Post: #51

(11-28-2018 10:40 AM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  

(11-28-2018 10:17 AM)VincentVinturi Wrote:  Then you have counterexamples to the likes of Marx and Engels (who was little more than a bum) in brilliant minds like Milton Friedman and Ayn Rand, who in my estimation upheld the sanctity of those principles upon which the American republic was founded, but from which it so fatally departed much too quickly thereafter.

Libertardianism and extreme individuality/selfishness =/= the principles of the Founding Fathers

Libertarianism is a political orientation (not a necessarily philosophical one) that has often times been co-opted by peacenik wussies who don't know when it's time to pick up and fight, and anything-goes anarchists who believe the greatest freedom is the freedom to smoke pot unmolested.

But what I'm alluding to by mentioning Ayn Rand and Milton Friedman is something more fundamental. It's a philosophy which empirically recognizes the true nature and motivation of human beings (which is that they're selfish and motivated by certain incentives, which is essentially what game seeks to do in the domain of relationships), and encompasses such things as:

- Rational self interest: which translates in practice to individual liberty protected by certain, inalienable rights (i.e. "do what you want with your life, as long as you don't prevent others from doing the same") and right to bear arms.

- Laissez-faire economics: basically, free trade. Which translates to a more or less capitalist economy (although we have a mixed economy, and the degree of market freedom is significant), and is a necessary (but not sufficient) condition for freedom. That is, everywhere you have freedom you have something approaching to a capitalist economy. But it's not the case that everywhere you have this kind of economy you have freedom.

- Minimal government, which was an express and explicit action by the founding fathers knowing what they know about the nature of government is to always grow its own power and eventually become tyrannical.

So in fact, the evidence is overwhelming that the founding fathers did indeed espouse, enshrine and seek to uphold the same fundamental principles that underpin much of objectivist philosophy (which is not as original as Rand liked to boast) and Austrian economics (although that was a natural consequence of the philosophical component more than anything).

If you'd like to prove me wrong, show me the evidence. And send location.

(11-28-2018 11:05 AM)moneyshot Wrote:  

(11-28-2018 10:17 AM)VincentVinturi Wrote:  brilliant minds like Milton Friedman and Ayn Rand, who in my estimation upheld the sanctity of those principles upon which the American republic was founded, but from which it so fatally departed much too quickly thereafter

ah yes, I remember that phase from high school well.

her philosophy is not only complete bunk but she is a fuck-awful writer.

OK, which ideas of hers do you disagree with and why?

In terms of bad writing, I'll concede that point with respect to Atlas Shrugged in particular. It blew me away the first time I read it because taken as a whole the plot is totally epic and the implications leave you reeling and thinking for weeks on end.

But the sermonizing, especially Galt's speech, detracted from it as a pure novel and turned it into some kind of half fiction, half treatise hybrid that gets so plodding you need to take breaks to get through it.

The Fountainhead is much more readable and I think pretty damn good as far novels go. I suspect it's easier to criticize a novel than write your own, or invent and codify a philosophy, but I could be wrong about that. Who knows.

Her earlier fiction work, a novelette called Anthem, is excellent.

(11-28-2018 11:07 AM)The Stronger Sex Wrote:  Ironically one of the reasons is the lack of traditional masculinity and blue collar/farming culture. They were the Asians before the Asians. Every immigrant group that came to the states, from the first Puritan settlers and including Blacks has been heavily involved in physical work. Even the original Asians worked on the railway construction. On the other hand there's never been Jewish farmers, miners, construction workers or factory workers in America. That means no blue collar pride or country pride. From the very beginning, and driven by the Jewish mothers (the original dragon parents) Jews have been dead set on social and financial climbing.

Do you have a source for this?

I couldn't find any reference or statistics about what percentage of early Jewish immigrants worked in what professions. And I looked.

I did find this interesting excerpt from Tomas Sowell's book, Black Rednecks and White Liberals, though:

Quote: According to a history of the Jews in the United States, "staggering numbers of Jews in the decades before and after the Civil War first experienced America through peddling," which became "the nearly universal American Jewish male experience."

While Jewish peddlers worked as isolated individuals, their supplies came from a wider network: Each peddler functioned in a long Jewish economic chain linking shopkeepers to Jewish wholesalers in the larger cities on whom they depended for credit. The Jewish peddler on the road served as the agent of the Jewish town shopkeeper and the big city jobber. This trading network depended on intracommunal trust.

