Post: #376

(05-24-2017 04:23 PM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  Since we're talking about Ariana Grande, I thought this was funny. I happened to catch that song "Side to Side" on the radio a couple of times and wondered what the hell the lyrics were about.

Well...

Quote:"That whole song is about riding leading to soreness," she explained to MTV News.

"Ride d--k bicycle' is the lyric, indeed," she added.

This is what parents bring their little girls to listen to

8 year olds being versed in the art of the sloot.

I saw a couple of unaccompanied 5/6 year olds the other day pass by my window. Hot pants. Boots. Make up. When I say 'hot-pants' I mean right up the crack. Full on. Oh and a certain swagger. Wanting to be noticed. They were awakened. And this in the rural country where I live. Those girls would never be allowed to roam the big bad city.

Beautiful girls. I wouldn't let me kids go out dressed like that at that age. But then again, I wouldn't allow them to become so sexual by that point either.

So, 8 year olds doesn't seem such a stretch. Thigh-high boots. Hot pants. Thrusting backsides. Sexual innuendo. Bright lipstick. Eh sexist bigot, what is your problem? Not a paedo are you, dirty ol' bastard.

We are fucked. But the kids are more fucked. They won't find an easy way out of this. The next steps will be a version of war and submitting to the conquerors. Makes you wonder why we don't all kick back against the impotent fucking wanker councilors usurping our country.

Some of us want to go to war. But it's the big hard men with big hard muscles holding us back. When things get wild, I will make it a point of pride to take these fuckers out first. The bigger they are, the harder they fall. They protect the weak. The perverted. All in the name of being brainwashed. I'm aware I'm not making much sense.

Man, those kids. Those children. So awake. So ready. Too much internet. I think they had watched one porn vidya too many on pornhub. I blame the parents. I really do.

I wouldn't let an 8 year old child of mine go to a concert where she saw a proto-type of herself in five years time, twerk and thrust on stage, in fuck-me boots, singing songs about 'you know you want it'.

Man, I'm really not making much sense at all. The world has got to me. There may be a grain of truth in all I've said.

Post: #377

(05-24-2017 11:41 AM)El_Gostro Wrote:  Is Great Britain aware of having become a Monty Python sketch?

Say no more!





No, I don't think we have.

Post: #378

@Zelcorpion, are you serious, is that first picture Ariana Grande? When she was on Nickelodeon or Disney or whatever it was she was only 14-16 around that mark, surely they couldn't do plastic surgery on her and other stuff like that then? Her face looked better at that point, more natural. Now it looks like a very pointy, bony, sunburnt, unrealistic statue.

On Page 8 I talked about mass deportation from UK and deportation of all Turks and extremely tight shoot on sight border patrols in the waters between Turkey/Africa and mainland Europe (including Russia). I read a more recent post stating that perhaps the UK is too far gone to be saved. Why don't we just let them in, the muslim refugees can join the fat, ugly, mentally ill UK sluts, we shut opposing borders from UK to Europe not the other way around, while we move valuable resources to countries that can actually be saved. We can also let all the thirsty Turks go to the UK, removing them from CE/EE and thus restoring at least some of the former great poosy paradises. I know I shouldn't be thinking of poosy paradise right now because nails, but Roosh is right, the Manchester attack won't really change anything. We need massive action. What about a hybrid UK, Ireland, Madagascar solution? Those Libyans will sure love the welcoming weather of the Outer Hebrides. Meanwhile, RVF Members get a "2nd Coming" of certain poosy paradises lost.

Post: #379

(05-24-2017 05:18 PM)Canopus Wrote:  The bomber’s other brother, Hashem, and his dad Ramadan were both also arrested in Tripoli by Libyan counter-terror officers.

Libyan officers have said Hashem ‘knew all the details’ of his brother’s devastating attack.

They added that he was planning his own ‘terrorist activity’ in Tripoli.

Global warming must have really hit that family hard to make them all snap like that.

Post: #380

Post: #381

Post: #382

(05-24-2017 06:34 PM)iop890 Wrote:  

No. Because his neighbors are all Muslim and either pro Caliphate or too afraid to say anything. This is THE issue with Islam.

Post: #383

Post: #384

(05-24-2017 04:45 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  Let us not forget that the majority of her beauty merit has to go to beauty surgeons and stylists:

Let us not forget that re-sizing images accurately is important. Fixed the skewed aspect ratio added to the above picture. Clearly she's had a nose job, but there's nothing majorly wrong with her. She didn't need the nose job, but clearly it helped her appearance.

