Post: #551

(12-07-2016 05:39 PM)Rhyme or Reason Wrote:  Can we just rename this thread "schism in the RVF"?

7 pages late brother. 2/10 Dupe joke no GIF's.

(11-30-2016 07:59 PM)wi30 Wrote:  Can we change the name of the last few pages of this thread to "The Schism of RVF"?

Post: #552

(12-07-2016 05:23 PM)aSimpNamedBrokeback Wrote:  

(12-07-2016 05:03 PM)Andre3k Wrote:  

(12-06-2016 09:32 PM)Samseau Wrote:  By the way - I'm no White nationalist. I think Whites are superior, on average, to the other races.

Of course you´re not a white nationalist; you´re Asian. Have some pride in who you are, there´s no way you can be doing well in life if you carry this inferiority complex.

Although I see nothing wrong per se being a Hapa (?) (and not not mention Asian, Vulcan or whatever)...I see now some thought patterns of his more clearly.


I can even relate somewhat (I am kinda biracial as well).


Of course, that does not mean anything to me. As long as he treats me with respect (he did so far), we're cool in my book.


Same with everyone else.

Post: #553

Rabbi stumped

Post: #554

(12-06-2016 07:09 PM)#buildthewall Wrote:  1. I read the rules

2. If women came to you, you wouldn't be interested in game either.

3. I insulted 1 member, singular. The "cucking around" comment was more of a pep talk.

Late to the party, but fuck did I find this hilarious.

Post: #555

(12-07-2016 05:51 PM)armenia4ever Wrote:  White European culture is rotten. The foundations have been carved away. A new better culture will take its place. This doesn't mean that its going to be the immigrants from Africa who do it. It just means that a new culture and kind of people will arise from the ashes and hardship.

In other words, "it's time for all of the white people to die"

And then you wonder why white people have a problem with this.

Post: #556

(12-07-2016 04:20 PM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  

(12-07-2016 03:10 PM)Quintus Curtius Wrote:  What great man have you ever heard of who was a racist or a bigot? None. It's all about greatness of soul. Small, petty, venomous little chickenshits who are failures at life or love are bigots or racists. Like this guy Spencer.

Lots throughout history.

Good lord do you love to virtue signal....

Yes, claiming that there are no "great men" who were "racist" is absolutely absurd. Almost everyone in history was racist, if we're basing it on the watered down Marxist version thrown around in modern America.

I've already given my (negative) thoughts on Spencer and the "Alt-White", but there's no need to invent things out of thin air to make a point.

Post: #557

(12-07-2016 11:14 PM)Enigma Wrote:  

(12-07-2016 05:51 PM)armenia4ever Wrote:  White European culture is rotten. The foundations have been carved away. A new better culture will take its place. This doesn't mean that its going to be the immigrants from Africa who do it. It just means that a new culture and kind of people will arise from the ashes and hardship.

In other words, "it's time for all of the white people to die"

And then you wonder why white people have a problem with this.

It sounds like my grandpa's ghost has an account here. Towards the end you couldn't visit him without getting his "haole's time is up" speech.

Aloha!

Post: #558

(12-07-2016 11:21 PM)Enigma Wrote:  

(12-07-2016 04:20 PM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  

(12-07-2016 03:10 PM)Quintus Curtius Wrote:  What great man have you ever heard of who was a racist or a bigot? None. It's all about greatness of soul. Small, petty, venomous little chickenshits who are failures at life or love are bigots or racists. Like this guy Spencer.

Lots throughout history.

Good lord do you love to virtue signal....

Yes, claiming that there are no "great men" who were "racist" is absolutely absurd. Almost everyone in history was racist, if we're basing it on the watered down Marxist version thrown around in modern America.

I've already given my (negative) thoughts on Spencer and the "Alt-White", but there's no need to invent things out of thin air to make a point.

I'd put it more accurately as a mixed bag with different motivations that weren't necessarily malicious. A different time and a different era.