Wholesaler and peddler understood each other, spoke the same language, and knew the same people. Jewish wholesalers in port cities from New York to San Francisco supplied Jewish peddlers with merchandise which they carried on their backs into the hinterlands --- to farmers, minders, railroad crews and others working far from the big cities and often in places where there were few or no stores.

Peddlers of course also worked in cities and in every region of the country
--- from the Souther plantations to the California mining camps where Levi Strauss first began to sell the rugged trousers that were to make his name famous. While Jewish peddlers often worked in isolation among a non-Jewish population, they were nevertheless tied to a wider Jewish community, not only by commercial ties to Jewish wholesalers and manufacturers, but also to family members in Europe and America. They often saved money to pay for transatlantic passage for relatives in Europe to come and join them.

These savings at some point also allowed the peddler to set up a little shop in town, settle down, get married, and raise a family. The wives and children then worked in the same little business. Often the Jewish shopkeeper or other small business and his family lived above or behind the store.

Milton Friedman's family lived this way when he was growing up, a pattern that
he described as common among the immigrants to America in that era.24 Yet this pattern was by no means confined to Jews or to America. Similar economic and social patterns could be found among the Lebanese in Sierra Leone and among other middleman minorities in other parts of the world. The overseas Chinese storekeeper in the Philippines was likewise "willing to live in a small corner of his store."

Post: #52

(11-28-2018 11:58 AM)VincentVinturi Wrote:  Her earlier fiction work, a novelette called Anthem, is excellent.

yeah, Anthem's alright, kinda sorta.

Post: #53

(11-28-2018 10:17 AM)VincentVinturi Wrote:  I do have to admit that all of the Jewish Question discussion on this forum strikes a nerve because some percentage of me is Jewish

Post: #54

(11-26-2018 04:55 PM)scorpion Wrote:  This is based on a really extensive article by Ron Unz. Link here: https://www.theamericanconservative.com/...ritocracy/

The tl;dr is that Jews are absurdly over-represented in Ivy League administrative roles, with 7 out of the 8 Ivy League schools having Jewish presidents. All of the admissions staff are similarly very Jew-heavy. Thus it's no surprise that Jews are admitted more often than they would be normally. What is surprising is the manner in which this is camouflaged: the Universities do not publicly release statistics of their Jewish enrollment (Unz had to dig for that info mostly by recognizing Jewish surnames). But they do have statistics on their white enrollment. The scam is that the Universities pool Jews in with whites in their enrollment statistics. So the campus might be 50% "white" according to the official statistics, but half of those whites will actually be Jewish. So the school is actually 25% Jewish, while Jews are still just 2% of the population. This is a scam because even generously extending Jews an IQ advantage as a group, their relatively small population size means that the number of high IQ, Ivy-League qualified Jews would still be dwarfed by the number of similarly intelligent whites. And yet Jews are being given those Ivy League slots more than 10x more often than they should be, meaning they are filling up spots in the white "quota" that they don't deserve.

Post: #55

Ayn Rand was a notorious slut, and adulterer. If she were alive at the country's Founding, she would have been a societal outcast.

Also I can't help but notice the irony of her fleeing the Soviet Union from the political system which her tribe forced upon the country via a bloody revolution.

Post: #56

It's not unexpected. The very origins of Harvard and the Ivy League schools that followed it tie into the (((Royal Society))) /Zevian cult.







Sidenote is that this conversation really shouldn't be about "Jews". So fucking what? The majority of them aren't aware of any of this, let alone supportive of the insanity that is Kabbalism.

What we're dealing with is a cult that operates largely behind the curtain of the greater jewish community. I suspect that it's only a small number even of that group that understand's Yahweh's true nature.

