Post: #126

(02-19-2018 06:49 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  Let me make this clear as if explaining 2+2=4.

There is no need to be condescending when he made a perfectly valid point. I went through your previous posts and found a recurring pattern which doesn't surprise me. You are sensitive and touchy to a fault seeing everything as an attack on White people and rely on emotive posts that are capitalised or written in italics to grab peoples attention because there is no hope of any of the actual content doing so.

In a curated forum that panders to your viewpoint like this it works but if you step out into a proper zone you would get ripped apart for your intellectual dishonesty. Then again apparently this forum owner sees no value in debating, perhaps someone should direct him to the state of societies that do not debate.

PS : IQ is a ridiculous measure so not sure why you keep going on loop like a broken tape recorder about it. You don't have to k-select people or whatever pseudo-science you are on about to increase it. If you don't educate the children of people with very high IQ then they will have low IQ and vice - versa.

I hope you take this in good spirit and not as a personal attack and use it to improve yourself.

However, to address the bits of your post that actually had some content :

Quote:Some animes like One Piece have tens of millions of Western fans, but no Hollywood studio wants to do a Western adaptation.

Hollywood is a generic term but Netflix has been adapting Animes at a rapid rate over the past two years and casting the leads as White Males so clearly your main hypothesis is wrong never mind your conclusion.

One Piece is an extraordinary work of art that will need to be done right if they ever bring it to the big screen.

Second, other nations have definitely cut the gap with Hollywood. Indias cinematic industry is now producing some gritty movies that strike a different chord like Shaitan, Gangs of Wasseupur etc. In fact, Chinas biggest superstar is an Indian actor

http://www.scmp.com/week-asia/society/ar...ias-tagore

http://variety.com/2018/film/asia/china-...202687024/

The Iranians are producing some gems like A separation etc and Korea is doing some interesting things as well with Train to Busan one of the best zombie films I have seen.

So perhaps going forward, inclusion will not matter so much and movies will be movies.


Lastly, Black Panther was a good movie simply because Killmonger was a villian Marvel got right. He is what Loki should or could have been if they hadn't messed it up. The story flows smoothly and the cinematography is outrageous with the set and setting some of the most colorful and vibrant I have seen. The dialogues flow well and the jokes seem natural unlike some of Marvels other offerings.

I give it a solid 4/5

Post: #127

(02-18-2018 06:20 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  The main group "colonizing" Africa today are China.

China is not "Colonizing" Africa the way the West did. While there are questions as to how beneficial Chinese investment is to the average African the Chinese are not conduction negotiations while pointing the gun or raping the local women like the Whites did a while back.

Furthermore, there is no chopping of limbs for failing to meet quotas like the Belgians in the Congo.

That aside it is clear that the Chinese are bending the rules and are in it purely out of self interest rather than any altruistic motive

Post: #128

I changed my mind about seeing this movie and not seeing it because it seems the MCU is jumping the shark by going SJW with this film.

But it got me thinking, if this was addressed in the film: Why did Wakanda do nothing about the slave trade going on or the colonists invading? Did they decide to act isolationist like America before World War II? With all of the space technology, they could've given those evil white people a beating and tell them not to come back and armed their nations instead of letting the continent be pillaged.

Post: #129

For me, this movie is going down as something quite akin to 2016's shitty ass Ghostbusters reboot (or whatever the fuck it was). In that I'm probably going to always think of all the commotion and agenda pushing surrounding the movie, first and foremost. Which in both cases is intentional, so it's absolutely warranted.

As a guy who grew up in the 1990's being more into comics, than say, Star Wars, I find the MCU to be less and less of a interest in my life. The SJW waters was no doubt tested in the lackluster Spider-Man Homecoming, and to see more SJW agenda pushing with Black Panther isn't a fucking surprise to say the least. Given the success of BP, with no real hard push back from either sides of the political spectrum, I think is safe to say we'll be seeing more of SJW/lib agenda pushing in future MCU films for sure. Hell, we've already had the guy in charge of the MCU, Kevin Feigi or however it's spelled, praise one of his actor's, Chris Evans, over how vocal he's become politically on Twitter. And it's no secret that he's as anti-Trump as it gets. So what does that tell you?

