(09-04-2015 07:56 AM)freeuser Wrote:  

(08-28-2015 02:14 AM)deathtofatties Wrote:  Tinder is a joke. Don't waste your time with an app the is designed to do nothing more than stroke women's already over-inflated egos.

I completely agree. I would also like to add, that it´s gotten worse in the last months. I remember using Tinder like one and a half years ago and I had some decent results. It was relatively easy, to get dates and I even banged some girls. I recently installed it again and it was much harder to get matches. Forget about setting up dates, let alone fuck these bitches. I came to the conclusion that there´s too many guys on it. The ratio must be horrible now.

I've always found the opposite- a ton of matches, but very few materialize into anything substantial.

found a new functioning autoliker app for Tinder

The problem is not enough girls see my profile.I get matches weeks after I've swiped on them. Does anyone know if subscribing to tinder plus puts you on top of the queue? If it does then I don't mind paying the money.

Jesus fuck you gotta move fast on this thing. I got blessed out by this one chick for telling her to meet at my local spot.
Apparently I was supposed to arrange a halfway location? Guess I got schooled on that one

Last girl had a simple question to answer:
How many licks does it take to get to the toosite roll center of a tootsie pop. I had an answer ready to fire off but I was at least going to wait 40 minutes. Clearly nobody's gettin fooled on this. You either fire it off right away or they jet.

BTW the correct answer I had was
"I think some owl said three, but I don't think his methods were very scientific. I'm sure if we put our heads together we could figure it out"

If she was DTF that would have been a lock damnit.

So what's the hell's the protocol? Fire off right away. Jeeze

(09-05-2015 03:35 AM)etuvus_spaxus Wrote:  Jesus fuck you gotta move fast on this thing. I got blessed out by this one chick for telling her to meet at my local spot.
Apparently I was supposed to arrange a halfway location? Guess I got schooled on that one

Last girl had a simple question to answer:
How many licks does it take to get to the toosite roll center of a tootsie pop. I had an answer ready to fire off but I was at least going to wait 40 minutes. Clearly nobody's gettin fooled on this. You either fire it off right away or they jet.

BTW the correct answer I had was
"I think some owl said three, but I don't think his methods were very scientific. I'm sure if we put our heads together we could figure it out"

If she was DTF that would have been a lock damnit.

So what's the hell's the protocol? Fire off right away. Jeeze

You shouldn't overthink this whole pointless "oh I have to wait x minutes/hours/days to answer", that's some archaic old shit from the era of landline phones. It's kind of understandeable too, sometimes you have periods where you can be at your phone and have a lil convo if the other person answers, and sometimes you can't/have no time/have no desire to check on your phone even if the messages are piling up. So I wouldn't say it's the best way to fire off a response immidiately, but if you've read the message and are holding the phone in your hand anyway, might as well.

I've noticed for myself that short, contained convos that happen instantly over a couple of messages are usually better than looooong drawn out (time wise, no necessarily message amount wise) convos to secure a number. However, and this is an annoying and dumb however, it seems like with short convos that happen at once when you ask for a number you can often times get the "but I barely you/only know you for so short!" tedious block whereas with long drawn out convos, even if it's the same amount of messages and literally the same thing that was said, some kind of "ok we've talked for a while (aka it has taken us x amount of time to hold this whole conversation) so it's ok to give out my number" button gets triggered

(09-05-2015 03:48 AM)NO_LIMIT_CRACKA Wrote:  

(09-05-2015 03:35 AM)etuvus_spaxus Wrote:  Jesus fuck you gotta move fast on this thing. I got blessed out by this one chick for telling her to meet at my local spot.
Apparently I was supposed to arrange a halfway location? Guess I got schooled on that one

Last girl had a simple question to answer:
How many licks does it take to get to the toosite roll center of a tootsie pop. I had an answer ready to fire off but I was at least going to wait 40 minutes. Clearly nobody's gettin fooled on this. You either fire it off right away or they jet.

BTW the correct answer I had was
"I think some owl said three, but I don't think his methods were very scientific. I'm sure if we put our heads together we could figure it out"

If she was DTF that would have been a lock damnit.

So what's the hell's the protocol? Fire off right away. Jeeze

You shouldn't overthink this whole pointless "oh I have to wait x minutes/hours/days to answer", that's some archaic old shit from the era of landline phones. It's kind of understandeable too, sometimes you have periods where you can be at your phone and have a lil convo if the other person answers, and sometimes you can't/have no time/have no desire to check on your phone even if the messages are piling up. So I wouldn't say it's the best way to fire off a response immidiately, but if you've read the message and are holding the phone in your hand anyway, might as well.

