(12-12-2016 05:03 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:
Cops in Germany are more concerned about finding the one who leaked the metro-kicking video than about finding the men who did it.
The enrichers can enrich, but the sheep better not find out about it.
--------
I see a lot of bravado around here claiming that men have to "reign in" their women and everything would be fine. This is so much bullshit frankly. (A good example is the black community in the US - the men are more Alpha as a rule and what did that get them? Nothing - when women have all the power and are all taken care of by government daddy, then they "don't need a man".)
Women have as much freedom as the economic system and the government gives them. When a society is rich and women can survive easily on their own and government is her replacement daddy, then you simply cannot control women unless you can legally beat and kill her like in Muslim countries.
Also Islam and Mohammed are utterly and completely undefensible as doctrines and "spiritual laders". Mohammed was not spiritual - he was a stark raving lunatic and warlord - trying to defend that guy is 100 times tougher than defending Hitler. Probably Stalin might have come close to Mohammed. I feel real pity when Muslim clerlics try to debate guys like David Wood or former learned Muslim scholars who turn Ex-Muslim. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymh9f8REoOY Guys like this Jajaboor can quote verses from Quran and Hadiths by heart and so can David Wood. The teachings and MOhammed are so incredibly evil, that you would have to burn that stuff instantly and start fresh.
Any comparison with the descriptive violence found in the Old TEstament is just nuts. Also Christianity is more about the New Testament and Jesus despite all the attempts of the Rockefeller-funded Council of Churches to make Christianity appear like Judaism light. They actually managed that with some protestant groups.
Currently the strongest Christian faiths seem to be the Orthodox ones - some actually have balls and old-school patriarchic values. No wonder Roosh chose that path for his future children to be raised in (they will decide anyway later on for themselves, but such a basis does not hurt).
But I am an Ex-Christian myself so my assessment is a detached one.
--------
The bigger problems than all the men and attempts to "reign in" your women is the government which betrays you at every step.
Look at the guy who leaked the video - he will probably get his career destroyed if he is a cop. Chances are that those things happened dozens or hundreds of times, but no one was there to let the public know. Those are the traitors and they will destroy our countries, because they have been ammassing power since centuries and they never stop.
(12-11-2016 04:04 PM)Parzival Wrote:(12-11-2016 03:57 PM)LikeABaller Wrote:(12-11-2016 03:55 PM)Valentine Wrote: Yeah, we'd have been so much better off if our culture was Islamic instead. We'd get to fuck our cousins, participate in weekly stonings and be killed if we left the religion.
Quit the shilling for Islam and Turkey when they are both far inferior to even the current declining state of Europe.
Islam was introduced 500 years after Christianity as a more modern religion. If you want to measure Islams progress you have to go 500 years ahead and compare it with the current state of Christianity today. 200-300 years old women were killed on European soil because they were accused of being witches thanks to Christianity.
Still its 2016, almost 2017. We don't do this stuff here since centuries. Islam still do the stoning, honour killing, rape and marry, cut of hands, heads or whatever. Even the suicide and terror attack. Don't see a lot of people commit them that scream Hail Jesus or Hail Buddha.
With the 200 - 300 years back argument, if it is even one, you just say that Muslims are retarded because they life in some magical past and their brains are not able to adapt. Till then, we just have to wait till their societies are ready. But wait, where will the west stand in 300 years and where Islam when they are already 300 years behind? Look at China or India, they made in a few decades a development that Islam is not able to do even if its so gloryful.
(12-12-2016 05:03 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote: Currently the strongest Christian faiths seem to be the Orthodox ones - some actually have balls and old-school patriarchic values. No wonder Roosh chose that path for his future children to be raised in (they will decide anyway later on for themselves, but such a basis does not hurt).
(12-12-2016 07:14 AM)Wreckingball Wrote:(12-11-2016 03:09 PM)rockoman Wrote: Whether we like it or not, LikeABaller's attitude is why Turkish culture and the Turkish gene pool will survive, in probable contrast to that of many European nations.
It's also the reason why most Europeans do not like turkish people.
