Post: #76

Post: #77

Post: #78

(11-16-2015 02:08 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

(11-16-2015 01:19 PM)BallsDeep Wrote:  

(11-11-2015 09:09 PM)Gmac Wrote:  I'm going to go with "who gives a flying fuck?"

If it's Charlie Sheen then I give a fuck because that would mean that straight men can get AIDS.

Yes, straight men can get AIDS.

All you need is millions and millions of dollars so you can bed an endless parade of porn stars and prostitutes -- plus probably some trannies on the side or during threesomes. Then you need still more money to imbibe and shoot more drugs than any of us will ever see.

Kidding aside, it's not likely any straight man will get AIDS. The hysterical media scribes warned about this when I was growing up. It was the "climate change" of its time. We were all gonna die by 1999!! OMG!!

Here is an example cover headline from Life Magazine, July 1985: "Now No One Is Safe From AIDS."

Needless to say, the hetero explosion of AIDS didn't happen. So the media swept their false warnings under the carpet.

But luckily for us, someone pulled together all their bullshit panic headlines and put them on a Web page. View their disgraceful "journalism" here: http://fumento.com/aids/comment.html

Charlie Sheen is not even close to being representative of the average straight man. But don't expect the media to tell you that if it turns out he's HIV positive. They'll act like a celebrity who has paid for sex with thousands of women is just like you and me.

The overwhelming odds are that he either contracted it from gay sex or from i.v. drug use. Do you think any major news article or television show will even hint at that? I haven't seen it happen yet and I doubt I will.

Post: #79

How do you reckon Magic Johnson got it? He may have been on the DL. His son is a flaming homosexual, if this stuff runs in families.

Post: #80

(11-17-2015 03:35 PM)Dusty Wrote:  How do you reckon Magic Johnson got it? He may have been on the DL. His son is a flaming homosexual, if this stuff runs in families.

Probably either straight anal sex or gay sex and yeah, his son is flaming.

Post: #81

(11-17-2015 03:36 PM)Merenguero Wrote:  

(11-17-2015 03:35 PM)Dusty Wrote:  How do you reckon Magic Johnson got it? He may have been on the DL. His son is a flaming homosexual, if this stuff runs in families.

Probably either straight anal sex or gay sex and yeah, his son is flaming.

Magic johnsons kid:

   

Post: #82

Zero sympathy for Charlie - karma's a bitch.

Post: #83

Charlie Sheen is the scumbag of scumbags. Up until now I really didn't care one way or another about his antics and thought they were kind of funny but I see now that he is a lying, devious overgrown manchild who's mind is so fucked up from drugs. If he didn't have the famous father Martin Sheen and a seemingly superhuman ability to show up to work and perform while fucked up he would have been shot in an alleyway a long time ago by a crack dealer.

Post: #84

you have to admit, for his decades of drinking, drugs, and now HIV, he looks remarkably well. Any woman who parties like that would've looked like shit 15 years ago.

Post: #85

(11-17-2015 07:47 PM)Disco_Volante Wrote:  you have to admit, for his decades of drinking, drugs, and now HIV, he looks remarkably well. Any woman who parties like that would've looked like shit 15 years ago.

Post: #86

(11-17-2015 07:47 PM)Disco_Volante Wrote:  you have to admit, for his decades of drinking, drugs, and now HIV, he looks remarkably well. Any woman who parties like that would've looked like shit 15 years ago.

Huh? He looks like the pathetic crackhead he is






Here's a recent photo of his older brother who's 53 and his father whos 75

Post: #87

Should probably change the thread title now. Anyhow I feel sorry for him. Two and a half men was one of my favourite shows.

Post: #88

(11-17-2015 09:41 PM)Pride male Wrote:  Should probably change the thread title now. Anyhow I feel sorry for him. Two and a half men was one of my favourite shows.

Also one of my favourite sitcoms in the first half or so of its long run. Even after it reached a point (probably somewhere around the fifth or sixth season if I recall correctly) where Sheen couldn't do a whole lot more than sit down with a drink in his hand and deliver his lines (which he still did well), I still found him more entertaining than the majority of actors in modern comedy.

