Post: #126

I honestly don't understand this, Roosh. Why would you show any ounce of mercy towards this woman? (She won't do the same, if the roles were reversed). Why are you being extremely restrained in pushing and punishing everything to the fullest extent of the law?

If the limiting issue is legal expenses, let us all know and we will be more than happy to donate. So what is holding you back?

--Dr. Kahn

Post: #127

^ Justice is expensive. Both in terms of money and one's own personal energy.

Post: #128

(02-28-2016 10:44 AM)Onto Wrote:  ^ Justice is expensive. Both in terms of money and one's own personal energy.

But if one of them can take a shot at you; there will be a stampede with others following in her stead. That means you will end up spending more money and personal energy in the long run; because you didn't nick it in the bud early.

To me, it is a question of smaller present cost versus potentially much larger future cost. The risk benefit analysis suggest you take the smaller, personal cost now.


--Dr. Kahn

Post: #129

Has there been any new developments that I've missed? Her fake story is still on her blog...

Post: #130

Roosh has probably been advised not to speak publicly about a case that could go to litigation. With everyone advising him on how to handle this, the only person he should be listening to is his lawyer.

Post: #131

What ever happened with this case?

Did the writer ever do anything (retract the story or provide her 'proof') or did everyone just forgot this story even happened?

Post: #132

I'll give an update when it's okay to do so.