Post: #57

(11-26-2018 04:55 PM)scorpion Wrote:  This is based on a really extensive article by Ron Unz. Link here: https://www.theamericanconservative.com/...ritocracy/

The tl;dr is that Jews are absurdly over-represented in Ivy League administrative roles, with 7 out of the 8 Ivy League schools having Jewish presidents. All of the admissions staff are similarly very Jew-heavy. Thus it's no surprise that Jews are admitted more often than they would be normally. What is surprising is the manner in which this is camouflaged: the Universities do not publicly release statistics of their Jewish enrollment (Unz had to dig for that info mostly by recognizing Jewish surnames). But they do have statistics on their white enrollment. The scam is that the Universities pool Jews in with whites in their enrollment statistics. So the campus might be 50% "white" according to the official statistics, but half of those whites will actually be Jewish. So the school is actually 25% Jewish, while Jews are still just 2% of the population. This is a scam because even generously extending Jews an IQ advantage as a group, their relatively small population size means that the number of high IQ, Ivy-League qualified Jews would still be dwarfed by the number of similarly intelligent whites. And yet Jews are being given those Ivy League slots more than 10x more often than they should be, meaning they are filling up spots in the white "quota" that they don't deserve.

This is pretty fascinating stuff.

A few points:

1. There's a critical analysis of Unz's research here.

AND a reply by Unz himself to the critique here.

2. I found this bit on Wikipedia quite interesting as it concerns the topic of this thread:

Quote:As of 2017, Nobel Prizes[note 1] have been awarded to 902 individuals,[1] of whom 203 or 22.5% were Jews,[note 2] although the total Jewish population comprises less than 0.2% of the world's population.[2] This means the percentage of Jewish Nobel laureates is at least 112.5 times or 11,250% above average. Various theories have been made to explain this phenomenon, which has received considerable attention

Jews are also over-represented among nobel prize winners, and mostly in the hard sciences. Again the question arises "why?" A few theories prevail including a genetic explanation and a culture of bookishness.

The author of this article, however, posits another theory: that Jewish hyper success is a recent phenomenon driven by a desire to transcend historical roles for Jews by going into the most meritocratic fields, i.e. hard sciences. Particularly so, the Jews who emigrated to the USA.

If we operate on the assumption that nobel prizes are given out based primarily on achievement (or at least historically that this was the case), then we can see a similar over representation as in the universities.

3. Whomever it favors - Jew or black or Asian - Any kind of affirmative action in universities is loathsome and, in my opinion, anathema to the American way.

The ONLY bases for admission into an educational institution should be aptitude and performance (in the case of conservatories, technical schools, etc.)

There's a great book by Tomas Sowell on affirmation action where he talks specifically about the university system in the US and how the federal government threatens unis with the withdrawal of funding if they don't play ball on affirmative action.

And how when certain California unis withdrew affirmative action the enrollment statistics showed a corresponding shift in demographics and an overall increase in enrollment across the board (since underachieving students who were previously admitted via affirmative action and were flunking out were now more inclined to apply to and get admitted to schools that fit with their level of education).

'Trumpian Wrote:Ayn Rand was a notorious slut, and adulterer. If she were alive at the country's Founding, she would have been a societal outcast.

Also I can't help but notice the irony of her fleeing the Soviet Union from the political system which her tribe forced upon the country via a bloody revolution.

And some of the Founding Fathers were slave owners, what's your point? History makes everybody a hypocrite if you put their lives under a microscope especially in retrospect (slavery was abolished by white people to the violent protest of Turks, Indonesians, Africans, and others who considered it a completely normal institution).

The question is: is she a Jew that made a net positive contribution to humanity? And I'd argue she most certainly did. You fail to see the fundamental principles that underlie what Rand wrote about and what the framers did in the creation of the American republic.

It's not that Rand believed in "extreme selfishness" (what is "extreme" anyway?) It's that she recognized that we all function on self-interest and recognized that the only way for human interaction and trade to NOT be a zero sum game is to enable people to deal with one another in a purely volitional manner. Not through compulsion, or compulsion writ large (= Tyranny). Which is precisely the same truth that the founders recognized having experienced the tyranny of monarchical rule and mob rule (contrary to popular belief, the US was founded as a republic of laws, not a "democracy" of majority rule. Inalienable rights that are enshrined in the country's documents are there precisely because mobs could otherwise vote away your life and property from you.)

As to your second point, it's true that some percentage of Bolsheviks were Jewish. But certainly not all. Depending on which source you believe to be credible, Jews comprised an absolute minority of the murderous commies. As a matter of fact, that majority of Jews opposed the Bolshevik takeover.

More nuanced reading on the topic: https://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-news-an...revolution

I would like to see a day when instead of making blanket statements people on this forum look at data, provide evidence, examine counter-evidence, and make nuanced distinctions instead of universals.

