wouldn't exist online.

(01-27-2017 08:25 PM)Naughty By Nature Wrote:  Tinder: where an uneducated 400 pound woman covered in warts who wraps burgers for a living has more options than a 6'3 male model looking mofo who works at Google.

I highly doubt it. But of course tinder is skewed towards females. My sister, who also inherited a rock-solid jawline has 1000+ matches online and gets asked out on the daily.

I've seen you poking around a lot of LA online dating threads recently. It's been said for a while but online is rough here. You know this. Max out your pictures. Try a few sites/apps. And if you're not getting traction, move on. Continually complaining about how lopsided it is won't get you anywhere.

(01-26-2017 02:41 PM)Euphoria Wrote:  I have three pictures on Tinder. I am 7/10, i get ZERO matches. I repeat, ZERO. I am not saying '' few matches,, close to zero..'' , i am saying literally ZERO. Maybe my account flagged by Tinder,, but im sure my phone is working as it should, since fake account i created as a female got 20 matches in 5 minutes. My Tinder acc either flagged as spam or im just ugly. But i think even ugliest people get match, even if it is bot account.

You're a 7/10 or maybe you're just ugly? 7/10 is universally quite attractive. I'd rate myself a 7-7.5/10. I get opened every few nights out. I have ~300 unopened matches here. Yes, tinder flagging is real. Change locations frequently, talk to all your matches, and discriminate when swiping to improve it. Get new pictures and re-start your account (delete it from facebook and make sure your phone number isn't linked). But like I told Naughty, relying on tinder, especially to a point of exclusivity, in LA is a fool's game. Social circle is king here and you're way better off expanding yours than swiping for a night.

Post: #5812

(01-27-2017 09:13 PM)Balkan Wrote:  

(01-05-2017 04:22 AM)The Right Frame Wrote:  I am in Los Angeles San Fernando valley and tinder is turning into okcupid in results and quality. It has for the most part stopped being a hookup/dating app and more of a promotional check out my Snapchat/ instagram app for girls. Girls even say in bio " just here for laughs", " buy me weed", " only check this when I am bored." They love the validation of men liking them and then turn it off. Not saying it is completely dead but it is definitely in its decline.

Had the occasion to talk to some 17-19yr old girls. I brought up online dating and the results were not encouraging--they never even heard of okcupid, pof, match they had heard of but 1 girl said she would never use it because her mom is on it, regarding tinder most had accounts but never actually met anyone on it. They liked swiping men's pictures for entertainment and flirting. Regarding how they actually meet people it seemed to be mainly social circle/ friends. They were aware of other dating apps like happn but not serious about them. General consensus was that only desperate women were seriously doing online dating.

I'm a stonethrow from you. I've had a similar observation that the majority of girls don't take it seriously, especially true of girls <23yo. If they have an ig, snap, or kik in their bio you might as well move on.

LA is the worst city I've ever been for online. I get better results visiting my grandma in rural oregon. I still match with a lot of hotties (wilhemia/ford models) but getting them out is a joke. A theme that's happened more often over the last 2 years, and occurs nearly half the time I number close, is a girl asking for my social media. I fought it for a while and had an arsenal of Heartiste comebacks but it's an uphill battle. These girls have enough options that they can afford to make you jump through that hoop. I really advise LA guys, if you're adamant about online dating, to have a great IG page. This is also helpful to stay on her radar for the lull time post number close, as you'll rarely set up a date in under a week.

The vast majority of my friends get a fraction of the matches I do and have never been on an online date in LA. Several of these guys are decent to good looking. The one guy I know that crushes it online is Portugese with an 8+ face, trust-fund, and roams deeply in socialite circles.

Despite all this, I've met some cute short-term relationship worthy girls online. They don't come often and it's a poor time investment per meeting one of these girls but they're out there even in LA.

It's been beaten into the ground already but if online is not working for you, allocate your time elsewhere. These last several pages seem to be getting excessive in figuring out how to hack tinder and the algorithm where you could be expanding your social circle. Social circle is king in LA and after several months of re-allocating time their I've had a lot of options open up that wouldn't exist online.

(01-27-2017 08:25 PM)Naughty By Nature Wrote:  Tinder: where an uneducated 400 pound woman covered in warts who wraps burgers for a living has more options than a 6'3 male model looking mofo who works at Google.