Where the DCEU films clearly doesn't have a cohesive vision, or direction, I've grown increasingly bored with the MCU product of family friendly, action-comedies with jokes and snarky one-liners popping up every 5 minutes or so. With, now, SJW material thrown in to boot. Which, I'm sure, is likely the case with the upcoming Captain Marvel movie as well.

Post: #130

(02-21-2018 08:45 PM)Kurgan Wrote:  I changed my mind about seeing this movie and not seeing it because it seems the MCU is jumping the shark by going SJW with this film.

But it got me thinking, if this was addressed in the film: Why did Wakanda do nothing about the slave trade going on or the colonists invading? Did they decide to act isolationist like America before World War II? With all of the space technology, they could've given those evil white people a beating and tell them not to come back and armed their nations instead of letting the continent be pillaged.

Never explained or explored.

They hate white people (referring to them as "savages" [while chucking a spear at their BMW] and "colonizers") but never did anything to help the rest of Africa.

Post: #131

(02-22-2018 02:00 AM)Aurini Wrote:  

(02-21-2018 08:45 PM)Kurgan Wrote:  I changed my mind about seeing this movie and not seeing it because it seems the MCU is jumping the shark by going SJW with this film.

But it got me thinking, if this was addressed in the film: Why did Wakanda do nothing about the slave trade going on or the colonists invading? Did they decide to act isolationist like America before World War II? With all of the space technology, they could've given those evil white people a beating and tell them not to come back and armed their nations instead of letting the continent be pillaged.

Never explained or explored.

They hate white people (referring to them as "savages" [while chucking a spear at their BMW] and "colonizers") but never did anything to help the rest of Africa.

Even more interesting - the Atlantic slave trade started late and lasted only for some 200 years before being actively shut down by Great Britain.

But the Muslim slave trade went on for almost 1400 years with blacks being mostly castrated - the numbers were also much higher than what Christians did - tens of millions. Why didn't Wakanda stop the castration and mass slavery by Islam? And why do they view Whites as more oppressive?

Of course you can say that you are Isolationist, which is fine, but only beating on Whitey is because the movie is made by postmodernists who have a chip on their shoulder against the West.

Post: #132

(02-22-2018 03:13 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

(02-22-2018 02:00 AM)Aurini Wrote:  

(02-21-2018 08:45 PM)Kurgan Wrote:  I changed my mind about seeing this movie and not seeing it because it seems the MCU is jumping the shark by going SJW with this film.

But it got me thinking, if this was addressed in the film: Why did Wakanda do nothing about the slave trade going on or the colonists invading? Did they decide to act isolationist like America before World War II? With all of the space technology, they could've given those evil white people a beating and tell them not to come back and armed their nations instead of letting the continent be pillaged.

Never explained or explored.

They hate white people (referring to them as "savages" [while chucking a spear at their BMW] and "colonizers") but never did anything to help the rest of Africa.

Even more interesting - the Atlantic slave trade started late and lasted only for some 200 years before being actively shut down by Great Britain.

But the Muslim slave trade went on for almost 1400 years with blacks being mostly castrated - the numbers were also much higher than what Christians did - tens of millions. Why didn't Wakanda stop the castration and mass slavery by Islam? And why do they view Whites as more oppressive?

Of course you can say that you are Isolationist, which is fine, but only beating on Whitey is because the movie is made by postmodernists who have a chip on their shoulder against the West.

Wakandans could get a pass for the White slave trade - it happened mostly on the West coast and Wakanda is supposed to be East, in the middle of Uganda, Ethiopia, Kenya and Sudan along Lake Turkana.

But that means they are central to the Muslim slave trade.