I saw some of the 90 or so episodes they fired off rapidly of Anger Management (possibly the longest season 2 ever in TV history? 70+ episodes. Supposedly because of a syndication deal). Not nearly as funny a show, but he did a decent enough job with the material he had to work with.

Post: #89

(11-17-2015 03:35 PM)Dusty Wrote:  How do you reckon Magic Johnson got it? He may have been on the DL. His son is a flaming homosexual, if this stuff runs in families.

He could've had a herpes sore on his dick and banged a girl while she was on her period. Nobody will ever know for sure how he got it. If you are smashing as many women raw as top tier athletes do, it's just a matter of time.

I don't believe Magic was bi. I've yet to hear any credible stories of him with men. Seemed like he just had a good run in the 80s up to his neck in pussy living the dream but numbers will catch up eventually.

Post: #90

I would still fuck the hell out of his ex Bree Olson.

Post: #91

(11-16-2015 02:29 PM)LINUX Wrote:  I should probably cut down on the amount of women I fuck in the ass per month.

Especially them being on Tinder and all.

Hey man, don't stop. How can you find true love in this world if not by unprotected anal sex with girls on Tinder?

Do you want to live in a world without poetic love? Me neither.

Post: #92

(11-17-2015 01:13 PM)Bacchus Wrote:  I
My read on why he's waited 4 years to make the announcement is that he's running out of money. He had the budget to buy drugs and hookers in bulk, but not for the extortion demands. Every one of the countless hookers he paid has the dirt on him about his HIV status, and they cashed in for millions. The announcement on Today should get him some publicity that he can turn into roles.

He made $1.8 million per episode of two and a half men. $48 million per year for 7 years. He was bought out of his contract for $125 million in 2012. I'm sure he's spent quite a lot for his vices, but it's a long way to the bottom for a guy like him.

Post: #93

Sometimes I am glad I am a beta and not as successful with women as others. There are downsides to being 'alpha'. Something that is rarely touched upon by the manosphere.

Post: #94

(11-17-2015 10:54 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  If you are smashing as many women raw as top tier athletes do, it's just a matter of time.

But how many top tier athletes do you see with HIV? I can only think of Tommy Morrison, and if I remember right he was on drugs. I guess only he knows, but Magic seems suspect to me.

Post: #95

"The announcement on Today should get him some publicity that he can turn into roles."


Old Charlie may have been able to make "publicity hay" with his 2011 meltdown, thus turning it into another opportunity to star in a new series. Hollywood, however, isn't digging his "I knew I had HIV and continued to raw-dog without telling my sex partners" routine. Put a fork in him - he's fucking done in this town.

I know the players in this little drama - not pretty.

Post: #96

(11-17-2015 10:54 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  

(11-17-2015 03:35 PM)Dusty Wrote:  How do you reckon Magic Johnson got it? He may have been on the DL. His son is a flaming homosexual, if this stuff runs in families.

He could've had a herpes sore on his dick and banged a girl while she was on her period. Nobody will ever know for sure how he got it. If you are smashing as many women raw as top tier athletes do, it's just a matter of time.

I don't believe Magic was bi. I've yet to hear any credible stories of him with men. Seemed like he just had a good run in the 80s up to his neck in pussy living the dream but numbers will catch up eventually.

The press was not the same back then, especially with sports. The press shielded Athletes a lot as a way to keep access. There was no incentive to be like TMZ in the 90s like that (NY Post aside). Unless it was criminal and a dude got charged, the local sports beats would bury unsavory stories on local state athletes.

Do you know that Jordan never actually retired to play baseball? He was suspended for gambling but the NBA and Nike did not want to ruin his brand image so they made him walk away for a year and made it look like he retired.

I say that because the press never let that out, even though it was common knowledge behind the scenes.

Magic was known to frequent Eddie Murpheys sex party's at his mansion that were known to include paid trannys...

