The German military is already full with Russians. Well Russian Germans or German Russians or whatever. But their loyalty to Germany is in high doubt. Maybe not from the leaders but what I get from friends that had be soldiers as well. Some even when into the Ukraine conflict to side with Russia.
Personal I don't fear the German Netherlands unit or a German Polish unit. The issue with the EU is, that is has no legitimisation and interacts in national issues where countries should be independent but don't act where countries should stand together.

I just found out on Twitter that a Radiohead listening party in Constantinople* was attacked by Islamists yesterday:





*I'm not gonna call it by that Turkish name again

(06-18-2016 06:13 AM)fokker Wrote:  I just found out on Twitter that a Radiohead listening party in Constantinople* was attacked by Islamists yesterday:





*I'm not gonna call it by that Turkish name again

Music is haram. It is symbolic how the lights went out in the end.

When Islam rules complete, then the lights of civilization will be snuffed out again.

I wonder when Erdogan reintroduces the Jizya and slavery.

By the way - this persecution of music is nothing new in the Islamic world. I saw once a little documentary about Iranian musicians playing underground gigs - jazz, metal, rock etc. They risk a lot by playing music there.

It's really sad. I see no end to this crap until one final war which once and for all obliterates Islam.

A german foreign legion? I can only think of spies and undermining, the way they will setup this shit. If they want to do it, they will have to do it like the french foreign legion.

Seems like the military is preparing for war times (in contrast to last 25 years)

http://www.berliner-zeitung.de/berlin/po...lReferrer=

Quote:Several drug dealers have attacked two strollers and then police in Moabit. According to police, a patrol car has been recalled because of a personal injury in the Kleiner Tiergarten park.

As the police wanted to record the facts, 20 to 30 people gathered to view the police and became louder and more aggressive. "The calls to retire, they did not come by and insulted instead the police," said a spokeswoman authorities. More radio car and officials of 14 and 25 use a hundred met to push away the crowd. Finally, around 40 police officers were on site.

Police arrested the 18-year and 21-year-old attacker, two Tunisians, firmly. The 21-year-old offender with undetermined nationality who had attacked the 16-year-olds with a glass bottle, was also arrested. They were fingerprinted and then set free again.

A 19-year-old with undetermined nationality and a 32-year-old Syrian teamed up with the attacks and insults against the policemen particularly prominent. The elder asked an officer to take off his uniform and to brawl with him. He and the 19-year-old were also briefly detained. After the identification procedures and they were released.

Berlin, lol
So if you don't want to buy drugs from the African drug dealers, they will just beat you.

^^^^

Why don't they just get it over with and call it 'Deutsche ISIS' - DISIS?

(09-11-2015 04:16 PM)TonySandos Wrote:  Lmao My God that is a masterfully devious plan.

I'd rep you again if I could

I cannot say it better.

(06-18-2016 07:34 AM)Parzival Wrote:  http://www.berliner-zeitung.de/berlin/po...lReferrer=

Quote:Several drug dealers have attacked two strollers and then police in Moabit. According to police, a patrol car has been recalled because of a personal injury in the Kleiner Tiergarten park.

As the police wanted to record the facts, 20 to 30 people gathered to view the police and became louder and more aggressive. "The calls to retire, they did not come by and insulted instead the police," said a spokeswoman authorities. More radio car and officials of 14 and 25 use a hundred met to push away the crowd. Finally, around 40 police officers were on site.

Berlin, lol
So if you don't want to buy drugs from the African drug dealers, they will just beat you.

Yeah, technically it's a purchase but it's really a way of robbing people. Buy drugs from us or else...



Whenever you think those monkeys couldn't get any more brazen they come back and prove you wrong.

Quote:Seven percent said violence was a justifiable means of spreading Islam.

7 percent - that is 350.000 German Turks think it is fine to spread Islam with violence. Keep that number in mind - that is the number of recruits ISIS would have instantly when it would start violent civil war or WWIII in Germany.

And this news is not causing AfD to jump to over 50% in the polls instantly? Germany is truly fucked...