![[Image: 87518.jpg]](http://www.haksozhaber.net/d/news/87518.jpg)
![[Image: tank-halk.jpg]](http://www.isfikirleri-girisimcilik.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/tank-halk.jpg)
Quote: (AFP) – The party of populist anti-Islam Dutch MP Geert Wilders has risen strongly in the polls since the lawmaker was tried and convicted of discrimination, according to a survey published Sunday.
If legislative elections due next March were held this week, Wilders’ Freedom Party (PVV) would pick up 36 out of 150 seats in the lower house of parliament, making it the biggest single political group, it found.
Before the trial began on October 31, the PVV was credited with 27 seats.
During the trial, but before his conviction on Friday, its estimated share rose to 34 seats. It currently has 12 lawmakers.
The new poll data comes from a weekly monitoring by the Maurice de Hond Institute.
It found that Prime Minister Mark Rutte’s Liberals would place second with 23 seats, against 40 today, and his junior coalition partners, the Labour Party (PvdA), would gain 10 seats, compared with 35 today.
Wilders was found guilty of discrimination against Moroccans but acquitted of hate speech over remarks he made at an election rally in March 2014.
He had asked supporters whether they wanted “fewer or more Moroccans in your city and in the Netherlands.” When the crowd shouted back “Fewer! Fewer!” a smiling Wilders answered: “We’re going to organise that.”
Wilders, 53, largely boycotted the trial, which he denounced as a political attempt to gag him.
The judges were strongly critical of Wilders’ “inflammatory” remarks at the rally but decided not to impose any sentence or fine.
The outcome of the Dutch vote will be keenly watched given the anti-EU outcome of Britain’s Brexit referendum and the November election of populist Donald Trump as the next US president.
Wilders has among other things vowed to confiscate Korans, close mosques and Islamic schools, shut the borders and ban migrants from Islamic countries.
(12-12-2016 12:40 PM)Wreckingball Wrote: BTW: I'm quite sure the "coup" was a false flag to further push your dictators Islamic agenda and political cleansing, naturally zealots are clapping their hands. I just keep wondering if he got it done all by himself or has some puppet master behind.
(12-12-2016 01:02 PM)Samseau Wrote: They didn't even shoot at civilians. That was not a coup, it was theatre.
(12-12-2016 12:54 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:(12-12-2016 12:40 PM)Wreckingball Wrote: BTW: I'm quite sure the "coup" was a false flag to further push your dictators Islamic agenda and political cleansing, naturally zealots are clapping their hands. I just keep wondering if he got it done all by himself or has some puppet master behind.
The coup was nothing but a coup. There is some solid analysis on this supposed coup. In my opinion it was just a publicity stunt by Erdogan himself. There are sites who assessed a massive amount of information on the entire coup. If it was one then it was dumber than anything any banana republic could pull off. If you truly believe that then you must think that the Turkish high command is dumber than bread and I highly doubt that.
You really have to be a gullible one to trust the official mainstream assessment on that "coup". Pure bollocks!
https://geopolitics.co/2016/07/18/did-er...tary-coup/
(12-12-2016 12:40 PM)Wreckingball Wrote: No, we hate turks because of their arrogance. They mistake our kindness with weakness and they are only truly strong when they"zerg rush" small groups. When confronted in equal numbers or against smaller but possibly stronger forces, they tuck their tails between their legs and run away like scared cats. I have seen it so many times I no longer find it entertaining.
Having a puffed chest a loud mouth is not being "uncucked". Going in groups after single targets is merely cowardly.
Naturally, I also met several turkish non-zealot men and women and they are clearly "normal" folks... and if they had whiter complexion they would easily fit in your basket of "cucked" europeans.
BTW: I'm quite sure the "coup" was a false flag to further push your dictators Islamic agenda and political cleansing, naturally zealots are clapping their hands. I just keep wondering if he got it done all by himself or has some puppet master behind.
(12-12-2016 01:21 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote: Wreckingball -
I agree with you. Neither Erdogan nor the supposed officers who did the coup are dumb.
Anyone with 2 brain cells would know that a coup would have to be done very brutally - you would need the support of entire army divisions = you cannot send them out on exercises and they find out by the mob that they are taking part in a coup.