Post: #133

In truth real-life Wakanda is easy enough to create - just make sure that that genius-level writers like James Baldwin have 10+ kids and you get your Wakanda soon enough:



And no - literacy and school education does not raise IQs. Aside from breeding we know what does budge IQs and that is mostly nutrient dense healthy food before and during pregnancy, clean water, lack of toxins and also high-quality food in the first years of childhood. Even breast feeding raises IQs by up to 5 points if mothers stick to it for 1-2 years. Mental stimulation does certainly contribute somewhat, but most of it is simple expression of what nature has given you.

I wonder where those trolls find their shitty ideas. The globalists did massive IQ tests in the 1930s desperately trying to prove that the aristocracy and elite were sooo much superior to the middle classes and peasants. The results were rather embarrassing due to the fact that the aristocracy was quite inbred and well-fed peasants were sometimes geniuses.

And let me put this clear - I am 100% certain that blacks on planet Earth can indeed reach as high levels of civilization as Whites, Asians or Indians. But blaming Whitey and stating Wakanda as proof is not going to cut it.

Post: #134

(02-21-2018 05:46 PM)redpillage Wrote:  

(02-20-2018 04:52 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  Here's a business idea for those of you who don't mind some heat and the attention that comes with it.

Make a site rating films and series based on level of SJW.

You could have boxes to tick:

Unrealistic female violence
Stereotypical interracial romance
In your face homosexuality
Transgender normalization
etc

I think a lot of people would use such a site.

I spent two months building exactly that two years ago. Posted it here but got very little interest, which surprised me, so I let it die. Incomplete snapshot here but you get the idea:

https://web.archive.org/web/201502230440...ge.com:80/

It had a red/blue pill based rating system and all. Plus authors were able to get paid via bitcoins - it was all there in 2015. Still have the code backup somewhere...

I was planning on advertising it on ROK as well back then as well but Roosh wanted to get paid via PayPal (and not crypto) and that was too risky for me. Which turned out to be the right instinct judging by the witch hunt we've seen since then.

A year or so later I offered to donate the code to Roosh but he said he was too busy with other projects. Which is when I gave up for good.

So there, I tried - put in the work. Thought it was a great idea that would catch on. Clearly I was wrong.

Timing and marketing bro.

It's a fine line between niche product, using redpill terminology is a good in, but does it have mass appeal? Does my/your idea have mass appeal at all?

I really think it does. I think many people would embrace this, but it is the marketing part that matters.

You already have christian sites doing stuff like this, but you don't want to go in that direction. How are you going to sell this to the normal people? That's the thing to figure out to make it a sucess.

You got two interests here:

1) Hate bait to get attention

2) Get normies on board

That's the fine line to walk, but I bet the interest is there. You got to be able to have plausible deniability to some degree here. That you're not just "daily stmer does film reviews", but you're against cultural-marxism and far left propaganda.

How do we phrase this into something positive?

Politics free entertainment?

Only Entertainment?

See where I'm going with this?

Good, clean, fun.

For a new generation, not your parent's or christians.

I think you should think about restarting your project, only remember, user engagement is KEY.

Post: #135

(02-21-2018 08:45 PM)Kurgan Wrote:  I changed my mind about seeing this movie and not seeing it because it seems the MCU is jumping the shark by going SJW with this film.

But it got me thinking, if this was addressed in the film: Why did Wakanda do nothing about the slave trade going on or the colonists invading? Did they decide to act isolationist like America before World War II? With all of the space technology, they could've given those evil white people a beating and tell them not to come back and armed their nations instead of letting the continent be pillaged.

Most people are just united when it is to bash or fight an outer enemy. Muslims slay each other all the time, but love to focus on the USA, Israel and the west. Same for blacks in Africa or to a degree in the USA.
Its like a entitled kid. Not able to listen nor learn but always blame the others. There is no white man with a gun behind you and force you to blow yourself up in a Kindergarten or abuse your own tribe like Mugabe in Rhodesia. Africa is full of corruption and tribal thinking, same goes to the middle east. The West can just abuse what they give us to abuse. You will be always down as long you don't seek the true issue of all the problems inside you. Victim mentality is spreading like cancer in our times. Emotional driven and ready to blame the others.