Just give ISIS the nuclear codes already and let get done with this

(09-13-2015 07:28 AM)AFS Wrote:  Euronews, France24, YahooNews, and AFP are all lying and saying the anti-migrant protest in Warsaw had only 300 people. I've been to many concerts, I know what 300 people looks like, and there are clearly thousands in the streets. They also all claim that these are "far right" wingers, even though the majority of people in Poland are opposed to letting the migrants in. NONE of my friends here are "right-wingers", and they are all opposed to this.

BBC reported accurately on the number of people protesting, but also called protesters "radical right wingers."

The level of propaganda is insane. I'm starting to believe there is NO real journalism. Reporting, lying with such an agenda is completely against everything media and journalism stands for. Just check out the photos Mike Chernovich tweeted to get the real story in Hungary, for example.

I recommend everybody call out these news outlets on their lies on social media. Email them, tweet at them, blog about it. Don't let them get away with this.

I really hope Hungary putting their foot down is the real deal. Our only hope is if something radical happens here in EE - deportations of illegals, shooting them at the border, anything to start a push back against the elites in the EU.

In the meantime, thousands are in the streets in London in pro-migration protests. The western Europeans are fucking nuts. If they hate European values so much, why don't THEY move to Syria or Iraq? Let us live in peace with our European neighbors, not Islamic invaders.

Why do we give a rap about life-wingers in the first place? We are who we are. I am proud I am a die-hard right-winger and I think it is highly necessary that we stand tall being what we stand for and that we are not shamed by the so-called "mainstream media". When we simply ignore their noise, their narrative immediately loses power and steam.

(06-18-2016 08:12 PM)PK1098 Wrote:  ...
Why do we give a rap about life-wingers in the first place? We are who we are. I am proud I am a die-hard right-winger and I think it is highly necessary that we stand tall being what we stand for and that we are not shamed by the so-called "mainstream media". When we simply ignore their noise, their narrative immediately loses power and steam.

You fight their narrative because propaganda works. Because when they term limited-migration-nationalists as "far right wing" it paints the picture that they are a minority, and when they say that enough then unfortunately some of the shit sticks.

Some comments sections on news sites are still open to the public. The Daily Mail for example gives an excellent idea of how left wing the average reader ISN'T (other than the occasional left wing bot assaults, which are painfully obvious).

People don't stand up for themselves because they feel alone and powerless. That's the point of the MSM rhetoric and the reason it needs to be crushed ASAP.

(06-18-2016 08:12 PM)PK1098 Wrote:  Why do we give a rap about life-wingers in the first place? We are who we are. I am proud I am a die-hard right-winger and I think it is highly necessary that we stand tall being what we stand for and that we are not shamed by the so-called "mainstream media". When we simply ignore their noise, their narrative immediately loses power and steam.

Sam Harris - despite not being a fan of the likes of Trump - admits that the Western people sooner or later have no choice but vote for the most far right party possible. If no one is doing anything against it, then more and more people will vote in those directions - some may even vote for straight up Neonazis, because that choice is better to them to this craziness.

And the funny thing is that Sam Harris agrees with them, because they are pushed to having no choice.

Ultimately I expect a massive polarisation of Western societies. At the very least the countries will be divided - at the worst prepared for a bigger conflict.

(06-19-2016 01:18 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  Sam Harris - despite not being a fan of the likes of Trump - admits that the Western people sooner or later have no choice but vote for the most far right party possible. If no one is doing anything against it, then more and more people will vote in those directions - some may even vote for straight up Neonazis, because that choice is better to them to this craziness.

And the funny thing is that Sam Harris agrees with them, because they are pushed to having no choice.

Ultimately I expect a massive polarisation of Western societies. At the very least the countries will be divided - at the worst prepared for a bigger conflict.

Brilliant and very lucid analysis by Harris. However at the end he completely misses the point by suggesting that Hillary could easily steal Trump's momentum by calling out the hypocrisy of the left which is feeding the propaganda of organizations like CAIR.

