Post: #5626

Would you considering her asymmetrical boobs??

Post: #5627

^WNB.
Her drugged post wall used up slut vibe, is a boner killer for me.

Post: #5628

There is some weird skin going from her asshole to her pussy

Post: #5629

(11-26-2016 01:14 PM)torid Wrote:  There is some weird skin going from her asshole to her pussy

That little skin shows you the path to take my friend, from pussy to ass.

I'd smash it every day, morning noon and night. Unless she's a tranny of course and that little skin is a TAINT.

In that case WNB and give it to George, my little dog.

Post: #5630

This is same girl from post 5626. Would anyone bang now?

Post: #5631

In the pic with the bowl she looked dead ugly. WNB.

(I might have rated her WB if I had only seen the pic with the black leather jacket. But after having seen her in the bowl pic, it's a total turnoff. Also, she cannot smile. MAJOR red flag.)

Post: #5632

(11-23-2016 05:54 PM)AneroidOcean Wrote:  

(11-23-2016 05:26 PM)mcgooie Wrote:  17yo virgin from tinder. says she wants to have sex and seems into me. age of consent is 16 here. Would you?

Previous and current forum rules have all stated you're not allowed to discuss this here:

Quote:11. No jailbait/illegal threads. Do not talk about where to find girls under 18 or how to have sex with them, even if it's legal in the location being discussed. Do not post sexy pictures of girls that are confirmed to be under 18. Do not talk about illegal drug use or breaking the law.

Apologies and my bad!

Post: #5633

Yes or no?

           

Post: #5634

(11-03-2016 02:51 AM)Penta Sahi Wrote:  

(11-01-2016 07:50 PM)AneroidOcean Wrote:  /attachment.php?aid=34297

If only I hadn't seen that face . . .

Here's a special one. She's probably down to do ANYTHING.

Ugly as sin! I love her profile though. I'd be willing to take advantage of her; and make her buy me stuff or clean up around the house. As long as we weren't seen together in public. But only if she showed me her pussy, and paid for a genetic test to prove that she was born female. I'd have to actually see her body to tell you whether I'd bang her off of the books or not. I'm leaning towards no.

Post: #5635

(10-08-2016 07:03 PM)Penta Sahi Wrote:  No tattoo girl

YES Judge Pirro now and in her youth

No to possible trap girl

Also thought about it and I would definitely bang Huma.

Now, maybe they've been talked about before in this thread (and if so apologies) but I haven't gone through every page.




Asking for all 2.5 girls in pic.

I'd bang just for the novelty factor. But then again I'm a sick fuck!

Post: #5636

Hydraulic press channel guy's wife:

Post: #5637

(11-06-2016 02:22 PM)Sam Malone Wrote:  White Shirt Girl:

I looked her up online...

Jesus, those are big separate eyes.

(11-12-2016 02:08 PM)Sam Malone Wrote:  WB the blonde on the left without question. But what about other two ?


Tina Fey and Jane Krakowski:

Jane Krakowski, I had a thing for her when she did Betty in The Flintstones.





WB with the Betty costume on for the novelty.

Post: #5638

Met Jane in real life some years ago, she's more petite than you think. Very friendly, wb.

Post: #5639

This LGBTQ+ promoter:

Post: #5640

(12-18-2016 04:07 PM)torid Wrote:  This LGBTQ+ promoter:

Post: #5641

(12-18-2016 03:32 PM)DonnyGately Wrote:  Met Jane in real life some years ago, she's more petite than you think. Very friendly, wb.

Most people in entertainment are really very small, only extreme examples are notorious like Danny Devito.

Same thing happens with porn stars, everyone that meet one in person is always surprised how petite they really are.

Post: #5642

You have to read the text too.

Age: 42

Post: #5643

WB #donaldtrumpgotmehumped

Novelty old lady Trump bang.

Post: #5644

(12-21-2016 12:18 AM)RockHard Wrote:  You have to read the text too.

Age: 42

Respect and looks fit for an older girl but still too old for me.

Post: #5645

(12-21-2016 12:18 AM)RockHard Wrote:  You have to read the text too.

Age: 42

I don't think it's possible to give (positive) ratings on this thread without either seeing the girl's full face, or full body, preferably both. There is more text than picture in your posting, and the text is irrelevant.

The ass is ok, but I need to see her face.

Post: #5646

^ Agreed. I, too, would need to see more of her face before I could make a "WB" or "WNB" designation. A whole lot of heinousness can occur above the lip line -- she could have bug eyes, a receding hairline, etc. For her age, the ass looks pretty good, but in the words of Johnny 5...

   

Post: #5647

Post: #5648

(12-25-2016 03:33 AM)Revolutionary Wrote:  

(12-21-2016 12:18 AM)RockHard Wrote:  You have to read the text too.

Age: 42

and the text is irrelevant.

The ass is ok, but I need to see her face.

but STDOWNB

still too damn old so WNB...good lord she's almost my age

Post: #5649

(01-17-2017 06:45 PM)DamienCasanova Wrote:  

Photographs with camera below the subject are usually unflattering.

There is nothing wrong with her. Perfectly usable specimen.

Post: #5650

(01-17-2017 10:28 PM)MOVSM Wrote:  Photographs with camera below the subject are usually unflattering.

There is nothing wrong with her. Perfectly usable specimen.

While what you're saying is true that she is not particularly unattractive, she killed two men and cut them up and put them in concrete below her ice cream parlor. Charming lady.

The caption to that photo on GettyImages:

Quote:Goidsargi Estibaliz Carranza Zabala waits for the beginning of her trial at the regional court in Vienna on November 19, 2012. The woman, who has joint Spanish-Mexican citizenship and who is described as 'singularly cold-blooded', is accused of murdering two men and setting their sawn-up body parts in concrete in the cellar of her ice cream parlour.

WNB and would not buy ice cream from.