Post: #385

Article from April 2017:

Londonistan: 423 New Mosques; 500 Closed Churches

Quote:"London is more Islamic than many Muslim countries put together", according to Maulana Syed Raza Rizvi, one of the Islamic preachers who now lead "Londonistan", as the journalist Melanie Phillips has called the English capital. No, Rizvi is not a right-wing extremist. Wole Soyinka, a Nobel Laureate for Literature, was less generous; he called the UK "a cesspit for Islamists".

"Terrorists can not stand London multiculturalism", London's mayor Sadiq Khan said after the recent deadly terror attack at Westminster. The opposite is true: British multiculturalists are feeding Islamic fundamentalism. Above all, Londonistan, with its new 423 mosques, is built on the sad ruins of English Christianity.

The Hyatt United Church was bought by the Egyptian community to be converted to a mosque. St Peter's Church has been converted into the Madina Mosque. The Brick Lane Mosque was built on a former Methodist church. Not only buildings are converted, but also people. The number of converts to Islam has doubled; often they embrace radical Islam, as with Khalid Masood, the terrorist who struck Westminster.

The Daily Mail published photographs of a church and a mosque a few meters from each other in the heart of London. At the Church of San Giorgio, designed to accommodate 1,230 worshipers, only 12 people gathered to celebrate Mass. At the Church of Santa Maria, there were 20.

The nearby Brune Street Estate mosque has a different problem: overcrowding. Its small room and can contain only 100. On Friday, the faithful must pour into the street to pray. Given the current trends, Christianity in England is becoming a relic, while Islam will be the religion of the future.

In Birmingham, the second-largest British city, where many jihadists live and orchestrate their attacks, an Islamic minaret dominates the sky. There are petitions to allow British mosques to call the Islamic faithful to prayer on loudspeakers three times a day.

By 2020, estimates are that the number of Muslims attending prayers will reach at least 683,000, while the number of Christians attending weekly Mass will drop to 679,000. "The new cultural landscape of English cities has arrived; the homogenised, Christian landscape of state religion is in retreat", said Ceri Peach of Oxford University. While nearly half of British Muslims are under the age of 25, a quarter of Christians are over 65. "In another 20 years there are going to be more active Muslims than there are churchgoers," said Keith Porteous Wood, director of the National Secular Society.

Since 2001, 500 London churches of all denominations have been turned into private homes. During the same period, British mosques have been proliferating. Between 2012 and 2014, the proportion of Britons who identify themselves as Anglicans fell from 21% to 17%, a decrease of 1.7 million people, while, according to a survey conducted by the respected NatCen Social Research Institute, the number of Muslims has grown by almost a million. Churchgoers are declining at a rate that within a generation, their number will be three times lower than that of Muslims who go regularly to mosque on Friday.

Demographically, Britain has been acquiring an increasingly an Islamic face, in places such as Birmingham, Bradford, Derby, Dewsbury, Leeds, Leicester, Liverpool, Luton, Manchester, Sheffield, Waltham Forest and Tower Hamlets. In 2015, an analysis of the most common name in England showed it was Mohammed, including spelling variations such as Muhammad and Mohammad.

Most important cities have huge Muslim populations: Manchester (15.8%), Birmingham (21.8%) and Bradford (24.7%). In Birmingham, the police just dismantled a terrorist cell; there is also a greater probability that a child will be born into a Muslim family than into a Christian one. In Bradford and Leicester, half the children are Muslim. Muslims do not need to become the majority in the UK; they just need gradually to Islamize the most important cities. The change is already taking place. "Londonistan" is not a Muslim majority nightmare; it is a cultural, demographic and religious hybrid in which Christianity declines and Islam advances.

According to Innes Bowen, writing in The Spectator, only two of the 1,700 mosques in Britain today follow the modernist interpretation of Islam, compared with 56% in the United States. The Wahhabis control six percent of mosques in the UK, while the fundamentalist Deobandi control up to 45%. According to a survey from the Knowledge Center, a third of UK Muslims do not feel "part of British culture."

London is also full of sharia courts. There are officially 100. The advent of this parallel judicial system has been made possible thanks to the British Arbitration Act and the system of Alternative Dispute Resolution. These new courts are based on the rejection of the inviolability of human rights: the values ​​of freedom and equality that are the basis of English Common Law.