And those soldiers would have to be ready to fire into the crowds and kill Erdogan, his followers, his generals and any higher-ups. There was also way too much support for Erdogan - I don't think that anyone can actually stage a coup at Erdogan without some kind of super-power behind him and even then it is not a coup, but a hostile takeover. A coup needs massive support of the population - either outright approval or at least tacit willingness to go along. It was clear from the start that nothing of the sort would have any chance of success.
The very best thing a real coup would have achieved was a civil war and this is just dumb - no one is that stupid.
![[Image: fft1_mf1117719.jpeg]](http://icdncube.milliyetvideo.com/video_snapshot/2016/07/16/fft1_mf1117719.jpeg)
(12-12-2016 11:59 AM)LikeABaller Wrote: They hate us because we are not cucked like them. These people thwarted a Soros backed coup attempt. Coup decleration was read on official state channel TRT, Erdogan however adressed the nation from Facetime urging citizens to take the streets and that he is legitimate commander in chief. He asked the citizens to occupy the Istanbul Ataturk airport and recapture the airport. He said he will land there shortly.
...
...
Now if the same thing happened in Europe the people would pussy out. I can only imagine a similar reaction in USA, if Trump called on his citizens to take to the streets then the rednecks in Texas,Wyoming, Panhandlers in Florida would sacrifice their lives to defend their nation. But Europe is cucked.
(12-12-2016 02:28 PM)redpillage Wrote:(12-12-2016 11:59 AM)LikeABaller Wrote: They hate us because we are not cucked like them. These people thwarted a Soros backed coup attempt. Coup decleration was read on official state channel TRT, Erdogan however adressed the nation from Facetime urging citizens to take the streets and that he is legitimate commander in chief. He asked the citizens to occupy the Istanbul Ataturk airport and recapture the airport. He said he will land there shortly.
...
...
Now if the same thing happened in Europe the people would pussy out. I can only imagine a similar reaction in USA, if Trump called on his citizens to take to the streets then the rednecks in Texas,Wyoming, Panhandlers in Florida would sacrifice their lives to defend their nation. But Europe is cucked.
No, we hate they Turks because they are the most violent, barbaric, uneducated, abrasive, righteous, egotistical, dirty, lying, and back stabbing bunch you'll ever run into. Did I leave anything out? ;-)
Seriously, I remember even back in the 1980s in Germany we were told to stay out of certain 'troublesome' neighborhoods, e.g. Kreuzberg in Berlin, Altona in Hamburg, because they had been completely taken over by turkish clans. The first generation turks in the 1950s were alright and kept their heads down but their children were the biggest assholes you can imagine. Most of them barely made it through the 'Hauptschule' (lowest education branch in Germany, basically for idiots) and didn't even bother to learn proper German. I'm not even kidding, most 2nd or 3rd gen Turks in Germany even today have a vocabulary of about 500 words +/- and they insist on using a turkish accent despite the fact that they were fucking born in Germany. Suffice to say that most of them hate Germans and never intend to integrate. Why would they bother in the first place as the big plan now is to turn Germany into some version of Turkey, or at least some Northern European caliphate.
I've never met a turk in my life I wouldn't want to punch almost instantly and I may just have done that back in my days. What can I say, we were still cut from a different branch than today's Germanic manginas. Otherwise I agree with him, the Germans are way too comfortable and pacified at this point. If there was some coup attempt everyone would just sit on their thumbs and wait for someone else to risk their lives.
The underlying reasons for that are clear and I have been describing the twisted guilt laden and acquiescent psychology of the average German on several occasions right here. In a nutshell they have no emotional investment in their own cultural heritage, which isn't surprising if you're being told starting in Kindergarten that your old grand-daddy committed war crimes and that Germany must eternally pay for its horrible deeds. Plus you are surrounded by an immense amount of peer pressure that shapes you into an obedient little worker drone. Most native Germans have never been in a real fight, it's considered to be barbaric and boys are told that violence never solved anything.