I've noticed for myself that short, contained convos that happen instantly over a couple of messages are usually better than looooong drawn out (time wise, no necessarily message amount wise) convos to secure a number. However, and this is an annoying and dumb however, it seems like with short convos that happen at once when you ask for a number you can often times get the "but I barely you/only know you for so short!" tedious block whereas with long drawn out convos, even if it's the same amount of messages and literally the same thing that was said, some kind of "ok we've talked for a while (aka it has taken us x amount of time to hold this whole conversation) so it's ok to give out my number" button gets triggered

Well like what's the deal with every match saying "active 0 minutes ago"? I know not every match is doing that. Yeah?

(09-05-2015 03:22 AM)Pestilence Wrote:  The problem is not enough girls see my profile.I get matches weeks after I've swiped on them. Does anyone know if subscribing to tinder plus puts you on top of the queue? If it does then I don't mind paying the money.

Yeah you actually do, but it's really not worth the money especially if you aren't using Tinder everyday. You also have to realize that 1 out of every 10-15 guys probably have tinder plus. I've banged 2 chicks off of it in last month and swipe about 20 minutes a day when on shitter or playing texting game. It does and will hurt your psyche when it comes to approaching. I realized it was making me lazy so I began to use less.

Also like someone said above, calling is the best way now after getting numbers. One chick sent me a screen capture saying i ignored her text, she had 28 unread messages all from different dudes

-CD

(09-05-2015 03:55 AM)etuvus_spaxus Wrote:  Well like what's the deal with every match saying "active 0 minutes ago"? I know not every match is doing that. Yeah?

It means they are online and messaging you or other men at that exact same point in time as you are reading it. Or, like with a good percentage of matches, they're bots who will be spamming you with some link soon before you unmatch.

(09-05-2015 05:20 PM)Gmac Wrote:  

(09-05-2015 03:55 AM)etuvus_spaxus Wrote:  Well like what's the deal with every match saying "active 0 minutes ago"? I know not every match is doing that. Yeah?

It means they are online and messaging you or other men at that exact same point in time as you are reading it. Or, like with a good percentage of matches, they're bots who will be spamming you with some link soon before you unmatch.

It's worth reminding everyone that there isn't a single girl out there on Tinder that is only talking to you. Being alpha can only get you so far when you are texting through a phone app, so it helps to personalize the conversation as soon as possible so that you are the one on her mind first.

People mention on here a lot that being funny is a good approach, but there are plenty of funny guys out there. I try to say something I notice in their pics, talk about the common connections, or even better her nationality.

My last Tinder lay was a Venezuelan in DC and I just opened her by asking her if she could bring me some arepas. No way a Venezuelan will ignore a message about her country's most famous food. This also worked on a Mexican by proving to her that I knew more about her country than Chipotle.

Naturally, both of them still message me all the time like good Latinas do, wondering when I will come back to see them.

Gotta say whoever mentioned that two truths and one lie game is a genius. Bitches eat that shit up gives you a lot of stuff to tease her with. I just do that for a bit then say let's shift this to text you seem normal enough. Getting numbers has never been easier.

...that's clogged full of fat.

(09-06-2015 07:06 AM)Pestilence Wrote:  Gotta say whoever mentioned that two truths and one lie game is a genius. Bitches eat that shit up gives you a lot of stuff to tease her with. I just do that for a bit then say let's shift this to text you seem normal enough. Getting numbers has never been easier.

When you're guessing which the lie is, more often than not, you'll notice that the lie is usually the 2nd one they tell you. At least with round one of the game. If you're playing over and over she'll probably switch it up.

(09-05-2015 03:35 AM)etuvus_spaxus Wrote:  Last girl had a simple question to answer:
How many licks does it take to get to the toosite roll center of a tootsie pop. I had an answer ready to fire off but I was at least going to wait 40 minutes. Clearly nobody's gettin fooled on this. You either fire it off right away or they jet.

In my experience the chick asking that question is a bot. She may have just gotten banned while you were waiting.

No shit I'd say 70% of the bangable girls I right swipe for are spam bots now. Seriously, not getting TInder Plus, and on freebie Tinder, I'd go as far as saying 50% of ALL girls I see are spam. Fuck this app, it's dead IMHO. Waste of fuckin time.

(09-08-2015 11:29 PM)Ingocnito Wrote:  No shit I'd say 70% of the bangable girls I right swipe for are spam bots now. Seriously, not getting TInder Plus, and on freebie Tinder, I'd go as far as saying 50% of ALL girls I see are spam. Fuck this app, it's dead IMHO. Waste of fuckin time.

I wouldn't say that, i've definitely been happier with results from day/night game but every now and then i'll pull a nice one off tinder with little effort. Not worth paying, but if you put no more than 30 mins in a week, it's a good ROI in long run.

-CD

Using it for pipelining to 2 cities. (Berlin & Prague)

I'm 6'3 Black Guy with dreads (yeah odds are stacked against me). I'm not sure on where
I stand lookswise, I'm not bad looking but I wouldn't consider myself a Tyrese or something. I do get compliments on my looks, but than again I've also gotten remarks (not on tinder) from girls who were not into me at all.