I highly doubt it. But of course tinder is skewed towards females. My sister, who also inherited a rock-solid jawline has 1000+ matches online and gets asked out on the daily.

I've seen you poking around a lot of LA online dating threads recently. It's been said for a while but online is rough here. You know this. Max out your pictures. Try a few sites/apps. And if you're not getting traction, move on. Continually complaining about how lopsided it is won't get you anywhere.

(01-26-2017 02:41 PM)Euphoria Wrote:  I have three pictures on Tinder. I am 7/10, i get ZERO matches. I repeat, ZERO. I am not saying '' few matches,, close to zero..'' , i am saying literally ZERO. Maybe my account flagged by Tinder,, but im sure my phone is working as it should, since fake account i created as a female got 20 matches in 5 minutes. My Tinder acc either flagged as spam or im just ugly. But i think even ugliest people get match, even if it is bot account.

You're a 7/10 or maybe you're just ugly? 7/10 is universally quite attractive. I'd rate myself a 7-7.5/10. I get opened every few nights out. I have ~300 unopened matches here. Yes, tinder flagging is real. Change locations frequently, talk to all your matches, and discriminate when swiping to improve it. Get new pictures and re-start your account (delete it from facebook and make sure your phone number isn't linked). But like I told Naughty, relying on tinder, especially to a point of exclusivity, in LA is a fool's game. Social circle is king here and you're way better off expanding yours than swiping for a night.

Thanks for the tips, bro.

I just started doing online out here out of necessity.

Daygame, Nightgame, Online game, you name it. They're all brutal out here in LA.

I had DRAMATICALLY better results doing nothing but daygame out in NYC and Chicago (typically 8 dates/month vs. 2 dates/month out here...although with online under my belt now, that should increase to roughly 4/month in LA). This city is a pussy purgatory.

At least, I get responses on OKC and POF.

Post: #5813

For tinder profile pic(s), do you think headshot or a full length is better or mix it up a bit? I am about to get some pro photos done and trying to decide on the types of photos i want

Post: #5814

(01-03-2017 05:39 PM)Kid Twist Wrote:  Does anyone know if there is any tinder location spoof available? It seems that avenue has been shut down, is only tinder plus available for out of GPS territory swiping?

I've been looking for this one too but no luck so far.

Post: #5815

(02-01-2017 05:54 PM)mcgooie Wrote:  For tinder profile pic(s), do you think headshot or a full length is better or mix it up a bit? I am about to get some pro photos done and trying to decide on the types of photos i want

Depends. Are you in good shape? You could do a shirtless body pic of you playing volleyball or some other activity which requires you to be shirtless.

However in most circumstances it's probably best to do a headshot...especially if you have good facial aesthetics. These women are just going through profiles and swiping left/right on a split second decision.

I would mix it up and you can switch it back and forth to see what works best. Definitely have a variety on there though to maximize your matches.

Post: #5816

I don't think this is thread-worthy so I'm posting it here.

I just casually took one of my girl's phone and opened tinder. As a man, I am not getting enough matches so I was curious. Then I took a look at her inbox. She has around 61 messages in her inbox(she's hot). DAMN! every single idiot is using one-liners. Most of them are really good and are similar to the ones we posted here on this forum.

I noticed that she never replied to them. I asked her why and she told me that these texts make her cringe.


So,I'm thinking of using direct-game in tinder. Something like "hey, let's have sex." or " hey, let's cut the bullshit. When are we gonna meet?"

The idea behind it is that we have to be "different" from the normal guys to catch a hot girl's attention on tinder. Since every single idiot is using one-liners and flirty texts, how about we go back to the roots and use direct-game? What do you guys think? Any opinions?

I know that direct-game has lower result if you're unattractive but I still believe that this is the only way to go. I don't want to get lost in one of her messages. I want to stand out.

EDIT: Another important thing is that we will automatically stand out. Even if she denies, remember that she "replied" to you. That means you've got her attention. We can then run online game on her because she's already hooked.

Maybe this might work. I will try it for a month and post the results.

Post: #5817

Forgive me for not reading through 200+ pages for a breakdown of super likes and boost, but I'd like to share what has been working for me.

Use your super likes on extremely young cute girls, 18-19, maybe 20.

