(05-16-2016 12:48 PM)Red_Pillage Wrote:  Women are inherently anti-gun because they don't want weak men to be able to defend themselves. It's built into their hindbrains to want to remove weakness from the gene pool. Almost all women I've met are anti-gun without giving any real reason other than they "don't like" them. They instinctually want jungle law so that alphas can smash beta's skulls on the nearest rock, thus culling them.

After fucking a plate the other day she said something to the affect of "she hates guns because if you can't defend yourself with your bare hands you should die". She said she'd rather "get in shape and take boxing lessons rather than have a gun".

I pointed out that she, a woman, would benefit most from a firearm as she'd be hopelessly defenseless in the face of male aggression, despite her delusions of fighting off a rapist without a weapon of some kind.

*Woosh*

One of my girl's friends was telling me how some guy was hitting on her at work and how she's going to "mess him up" if he did it again. The bitch is 5"4 120lbs max & deems herself a top athlete because she does Crossfit 3 times a week while the guy is a big Viking type, 220 lbs minimum.



Blame Hollywood grrrrrrl powah trash like the above scene man. Most girls now believe they're capable of out-muscling men if they just tried.

(05-16-2016 01:19 PM)Anabasis to Desta Wrote:  Blame Hollywood grrrrrrl powah trash like the above scene man. Most girls now believe they're capable of out-muscling men if they just tried.

Hollywood definitely makes it worse, but women have always believed this. In the eighties I knew a woman who saw the world's record in the mile and told me that it didn't seem that hard and that she could do it. I took her to the track, and after a few minutes she got the point and said, "Hmm, guess not. I thought I could do it."

Few weeks later, same girl, saw me swimming and said it didn't look like I was swimming that fast, and that she could swim faster than I could. I told her that was ridiculous, and she said to me, "you aren't even on the swim team."
I said, "yeah, but I am in shape, and I swim, and you hang out with the stoners smoking weed all day in the parking lot."

So we went to the pool, raced, she couldn't even finish, let alone win, and said, "Hmm, guess not. Thought I could."

So just as important as the fact that they are delusional is the fact that not only do they not learn from their mistakes, but they have no shame whatsoever. They don't feel embarrassed when they make a claim and fail disastrously.

They have no pride. No skin in the game. They are just saying the first self serving shit that comes into their minds, and have no concept of any possible consequences.

It would be funny, their carelessness with their word, if there was no such thing as false rape allegations. You hear similar mentality from these women. I didn't want him to go to jail, but I didn't want him to get away with it either. I wanted to teach him a lesson.

They don't distinguish between different kinds of talk.

I'm hungry. I like pandas. I could run a three minute mile. You raped me.

Say any old thing. It's fine.

Breaking news. Sinead O'Connor reported missing in Chicago after distressing Facebook post. Then disaster strikes. She is found.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...cidal.html

(05-16-2016 01:19 PM)Anabasis to Desta Wrote:  One of my girl's friends was telling me how some guy was hitting on her at work and how she's going to "mess him up" if he did it again. The bitch is 5"4 120lbs max & deems herself a top athlete because she does Crossfit 3 times a week while the guy is a big Viking type, 220 lbs minimum.



Blame Hollywood grrrrrrl powah trash like the above scene man. Most girls now believe they're capable of out-muscling men if they just tried.

Chicks in General vastly over estimate their power, especially if they did any kind of physical training / sports.

I dated this one chick who was in track and field, I think she was a hurdle jumper or something like that. Tall and had some fairly powerful legs for a chick, not something I'd see on many Japanese girls.

At one point in time after we finished banging and I was laying on the bed watching netflix and having her explain phrases I didn't catch. She was sittin on my chest and got the bright idea she could pin me down simply by puttin her legs on my arms.
The look of shock on her face when I just tossed her aside like a rag doll, she knew I was stronger but she had never truly realized the magnitude of the difference between us.

(05-16-2016 01:19 PM)Anabasis to Desta Wrote:  Blame Hollywood grrrrrrl powah trash like the above scene man. Most girls now believe they're capable of out-muscling men if they just tried.

Any action movie in the last 5 years has at least one "bad ass" chick who beats up guy way bigger than her with ease.

I saw the new Captain America movie and was snickering when Scarlett Johansson (she has no superpower) was beating up multiple trained terrorists in the first half of the movie, all of them way bigger than her obviously.

I am not even sure how people watch that. Even if you are a male feminist how does that shit not get distracting and make you question the whole movie even though ironically it is a superhero movie.

Quote:Suzanne, a young woman in San Francisco, met a man—call him John—on the dating site OKCupid. John was attractive and charming. More notably, he indulged in the kind of profligate displays of affection which signal a definite eagerness to commit. He sneaked Suzanne’s favorite snacks into her purse as a workday surprise and insisted early on that she keep a key to his apartment. He asked her to help him choose a couch and then spooned with her on all the floor models. He even accompanied her, unprompted, to the D.M.V.—an act roughly equivalent, in today’s gallantry currency, to Perseus rescuing Andromeda from the sea monster.