Finally there are the women, who are among the most feminist and spoiled pains in ass you'll ever run into. Short haired little ball busters from hell who will disagree with you solely on the basis of you being a man. There was a big hit in the 1980s which was called 'Neue Männer braucht das Land' (the country needs new men). Fuck, they weren't kidding, were they? ;-)
But the Rubicon has long been crossed on the demise of Germany and 20 years from now it is going to be some version of Turkey. Which is going to suck big time, because we won't be able to buy those amazing German cars anymore, their beer is going to suck (alcohol isn't haram), and much of the amazing Germanic cultural heritage will be lost forever. Apparently that is whatever everyone wants, including those hare-brained multi-cultural ideologues running the country in the ground. But I the end a culture that has lost its own sense of self preservation cannot be saved.
I just hope that the U.S. manages to pull all fissionable material out of the remaining nuclear plants way in advance. Which may in retrospect turn out to be a good decision by Merkel. It's scary enough that Erdogan has nuclear weapons.
(12-12-2016 03:03 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote: I gotta agree with LikABaller there.
I met intellectual Turks who made it out from the underclass you find in Germany. Also you find many more of those in Turkey - the descendents of the Anatolia Turks who came to Germany were the most backwards ones and I guess the Turkish government was happy to get rid of them and send them off to the West.
They will constitute and eternal underclass and the only way they will get to the top is when a more advanced Islamic Caliphate takes over Germany and they join those forces.
By the way in contrast you get the top 10% of the Indians moving to the US. Their average IQ is 110, but the average IQ in India is 85. That happens when you are a 1.4 bio. country and the more intelligent get to move to the US and West. But that should not disguise the fact that there are plenty of dumb folk who remain in India. No one is crazy enough to send them en masse to Germany to staff the already dying manufacturing sector.
Quote:Is the danger of becoming victim of a crime, even of violent crimes, with the immigrants on the rise? After the hope for them as specialists and rescuers of the pension insurance burst, this is one of the last bastions to be wrestled.
In 2015, migrants in Germany committed 208,344 crimes. This figure is the result of a confidential report by the Federal Criminal Police Office (Bundeskriminalamt, BKA), which is available to the Bildzeitung. A strong increase of 80% compared to the previous year, which is all the more terrifying when one looks at the period during which the deeds were committed. As a result, migrants have committed 570 offenses per day or 23 per hour between January and December 2015. In 2015 - when the refugee crisis began to take off until the end of the year, before Cologne and an unprecedented succession of sexual, violence and theft drones in 2016.
In any case, you do not have to worry about the crime numbers from the most populous state with most migrants. The figures from North Rhine-Westphalia do not even appear in the report. Why it is like that? One of the great secrets. Policemen questioned pointed out that the origin of the perpetrators can no longer be recorded. This was confirmed by the committee of inquiry on the Cologne New Year's Eve night. The statistics are not wrong - only non-meaningful.
The government's objectives are not counted. This works the same way with the latest phenomenon - the reunion of family members. They are not regarded as asylum seekers because they do not apply for asylum seekers. They are family members. So they are not counted. This is the simplest solution: not to notice threatening phenomena. It is more difficult with criminal statistics. They have been around for a long time. There must be more bending. The reason why, despite a demonstrable increase in migrant criminality by 80% compared to the previous year, the reason why migrants are not more criminal than Germans and Germany has not become more unsafe is simply the fact that the proportion of the offense is matched with the total population of around 80 million. If there are about one million refugees on 80 million people, some of whom are being convicted, this does not lead to a significant increase in migrant criminality at a total of 81 million. The logic is as simple as misleading: the problem is defined away by placing it in relation to a very large number. It is diluted as the tear in the ocean.
In addition, crime statistics are still largely anonymous. To prevent the judges from influencing. After talking to lawyers and attorneys, however, it is more likely that the migration background is not mentioned, in order not to raise the population against migrants, ie not to complicate their integration. De facto, however, obscuring the background of migration in the statistics leads to an aggravation of the police and reconnaissance work.
For decades, Germany has been debating whether the migration background should be recorded in statistics on crime. In the end, the debate grew again, after Berlin became aware of the fact that 81% of young young offenders there had an (almost invariably Turkish or Arab) migration background. Quickly, representatives of the CDU and police volumes demanded to record the immigration history in NRW, which, however, was rejected by Red-Green. Once again the disunity of the countries, which makes a complete collection and evaluation impossible.