British personalities keep opening the door to introduce sharia. One of Britain's leading judges, Sir James Munby, said that Christianity no longer influences the courts and these must be multicultural -- which means more Islamic. Rowan Williams, the former Archbishop of Canterbury, and Chief Justice Lord Phillips also suggested that British law should "incorporate" elements of sharia law. The British cultural establishment is rapidly capitulating to Islamic fundamentalists in accepting their demands.

British universities are also advancing Islamic law. The official guidelines of the university, "External speakers in higher education institutions", published by Universities UK, provide that "orthodox religious groups" may separate men and women during events. At Queen Mary University of London, women had to use a separate entrance and were forced to sit in a room without being able to ask questions or raise their hands -- as in Riyadh or Tehran. The Islamic Society at the London School of Economics held a gala, in which women and men were separated by a seven-meter panel.

After the attack on the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo, the head of MI6, Sir John Sawers, recommended self-censorship and "some restraint" in discussing Islam. The British ambassador in Saudi Arabia, Simon Collis, converted to Islam and completed the pilgrimage to Mecca, the hajj. He now calls himself Haji Collis.

What will be next?

People mentioned all this Islamic shit a while ago, article from 2010:

England is 'cesspit' breeding Islamists, says Soyinka

Quote:England is a "cesspit" and breeding ground for fundamentalist Muslims, the Nobel laureate and political activist Wole Soyinka has said in an interview in which he also accused Britain of allowing the existence of "indoctrination schools".

His extraordinary attack on what he views as Britain's part in fuelling Islamist terrorism was published on the US news and opinion website The Daily Beast. It was coupled with his assertion that the 1989 fatwa issued by Ayatollah Khomeini against Salman Rushdie meant that the assumption of power over life and death had passed "to every ­inconsequential Muslim in the world".

Soyinka, the first African to win the Nobel prize for literature in 1986, made his claims in response to a question about his homeland of Nigeria being added to the watchlist of countries deemed to be incubating terrorists, after the failed attempts of Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab to bring an airliner down over the US on Christmas Day.

"That was an irrational, knee-jerk reaction by the Americans," the writer said. "The man did not get radicalised in Nigeria. It happened in England, where he went to university.

"England is a cesspit. England is the breeding ground of fundamentalist ­Muslims. Its social logic is to allow all religions to preach openly. But this is illogic, because none of the other religions preach apocalyptic violence.

"And yet England allows it. Remember, that country was the breeding ground for communism, too. Karl Marx did all his work in libraries there …"

Soyinka added: "This is part of the character of Great Britain. Colonialism bred an innate arrogance, but when you undertake that sort of imperial adventure, that arrogance gives way to a feeling of accommodativeness. You take pride in your openness."

The attempted Christmas Day bombing has helped to raise fears that some British universities are becoming places in which young Muslims are radicalised – ­Abdulmutallab attended University College, London. But Soyinka, who splits his time between the US and Nigeria, suggested that British Muslims were being radicalised earlier in their lives.

"I doubt you can have the kind of indoctrination schools in America as you do in the UK," he said. "Besides, there's a large body of American Muslims in the US – the Nation of Islam – which has created a kind of mainstream Muslim institution. The Muslims there are open Muslims, whereas in Europe they tend to go into ghetto schools. "The Nation of Islam provides an antidote in the United States to fundamentalist Islam – which is why individuals from America have to go abroad to find radical teachings."

And , speaking about the fatwa issued by Khomeini against Rushdie, he said: "It all began when he assumed the power of life and death over the life of a writer. This was a watershed between doctrinaire aggression and physical aggression. There was an escalation. The assumption of power over life and death then passed to every single inconsequential Muslim in the world – as if someone had given them a new stature.

"Al-Qaida is the descendant of this phenomenon. The proselytisation of Islam became vigorous after this. People went to Saudi Arabia. Madrasas were established everywhere."

This is from 2004:

Militant Muslims find a haven in 'Londonistan' / Some say Britain overdoing tolerance -- attacks feared

Quote:2004-07-24 04:00:00 PDT London -- "Osama bin Laden is a good man. Osama bin Laden wants the same as me -- he wants to see the implementation of God's law," says Khalid Kelly as he sips coffee in a sun-filled London cafe and expounds on his allegiance to the man who has declared war on the West.