I once again sense a cognitive dissonance in Harris - he clearly grasps the root of the issue and why so many citizens in the West feel disenchanted, frustrated, and largely ignored by the current political class. But to suggest that Clinton would be able to leverage that growing sentiment laughs in the face of the fact that she herself (as well as her husband) represents the very polity that lies at the core of globalism and the scourge of socialized feminism. She's an intricate component of everything conservatives and even centrist are (or should be) opposed to.

Trump in essence has become the catalyst that managed to breathe new life into a large portion of the voting public that has continuously been taking it up the ass for several decades now. He represents an anomaly in American politics as he has successfully been able to break all the rules of the game and, much to the chagrin of the left, keeps getting away with it. He's a lot smarter than most people give him credit but most importantly he's got FU money and doesn't give a damn about his critics. And that is key - that set of BALLS and CLARITY is something that has been long missing in our political process.

What many people in the center or on the right are experiencing thanks to Trump is a moment of catharsis. It's an opportunity for them to finally channel their own frustrations and sense of helplessness. Much of what Trump offers may be over simplified and I am sure that deep inside most of us know it. But it's not so much about the man right now - it's about the message. BALLS and CLARITY with a focus on real life solutions opposing the globalist politically correct nightmare we have found ourselves in.

Guys... all this hatred of Islam - don't you know that it's a small minority of extremist Muslims that want these bad things in the world? Most normal Muslims are moderate and despise the extremists as much as we do - see for yourself:

(06-19-2016 07:46 AM)Sandstorm Wrote:  Guys... all this hatred of Islam - don't you know that it's a small minority of extremist Muslims that want these bad things in the world? Most normal Muslims are moderate and despise the extremists as much as we do - see for yourself:

The moderate Muslim narrative works only under the following circumstances - 3 kinds of "moderates":

1. First kind of Muslim lives in a secular or Western state that would punish him if he follows the dictates of the Quran - this also concerns predominantly Muslim states. Essentially that kind of fake moderate is just cowed into submission by more powerful forces.

2. Second kind of Muslim does not know jack shit about the Islamic lore and only gives lip service to Islam - that is the majority of Muslims in the world. They defend Mohammed and Islam without knowing much about it. This still does not make them really moderate, since they do not really know what they are talking about. They are swayed by the emotions of crowds easily.

3. The third kind of Muslim is probably the truly moderate one. The spiritual or intrinsically secular aware Muslims, because they are either highly positive (spiritual in my definition) - thus this group would never dream of doing as Mohammed has done. And the other group is also aware of the shortcomings of Islam, but simply chooses to ignore it out of reason, logic or ethics. So those groups adhere to some rules of Islam, but completely ignore others. Also many tend to focus on positive influences like Rumi, Sufism or secular Muslim reformers.

Of course in reality the first group of subdued radicals would always rule unless someone like Ataturk literally threatens to kill them. The second group of the majority play no role in reality. They will follow the wind. They won't join ISIS, but they won't fight ISIS either.

The third group - the secular ethical ones and the spiritual ones only have power if they are willing to combat the first group. But this is so difficult in reality, because the Islamic clerics are right - they do not represent true Islam. And this is a big problem.

Christians had an easy time abolishing the Spanish Inquisition because that movement was un-Christian (what would Jesus do?). But you would have a much harder time abolishing sharia law, slavery, Jizya, violent Jihad because those things are at the core of Islam (what would Mohammed do?).

Reform in my opinion is incredibly difficult. It would be easier to ban the entire religion. Religions come and go - it takes thousands of years sometimes - but nothing lasts forever. Now it seems as the elite is just speeding up the process by inciting bloodshed, but that is their hallmark - so no surprise there.

http://www.welt.de/vermischtes/article15...Mosel.html

Quote:Three and a half years ago Ninorta Bahno fled from the civil war in Syria. Now the 25-year-old is nominated for Trier's Wine Queen. She has built up in Germany a new life.

   

Whereby Ninorta Bahno also can imagine, even to apply for a German passport. Because here it is built up not only a livelihood. Here she met her fiance; He is also Aramaic Christ.