Magic never did drugs, he didn't drink, or smoke...

There is a 2% chance of a hetero man getting HIV from hetero sex. You only gamble fucking high risk women (drug users, whores) non stop until your luck runs out.

Or you use IV drugs or your a fag/Bi where the percentages shoot up to 35%+ of contracting it.

Magic was BI. Go listen to his stories of how he used to get with girls, it defies reality as his supposed notch counts make no sense.

Where are his illigitmate children? Where are the thousands of women he fucked who have kid attempting to get money from him? The man is worth $100 million, and you don't think any of the "Hood rat girls" he supposedly only dealt with would not try to extort him for money? You raw dog that many women and no kids come from it?

Look how many women look to try and exploit Cosby with his situation. Why has Magic not seen the same angry parade of dubvious trying yo claim money or fame of his name?

Its all bullshit. Magic is on the low and got HIV from anal, likely from getting fudge packed by trannys as the extreme high HIV risk comes from fags who are bottoms.

Post: #97

Well on the bright side, I think he will pay less for hookers now.

Post: #98

Just contributing to the thread..

Post: #99

This is again so much bullshit:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...rview.html

Quote:Charlie Sheen said that he was diagnosed 'roughly four years ago' and his doctor said the virus is now 'undetectable' in his blood

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...z3rrsTRZKG
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Many in the alternative scientific medical community know fully well that the whole HIV/AIDS crap is one giant con.

The virus is undetectable?

Yeah - there were multiple cases where people tested positive, but then later turned negative again.

http://www.africaresource.com/rasta/seso...ds-theory/

The entire AIDS/HIV crap was one giant hoax from the beginning.

http://www.whale.to/aids.html

http://www.whale.to/a/kohnlein_h.html

Of course will Charlie Sheen have a positive reading given his toxic lifestyle. But as soon as he cuts down on toxins, his body signals return to normal. Many folk don't know that most pregnant women wold test positive if they did the test and then later after pregnancy they would test negative again. There are many other inconsistancies with the shitty test itself.












That doctor injects himself with "HIV-infected" blood. Of course he died next year after that during a strange car accident.

So - go fuck yourself through Central Africa. The worst you can get is genitcal herpes, syphilis or parasites like mites. All of that is treatable.

Give me a 1000 young Nubian girls and I shall fuck them raw without fear. Test them only for the STDs above - don't want to get syphilis every month.

Quote:This is by the way not the only MD who openly states that it is a scam. Dr. Luc For the president of South Africa, Mbeki, the discrepancy between what European and US newspapers write about his country (drastic population reduction) and what´s actually happening in his country (doubling of the population within the past 30 years), was striking, hence he refused to follow the general (American) AIDS-politics and instead, called the meeting of experts who had the task to examine whether or not HIV was actually the cause of AIDS.
Two things had particularly startled him: First the extensive literature on AZT and the damaging effects of this substance, and secondly a paper by Max Essex that was published in the "Journal of Infectious Diseases" and which describes a strong cross reaction of HIV tests with antigens, that can be found in the bacteria which cause tuberculosis and lepra. That means, nobody in Africa or elsewhere in the world knows whether a patient suffers from tuberculosis because he is HIV-positive, or whether he is HIV-positive because he suffers from tuberculosis. BSE/AIDS/Hepatitis C Infectious or Intoxication Diseases? By Claus Köhnlein

"Another problem of the AIDS epidemiology is the following: By now about 30 afflictions all of which were known before, are being renamed to AIDS in the presence of a positive HIV-test. This also is not an increase of diseases of course --but just a redefinition. This circular definition HIV+/TB = AIDS and HIV-/TB = TB makes the correlation HIV-AIDS appear 100%. For example, a patient who suffers from TB and who is also HIV-positive is an AIDS patient today, and a woman who suffers from cervical carcinoma is an AIDS patient today, and a patient with a lymphoma is today not a lymphoma patient but also an AIDS patient if he has antibodies against HIV. " ---- BSE/AIDS/Hepatitis C Infectious or Intoxication Diseases? By Claus Köhnlein (BSE/AIDS/Hepatitis C Infectious or Intoxication Diseases?)