Kelly, an Irishman, converted to Islam two years ago while imprisoned in Saudi Arabia for distilling and selling alcohol. Since then, he has become the public face of the tiny London-based organization called Al-Muhajiroun. The radical organization is led by Sheikh Omar Bakri Mohammed, who has long been linked to bin Laden's International Islamic Front for Jihad Against Jews and Crusaders.

The presence of militants like Bakri has earned the British capital the sobriquet "Londonistan" among diplomats and terrorism experts, who see London as a worldwide center of Islamic terrorism.

"The Islamists use Britain as a propaganda base but wouldn't do anything to a country that harbors them and gives them freedom of speech," Camille Tawil, a terrorism expert at the Arabic daily Al Hayat, told the New Statesman magazine.

Recently, however, British security officials have staged several high- profile crackdowns on suspected terrorists.

On March 30, police netted eight suspects and more than half a ton of ammonium nitrate fertilizer, the ingredient used in the 2002 Bali nightclub explosion that killed more than 200 people. The bust came after months of bugging telephone lines and tracking suspects and following a web of leads across Europe and the Middle East, according to Peter Clarke, the deputy police commissioner who serves as Britain's anti-terrorism chief.

The scheme was apparently planned abroad but was to be carried out by British citizens. "That is something that is deeply worrying to us," Clarke said.

In April, 10 foreigners suspected of plotting attacks were arrested in central and northern England.

Then on May 27, acting on an 11-count U.S. indictment, police arrested Abu Hamza al-Masri, the fiery former preacher at London's Finsbury Park mosque, the spiritual home of several notorious terrorists, including convicted shoe- bomber Richard Reid.

Al-Masri, who lost both hands and an eye in Afghanistan, is being held in London's high-security Belmarsh prison pending extradition on charges of aiding al Qaeda, attempting to set up a terror camp in Oregon and plotting the hostage-taking of 16 tourists in Yemen in 1998. At a hearing Friday, a London court delayed a decision on his extradition until Oct. 19.

But other clerics continue to take advantage of official British tolerance to openly espouse jihad and support for al Qaeda.

In recent weeks, Britain has allowed visits by two high-profile Middle Eastern clerics -- Egyptian Yusuf al-Qaradawi and Sheikh Abdur-Rahman al- Sudais of Saudi Arabia -- who are known for their anti-Semitic and anti- Western views. Yusuf, who has been banned from the United States since 1999, has publicly expressed support for suicide bombers on the grounds that the "martyrdom operations" are the only available "weapons of the weak."

Publicly, officials justify what the French call Britain's indulgence of militants by stating that no law is being broken. Britain does not have laws against speech that incites religious hatred. Privately, security sources say that by allowing extremist leaders to speak freely, they are able to keep them under close scrutiny.

Although Britain allows incendiary speech, security sources note that it has introduced draconian anti-terrorism laws under which foreigners deemed to pose actual threats to the public can be held indefinitely without charge. Among the 14 foreigners being held under Britain's anti-terror legislation is Abu Qatada, who has been locked up in Belmarsh prison since October 2002 on suspicion of being a leading member of Al Qaeda.

Syrian-born Bakri, whose group's Web site often carries statements purportedly by Osama bin Laden and advocates support for al Qaeda activities, has lived in Britain since 1985, after being deported from Saudi Arabia. Police and intelligence organizations number his adherents between 300 and 800. He has bragged about recruiting young Muslim men to fulfill "religious obligations" by doing three months "military training" in such battle zones as Afghanistan, Chechnya and the Balkans. Since the Persian Gulf War of 1991, he has named British Prime Ministers John Major and Tony Blair as "legitimate targets."

Bakri claims the protection of a "covenant of security" under which he is left alone as long as he does not sanction attacks on British soil. Security forces deny that such an arrangement exists.

According to Magnus Ranstrop, director of the Center for the Study of Terrorism and Political Violence at St. Andrew's University in Scotland, 75 percent of the resources of Britain's domestic security agency, MI5, are concentrated on Islamist terrorism.

"The threat is very real," he said. London "has the intelligence architecture because of Northern Ireland and the IRA, but the effort has been reoriented. ...We are not talking about a lot of individuals; the key is finding them."

Faced with the daunting task of unraveling amorphous networks, investigators said it was now essential to probe deeply. "What has emerged is the recognition that we need to look inward at our own communities," Clarke said.

Most mainstream Muslims in Britain strongly condemn Bakri's teachings.