Was just reading this introduction of Kwaidan: Stories and Studies of Strange Things which is a collection of Japanese folk tales translated around 1904 during the Russo-Japanese War. Very different kind of mentality when talking about people of other races, but not inherently malicious or racist at all.

Quote:INTRODUCTION
The publication of a new volume of Lafcadio Hearn's exquisite studies of Japan happens, by a delicate irony, to fall in the very month when the world is waiting with tense expectation for news of the latest exploits of Japanese battleships. Whatever the outcome of the present struggle between Russia and Japan, its significance lies in the fact that a nation of the East, equipped with Western weapons and girding itself with Western energy of will, is deliberately measuring strength against one of the great powers of the Occident. No one is wise enough to forecast the results of such a conflict upon the civilization of the world. The best one can do is to estimate, as intelligently as possible, the national characteristics of the peoples engaged, basing one's hopes and fears upon the psychology of the two races rather than upon purely political and statistical studies of the complicated questions involved in the present war. The Russian people have had literary spokesmen who for more than a generation have fascinated the European audience. The Japanese, on the other hand, have possessed no such national and universally recognized figures as Turgenieff or Tolstoy. They need an interpreter.
It may be doubted whether any oriental race has ever had an interpreter gifted with more perfect insight and sympathy than Lafcadio Hearn has brought to the translation of Japan into our occidental speech. His long residence in that country, his flexibility of mind, poetic imagination, and wonderfully pellucid style have fitted him for the most delicate of literary tasks. Hi has seen marvels, and he has told of them in a marvelous way. There is scarcely an aspect of contemporary Japanese life, scarcely an element in the social, political, and military questions involved in the present conflict with Russia which is not made clear in one or another of the books with which he has charmed American readers.
He characterizes Kwaidan as "stories and studies of strange things." A hundred thoughts suggested by the book might be written down, but most of them would begin and end with this fact of strangeness. To read the very names in the table of contents is like listening to a Buddhist bell, struck somewhere far away. Some of his tales are of the long ago, and yet they seem to illumine the very souls and minds of the little men who are at this hour crowding the decks of Japan's armored cruisers. But many of the stories are about women and children,-- the lovely materials from which the best fairy tales of the world have been woven. They too are strange, these Japanese maidens and wives and keen-eyed, dark-haired girls and boys; they are like us and yet not like us; and the sky and the hills and the flowers are all different from our. Yet by a magic of which Mr. Hearn, almost alone among contemporary writers, is the master, in these delicate, transparent, ghostly sketches of a world unreal to us, there is a haunting sense of spiritual reality.
In a penetrating and beautiful essay contributed to the "Atlantic Monthly" in February, 1903, by Paul Elmer More, the secret of Mr. Hearn's magic is said to lie in the fact that in his art is found "the meeting of three ways." "To the religious instinct of India -- Buddhism in particular,-
which history has engrafted on the aesthetic sense of Japan, Mr. Hearn brings the interpreting spirit of occidental science; and these three traditions are fused by the peculiar sympathies of his mind into one rich and novel compound,-- a compound so rare as to have introduced into literature a psychological sensation unknown before." Mr. More's essay received the high praise of Mr. Hearn's recognition and gratitude, and if it were possible to reprint it here, it would provide a most suggestive introduction to these new stories of old Japan, whose substance is, as Mr. More has said, "so strangely mingled together out of the austere dreams of India and the subtle beauty of Japan and the relentless science of Europe." March, 1904. = = = = = = = *** = = = = = = =
Most of the following Kwaidan, or Weird Tales, have been taken from old Japanese books,-- such as the Yaso-Kidan, Bukkyo-Hyakkwa-Zensho, Kokon-Chomonshu, Tama-Sudare, and Hyaku-Monogatari. Some of the stories may have had a Chinese origin: the very remarkable "Dream of Akinosuke," for example, is certainly from a Chinese source. But the story-teller, in every case, has so recolored and reshaped his borrowing as to naturalize it... One queer tale, "Yuki-Onna," was told me by a farmer of Chofu, Nishitama-gori, in Musashi province, as a legend of his native village. Whether it has ever been written in Japanese I do not know; but the extraordinary belief which it records used certainly to exist in most parts of Japan, and in many curious forms... The incident of "Riki-Baka" was a personal experience; and I wrote it down almost exactly as it happened, changing only a family-name mentioned by the Japanese narrator. L.H. Tokyo, Japan, January 20th, 1904.