As we learn from the podcast “Reply All,” which reported the tale, Suzanne was not the only woman on whom John had chosen to bestow his favor. Six months into their relationship, she discovered that he was seeing half a dozen other women, one of whom he’d been stringing along for two years. All of them had received the couch-spooning treatment. John was a champion girlfriend accumulator, the ringmaster of a romantic circus that only he could see. Every so often, one of his paramours would catch on and alert the others. Then he’d block them all on social media and begin the whole thing again.

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/0...s-drudgery

Was this beta?

(05-16-2016 09:54 PM)Bacchus Wrote:  http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/0...s-drudgery

Was this beta?

An interesting if solipsistic article.

Quote:To have fun, a woman had to let a man pay for her and suffer the resultant damage to her reputation. Daters were “Charity Girls”—“Charity Cunts,” in a dictionary of sexual terms published in 1916—so called because they gave themselves away for free.

Dating thus amounted to a double bind. If women went out, they were seen as akin to whores, who at least got cash for their trouble—a distinction that was lost on the police, who regularly arrested female daters for prostitution.

1916 knows what's up.

After a month of no home internet and laptop not working, good to be back.

I've downloaded "Elevate" app on my iPad and I have to say it's the greatest app I've ever purchased. Very very good games to improve and sharpen your basic communication skills, and really good exercise for my brain every day.

Definitely recommend it.

(05-16-2016 07:39 PM)TheSlayer Wrote:  

(05-16-2016 01:19 PM)Anabasis to Desta Wrote:  Blame Hollywood grrrrrrl powah trash like the above scene man. Most girls now believe they're capable of out-muscling men if they just tried.

Any action movie in the last 5 years has at least one "bad ass" chick who beats up guy way bigger than her with ease.

I saw the new Captain America movie and was snickering when Scarlett Johansson (she has no superpower) was beating up multiple trained terrorists in the first half of the movie, all of them way bigger than her obviously.

I am not even sure how people watch that. Even if you are a male feminist how does that shit not get distracting and make you question the whole movie even though ironically it is a superhero movie.

Black Widow is a super duper assassin if you want to call her that so she gets a pass.

Don't expect much from a genre which replaces male characters with female ones at will.

On the subject of women with delusions of grandeur towards physical gulfs in male-female strengths, they tend to look at the top percent of women. The olympics, UFC, boxing are good examples where a woman can believe she can be better than the man sitting next to her.

Give most men physical and mental training over 6 months and he could kill most, if not all women on the planet. You try and get a woman to do that without her using the pussy and some blade in his gut as he climaxes.

"If you can't defend yourself with your bare hands you should die?" Haha. Jeez. I'd seriously question the sanity of anyone who said that to me (well, if they were male, at least.)

It's sadly hilarious listening to both men and women alike talk about what they think they know about self-defense. They think because they've taken some casual Krav Maga classes they're going to fend off all comers with their sick ninja moves.

The truth is that the overwhelming majority of the physical stuff you learn in most "self-defense" classes is useless. It all becomes useless the moment someone pulls a $4 knife on you, or there's only one of you and 2+ of them.

If you're in a real life or death situation a lot of it will just get you killed. And if you find that you're in a situation where you CAN use it, like a bar fight, it means your life is not really in danger...and you're not really doing "self defense." You're just fighting - and fighting is illegal, and will certainly get your ass handed to you by the judge when you start breaking out your sick moves because someone threw a punch at you outside a nightclub.

Time learning that would be better spent buying a pepper spray gun, learning conflict de-escalation tactics, how to not get youself into dangerous situations in the first place, and learning how to dump your pride and get the fuck out as fast as you can when shit starts going south. The law definitely doesn't care about your wounded pride.

This info might be a datasheet, but other sites have probably covered these essential truths far better than I can.

Quote:Haha. Jeez. I'd seriously question the sanity of anyone who said that to me (well, if they were male, at least.)

It was something to that affect, I can't recall her exact words. She says lots of asinine shit. You should hear what she says in the sack..shit coming straight out of the id that would make Jenna Jameson blush...

^ Stuff like "Please sir, fuck me like the little whore that I am! Fuck me in my dirty pussy!"

Yep. I'm familiar with the type! I like the ones who wear glasses and work in the library the most. Pretty sure they dont say that stuff to the beta guys who want long term relationships with them. Ah, having game is great ain't it. I'm not sure how I'll ever have a monogamous LTR relationship ever again though, given what I've seen, which is a little frightening given that I'm pushing 40.

So I guess it's been a bit of a double edged sword.

(05-17-2016 11:15 AM)Red_Pillage Wrote:  It was something to that affect, I can't recall her exact words. She says lots of asinine shit. You should hear what she says in the sack..shit coming straight out of the id that would make Jenna Jameson blush...