"Al-Muhajiroun are well known for their notorious antics, including publicity stunts on the 9/11 anniversary, calling it a 'towering day in history' and the perpetrators 'the magnificent 19,' " said Inayat Bunglawala, a spokesman for the Muslim Council of Britain. "They clearly set out to create a rift between the Muslim community and white society, and part of their agenda is to destabilize society."

Last spring, the council contacted 1,000 mosques, urging their congregations to maintain "utmost vigilance" against hard-liners seeking to infiltrate mosques and convert vulnerable young men into fanatics. It has also urged Britain to adopt a law, similar to the one in Germany, outlawing speech that is an incitement to violence.

Nevertheless, extremist proselytizers like Kelly continue to use London as their forum.

"George Bush said you are with us or with the terrorists -- we have no problem being called terrorists," he says. "When you call us extremists, it's OK because we are against all the pornography, drinking, homosexuality, pedophilia out there. When you call us fundamentalists, it's OK because we stick fundamentally to our beliefs."

By any measure, Kelly has executed a sharp about-turn in his life. Born Terence Kelly in south Dublin, he attended Catholic school there until age 15, when he left to work in pubs. At 23, he moved to London to train as an intensive care nurse and in 1996 took a job in Saudi Arabia, attracted by the tax-free salary.

Bored, as many foreigners in strict Islamic countries are, he began distilling alcohol at home, earning up to $10,000 a month. He was caught and spent eight months in a Saudi prison, where he found Islam.

"Before, I didn't know how I was supposed to feel about alcohol, about women walking in the street half-naked, about homosexuality and pedophilia, but now I know," he said. "Now, I have all the answers."

Despite the support network offered by al-Muhajiroun, Kelly says he hates life in free-wheeling Britain and wants "to go to an Islamic country to live a pious Islamic life." He thinks al Qaeda's efforts to drive foreigners out of Saudi Arabia could open up new opportunities there.

"It would probably be easy for me to get a job there," he said. "But I'm white, so they might kill me, too."

Radical Islamists in London

Muslims are the largest minority faith community in the United Kingdom, composing 3 percent of the population, or more than 1.5 million people. In London, this rises to 8.46 percent, or more than 700,000 people. Most British Muslims are moderate and disavow the small fringe who are militants. The major extremist Muslim leaders in London are:

Sheikh Omar Bakri Mohammed, a Saudi exile who leads Al-Muhajiroun (the Migrant's Movement), an international organization founded in the 1980s. Bakri is anti-Israel and has encouraged young followers, including converts, to join Islamic factions in regional wars in the Balkans and Chechnya, and in Afghanistan.

Imram Waheed, London representative of Hizb ut-Tahrir (Islamic Liberation Party), a group led by Abdul Qadeem Zallum that claims to be nonviolent but supports suicide bombings in Israel and seeks to establish a worldwide caliphate, or Islamic regime.

Sheikh Omar Mahmoud Othman abu Omar, also known as Abu Qatada, a Jordanian Palestinian granted asylum by Britain in 1993. Tried and convicted in absentia in Jordan for terrorist activities, Abu Qatada has openly called for the destruction of the United States and its Arab allies and is known as "al Qaeda's spiritual ambassador in Europe." He is being held in a British prison as a suspected terrorist but still commands a large following.

Sheikh abu Hamza al-Masri, an Egyptian who lost both hands and an eye fighting in Afghanistan against the Soviets and was granted asylum in Britain in 1978. The spiritual leader of the Finsbury Park Mosque, now closed, where convicted shoe-bomber and convert Richard Reid worshiped. He is in jail facing extradition to the United States on charges of aiding al Qaeda and other militant groups.

Post: #386

Four-hundred-twenty-three mosques?

Post: #387

Of course the neighbors were afraid and didn't report him or his scum friends who probably visited him to converse about killing infidels.
I can perfectly imagine same scenario happening in my village where I live. They would simply buy house here and be surrounded by at least 70 year old neighbors or families with small children.
Would they really be a problem for them? No way they would report anything because of fear, especially if the scum casts angry looks to them every day and make weird gestures.

People need shift in mentality. Not just realizing truth about islam, but also adopting a mentality where they know its "good" to report weird events to police (such as regular meetings of suspicious men) and that they will not be racist or islamophobic because of that. They would simply do their civic duty to ensure safety of him/her and people around them.

Post: #388

(05-24-2017 06:30 PM)iop890 Wrote:  

This is how a future shitlord is created.