Personal I don't like to give such people any support. Even more, countries have interest and not friends. Those countries in Africa and the middle east don't act in favour of their own people. Its naive to think people in the west should do it.

Post: #136

(02-21-2018 05:46 PM)redpillage Wrote:  

(02-20-2018 04:52 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  Here's a business idea for those of you who don't mind some heat and the attention that comes with it.

Make a site rating films and series based on level of SJW.

You could have boxes to tick:

Unrealistic female violence
Stereotypical interracial romance
In your face homosexuality
Transgender normalization
etc

I think a lot of people would use such a site.

I spent two months building exactly that two years ago. Posted it here but got very little interest, which surprised me, so I let it die. Incomplete snapshot here but you get the idea:

https://web.archive.org/web/201502230440...ge.com:80/

It had a red/blue pill based rating system and all. Plus authors were able to get paid via bitcoins - it was all there in 2015. Still have the code backup somewhere...

Good idea, but it would take quite some considerable manpower and money to create a site that is attractive enough for people to look at.

Also it would have to be a bit distinct from pure Manosphere/Red Pill/neomasculine sites to appeal to a greater number of people.

You could simply have a few selection criteria beyond the overall rating which can be murky for example:

+ social justice agenda
+ anti-parent agenda - parents/siblings getting killed brutally (in lots of Disney movies)
+ gay agenda
+ anti-capitalism agenda
+ feminism agenda
+ anti-White agenda
+ anti-Trump agenda
+ pro abortion agenda
+ anti gun agenda
+ transgender agenda

etc.

You could have a movie on first glance in addition to the rating, quality of production, story, plotholes etc.

So that everyone taking a look at a movie would see instantly whether it is worth getting their kids into a flic when for example the father gets brutally murdered one hour into the movie in HOW TO TRAIN A DRAGON (with younger children left crying in the theaters while the lead character forgets about his dad 2 minutes later).

That spares you from reading scores of reviews.

For example - older movies like the Star Wars trilogy and even the Prequels - would be all green on all agendas mentioned above, since they don't have any of the agenda points and can be enjoyed equally by Hillary and Trump supporters. Also it's safe to send their kids in and not have them impacted by seeing the lovely dad be massacred in front of the son one hour into the movie:



But as I said - the necessary budget for a project would be massive since you have to add instantly scores of old movies by a large team to make it interesting for many people quickly.

Post: #137

RedPillage, have you looked into finding an Angel Investor? I've had some emails about this sort of stuff, but I don't presently have any "big ideas" that need funding and manpower.

There's suits moving around the silicon valley spheres looking to gamble money. Most of them are just looking for the next big thing, not an ideological product. If you have the code, you could present it to them showing that you're not an idiot, and possibly get some serious bank behind you to make it happen.

There's websites dedicated to this, but I can't vouch for them.

Post: #138

Now that Black Panther has been out for a week, I figured the reviews have settled enough to compare the critics' average score with the audience's average score.

The format is:
Average Critics Score - Average Audience Score = Difference in Bold

Phase One
Iron Man (2008) 94 - 91 = 3
The Incredible Hulk (2008) 67 - 71 = -4
Iron Man 2 (2010) 73 - 72 = 1
Thor (2011) 77 - 76 = 1
Captain America: The First Avenger (2011) 92 - 88 = 4
Marvel's The Avengers (2012) 92 - 91 = 1


Phase Two
Iron Man 3 (2013) 80 - 78 = 2
Thor: The Dark World (2013) 66 - 77 = -11
Captain America: The Winter Soldier (2014) 89 - 92 = -3
Guardians of the Galaxy (2014) 91 - 92 = -1
Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015) 75 - 83 = -8
Ant-Man (2015) 82 - 86 = -4


Phase Three
Captain America: Civil War (2016) 91 - 89 = 2
Doctor Strange (2016) 90 - 86 = 4
Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 (2017) 91 - 92 = -1
Spider-Man: Homecoming (2017) 92 - 88 = 4
Thor: Ragnarok (2017) 92 - 88 = 4

Black Panther (2018) 97 - 77 = 20


One of these things is not like the others.