"Kary Mullis, Nobel laureate in chemistry 1993 and inventor of the polymerase chain reaction, needed a reference for "the generally known fact" that HIV was the cause of AIDS. While working on a project he became aware that he didn´t know a scientific reference for the statement he had just written down: HIV is the probable cause of AIDS. So he asked the next virologist at the table after that basic paper. The virologist told Mullis, he wouldn´t need a reference in this case; after all, everyone knows that HIV leads to AIDS. Kary Mullis disagreed and thought such an important discovery should be published in some paper. He learnt soon that it was impossible to find such a paper. Instead, he was pointed to the press conference of 1983 over and over again.
One day, he got the opportunity to talk to Luc Montagnier from the Pasteur Institute, the [claimed] discoverer of the virus, during an event in San Diego. HE should know the answer. Confronted with Mullis´question, Montagnier said: "Why don´t you cite the report of the CDC (Centers of Disease Control)?" Mullis answered: "This report doesn´t address the question whether or not HIV is the cause of AIDS" - "Right", Montagnier admitted, "but maybe you could cite the SIV study (Simian Immunedeficiency Virus, which is very similar to HIV)." That paper didn´t convince Mullis either, because the monkeys developed different diseases, also because the virus wasn´t the same one, and thirdly, because the paper had been published only a few months before. He looked for the original paper that should demonstrate in whatever form that HIV was the cause of AIDS. At that point, Montagnier´s answer consisted of running away, to greet a group on the other side of the room.
I had a similar experience this year [2000] in South Africa on the AIDS Advisory Panel, which had been initiated by president Thabo Mbeki. Mbeki had invited 33 scientists from all over the world in order to shed light on the AIDS problem in his country. Among them were 22 scientists who believed in the virus hypothesis, and 11 so-called dissidents (which I belong to), who cast doubt on the virus hypothesis and rather assume that AIDS in Africa is the result of increasing poverty, while AIDS in the developed countries is the result of drugs, and above all the result of the therapy against AIDS (AZT)
I asked Montagnier what convinced him that AIDS is caused by a virus. Montagnier answered that over the years apparently an effective treatment has been developed, and this was proof enough for HIV leading to AIDS. In other words, the virologists have no virological arguments for the theory that HIV leads to AIDS. Instead, they get the proof for their hypotheses from physicians, who give a positive feedback by saying "Of course AIDS is a viral disease that responds to antiviral treatment." ---- BSE/AIDS/Hepatitis C Infectious or Intoxication Diseases? By Claus Köhnlein

"Tuberculosis has always been a good indicator for the weal and woe of a society (see the frequency of TB in Germany after the two world wars, Statistisches Bundesamt Wiesbaden). Modern tuberculosis however is now, after the introduction of HIV-tests, called AIDS and is treated accordingly. In India they showed me patients who had tuberculosis and sold house and home, in order to get the cure (AZT) from the West. "----BSE/AIDS/Hepatitis C Infectious or Intoxication Diseases? By Claus Köhnlein

"The therapy business: Antiviral medication, 3 or 4 or 5 fold combinations, AIDS can´t be topped in this department. ....... With intoxication hypotheses on the other hand you cannot make any money at all. The simple message is: Avoid the poison and you won´t get sick. Such hypotheses are counterproductive insofar as the toxins (drugs, alcohol, pills, phosmet) bring high revenues. The conflict of interests is not resolvable: What virologist who does directly profit millions from their patent rights of the HIV or HCV tests (Montagnier, Simon Wain-Hobsen, Robin Weiss, Robert Gallo) can risk to take even one look in the other direction."--BSE/AIDS/Hepatitis C Infectious or Intoxication Diseases? By Claus Köhnlein