Post: #559

(12-07-2016 11:38 PM)Comte De St. Germain Wrote:  I'd put it more accurately as a mixed bag with different motivations that weren't necessarily malicious. A different time and a different era.

Was just reading this introduction of Kwaidan: Stories and Studies of Strange Things which is a collection of Japanese folk tales translated around 1904 during the Russo-Japanese War. Very different kind of mentality when talking about people of other races, but not inherently malicious or racist at all.

Less than 40 years later Imperial Japan was rampaging across Asia exterminating, mutilating, and enslaving every other Asian ethnicity by the millions. They used to cut pregnant women open while they were still alive.

Do you really think one of Hitler's biggest allies wasn't "maliciously" racist?

Again, while I don't agree with Spencer's views as a whole, he doesn't believe anything worse than the average Japanese person does, i.e., racial and culture homogeneity.

I grew up in the American South and now live in Asia. Asians are way more "racist".
Filipinos in Luzon talk about Filipinos in Mindanao worse than I've ever heard someone talk about blacks or Latinos during 25 years in South Carolina.

Post: #560

(12-08-2016 12:01 AM)Enigma Wrote:  

(12-07-2016 11:38 PM)Comte De St. Germain Wrote:  I'd put it more accurately as a mixed bag with different motivations that weren't necessarily malicious. A different time and a different era.

Was just reading this introduction of Kwaidan: Stories and Studies of Strange Things which is a collection of Japanese folk tales translated around 1904 during the Russo-Japanese War. Very different kind of mentality when talking about people of other races, but not inherently malicious or racist at all.

Less than 40 years later Imperial Japan was rampaging across Asia exterminating, mutilating, and enslaving every other Asian ethnicity by the millions. They used to cut pregnant women open while they were still alive.

Do you really think one of Hitler's biggest allies wasn't "maliciously" racist?

Again, while I don't agree with Spencer's views as a whole, he doesn't believe anything worse than the average Japanese person does, i.e., racial and culture homogeneity.

I grew up in the American South and now live in Asia. Asians are way more "racist".
Filipinos in Luzon talk about Filipinos in Mindanao worse than I've ever heard someone talk about blacks or Latinos during 25 years in South Carolina.

I'm not saying they weren't but there were complex reasons that weren't all malicious. And that post wasn't even a response necessarily to you. Just simply something related to your comment and interesting in the context of the thread.

And the introduction was by a British or American person towards the Japanese not vice versa. I didn't even say Asians weren't racist or that they were. There was nothing in that introduction from 1904 about that at all or in my post. Just that back then the world was different and understood in a way that a lot of people can't even relate too today. No one actually seems to read anything I post in full it seems.

Post: #561

(12-08-2016 12:01 AM)Enigma Wrote:  Less than 40 years later Imperial Japan was rampaging across Asia exterminating, mutilating, and enslaving every other Asian ethnicity by the millions. They used to cut pregnant women open while they were still alive.

Do you really think one of Hitler's biggest allies wasn't "maliciously" racist?

Again, while I don't agree with Spencer's views as a whole, he doesn't believe anything worse than the average Japanese person does, i.e., racial and culture homogeneity.

I grew up in the American South and now live in Asia. Asians are way more "racist".
Filipinos in Luzon talk about Filipinos in Mindanao worse than I've ever heard someone talk about blacks or Latinos during 25 years in South Carolina.