Average Difference Without Black Panther:
-0.35%

Average Absolute Difference without Black Panther:
3.4%

Highest difference when Critics scored an MCU movie better than the audience:
4
for the 1st Captain America (?!?), Doctor Strange and Spider-Man

Keep in mind that Rotten Tomatoes threatened to censor poor Black Panther audience reviews that they deemed "racist".

Also, apologies for the bad formatting, but I don't know how to make a table on a post. Is it even possible?

Post: #139

^
The guilt..., the guilt...

Post: #140

One hate-review wasn't enough. In this one, I explain why Black Panther is for Black Cucks; essentially, it's a made up bullshit world created by White people to distract Blacks with shiny "We wuz Kangz" bobbles. Ya' gettin' played, shorty!

Post: #141

(02-23-2018 08:35 AM)Aurini Wrote:  One hate-review wasn't enough. In this one, I explain why Black Panther is for Black Cucks; essentially, it's a made up bullshit world created by White people to distract Blacks with shiny "We wuz Kangz" bobbles. Ya' gettin' played, shorty!

http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?pag...l2017b.htm

Black Panther is a staggering financial success, but as some black Youtubers have pointed out - US blacks already spent 100 mio. of their dollars on the movie and will continue to make even more far-left white Hollywood people rich.

Fantasy is easy to fall for - when you can simply blame someone for your problems and shortcomings, but then feel good afterwards, then this is infinitely easier than facing the truth:





When the Japanese were faced with the staggering technological and scientific superiority of the West, then they rolled up their sleeves and got to work implementing necessary reforms to change their country. South Korea back in the 1950s was poorer than many African countries even on a per-capita basis when counting only the black population!

Ah well.... postmodernist propaganda and more bamboozling of the people, stoking the white hatred while not solving jack shit. And the worst part is that Hollywood will be feeling uppity now putting more SJW-content into Black Panther 2 and 3.

Post: #142

(02-22-2018 05:09 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  And let me put this clear - I am 100% certain that blacks on planet Earth can indeed reach as high levels of civilization as Whites, Asians or Indians. But blaming Whitey and stating Wakanda as proof is not going to cut it.

Are you really?

You can't write endlessly about IQ differences between races and then say something so contradictory. Pretty sure I've seen posts of yours where you've said "Somalia will never be Japan" or something to that effect.

Then you write this....

Post: #143

In context, he's correct. It could happen but it won't happen.

Eugenics is an incredible powerhouse for human potential, but humans are generally too squeamish or disorganised to harness it.

If someone gave Zel total control over Somalia with unlimited resources and imbued him with the will to rule it with an iron fist then he'd need only take the smartest 1% and use the entire nation's female population as surrogate mothers for a new breed of brain-children. Three generations later and you'd have a fundamentally changed race that was capable of building and maintaining a first world civilisation.

But despite the fact that it's possible it's obviously not going to happen.

Based on evolution there was obviously something about white or asian struggles that selected for intellect whereas black struggles did not. The alternative is to suggest that God simply made everyone the way they are, THE END.

Unless you believe in the latter, then it follows that selective breeding can achieve for blacks what it has already over thousands of years achieved for whites and asians.

Post: #144

(02-23-2018 09:54 AM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  

(02-22-2018 05:09 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  And let me put this clear - I am 100% certain that blacks on planet Earth can indeed reach as high levels of civilization as Whites, Asians or Indians. But blaming Whitey and stating Wakanda as proof is not going to cut it.