But if a toxin can speed up the outbreak of a disease, like alcohol can contribute to liver diseases, then it can also be the sole cause. However, if Phosmet would be declared as cause of BSE, compensation lawsuits in billions would wait for both the British government and the manufacturer of the insecticide. This is certainly not desirable for them, so they prefer to surround the basically clear context in a fog of prions.
Intoxication hypotheses are easily testable and in contrast to the virus or prion hypotheses also falsifiable. They can be examined toxicologically and epidemiologically and then we can either accept or reject them. BSE/AIDS/Hepatitis C Infectious or Intoxication Diseases? By Claus Köhnlein

Epidemiological and toxicological data suggest that chronic intoxication's are the real cause for the named diseases AIDS, Hep C and BSE. Why these plausible hypothesis aren´t investigated further, this is a topic one could write a book about which could have the title "conflicts of interests".
Infection hypotheses can help making billions of dollars:
1. The antibody business: Millions of screening tests are distributed, each blood sample needs to be tested (4 millions in Germany alone)
2. The therapy business: Antiviral medication, 3 or 4 or 5 fold combinations, AIDS can´t be topped in this department.
3. Possibly vaccinations: Here, however, the concept of the new big plagues gets in the way of itself, because this has brought up the central paradox of immunology. Since the beginning of HIV they have told us: He who has antibodies to HIV, will die, instead of, he who has antibodies to HIV will live, which would meet our vaccination concepts. How many HIV antibody negative individuals would like to get vaccinated, in order to have antibodies to HIV afterwards?
With intoxication hypotheses on the other hand you cannot make any money at all. The simple message is: Avoid the poison and you won´t get sick. Such hypotheses are counterproductive insofar as the toxins (drugs, alcohol, pills, phosmet) bring high revenues. The conflict of interests is not resolvable: What virologist who does directly profit millions from their patent rights of the HIV or HCV tests (Montagnier, Simon Wain-Hobsen, Robin Weiss, Robert Gallo) can risk to take even one look in the other direction.
What physician who has treated AIDS or hepatitis C patients over many years in good faith in the virus hypothesis and with high personal input, can look in the other direction? BSE/AIDS/Hepatitis C Infectious or Intoxication Diseases? By Claus KöhnleinMontagnier who proved the existence of the HIV virus openly stated that about 50% of the human population comes into contact with the virus. It has existed forever as probes done on WWI soldiers proved that some were HIV-positive under current tests.

Oh - shut up and relax you ageing porn star:

Quote:'He's a monster,' said an emotional Olson in an interview with Inside Edition on Tuesday

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...z3rrvVyyvy
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Post: #100

Oh - if someone is interested - here is an email I wrote to a member some time ago - plenty of links to documentaries and scientific literature to make up your own mind:

It's a minor topic, but actually not that difficult. There were two fields which I looked at in minute detail - first the financial and economic scam and what's behind it and then next the medical scam. I spent about 6 months 5-8 hours a day just on the topic of medicine - truths, myths, crazy stuff - finding out what's real and then re-evaluating everything with what I know.

I will post here a number of links - mostly documentaries in the beginning and then links to scientific opinions. ...

After those links and then some added emails I wrote to acquaintances I will point out in a few points why I think this is true and what my opinion on it is in detail:

Some of the best links in short:
http://www.whale.to/b/hiv.html
http://www.whale.to/aids.html - plenty of MDs and scientists who dare oppose the madness
http://www.whale.to/a/kohnlein_h.html

Go down to the bottom of the response to get a TLDR version.