The reason for this is because if your tinder age is too high out of her search criteria, you won't even show up for her to swipe.

These women have no idea what they want, and some 18 year old girl could have selected 18-25 as her range when your profile is 27, 37 or whatever. She would never even see you.

A super like bypasses her search criteria. I have matched and had success more than once doing this.

Boosts are a little trickier, it depends on where you're at in the world. A Sunday 7-9pm boost may be a safe bet, but I've had the best results in Kiev with a 10pm Saturday boost shockingly. Test and adjust accordingly.

Post: #5818

Guys, I have a technical problem with Tinder.

I signed up for tinder plus for a month to change my location and pipeline. It worked well for the first few days, got a decent number of matches, but then it just stopped finding new girls. Every time i open it it gets stuck on "finding new people near you".

I tried everything I could think of: changed locations, age limits, search radius, logged on and off tinder, uninstalled and reinstalled app and logged back on. Nothing works. If I press the "skip the line" thing which is a tinder plus feature I can use once a week, I get a few new matches and then again stuck on "finding new people near you".

Is there anything that I can do? I already have quite a few matches, so I don't want to wipe out this Tinder account completely and start from 0. especially while I'm paying for Tinder Plus.

Post: #5819

(02-05-2017 03:27 AM)tapthatass Wrote:  So,I'm thinking of using direct-game in tinder. Something like "hey, let's have sex." or " hey, let's cut the bullshit. When are we gonna meet?"

This has been discussed here. It is a good idea to try it for fun, but believe it or not, “let’s have sex” might be also boring for them if you are not very attractive. I tried the old “You have this girl next door that likes a hard good fuck look on you” and worked only in Manila, where my looks are more appreciated.

In my experience I found that I get more positive replies when going little less sexual and more creative, but not boring. Something about a massage with Nutella, biting her ear or make out with whipped cream or whatever is not explicit sex but something that clearly points toward it. That way your expectations are set since the beginning, but the girl is more likely to accept the risk.

In addition remember that more important is to get professional pictures than an opener.

Post: #5820

(02-07-2017 08:23 AM)Brodiaga Wrote:  Guys, I have a technical problem with Tinder.

I signed up for tinder plus for a month to change my location and pipeline. It worked well for the first few days, got a decent number of matches, but then it just stopped finding new girls. Every time i open it it gets stuck on "finding new people near you".

I tried everything I could think of: changed locations, age limits, search radius, logged on and off tinder, uninstalled and reinstalled app and logged back on. Nothing works. If I press the "skip the line" thing which is a tinder plus feature I can use once a week, I get a few new matches and then again stuck on "finding new people near you".

Is there anything that I can do? I already have quite a few matches, so I don't want to wipe out this Tinder account completely and start from 0. especially while I'm paying for Tinder Plus.

If your in the Phils, notorious for having problems on prepaid data plans. You'll need to get a post paid or connect via landline wifi

Post: #5821

There's an app for iphones where if you shows you only who has liked you and eliminates the need for swiping.

Anyone know of an app for android that does this?

Post: #5822

How do you wipe out a Tinder account completely and start from scratch? I want to start from scratch and it always prompts me to login with facebook (even when I don't have fb installed on my phone). I was using a fake fb profile. Can you create a fresh Tinder account w/out facebook, or do you need a fb to have Tinder? Should I close my fake fb account and create a new one?

Post: #5823

Go into tinder and deactivate your account.

Go into facebook (not on mobile) and remove tinder as an authorized app. Wait half a day or so, re-login with facebook and viola.

I do this every few months.

Post: #5824

(02-07-2017 12:41 PM)tobehero Wrote:  There's an app for iphones where if you shows you only who has liked you and eliminates the need for swiping.

Anyone know of an app for android that does this?

Care to elaborate? I would definitely be interested in this and I have an iphone.

Post: #5825

Did my own search online for the apps that show you who liked you on tinder and found some. Downloaded one and it said I had two, both of which ended up not working.

Tinder is getting really bad for me lately. When I first got the app nearly a year ago I used to match more than 3 girls a day, and could get a date easily. Now it has gotten to the point where I'm lucky to get one match a day and they are usually ugly, fat, a bot, or don't respond.

Another member mentioned similar results in Houston, but can anyone help explain this? Is it just me or is tinder actually six feet under?