Are you really?

You can't write endlessly about IQ differences between races and then say something so contradictory. Pretty sure I've seen posts of yours where you've said "Somalia will never be Japan" or something to that effect.

Then you write this....

Actually I have said that Somalia can be Japan - heh.

And the logic is simple - there are 30 times less 130+ IQ blacks than among Whites, but they do exist. If I were an immortal king and implemented wide-ranging IQ-boosting policies with positive eugenics where all 130+ IQ blacks would be encouraged to take 10 wives and pop put 4 children each and all 110+ IQ blacks would be encouraged and financed to get at least 2 wives and have also 4+ kids each with each wife, then it would take probably only a few generations to raise the IQ to way beyond 100. Plus you add financial incentives for all lower IQ folk to have a one child policy.

I find it really funny when some folk argue that IQ makes for superiority and is unchangeable when you have the Jewish people who have simply bred themselves to a higher IQ - and they barely did it consciously.

https://pumpkinperson.com/2017/05/13/160...ale-hbder/

There was a great interview with a 160 IQ black guy living in Japan as a programmer. It has been taken off-line now.

Now my reasoning goes this - only because your ancestors have bred themselves more for speed across the millennia, then that does not mean that you cannot change this and simply start focusing on intellectual prowess vs speed.

Just as I believe that Whites can breed themselves to IQs well beyond 112, 120 - difficult to know what the limit is. The same way do I make the argument that blacks can do so too, simply because there exist 5 mio. blacks with IQs well beyond Ashkenazi Jewish level. If you brought all those high-IQ buggers into a country, do your really think that they would do a Liberia there? I met high-IQ black doctors and programmers - and they have more in common with the Japanese than with Somalis.

Post: #145

(02-23-2018 10:12 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  In context, he's correct. It could happen but it won't happen.

Eugenics is an incredible powerhouse for human potential, but humans are generally too squeamish or disorganised to harness it.

If someone gave Zel total control over Somalia with unlimited resources and imbued him with the will to rule it with an iron fist then he'd need only take the smartest 1% and use the entire nation's female population as surrogate mothers for a new breed of brain-children. Three generations later and you'd have a fundamentally changed race that was capable of building and maintaining a first world civilisation.

But despite the fact that it's possible it's obviously not going to happen.

Based on evolution there was obviously something about white or asian struggles that selected for intellect whereas black struggles did not. The alternative is to suggest that God simple made everyone the way they are, THE END.

Unless you believe in the latter, the it follows that selective breeding can achieve for blacks what it has already over thousands of years achieved for whites and asians.

Correct. That is more or less what I meant - there are even adequately peaceful means to implement it without any force.

But of course I don't think it will happen. And it would take too long to do given over to nature or chance alone. So of course this kind of thing won't happen anytime soon - maybe never, but who knows.... All it takes is for one African shitlord to implement it and reap the rewards within decades in the future.

Post: #146

(02-23-2018 10:13 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  And the logic is simple - there are 30 times less 130+ IQ blacks than among Whites, but they do exist. If I were an immortal king and implemented wide-ranging IQ-boosting policies with positive eugenics where all 130+ IQ blacks would be encouraged to take 10 wives and pop put 4 children each and all 110+ IQ blacks would be encouraged and financed to get at least 2 wives and have also 4+ kids each with each wife, then it would take probably only a few generations to raise the IQ to way beyond 100. Plus you add financial incentives for all lower IQ folk to have a one child policy.

Financial incentives wouldn't work. You'd have to go old school eugenics and start sterilizing the useless eaters.

There's the rub and why it always fails. Humans don't like involuntary sterilization, who would have thought.

That aside - would IQ alone do it? Even the high IQ Africans still have their juju men.