This story is interesting. You have a women that a real refugee and mostly she integrate and adapt to German values because she is christian. Still nothing is perfect the last line let me wonder. We get 80 % men below 30, then families and if there are any women, they marry someone from their own group. There are cases where German women take an Arab but I've never read about a story where a German guy manage to land and an Arab girl like her. So even if there are single women arrive to Germany, they marry insider their ethical religious group. Many cry about the Yazidi but in Germany even before the whole invasion we had some groups of them. They are well know for honour killings when the daughters dare to marry outside of their group.

How should it work when german women are able for the invaders but German men are cut out? Even more the birth rate among then is higher. They talk about diversity and stuff like that. Where is the diversity when there are no Germans left?
And why do we need diversity? Go to the middle east, all look the same, brown skin, brown eyes, dark hair. Go to Africa, all are black and have black hair. Go to Asia, all are Asian with dark eyes and dark hair. Go to Europe and you see all variations of hair and eye colour. This is the real diversity.

Arabs and Africans largely contribute nothing to Europe, get used to saying it without feeling shame, we do not need them.

I'd be all for immigration from Brazil, Ukraine, Russia even Portugal, Greece and Spain, but this bs of arabs and africans GTFO, can't wait until deportations begin.

(06-19-2016 08:22 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

(06-19-2016 07:46 AM)Sandstorm Wrote:  Guys... all this hatred of Islam - don't you know that it's a small minority of extremist Muslims that want these bad things in the world? Most normal Muslims are moderate and despise the extremists as much as we do - see for yourself:

The moderate Muslim narrative works only under the following circumstances - 3 kinds of "moderates":

1. First kind of Muslim lives in a secular or Western state that would punish him if he follows the dictates of the Quran - this also concerns predominantly Muslim states. Essentially that kind of fake moderate is just cowed into submission by more powerful forces.

2. Second kind of Muslim does not know jack shit about the Islamic lore and only gives lip service to Islam - that is the majority of Muslims in the world. They defend Mohammed and Islam without knowing much about it. This still does not make them really moderate, since they do not really know what they are talking about. They are swayed by the emotions of crowds easily.

3. The third kind of Muslim is probably the truly moderate one. The spiritual or intrinsically secular aware Muslims, because they are either highly positive (spiritual in my definition) - thus this group would never dream of doing as Mohammed has done. And the other group is also aware of the shortcomings of Islam, but simply chooses to ignore it out of reason, logic or ethics. So those groups adhere to some rules of Islam, but completely ignore others. Also many tend to focus on positive influences like Rumi, Sufism or secular Muslim reformers.

Of course in reality the first group of subdued radicals would always rule unless someone like Ataturk literally threatens to kill them. The second group of the majority play no role in reality. They will follow the wind. They won't join ISIS, but they won't fight ISIS either.

The third group - the secular ethical ones and the spiritual ones only have power if they are willing to combat the first group. But this is so difficult in reality, because the Islamic clerics are right - they do not represent true Islam. And this is a big problem.

Christians had an easy time abolishing the Spanish Inquisition because that movement was un-Christian (what would Jesus do?). But you would have a much harder time abolishing sharia law, slavery, Jizya, violent Jihad because those things are at the core of Islam (what would Mohammed do?).

Reform in my opinion is incredibly difficult. It would be easier to ban the entire religion. Religions come and go - it takes thousands of years sometimes - but nothing lasts forever. Now it seems as the elite is just speeding up the process by inciting bloodshed, but that is their hallmark - so no surprise there.

Whoever came up with the metaphor of the snake in the grass, with radical Islam as the snake and moderate Islam as the grass, was right apart from one detail. (Not only does the grass hide the snake, it also hides the snake's hiding places and its haunts. Grass, left unchecked in a garden bed, overgrows and strangles most other plants in that bed.)

The one area where the metaphor falls down is that, in this case, the grass actually births the snake. Most of ISIS's foreign recruits, and some of its domestic terrorists, are the children of, or former, moderate Muslims. The pattern is invariably the same: the child comes from a first or second generation Muslim immigrant home, is generally well-educated or from the middle class (although it's not a direct analogue, the 9-11 hijackers were from wealthy Arab states and had funds and means to infiltrate and settle in the US for years).