Post: #562

Anyone trying to push the idea that racism isn't derived from the human average is regurgitating marxist indoctrination. People are born with an inherent fear of anything different from them, including race. Racism is as natural as discriminating again mutants with four arms.

That said, based on human nature it's perfectly "natural" for us to slap uppity members of our harem and stomp any son of a bitch that looks at us sideways in the meantime.

Civilisation is in many ways a rejection of what is natural. Refusal to accept the existence of our natural responses means a refusal to reject them because we can't even acknowledge they exist. It would be like finding rat shit in your pantry and refusing to accept that you have rats, then going on bizarre witch hunts for the vindictive people who planted ratshit in your pantry.

Racism is natural. Civilisation is not. To have civilisation we must in some instances reject what is natural. When we reject uncivilised behaviour rather than entire groups we claim to be less civilised then the matter becomes a lot clearer.

Post: #563

(12-07-2016 07:59 PM)Roosh Wrote:  Rabbi stumped

People don't believe when you tell them Talmudic Jews are dangerous hypocrites. It's sorta like how most betas don't believe how slutty women actually can be until they see it. But once you take the Talmudic pill you never go back. The extent at which a Talmud rationalizes their superiority and quick condemnations of others (especially Whites) is spectacular to behold. The whole pretending not to be racist thing while supporting their own ultra-racist state is a very strong example but there are others.

Even though Spencer shut this Talmud down, he will not learn anything from the exchange and continue to denounce Spencer as a bigoted hater while he emails back to his family in the race-caste state of Israel.

Post: #564

(12-07-2016 11:14 PM)Enigma Wrote:  

(12-07-2016 05:51 PM)armenia4ever Wrote:  White European culture is rotten. The foundations have been carved away. A new better culture will take its place. This doesn't mean that its going to be the immigrants from Africa who do it. It just means that a new culture and kind of people will arise from the ashes and hardship.

In other words, "it's time for all of the white people to die"

And then you wonder why white people have a problem with this.

I'm half white. I don't want the expiration of my English, German, and French part of me either.

However when the French birthed the French Enlightment, they started the process that cut out the foundations of Western Christendom that made it great.

White people won't die so to speak - however the weak willed progressive one's will. Because of this, "white" as an ethnicity will absorb new groups of ethnicity. Demographics will change.

Because multiculturalism has essentially come to now mean "dont assimilate" and instead bash "white" Western heritage and culture, current white culture is going to change - probably for the worst. Its had its ancestral narrative and kind of "tribalism" - Christendom, which made it great undermined.

How did this happen? The French revolution and enlightenment may have started it, Bolshevism poured fuel on the fire, but the the end attacker is to quote Jack Donovan:

Quote:"People in Western nations haven’t “somehow lost” the kinds of ancestral narratives and common cultures that unite people and encourage them to look out for each other and stick together. Those cultures and narratives have been systematically undermined by the institutions of Western governments, in favor of a “multicultural” approach that better serves the interests of globally oriented corporations."

And it's not just "white" culture that is and has been the target of it. Look what's happening to other people groups around the globe.

"White" americans are just far more susceptible, because since The Greatest Generation, we have no real identity besides one of materialism. Look at the 3rd and 4th generation ethnicities that immigrate and somewhat assimilate - everything is about what and how much stuff we can get.

Jack Donovan shares some insight on why even with Trump, we are probably still doomed as a "group":

"

Quote:Trump can never be Caesar or Hitler or Napoleon or even Mussolini, because the American people aren’t Romans or Germans or French or Italian. They are all and none of those things. They aren’t really anything. They don’t have a shared identity or culture, and their shared history has to do with a pioneering past and the establishment of a form of government that would be recognizable to its founders only as a grotesque perversion of abstract ideals that seemed like a good idea at the time, in a very different world. If some political necromancer resurrected them to do annotate a new edition of the Declaration of Independence, they’d be footnoting the hell out of groaners like “…all men are created equal.”