Links:
Documentaries:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3DC4jUa76w
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFBy19iJLeo
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_q...about+aids
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTaPPOwgGT4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tf78IYBe...re=related
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wze_cpu_PRk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQoNW7lOnT4 Nobel Price winner and discoverer of HIV virus Luc Montagnier says clearly that the HIV virus is harmless
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTxvmKHYajQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfupzhtR6FY
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_q...+with+hiv+ Dr. Robert Wilner injects himself with blood of AIDS patient live on tV camera - he died under strange circumstances one year later as he was making great effort to expose it all

Papers and further links:
http://aras.ab.ca/top10.html
http://duesberg.com/
http://www.rethinkingaids.com/
https://hivskeptic.wordpress.com/2013/03...on-by-hiv/

Quote:
Extracts of some emails of mine:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3DC4jUa76w video

It is already widely known among "medical heretics" that HIV does not cause AIDS and AIDS in itself is a multitude of illnesses caused by most notably drugs like now banned poppers (amylnitrates), in Africa simply lack of proper food, clean water and hygiene, as well as most notably in the Western world highly toxic AIDS-drugs like AZT and the current "cocktails". Needless to say that the HIV test itself is highly sensitive and reacts to certain risk groups like drug users, gays with many sexual partners and thus exposure to age-old sexual diseases, hemophiliacs and tragically sometimes pregnant women - also sometimes years later the tests turning from positive to negative as documented many times.
(Proven and researched by Dr. Peter Duesberg (University of Berkeley), also by Nobel Prize Winners Dr. Walter Gilbert and Kary Mullis, Dr. Charles Thomas, Dr. Robert Willner (injected himself with HIV-blood on live-TV), Dr. Claus Koehnlein highly active in Germany and Switzerland, etc..)

HIV was until 2003 seen as a harmless retrovirus, but ever since 2003 and new publications 2009 it seems that in fact the virus itself has certain cancer-fighting properties.
Here some links to the publications of that Italian research team and also a comment by Dr. Ruggiero:

Abstract: https://hivskeptic.files.wordpress.com/2...stract.jpg
Comment Dr. Ruggiero: https://hivskeptic.files.wordpress.com/2...-et-al.jpg
Alternative Website comment: https://hivskeptic.wordpress.com/2009/12...ause-aids/
(Dr. Ruggiero also mentioning that the HIV virus was proven to exist in 100-year-old blood samples thus discrediting the AIDS-scam even more)

I was wondering what they intend to do with this widely popularized HIV-cancer-treatment now since most of the time they shut down or attack by disinformation any real cure very fast:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnew...y-HIV.html
http://www.geek.com/geek-pick/hiv-virus-...s-1411827/
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe1106965


One reason could be that contrary to the simple and thus CHEAP technique used at the Italian HIV derived vpr-protein - they used a genetically modified version of the HIV protein - thus making the treatment extremely complicated and expensive - 20 mio. $ per patient and also giving THEM an opportunity to add "additional" genetic properties to the newly created HIV-derivative (who knows what - termination date by age 60, infertility?).


   
https://hivskeptic.files.wordpress.com/2...-et-al.jpg - full picture if you cannot read that

Don't know whether you wish to cover this, but it seems that they let the AIDS scam die (by finding a "cure"), since most are too infertile to procreate in a world of super-promiscuity.

Baby "cured" of HIV
http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB1000142412...0521959748
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/n...cured.html

Adult Male in Berlin cured of HIV
http://articles.latimes.com/2012/jul/27/...g-20120727
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/13...81004.html


We will see what happens. A real sexually transmitted disease actually does not fit very much in the long-term agenda - one possibility is that the massive promiscuity worked too well in the 70s and they had to put a damper on it until the fertility dropped enough.

Since I believe that the illness is a scam (together with a 3 nobel laureates and quite a few of independent doctors) it is likely that a cure will be announced sooner or later. But probably not anytime soon, since the Developing Countries in Africa, Latin America and some parts of Asia have too high a fertility left due to better food and "lack" of vaccinations. They will have to drop the scam sooner or later however for rampant planned family-destroying fornication to take hold. Probably around the time when developing countries' fertility comes down to US-EU levels.

_________________

IN short:

1) AIDS/HIV test are ridiculous - cross the border from Canada & US and you are positive in one country and negative in another. Africa in addition has literally no test in most cases. Having people sick of AIDS means money to their rulers so anyone being somewhat sick is having AIDS there.