I took 2 photo's with a system camera (lumix GF7) and the rest of my photo's are pictures with friends in Beverly Hills, Club with a girl (girl is cut out for the most part) and Club with friends acting as total fools.

I'll be leaving for Berlin tomorrow, but I will only stay for 1 day before I departure to Prague.

I've been using Tinder for 12 days and so far I've gotten:
- 35 Matches (I unmatched 2, because they were bots & 3 unmatched me)
- 16 didn't respond to my opener
- 2 Numbers (I don't really push for the number)

So far Berlin is pretty much a bust. A lot of hippie chicks, vegan bitches who all love traveling but never travel. It doesn't help that I will only be staying for a day, so I can't
really blame them for not being enthusiastic about my arrival. One of the girls that unmatched me was on my first day on Tinder and she was really eager to meet me, but unmatched me when I told her I wasn't in Berlin yet.

Planning to do some day & night game when I arrive and we'll see what happens. I'm actually more excited to do daygame, as I never really do that at all.

Pipelining Prague has been more promising. I have 2 waiting for my arrival (hence the numbers), but they are of the kind that I've grown tired of. Average quality girls who really want black men and I get a feeling that it doesn't even matter how I look. I have lost interest in that type, I don't even go out to clubs where I know that being a 6'3" black man is in my advantage. The reason I'm getting into game is not because of a lack of pussy, but for the thrill of the hunt. These girls are hunters and that's not my thing, but I'll keep 'm around just in case I get a dry spell.

I wasn't using Tinder back when it was really popular, but I do think there is probably a decline in action on Tinder. Most girls have ridiculous bio's full of instructions on how to behave. They never start the conversation and some even say so in their bio, as they think it's a man's job to initiate conversation. Even the wannabe feminist types from Berlin say this.

A lot of women are using Tinder to promote their Instagram. Atleast half of the women that didn't respond to me had their Instagram account on there. I don't open with 'hey'. I usually open with a comment about something in their picture. I tried the smiley opener 4 times, just to test it out, no response yet. I'll try it while I'm in Prague, as I will spend less time on the App.

The App has something addictive and I see the potential for making a person complacent, but It's definitely not a replacement for real life game. The girls that I can close in a club situation will not regularly swipe right on Tinder.

I just saw an oldie but goodie. I call it the "increasing hag" factor. They put their youngest, best looking pic first and then it gets increasingly older and nastier.

If you have a limited set of pics and you're going for a hook, you should have at least two pics that are arguably best. The best hand you can play is always worst to best.

Tinder has officially jumped the shark. Did anyone else see this news about the new 'super like' feature? It essentially lets someone flag a profile alerting the person that they like them before the swipe is made. In other words, you're blissfully swiping along and you run into that perfect smoke show. You can 'super like' her and swipe right. When she eventually comes across your profile the super like badge will appear next to your photo. She already knows you like her (read: validation jackpot!) without her having to make that pesky right swipe to see if it's a match.

http://techcrunch.com/2015/09/09/tinders...ght-swipe/

Here's a quote from the Tinder CEO:

“What you’re going to see in the coming months is Tinder launching features that help you digest the sheer volume of people on the app,” said Rad. “There is just so much opportunity on Tinder that we need to build features that help you filter through and find that one special person.”

At the mention of filter, I asked Rad whether or not Tinder might introduce actual filters (for height, likes, or details more granular than age, geography and gender), to which he replied, “potentially.”

So in other words, Tinder is e̶v̶o̶l̶v̶i̶n̶g̶ devolving into another run of the mill POF/OKC app

Tinder's devolving - next you'll be able to buy a potential match "gifts".

Every time I see gifts on a girl's profile on POF - I laugh my ass off and wonder what chump did that.

(09-09-2015 11:30 AM)kaotic Wrote:  Tinder's devolving - next you'll be able to buy a potential match "gifts".

Every time I see gifts on a girl's profile on POF - I laugh my ass off and wonder what chump did that.

I thought it would help me get it in......

I'm still hung up on the sheer stupidity of this move simply from a marketing/branding standpoint. The one and only thing Tinder could hang its hat on is that for two people to begin communicating there had to be a mutual match. By employing this idiotic 'super like' they've just negated their whole market advantage over other dating apps.

Honestly, in the end what's the difference between some simp sending an unsolicited message a la OKC vs. her seeing a little blue icon next to his photo? Both mean exactly the same.

Every time I go back to my hometown Houston, TX it seems like the quality just gets worse and worse on tinder. There used to be so many hot college and post grad girls, but now all you see are trashy and ethnic girls. It appears as if all the hot girls moved over to hinge.

(09-09-2015 01:53 PM)Oilrig Wrote:  Every time I go back to my hometown Houston, TX it seems like the quality just gets worse and worse on tinder. There used to be so many hot college and post grad girls, but now all you see are trashy and ethnic girls. It appears as if all the hot girls moved over to hinge.

Not sure how big it is in your area but give Bumble a look too.