The only culture Americans truly share is a culture of commerce. They identify with each other across racial, ethnic and sexual boundaries through a common love of products, of musical performers, of movies and television shows and clothing brands and sports teams. This culture of commerce is only capable of inspiring a national unity as cheap and disposable as the products that characterize it. If you could get everyone to be as fanatically devoted to the country as Apple users are to Apple, you might have something approaching a national culture, but the nation is divided over Apple and PC in rather the same way it is divided between Republicans and Democrats or gun users and gun prohibitionists.

The people inhabiting the United States are so deeply and irreconcilably divided over so many issues that the national identity is fragmenting. As Sebastian Junger observed in his recent book, Tribe, people on the opposite sides of issues no longer consider themselves part of the same group trying to come to an agreement. They openly revile each other. He also noted, correctly, that, “People who speak with contempt for one another will probably not remain united very long.”

The United States have been united for too long. People who don’t belong together and who don’t want to work together — who revile each other — remain stuck together because they can’t imagine a way out, because they don’t know what else to do. It’s like a bad marriage or an abusive relationship. Even more than that, commercial and legal interests between culturally and geographically divided states and regions are so deeply intertwined, and have been for so long, that separating them would be like separating conjoined twins.

Most of the states are larger than European countries, but the United States isn’t the European Union. European nations have individual cultures, histories, identities, social institutions and infrastructures that pre-date the relatively short experiment of the European Union by hundreds of years or more. American states grew and evolved together. I live in Oregon, which was a sparsely populated territory that included the entire State of Washington and Idaho until 1853, and it only entered the union as a state in 1859. It has very little history of its own that predates the American Civil War. There was no government to speak of in the territory before 1843 — when it was truly a “free country.” By comparison, when the Scots talk of seceding from the UK, it should be noted that the Scottish have a collective history that’s well over a thousand years old, and they’ve been in an on-again, off-again relationship with the Brits for about 400 years. France and Germany and Spain have been recognized as separate and distinct places since the Roman Empire. The Danes have been Danes since before they started raiding English churches.

While he is right, even the Danes, Scots, and Spanish are starting to fragment at the roots.

IF you don't know much about world war one, read about the effects it had on Europe. It launched the truly first post-Christian Europe because of how badly it shattered the culture, morale, and worldview of the generation who fought it.

After the war was over, everything from the past that did or might have contributed to it had to be rid - even if some of that, namely Christendom, helped it flourish for so many years. Whether it's Ernest Hemmingway and The Sun Also Rises to F Scott Fitzgerald and the Great Gatsby, notice what all the writers, poets, etc who survived the war wrote about.

When Europe shed it's identity it never replaced it. We barely have a cohesive identity in the US and the civil war permanently shattered that. WW2 briefly brought us together, but what then?

Eventually, a new tribal and cultural identity is going to be formed. It probably won't be "racial" because of technology, speed of communication, and the fact you can take a boat or fly to another part of the world in a day.

A new identity will be formed, and while it will still be local, it will involve men like us. People trying to rebuild civilization by rebuilding men and our families - which is what this forum is.

Embracing the "nazis" is going to make that happen. When you go down a path where you see every single jew, minority, or did "dindu" as a threat, you will be blinded to the fact to evaluating people based on who they are, rather then the tribe they came from. Don't put on a set of glasses that you can't take off.

Yes, there may be racial and genetic differences between the races and even ethnic groups. It's going to take Africa hundreds of years to build generations who have an education that goes beyond the first grade so to speak - just like it did Europe.

IT will also take the forming of a new culture. So many cultures in the world are flawed, rotten, and often the reason why certain groups have never been able to advance.

Post: #565

(12-07-2016 03:43 PM)Kona Wrote:  It just makes no sense to me. Guys like Richard Spencer and some on the forum want to be able to celebrate their Heritage and be proud of their identity, but they don't want it to go further than white. Are they embarassed of their Germaneness or Britishness?

I had a conversation with a girl who immigrated here from India earlier this week about something related to this.