Post: #147

(02-23-2018 11:25 AM)Malone Wrote:  

(02-23-2018 10:13 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  And the logic is simple - there are 30 times less 130+ IQ blacks than among Whites, but they do exist. If I were an immortal king and implemented wide-ranging IQ-boosting policies with positive eugenics where all 130+ IQ blacks would be encouraged to take 10 wives and pop put 4 children each and all 110+ IQ blacks would be encouraged and financed to get at least 2 wives and have also 4+ kids each with each wife, then it would take probably only a few generations to raise the IQ to way beyond 100. Plus you add financial incentives for all lower IQ folk to have a one child policy.

Financial incentives wouldn't work. You'd have to go old school eugenics and start sterilizing the useless eaters.

There's the rub and why it always fails. Humans don't like involuntary sterilization, who would have thought.

That aside - would IQ alone do it? Even the high IQ Africans still have their juju men.

Indeed - it would require a China One-child policy for everyone below a certain threshold and let's say - 10.000$ yearly income for every child sired by a 110-IQ black.

The Chinese did not have to sterilize people en masse - were just very strict about implementation.

In addition you create more strict policies regarding highly violent killers - make sure that they are taken off the breeding menu fast - Europe did it for over 1000 years in the past - there is even a thread here where all the studies and documentaries are compiled on how Europe became more civilized due to executing murderers and psychopaths.

IQ is the most important factor - the higher levels of serum testosterone levels would produce somewhat higher incidents of violence, but nowhere near the same as before - 20-40% more than Whites or North Asians would be a pittance. And aggression itself can be channeled usefully by a high-IQ society, by stable marriages, strong patriarchal discipline and simply more sports and martial arts.

Of course such a society would not be a stupid Black Panther clusterfuck where a king is decided by a battle to the death with spears overlooked by blokes with lip-plates. Such a society would be more Vulcan than Hollywood-Wakandan. So in effect .... far more boring.

Post: #148

double

Post: #149

Eugenicism is already happening at mass scales, just not in the (((Weimerica))).

In Europe, women are stricly breeding with tall, intelligent men.

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/04/d...ple-planet

Quote:The study suggests that sexual selection is at work in the Dutch population, Stearns says: Dutch women may prefer taller men because they expect them to have more resources to invest in their children.

The stats prove this clearly, Northern European men have grown like 20cm in 100 years due to women having free choice of partners. In addition, men without education are now much more likely to never father children in countries such as Scandinavia.

https://www.economist.com/news/internati...pears-rise

Quote:And in many countries childless men are disproportionately working class. French men who have never worked are about twice as likely to have no children as men who hold good white-collar jobs. Michaela Kreyenfeld, a demographer at the Hertie School of Governance in Berlin, finds that 36% of west German men without university degrees born in the early 1970s were childless in their early 40s. Among men with degrees, the rate was 28%.

The original pua theories, paraded by questionable characters, was completely mistaken as to the genetic agency of white women. European women DO NOT want to breed with low IQ alpha men, like it is claimed so often in (((Weimerica))). The idea of the low IQ alpha vs the high IQ beta is a sort of strange semi-cuckish fetish, which strikes me as "the former nerd doth protest too much", but that's a digression. Don't get it wrong though, the propagation of this myth that white women prefer to breed with high test, low IQ men is a filthy lie by the usual suspects, aimed at creating even worse sex-relations.

On the contrary, Northern European women strictly select for height and IQ in their choice of father of their children. They then just divorce them after harvesting their sperm, but there's no idiocracy going on here.

Of course, the lower classes still get more children than the middle class, but this just creates a divide. The middle to upper classes of Northern Europeans are subject to strict eugenicist pressure, all by giving women the freedom to breed as they wish.

Post: #150

I will watch it tomorrow. I like to go to the cinema in general. I have more issues with Anti German movies. Btw I see Black Panther as is is, seems most don't get it. Its a comedy film. Just think about this: A developed, non corrupt African state. Hilarious. Its so over the top it remembers me of Monty Python or Mel Brooks. The only high stable african states that I can imagine had be either colonies or former South Africa and Rhodesia.
I think Kenya and Ghana preform quite decent.