Post: #58

(11-29-2018 01:07 AM)VincentVinturi Wrote:  As to your second point, it's true that some percentage of Bolsheviks were Jewish. But certainly not all. Depending on which source you believe to be credible, Jews comprised an absolute minority of the murderous commies. As a matter of fact, that majority of Jews opposed the Bolshevik takeover.

Wow. You're being incredibly dishonest here. Not some. MOST. This has been brought up ad nauseum on right-wing blogs for a long time now. Jews made up anywhere from 80-90 % of the LEADING Bolsheviks and the vast majority of the NKVD monsters. Solzhenitsyn, Macdonald, Yuri Slezkine (himself Jewish), Gilad Atzmon, and countless others have written about it. I'm not going to spam this post with footnotes so you're just going to have to look it up yourself.

You like to talk a lot about being "rational" and "citing sources" but then turn around and write some blatant BS like the above.

Post: #59

(11-29-2018 09:21 AM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  

(11-29-2018 01:07 AM)VincentVinturi Wrote:  As to your second point, it's true that some percentage of Bolsheviks were Jewish. But certainly not all. Depending on which source you believe to be credible, Jews comprised an absolute minority of the murderous commies. As a matter of fact, that majority of Jews opposed the Bolshevik takeover.

Wow. You're being incredibly dishonest here. Not some. MOST. This has been brought up ad nauseum on right-wing blogs for a long time now. Jews made up anywhere from 80-90 % of the LEADING Bolsheviks and the vast majority of the NKVD monsters. Solzhenitsyn, Macdonald, Yuri Slezkine (himself Jewish), Gilad Atzmon, and countless others have written about it. I'm not going to spam this post with footnotes so you're just going to have to look it up yourself.

You like to talk a lot about being "rational" and "citing sources" but then turn around and write some blatant BS like the above.

Your statement is accurate in one sense but you're refuting a different argument than the one I made.

I said that the majority of Jews were not themselves Bolsheviks, and that most Jews at the time were not sympathetic to communism.

Your statement is that the "leading" Bolsheviks (however you might define that) were primarily Jews. That is, some of the anti-tsarist and socialist groups' leadership was largely Jewish intellectuals (so-called).

However, that's entirely different from saying that Jews made up the bulk of official communists (they were an absolute minority based on the sources I've seen), nor that most common Jews with no official affiliation were themselves communists or sympathetic to communism.

There's also a statistical wrinkle here that's easy to gloss over: between the late 19th and early 20th century over 2 million Jews left Russia. People generally vote with their feet. So it wouldn't be surprising to me that many of the Jews who chose to stay would be sympathetic to communism out of all proportion to Jews as a whole. Even though as I said, the data I looked at showed that this was not the case.

Quote:On the eve of the February Revolution in 1917, of about 23,000 members of the Bolshevik party, 364 (about 1.6%) were known to be ethnic Jews.[14] According to the 1922 Bolshevik party census, there were 19,564 Jewish Bolsheviks, comprising 5.21% of the total, and in the 1920s of the 417 members of the Central Executive Committee, the party Central Committee, the Presidium of the Executive of the Soviets of the USSR and the Russian Republic, the People's Commissars, 6% were ethnic Jews.[19] Between 1936 and 1940, during the Great Purge, Yezhovshchina and after the rapprochement with Nazi Germany, Stalin had largely eliminated Jews from senior party, government, diplomatic, security and military positions.[20]

Some scholars have grossly exaggerated Jewish presence in the Soviet Communist Party. For example, British journalist David Aaronovitch quotes Alfred Jensen as saying that in the 1920s "75 per cent of the leading Bolsheviks" were "of Jewish origin".[better source needed] According to Aaronovitch, "a cursory examination of membership of the top committees shows this figure to be an absurd exaggeration".[21]

Post: #60

And the backlash (?) has begun, I guess, surprised this happened in Jew York City at one of the Ivy Leagues (Columbia)

Edit: Word on the street is that a rabbi did it




https://www.columbiaspectator.com/news/2...-graffiti/

Post: #61

Top 60 (public & private) universities based on Jewish population: https://www.hillel.org/about/news-views/...population

^^This source is a Jew site, so I doubt its accurate lol

Post: #62

It is extremely expensive to study in an ivy league school. Jews have more money, statistically speaking.

So assuming a modicum of IQ, and Asians' IQ is actually higher than Jews', this would easily explain why more jews go to ivy league schools.