----

Waking up after death:
Shitlib: "What happened?"
Divine hierarchy representative: "You were killed by a Muslim suicide bomber."
Shitlib: "He was not a true Muslim if he did that."
Divine hierarchy representative: "No - he was. The time for lies is over. His religion taught him that he would get 72 virgins and killing you would get him there. Mohammed would have applauded it. The ones you called racist were right."
Shitlib: "So, most of what I heard on the news were lies?"
Divine hierarchy representative: "Pretty much."
Shitlib: "What about the terrorist. Will he get 72 virgins?"
Divine hierarchy representative laughing: "Of course not. That religion was created by a warlord, who told lies to his followers to die for him, so he would have better motivated soldiers. But you have been lied to by your rulers as well who claimed that Islam was a religion of peace. You attacked men who warned you about it and called them racist."
Shitlib: "So, what happens now?"
Divine hierarchy representative: "It has been decided that you need a more diverse experience in your next life. We have a place for your next incarnation as a nice little girl named Aisha in Afghanistan. There you will find out more about Islam on a first-hand basis."
Shitlib: "Great - I will be a double oppressed minority group."
Divine hierarchy representative: "Let's say - it will be a good learning experience for you."

Post: #389

Post: #390

The terrorist's father obtained asylum in the UK by stating his life was in danger in Libya, and he had therefore to flee this country.

Well, yes, his life was in danger, but because... he was wanted by the Libyan police and intelligence services, for having provided help and incitement to terrorists in Libya.

So, it seems, being wanted by a third-world country's police for terrorist offenses, is ground to get asylum in the West. Cool.

Post: #391

Post: #392

(05-24-2017 06:34 PM)iop890 Wrote:  

Back then, when Muslim immigrants kept arriving to western countries:

- in very low numbers,
- thoroughly filtered for education, character and cultural compatibility,
- strongly geographically dispersed both in terms of origin and host countries, and
- with no advantages in the market or before the law,

reporting an extremist neighbor would have been par for the course. Nowadays, the festering Islamic communities in the West not only have no inclination to report them, but will also get either:

A) murdered by those extremists (now numerous, fearless and well-armed) in the process, or
B) punished by the host country with loss of job opportunities, fines or even deportation.

By "back then" I mean 1970s or so. That's the last time that I can recall any western country still having a relatively sane immigration policy.

All in all, I can't blame the Muslims. Any nation or religion, even the most advanced ones, would start doing what they're doing after being so brutally pampered and being so carefully selected for their worst elements for 4 generations in a row. The traitors in our countries bear a lion's share of the responsibility for this carefully engineered disaster, and unless they get removed from power nothing will ever improve.

Post: #393

Havnt read all the pages so idk if its been posted, but disturbing theories coming forth now.

Basically there are still a dozen or so girls missing and there were SJW saying that "even the Muslim taxi drivers were out waiting to help out the most vulnerable or alone girls after the bombing".

There is an distinction made here between the Sikh taxi drivers (who the media misrepresented as Muslims) and actual Muslim taxi drivers waiting to help out.

The theory is that instead of helping these girls out we can assume the worst has happened ( aka Rotherham).

/pol/ posted this not me.

Post: #394

< Would not surprise me if some Muslim taxi drivers offered a free drive to a cellar in Rotherham-gang-rape-istan.

Either way - this is old news, but still valid:





It's about this massive report that came out recently made by Trevor Phillips himself who actually started the verse Islamophobia some 2 decades ago. Trevor says that he regrets making all those claims of Muslims seamlessly integrating to the West.

It is clear that they won't when some 25% condone violence over "offensive" cartoons and 12% only depending on how offensive they are (the moderates).

By the way - Canadians and Americans are utterly deluding themselves believing that your Muslims are the better ones. You simply did not see it that much, since the group was so highly dispersed across the country and many were better educated (also quite a few were de-facto Ex-Muslims fleeing from Islam). But that has long since stopped.

The refugee resettlement in the US is 200.000+ deep (in Canada it is 50.000+ big - 2016 numbers) and encompasses all the boat people that Europe gets - Somali illiterates and the usual kind. Also your assumptions that well-off ones won't join ISIS are ridiculous. There are a score of Muslims joining ISIS from Canada who grew up in homes with indoor pools in upper-middle class districts.