Invariably the kid gets dissatisfied with the old man's tepid observance of his religion, or gets dissatisfied with the way the old man acts like his balls have been cut off in the West, or just gets flat-out dissatisfied with the lack of available pussy for him in his culture, and is therefore vulnerable when he runs into sociopathic (read: "charismatic") imams or preachers who take him in as a brother and feed him a lot of literal and not-so-literal readings of the Quran.

So when the kid goes rogue and shoots people while wearing a black bandanna, the parents are bewildered, cannot comprehend it, etc, etc. And they can't necessarily be blamed for it, any more than you blame a gun's hammer for flicking forward with mechanistic perfection and allowing a bullet to be fired. It is an inherent problem with "moderate" Islam: it isn't Islam as literally provided or practiced. Follow Christianity literally in the present day and you're most likely to wind up starving in a Franciscan order of friars. Follow Islam literally in the present day and you're most likely to behead a British soldier and take his wife as your property before having to break to midday prayers. Even atheists like Sam Harris and Richard Dawkins concede that there is no moral equivalence between Islam and Christianity.

The other point was about reform of the religion.

As said, you're going to have a harder time removing things like jihad from Islam because they're direct instructions from Mohammed. The Spanish Inquisition (which did last, in one form or another from 1492 until 1834, albeit it really had lost all power except for censorship from around 1700) was a political/religious institution which had no mention in the Bible at all - and one might note the Spanish version of it developed as a consequence of seven hundred years of Christians fighting Muslims (the Moors) in Spain, finally prevailing when the Moors lost Granada in 1492.

Added to this is Islam's stubbornly nonhierarchical nature. Part of the reason the Reformation worked was because most of Christianity was centred on Rome (excluding the Orthodox Church). As Rome slowly ceded points to Protestant theology, the whole religion could be slowly modified as well. Islam doesn't operate the same way: there might be a council of clerics floating around the place, but it's not really like one mosque has real authority over any of the others.

I've seen a few mentions about moderates and reform. One should note that Wahhabism is a reform movement...actually the quintessential reform movement. Muḥammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab wanted to restore Islam's purity by rejecting all innovation and basing his observance only on what the Quran and Muhammed taught. So basically going back to the core teachings finds you with a more brutal islam...the true islam.

roosh just put out an interesting video about our possible future scenario:

(06-19-2016 09:26 PM)RexImperator Wrote:  

As usual you can see who brings violence to the street and who the cops are most concerned about.

The pathetic thing is that I've never seen an Antifa thug that wasn't a 60 kilo stringbean or an overfed granola bitch. If there were no cops standing in the way then Antifa would be crushed like bugs.

It always pleases me to see these videos. The police are daily getting an insight into who their real friends are, and that will make a big difference in the years to come.

One has to wonder how many illegal weapons seized from mosques will get lost in transit to the evidence locker...

(06-20-2016 03:39 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

(06-19-2016 09:26 PM)RexImperator Wrote:  

As usual you can see who brings violence to the street and who the cops are most concerned about.

The pathetic thing is that I've never seen an Antifa thug that wasn't a 60 kilo stringbean or an overfed granola bitch. If there were no cops standing in the way then Antifa would be crushed like bugs.

It always pleases me to see these videos. The police are daily getting an insight into who their real friends are, and that will make a big difference in the years to come.

One has to wonder how many illegal weapons seized from mosques will get lost in transit to the evidence locker...

That stupid bitch at the end goading on the opposition... women are so brave... when they're protected by men. God they're such fucking idiots. When she's gang raped by Muslim immigrants, perhaps the she'll cum to her her senses.

(06-19-2016 07:46 AM)Sandstorm Wrote:  Guys... all this hatred of Islam - don't you know that it's a small minority of extremist Muslims that want these bad things in the world? Most normal Muslims are moderate and despise the extremists as much as we do - see for yourself:

I think you guys need to actually watch this video - hint - I was being sarcastic about moderates