Asians are just poorer. If they had the same money as Jews Asians would vastly outnumber Jews in Ivy League schools.

Post: #63

(11-29-2018 11:41 AM)Latina Hunter Wrote:  

Sure, the Jews get to come into the office at one o'clock. The rest of us gotta get there at 7. Bullshit.

And seriously, is that really a Colombia University office? A blow-up doll, a 20-year-old computer, and all kinds of dangling wires? Step your game up Jews.

Aloha!

Post: #64

(11-29-2018 03:19 PM)Jefferson Wrote:  It is extremely expensive to study in an ivy league school. Jews have more money, statistically speaking.

So assuming a modicum of IQ, and Asians' IQ is actually higher than Jews', this would easily explain why more jews go to ivy league schools.

Asians are just poorer. If they had the same money as Jews Asians would vastly outnumber Jews in Ivy League schools.

Do you ever post anything but complete bullshit? Between this and your repeated advice to young men to "double their money in 30 days with FOREX trading" you're clearly either an idiot or a troll. Either way, you should stop shitting up the forum with your nonsense posting.

The truth: the Ivies have such huge endowments they can afford to massively discount tuition to students from non-wealthy backgrounds, and that is exactly what they do. See here: https://www.niche.com/blog/think-ivy-lea...you-think/

Post: #65

(11-29-2018 03:19 PM)Jefferson Wrote:  It is extremely expensive to study in an ivy league school. Jews have more money, statistically speaking.

So assuming a modicum of IQ, and Asians' IQ is actually higher than Jews', this would easily explain why more jews go to ivy league schools.

Asians are just poorer. If they had the same money as Jews Asians would vastly outnumber Jews in Ivy League schools.

No one in their right mind would give up the advantage of an ivy league diploma in the job market to avoid a few loans.

Post: #66

(11-29-2018 10:06 AM)VincentVinturi Wrote:  

(11-29-2018 09:21 AM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  

(11-29-2018 01:07 AM)VincentVinturi Wrote:  As to your second point, it's true that some percentage of Bolsheviks were Jewish. But certainly not all. Depending on which source you believe to be credible, Jews comprised an absolute minority of the murderous commies. As a matter of fact, that majority of Jews opposed the Bolshevik takeover.

Wow. You're being incredibly dishonest here. Not some. MOST. This has been brought up ad nauseum on right-wing blogs for a long time now. Jews made up anywhere from 80-90 % of the LEADING Bolsheviks and the vast majority of the NKVD monsters. Solzhenitsyn, Macdonald, Yuri Slezkine (himself Jewish), Gilad Atzmon, and countless others have written about it. I'm not going to spam this post with footnotes so you're just going to have to look it up yourself.

You like to talk a lot about being "rational" and "citing sources" but then turn around and write some blatant BS like the above.

Your statement is accurate in one sense but you're refuting a different argument than the one I made.

I said that the majority of Jews were not themselves Bolsheviks, and that most Jews at the time were not sympathetic to communism.

Your statement is that the "leading" Bolsheviks (however you might define that) were primarily Jews. That is, some of the anti-tsarist and socialist groups' leadership was largely Jewish intellectuals (so-called).

However, that's entirely different from saying that Jews made up the bulk of official communists (they were an absolute minority based on the sources I've seen), nor that most common Jews with no official affiliation were themselves communists or sympathetic to communism.

There's also a statistical wrinkle here that's easy to gloss over: between the late 19th and early 20th century over 2 million Jews left Russia. People generally vote with their feet. So it wouldn't be surprising to me that many of the Jews who chose to stay would be sympathetic to communism out of all proportion to Jews as a whole. Even though as I said, the data I looked at showed that this was not the case.

Quote:On the eve of the February Revolution in 1917, of about 23,000 members of the Bolshevik party, 364 (about 1.6%) were known to be ethnic Jews.[14] According to the 1922 Bolshevik party census, there were 19,564 Jewish Bolsheviks, comprising 5.21% of the total, and in the 1920s of the 417 members of the Central Executive Committee, the party Central Committee, the Presidium of the Executive of the Soviets of the USSR and the Russian Republic, the People's Commissars, 6% were ethnic Jews.[19] Between 1936 and 1940, during the Great Purge, Yezhovshchina and after the rapprochement with Nazi Germany, Stalin had largely eliminated Jews from senior party, government, diplomatic, security and military positions.[20]

Some scholars have grossly exaggerated Jewish presence in the Soviet Communist Party. For example, British journalist David Aaronovitch quotes Alfred Jensen as saying that in the 1920s "75 per cent of the leading Bolsheviks" were "of Jewish origin".[better source needed] According to Aaronovitch, "a cursory examination of membership of the top committees shows this figure to be an absurd exaggeration".[21]

It has been discussed quite a bit already in terms of what % the leaders of the revolution were so I will provide a bit of an anecdotal note.