Would you mind sharing? We need to know.

The reason why John got called out by these bitches is not because he was banging other chicks, but because he lied about it and ran "I'm a monogamous provider" game on them while he was banging the other girls. Probably adding them to his Facebook and social media and shit. How else are they gonna find out about each other?

He fucked it up and wasn't clear with his frame going in. If he'd done it the "right" way he never would have implied that he was on that track, but simply implied that he was banging other chicks and "take it or leave it." Then when Suzy runs to the New Yorker that her man was "cheating on her" they'll ask "did he imply that he wanted a monogamous relationship?" and she'd be all "well no I knew he was probably sleeping with other women, frankly he struck me as kind of a 'player' type but..." and theyd be like "oh."

Amazing that you can be banging six women and still not have an abundance mentality. I guarantee that Suzy and the rest of these "young" bitches are in their 30s, as that's the most effective game to run on them.

Frankly his big mistake is that he didn't just pump and dump them and instead tried to flip these husband hunting 30 something girls into essentially long term fuck buddies on false pretenses. Got greedy and was spinning six 30 somethings with lies when he would have been a lot better off with a smaller group of 20 somethings who didn't care.

A bit of it sounds like BS though, I don't know how any employed guy in Western society has time to spin six girls with "fake provider" game. I don't think there's any way all of them couldve seriously believed they weren't just fuckbuddies. I work 40 hours a week and barely had time to deal with two regular chicks I saw once or twice a week alternately for 6 hours and still get anything done. If there were six concurrent girls at some point, IMO there's no way he could see them all often enough and do "romantic stuff" for some of them not to realize they were just booy calls.

I bet a bunch of these girls had simply accepted their place until bigmouth Suzanne shows up and forces their hand.

Anyway, whatever it really was, no one to blame but himself.

For those travelling often to or living in Colombia/Ecuador/Peru, I just found out that the food here named ´chochos´ which is often sold on the street for no money and doesn´t taste bad at all with some lime and tomato is actually a great source of protein and fiber. More studies are coming out but besides high protein and fiber content it also lowers cholesterol and glucose levels and is high on antioxidants.

So for the 0.50-1$ here you can get a great and healthy snack!

I like it when I learn new words from the forum. For instance, I did not know what boricua or anabasis meant. And, as a result of the second one, I also ended up learning about Xenophon the Greek historian.

(05-17-2016 11:44 AM)rottenapple Wrote:  For those travelling often to or living in Colombia/Ecuador/Peru, I just found out that the food here named ´chochos´ which is often sold on the street for no money and doesn´t taste bad at all with some lime and tomato is actually a great source of protein and fiber. More studies are coming out but besides high protein and fiber content it also lowers cholesterol and glucose levels and is high on antioxidants.

So for the 0.50-1$ here you can get a great and healthy snack!

I just googled chochos, went to images, and I don't have safesearch on.
Try it out.

(05-17-2016 11:33 AM)Anabasis to Desta Wrote:  

(05-17-2016 11:15 AM)Red_Pillage Wrote:  It was something to that affect, I can't recall her exact words. She says lots of asinine shit. You should hear what she says in the sack..shit coming straight out of the id that would make Jenna Jameson blush...

Would you mind sharing? We need to know.

Will post when not at work

Quote:I did not know what boricua meant

I learned it's a psychological condition causing one to upload dick pics to an all men's forum.

(05-17-2016 12:34 PM)spokepoker Wrote:  

(05-17-2016 11:44 AM)rottenapple Wrote:  For those travelling often to or living in Colombia/Ecuador/Peru, I just found out that the food here named ´chochos´ which is often sold on the street for no money and doesn´t taste bad at all with some lime and tomato is actually a great source of protein and fiber. More studies are coming out but besides high protein and fiber content it also lowers cholesterol and glucose levels and is high on antioxidants.

So for the 0.50-1$ here you can get a great and healthy snack!

I just googled chochos, went to images, and I don't have safesearch on.
Try it out.

How things change decade by decade:

Quote:I learned it's a psychological condition causing one to upload dick pics to an all men's forum.

Well, now I have something to make me laugh whenever I see a Burger King ("BK") or Dairy Queen (dat dere Big Gulp...)

"Try the new BK bratwurst extreme and 64 oz. soft drink combo...only $5.99!"

I'll never look at fast food in the same way again.

Ramzpaul in his latest video: "Jesus was executed for HATE SPEECH!"

I cracked up.

I made the mistake of watching Sense 8.

Don't do what I did, DO NOT WATCH SENSE 8

To me, the wachowski brothers are dead!

^ Really? I quite enjoyed it.

Though I did skip an apparently 10 min long scene on egalitarianism in an early episode.

What do you think of the following "worldwide pollution by city" map... is it accurate, and especially, is the concentration of these kind of particles the main manifestation of pollution indeed?

Full picture here: http://www.francetvinfo.fr/sante/environ...49283.html