2) Especially if you look at the evidence and listen to the talk by Dr. Claus Koehnlein and Dr. Duesberg you find out that something is not right. There is no backed up credible date from the first cases among the gays, the massive incubation period is against anything that should be happening in real life, the tests are faulty at best producing massive false positives among pregnant women, sick people, people who have contact with many STDs (gays) etc.

3) Logic says that if you have an incurable disease with fast spreading then you should have billions of AIDS sick by now or anyone just fucking one partner. Especially in the West there did not happen any AIDs epidemic despite the claims. Back in the day during the time of Syphilis the elite, the wealthy in France, England etc. - they all had Syphilis. Among the French aristocracy they said that you were not a virgin if you got syphilis. Almost everyone in certain promiscuous classes got it. The ones who were free of it were strangely the rural population who fucked one person for life. Do you really believe that HIV would not spread in our times? Anyone with the disease being aware of it quickly despite decades-old incubation period and then not spread anything at all?

4) The facts about the tests are absolutely shattering. Especially Dr. Koehnlein cleans up with the nonsense easily - read his stuff. Also when I looked at the germ theory itself I found that it was lacking massively making even diseases like Hep C ridiculous (also fake - nothing in nature has an incubation period of 30 years but you having to take chemotherapy light for Hep C from day one - good luck living to the full "outbreak" of the disease)

5) What happens for real when people report being sick of AIDS and even noticing an improvement of their health after taking the new cocktail? Simple - the new cocktail is a potent mix of chemotherapy light/ anti-viral/ anti-fungal mix - essentially it kills off all possible STDs, fungi, viruses that have amassed itself in your body through various drugs, unprotected sex etc. That is still why gays report that - also they test much more often.

6) About the tests - there were examples of people who tested positive for HIV and then later tested negative - a pro boxer, various individuals. So long as you don't take the chemo-drugs longer (they will kill you over a few decades now) then you are fine. Just live more healthy, take supplements and it's very likely that you will test negative at those ridiculous tests.

So in short:

1) Diagnosis and initial creation of HIV/AIDS disease is ridiculous
2) Reasons for it exactly are a bit unknown, but aside from money, population control is always a good one
3) Any dissenting scientists are shunned or declared as crazy
4) Tests are bogus - one day you have HIV, another you don't
5) AZT first wonder-drug had a 100% mortality rate within 5 years, the others now are only useful for a months until you kill all crap STD viruses etc. - then it kills you - just slowly now - 10-30 years.
6) sexual transmission of AIDS among heterosexuals was never proven! Really - never - they had couples living for years and nothing!
7) Transmission even via blood was not proven - never!

Do I personally feel secure about it? Yes - I will literally fuck my way through Africa raw. There are plenty of old-age STDs like Syphillis, mites, etc. - they are shit and crappy to have but each of them has multiple treatments available and even Syphilis is curable within 2-3 weeks (antibiotics shots and mega-dose vit. C to speed up the process). A friend of mine got mites recently - had to poison the little critters with a toxic cream - takes 2 days to kill those buggers and 4 weeks for body to clean itself of them.

But AIDS and Hep C are not real diseases. Actually if they forced everyone to test for those "diseases" then the scam would blow up since probably 10% of the population would be HIV and Hep C infected - also some 30% of pregnant women and likely 10% of monks and virgins who hadn't had sex for years - also grandmothers who fucked only her husband for life and are 90.

So no - I don't believe in the fake conspiracy that the government has created a deadly STD named HIV/AIDs. The government just has perpetrated a stupid medical myth - the same goes for swine flu, SARS, Mad Cow disease and other such crap - they do that kind of shit all the time.

Do what you want from the info. Also I am really confident about this - find me a dozen of 18 year old black African beauties who are HIV positive, submit them to a couple basic STD tests (ones that exist - I don't feel like getting STDs non-stop) and then send them my way. I will fuck each and everyone of them raw to prove my point. You can send 1000 more like that and I will continue to do so. Yes - I would also accept a blood transfusion from them when needed.

Logic and science tell me so.