My grandparents were born in EE (well technically Ukraine) and a lot of their friends were born in Moscow, Samara and a few other places. They typically all hung out in enclaves of their communities (Assyrians/Armenians/other Orthodox Christians) and something that seemed consistent is that they ALL knew who was part of the takeover. My dad and uncles also told me the same thing about the stories they heard from their parents and other senior family members. The people on the street knew it was the "ܝܼܗܘܼܕܵܝܵܐ yhu'dha:ya" who pulled the big levers.

My fathers uncle was a bit of an ethnic nationalist but also proud of the Russian heritage. He spoke out in support of retaining ethnic identity and being a proponent of Christianity. Since the family escaped the Armenian/Assyrian/Greek Genocide committed by the Turks he saw the parallels of the Young Turks style of government and the Bolshevik's. For rejecting this form of communism he was sent to Siberia where he died in a Gulag. My family didn't know where he was for years so they ended up traveling to try to find him but ended up back in the middle east because Iran was more tolerable to live in than Russia at the time.

As for the population figures - just in passing and reading different sources- aren't these numbers all over the place? One source says x million number of jews existed in Y year but other sources say x+5 million or x-5 million exist in Y year. Again I'm not too sure on this but just a passing observation.

Post: #67

The Jews also control the NBA. Former commissioner: David Stern

Current commish: Adam Silver



Silver has the Jew eyes.

Post: #68

The original Politburo had 7 members, among them were Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamenev, and Sokolnikov - real names Bronstein, Apfelbaum, Rozenfeld and Brilliant. Considering Jews were maybe 1.5 percent of the population, this seems significant.

However, they were all taken out by Stalin - Trotsky was assassinated, Zinoviev and Kamenev executed, Sokolnikov died in prison. Jewish influence was highest at the very beginning.

Post: #69

What are the differences between Ashkenazi Jews, Israeli Jews and Russian/Ukranian Jews?

Why are Jews paranoid?

Post: #70

(11-30-2018 09:06 PM)Mason Plumlee Wrote:  What are the differences between Ashkenazi Jews, Israeli Jews and Russian/Ukranian Jews?

Why are Jews paranoid?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Do...TV_series)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9Ue9Wdl4fc


For Russian and Ukrainian Jews it's "proud to be Russian / Ukrainian" until it is convenient or necessary to admit to being Jewish. Even then - except for language - their mastery of Slavic culture seems limited at best. Such as this clip when they have Georgian & Turkish style belly dancing at the end of the video. Sure that's USSR culture (sort of for a few Caucasian Soviet Republics) but it's not Slavic culture at all.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=at7n-DAYA9k

That's compared to real Eastern Slavs in North America, which I believe are mainly limited to Sacramento and the Prairies, where they only focus on Slavic culture and even recreated a lot of it (the USSR era - intentional and accidental - ended up destroying a lot of culture. Same happened in mainland China and the only remnant of Confucius culture tends to be in rural Taiwan and South Korea these days).

Post: #71

Jewish-funded billionaire lobbying group The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) looking at this thread, must be triggered as fuck:

Post: #72

Berkeley Votes to Fund Migrant Caravan, Giving them $1,500.
Source: https://youtu.be/S86ek2geL3o

Nice...unleashing upon their host nation by paying for the mass immigration of potential welfare dependents
Wake up America!

Post: #73

Lol this thread, what the heck? What explains this vitriol on the Jewish people lol, so screwed up

Post: #74

Damn this thread has caught somebody's attention. Zero rep trolls showing up in force.

Post: #75

(12-02-2018 06:43 PM)Jaygg Wrote:  Lol this thread, what the heck? What explains this vitriol on the Jewish people lol, so screwed up

As E. Michael Jones said: What causes anti-semitism? Jewish behavior.