Post: #26

Sad. If she lost weight she would look really hot. WNB because of the fatness

Post: #27

Substitute "fat" for "fetch" then...

Post: #28

"Oh, you're lying..."

Post: #29

This shit is an ad.





Along with this one:



And this one:



I get what they're trying to do. They're trying to indoctrinate men into liking unattractive women. The narrative is that the magazines set unrealistic beauty standards, and that men learn to like young thin hotties because of the media. The problem with that narrative is that men have preferred fertile women since we learned to rub two sticks together for fire. Being attracted to an old potbellied hag would be uncivilized. The media doesn't set objective beauty standards. It reflects them.

But now there's a campaign to include different body types. But it's not going to work. Nobody taught me to be attracted to young hotties. It just happened.

Post: #30

Yep.
Ashley Graham might have a pretty face, but if I need to throw on a weightlifting belt to pick her up...
It's just not going to work.

Gives new meaning to the term PUA & "do you lift bro?"

Post: #31

I don't recall which thread it was, but a couple of guys, including myself dissected the whole Ashley Graham thing.

She was a Wilhelmina model as a teenager.

There is clearly a point in her life, before she married a Black dude from her church, when she was skinnier, but you can't find any pics of her from her earlier modeling days.

The weight gain has been coordinated, she is the face of plus-size models, and she's caking up, literally.

Post: #32

Print magazines in general are selling so poorly, publishers are doing anything they can to drum up controversy, publicity & sales. Penthouse recently featured a fat tattooed woman. It's the last gasp of a dying & increasingly irrelevant form of media.

Post: #33

Ashley Graham's ass is just... monstrously big. Like 2 Winnebagos racing down a gravel road in that dress.

Gorgeous face, hips and ass are just really too big.

Post: #34

(02-12-2016 11:42 PM)kaotic Wrote:  These SJW and the MSM are trying to say hey a size 15 woman is totally cool ! It's the new norm.

A size 10 is the new size 1 - they're shifting the scale (put intended).

Amazing pun man. Her scale was shifted to the next room.

Post: #35

(02-12-2016 01:16 PM)Castelnau Wrote:  Ehh, could be worse.

It is. Rhonda Rousey is gonna be a cover model according to ESPN.

Post: #36

Just saw a promo for a forgettable movie that showed Rebel Wilson in bed with a good-looking guy. It's not only print media, but it seems that movies are trying to promote obese women as being sexually attractive. In real life such a thing would never happen unless the guy had absolutely no game or an extreme fattie fetish. How come they didn't show her in bad with a guy who looks more like John Goodman or Kevin James?

Post: #37

How long do we want to take bets before transgender or gay guys show up as "bikini models"?

Post: #38

Plus size and fat isn't the same thing. It fatties who push that propaganda trying to link the two. Many plus sized models are Amazon women who are close to, and above six feet tall. Not the same as some 5 foot 5 girl with rolls who weighs 180 with a sky high BMI.

Ashley Graham would give mean blowjob. Her face is very nice, and her body tight for being big.

Post: #39

(02-13-2016 12:54 AM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  



"Oh, you're lying..."

God, I really wish Patrice was still around. Just imagine how funny this would've been with him in the mix. He would've absolutely wrecked this PC charade.

Post: #40

I'd let her suck my dick if I was in a dry spell, but definitely WNB.

Post: #41

(02-13-2016 04:19 AM)Sean Wrote:  Ashley Graham's ass is just... monstrously big. Like 2 Winnebagos racing down a gravel road in that dress.

Gorgeous face, hips and ass are just really too big.

That dress is super tight on her, and I bet the stitching on it could rival my Red Wing work boots. It's probably under immense pressure from restraining all of that fat into a feminine shape. I bet without the dress or the airbrushing she's got a Chris Farley ass.

I know because I banged a chick with her exact same build over the summer. Very pretty face. nice fake tits. But when the clothes came off, the feminine shape disappeared. I soldiered on because sometimes the path of least resistance is to go for the bang. Overall, it was disappointment because was a cool girl, but when you're that size at that age, you're only going to get bigger.

Post: #42

This will be the edition that all the feminists and media praise but no one buys.

I'm actually happy that they tried this.

Post: #43

(02-13-2016 04:19 AM)Sean Wrote:  Ashley Graham's ass is just... monstrously big. Like 2 Winnebagos racing down a gravel road in that dress.

Gorgeous face, hips and ass are just really too big.

black men are attracted to women who resemble the great resource-aggregating herbivores of the sub-saharan desert: the elephant, rhinoceros, cape buffalo, and hippopotamus. black men want their women to resemble these creatures in size, shape, color, and texture (it is important to not forget ‘texture’).

these apex herbivores survive droughts in the african wild, affording them high survival rates. fat black women are also unlikely to starve, and while this may seem a moot point if they live in america, it does not change the genetic preferences of their black male suitors. white women can mimic the size and the shape, but never the color or texture.

Post: #44

There is more nudity in the SI swim issue than there is in the new Playboy.

Post: #45

Wow.

What happened to the days when only hot women were on the cover of SI Swimsuit editions?

If Caitlyn Jenner ever graces the cover of SI....you know what, never mind. I've said too much.

Post: #46

(02-15-2016 04:24 PM)They Call Me Mister Tony Wrote:  Wow.

What happened to the days when only hot women were on the cover of SI Swimsuit editions?

If Caitlyn Jenner ever graces the cover of SI....you know what, never mind. I've said too much.

Yes, you MOST definitely have said too much. That is all we need. I was in enough shock when I saw the photo of the 56 year old.

Post: #47

This woman should be no where near an SI swimsuit edition magazine. No one can seriously say she is in the same league as a girl like Hannah Ferguson and other SI models:

Post: #48

Post: #49

Remember: SJW's don't care about the actual content geared towards men until it crosses the boundaries. They just want to make sure Si and the like are adhering to the PC-guidelines set out for them. SI is basically kneeling before the SJW lobby and appeasing them so that they won't face their wrath by promoting 'anorexia' and 'sexist body imagery.'

Now that SI gets the nod from HuffPo, Jezebel and the like they can go back to 'boobies' and faux masculinity.

Post: #50

(02-15-2016 06:37 PM)Saccade Wrote:  This woman should be no where near an SI swimsuit edition magazine. You can't seriously say she is in the same league as a girl like Hannah Ferguson and other SI models:

She looks pretty good to me... and Brock.