We ended up talking about how I had pride in my ethnic identity (European or white) and she asked something along the lines of, "How can you identify with being European, hasn't there been enough time where you are disconnected from them?" I would say that yes, to some extent I am disconnected on a cultural level from my racial heritage (French, German, Spanish, Dutch, Scottish, generally Western Euro countries), which is why I have trouble feeling pride in any individual Western European state that I am descended from. Those cultures are alien to me on some level, but the people that live there are not because we all are descended from the same tribes and share some common cultural values and history on some level.

Saying I am proud of my European heritage is just a shortcut to saying that I am proud to have descended from Germans who migrated to Idaho to become potato farmers, or Dutchmen who ended up in Oregon and contributed to the development of Electrical Engineering, or Spaniards who were once conquistadores who conquered South America and ended up becoming ranchers and doctors, or Italians who immigrated to South America to start a fashion business. This is just a basic collection of histories of what I remember learning about my ancestral history.

Ultimately, I am not Spanish or French or German or Scottish, I am an American. I am an American who happens to be descended from European immigrants (white guy), and I just want to understand who I come from, what that means to me, and to take pride in my ancestry.

For me, it's not about hate, I just want to understand who I am and where I fit into the world.

Post: #566

(12-08-2016 12:01 AM)Enigma Wrote:  

(12-07-2016 11:38 PM)Comte De St. Germain Wrote:  I'd put it more accurately as a mixed bag with different motivations that weren't necessarily malicious. A different time and a different era.

Was just reading this introduction of Kwaidan: Stories and Studies of Strange Things which is a collection of Japanese folk tales translated around 1904 during the Russo-Japanese War. Very different kind of mentality when talking about people of other races, but not inherently malicious or racist at all.

Less than 40 years later Imperial Japan was rampaging across Asia exterminating, mutilating, and enslaving every other Asian ethnicity by the millions. They used to cut pregnant women open while they were still alive.

Do you really think one of Hitler's biggest allies wasn't "maliciously" racist?

Again, while I don't agree with Spencer's views as a whole, he doesn't believe anything worse than the average Japanese person does, i.e., racial and culture homogeneity.

I grew up in the American South and now live in Asia. Asians are way more "racist".
Filipinos in Luzon talk about Filipinos in Mindanao worse than I've ever heard someone talk about blacks or Latinos during 25 years in South Carolina.

Living here now, I laugh at what counts as "racism" over there in the U.S.. If you are sensitive in any way, shape, or form, prepared to be "triggered" coming to Japan and living here.

I had several conversations with Japanese people that played out like this:

Japanese person: "I am surprised by what is happening in America and Europe. I think the immigrants should be able to move to where they can have a better life."

Wealth: "What about Japan? Should they come here?"

Japanese person: "......"

Post: #567

SJW's in the town Spencer's mom lives in are extorting her to stop supporting her son with office space or to sell her assets.

Quote:Human rights group Love Lives Here has been vocally opposed to Richard Spencer's views, but its co-founder says she has no problem with Richard spending time, or his mother doing business in Whitefish.

"I don't know what he does when he comes here,” says Albert. “But that is not our problem with Richard Spencer. It is the national policy institute and what that stands for and our town being smeared by his philosophy."

Tanya says she does have a problem with it, though. She says, Sherry "Could address this by selling the building, making a donation to human rights efforts, and making a statement in opposition to white supremacist ideas spread by Richard."

One thing on which both Tanya and Sherry agree: The tenants at 22 Lupfer are stuck in the middle. The owner of Whitefish Aesthetics tells me her association with the building is destroying her business and she's moving out if Sherry doesn't sell it.

http://www.abcfoxmontana.com/story/34036...-notoriety

Post: #568

^ Mommy gives him office space!

The Clarey Test was on point: /thread-59469...pid1457989

Post: #569

(12-14-2016 08:56 PM)Roosh Wrote:  SJW's in the town Spencer's mom lives in are extorting her to stop supporting her son with office space or to sell her assets.