The sheer size of the US and especially Canada insulates many people from the excesses we see in Europe. But you wait and see when you are 5% and 10% Muslim, you will see the Jihad coming soon enough and your daughters being blown to bits in concerts. This is all parts and parcel of Islamic enrichment.

Since Islam is so evil, then you will automatically have an x% number or even xx% number of people causing trouble - rapes, harassment, petty crime, drugs, outright terror, support of terror (that counts for Jihad - not telling the police or supporting financially Jihad counts for Jihad under Islamic lore). Also it does not matter much if xx% of them never cause you harm or even another xx% of them would fight against the radicals. The core ideology is too dangerous to be allowed to grow within any non-Muslim nation.

Sooner or later the West will buckle and submit to Islam or Islam will be wiped out - and I mean utterly banned worldwide. I don't think there is another way.

Post: #395

(05-25-2017 05:08 AM)Going strong Wrote:  The terrorist's father obtained asylum in the UK by stating his life was in danger in Libya, and he had therefore to flee this country.

Well, yes, his life was in danger, but because... he was wanted by the Libyan police and intelligence services, for having provided help and incitement to terrorists in Libya.

So, it seems, being wanted by a third-world country's police for terrorist offenses, is ground to get asylum in the West. Cool.

I've been saying exactly this sort of thing to people this week.
Additionally, whatever ISIS is in Syria and Iraq, its also pretty popular amongst lunatics. It controlled vast parts of these countries. How on Earth can immigration officers detect which Syrians/Africans or whatever are ISIS and which aren't? You can't. Its like giving Germans in Britain in WW2 free rein to travel willy nilly round Britain.

And there are more British Muslims in ISIS than the British Army. (And before anyone mentions, before Gulf War 2, or even 1, Britain had no really controversial mil ops in the M East).

The propagandists say "the bomber was not a Muslim". Thats bullshit, no one can say "ahh the good ones are, the murderers aren't".

The problem is that indigeneous Brits are being used as the bitches of Islamists in Britain. Separate schools, workplaces, families, communities. Why the fuck are they here? Because we are a soft spot for crime, money making and all the rest. Stealth invasion just as how the M East became Muslim.

The way the guilty parties ie globalists and libtards have tried to hijack this attack is disgusting.
We're a soft touch because we don't have a Saddam Hussein type who'll stamp out terrorist Islamists.

I know people from Southern and Northern Ireland. The IRA killed kids but it had mass support amongst Irish Catholics. Huge criminal networks funded it. Some Irish descent Catholic in Britain or Ireland setting up all manner of businesses very often took funds from IRA organised crime sources. You had the same thing with Loyalist (Protestant groups too but in small parts of N Ireland). It could be property deals, import export, even haulage and taxi firms using agricultural diesel thats been cleaned of its dye. Petrol stations, shops with smuggled excised goods. VAST networks.

And its exactly the same with mosques, curry houses, kebab shops, Muslim taxi firms and petrol stations, fraudulent "crash for cash" etc etc.

Islamic terror is part of a huge business. And the business exists because there are so many fanatical Muslims that they have no interest in mixing with whites. Because often the victims of their crimes (paedophile gangs, frauds etc) ARE white. Islamic communties as a whole are guilty to some extent.

I saw them being interviewed about the bomber's father. One Muslim said "he was a good man". But gave some really dodgy body language clusters when he said it. Turns out, the father has been arrested.

I don't fall for the "good cop, bad cop" routine that all too many Muslims are giving us. They are shielding fanatics and monsters because so many of them are.They WANT an ISIS state. And before someone says "oh an ISIS state could never happen", well it already has. And take a look at Saudi and the like, and its clear there's been an ISIS for a LONG time!

Post: #396

That reminds me, the little shit who ran whining to the po po got his account hacked:

(05-24-2017 03:38 PM)iop890 Wrote:  

heh

Post: #397

Post: #398

(05-25-2017 04:02 PM)Dusty Wrote:  

So how's that multi-culturalism working out for ya?

Post: #399

There are thousands of those that proudly support ISIS and are even known to be willing suicide bombers.

As the insane asylum collaborators have pointed out - "We cannot arrest them for just being wannabe terrorists. WE have to wait and see until they kill someone, then we can arrest them or scrape off the bits of them off the roof of a concert hall. Parts and parcel of living in an enriched Europe."

Post: #400

(05-25-2017 06:26 AM)Dusty Wrote:  

I just saw this and after having a good chuckle, I decided to come and post it here, only to discover that Mr Dusty has beaten me to it...