When you compare Spencer to similar thought leaders of alt right such Vox Day, MikeCF, or Roosh you have someone that is not anti-fragile. All the weapons that SJWs/Regressives can use, will have affect on him. Cenovich said that Spencer was control opposition, but by the looks of it he is the weakest link in the minds of SJWs/Regressives to stop the alt-right. Spencer is going to need copy of SJW Always Lie and alternative means to support himself.

Post: #570

^ I think he's got a trust fund and doesn't need to work.

Post: #571

Goddammit I have distaste for Spencer and resentment not only because of his beliefs but because he is wasting his opportunity. He is a child of privilege who went to the best schools and majored in bullshit. He should be a surgeon, or doing research to better mankind ,or litigating in high courts on behalf of the common man- but he is lazy and would rather race bait than do hard sciences or law. Despite all this people should leave his family out of this. I really do not like him but when people attack his family it is just going to generate sympathy for this spoiled brat of a man.I feel for his poor mother , although I do not know her,I know she is just a mother that loves her son-she should not bear the brunt of attacks by his critics.

We all know he does not really work or produce any value any more than Anita Sarkeissian. He is a trust fund kid that really accomplishes nothing. Without his parents money he would not be able to support himself .I remain unimpressed by him.

Post: #572

(12-15-2016 08:12 AM)Thersites Wrote:  

(12-14-2016 08:56 PM)Roosh Wrote:  SJW's in the town Spencer's mom lives in are extorting her to stop supporting her son with office space or to sell her assets.

When you compare Spencer to similar thought leaders of alt right such Vox Day, MikeCF, or Roosh you have someone that is not anti-fragile. All the weapons that SJWs/Regressives can use, will have affect on him. Cenovich said that Spencer was control opposition, but by the looks of it he is the weakest link in the minds of SJWs/Regressives to stop the alt-right. Spencer is going to need copy of SJW Always Lie and alternative means to support himself.

I'm not anti-fragile, and am just as fragile as Spencer is. We both make independent income, but as long as we have living family members, we can be attacked in some way.

I pointed out the distinction between anti-fragility and resiliency in a podcast: https://soundcloud.com/kingmakerpodcast/...-resilient

Ultimately, if you can be killed, you're fragile.

Post: #573

(12-15-2016 08:50 AM)scrambled Wrote:  ^ I think he's got a trust fund and doesn't need to work.

relevant:

http://captaincapitalism.blogspot.co.uk/...-test.html

Quote:So President Barack Obama would score thusly:

Worthless Degree - 1
No private sector experience - 1
Currently in government - 1
Hail from rich/well to do parents - 1

Total score = 4 = pass

Lena Koch

Worthless Degree - 1
No private sector experience - 1
Currently in government - 1
Hail from rich well to do - 1

Total score = 4 = pass

Matt Forney

Worthless degree - 1
No private sector experience - 0
Currently in government - 0
Hail from rich well to do - 0

Total score = 1 = fail

Post: #574

Spencer's mom is going to sell:

If I was Spencer, I'd attack the people who went after his mom with full legal force, or else they will keep hounding her. An example needs to be made.

Post: #575

Definitely sue their asses for extortion.

Check out this comment:

Quote:Lets look at the perpetrators. The three that head Love Lives Here: Allen Secher, Jew, Ina Alber, Jew, and Francine Roston, Jew. Tanya Gersh is a Jew and the buyer she was trying to compel you to sell to Hillary Sanders is a Jew. Tanya Gersh didn’t say the “human rights” organisation she wanted you to send money to but I’d be surprised if it weren’t a Jewish organisation.

Do not give these people any money, sell anything to them, buy anything from them or accept any money from them. Record any future communications with them. When you have an infestation of parasites feeding the parasites only makes the infestation worse. These people prey on unsuspecting goyim do not give them what they want.

(((POTENTIAL BUYERS)))