Barwin
Banned
Posts: 30
Joined: Jan 2015
|
RE: Chatting Up and then Rejecting Women for Fun
It was not tough, honest advice, it was name calling. There's a difference.
(11-09-2015 08:40 PM)Tex Wrote: (11-09-2015 05:51 PM)Barwin Wrote: Anyway, I wanted to know if there is anybody else out there who has swung this far to the other side of game, and my question was answered: there isn't.
Hey man, you immediately shot out the gate with a questionable post that was clearly trolling the forum. Yet you still got legit answers to your questions, and you got the treatment of tough, honest, direct advice that makes this community's tradition of self-improvement so strong.
You got more than you should have. So don't act like you didn't get what you asked for. Of course there's guys who have swung that far in their game. At that point, though, it's not some transcendent "super alpha I-don't-need-sex" stage. It's straight anti-game.
That's the shit people grapple with when they recover from their beta rage. That's day 1 shit, and it doesn't belong here with you masquerading like the ultimate pussy god who gets laid at will.
Your trolling job was given far more attention than it should have. You'll soon feel the ban.
|
|
| 11-09-2015 08:58 PM |
|
|
Barwin
Banned
Posts: 30
Joined: Jan 2015
|
RE: Chatting Up and then Rejecting Women for Fun
(11-09-2015 09:01 PM)Barwin Wrote: Incels? What? What's an incel? And why wouldn't I try to change women for the better, even if it be one at a time? Do you hate on Roosh for fighting feminism? Do you hate on him for exposing the true nature of women? Then why do you hate on me for giving them a taste of their own medicine? Why does this call for me being "banned"?
Oh and, it actually does show them. You should try it some time, and watch their faces. They are not faces of anger, but of genuine self loathing.
(11-09-2015 08:55 PM)Tex Wrote: (11-09-2015 05:51 PM)Barwin Wrote: Alright alright, I get it already. I'm an idiot and I'm wasting my time bringing down women's egos and putting them in their places.
I will instead repeat every hour of every day: "Fucking is glorious and it should be everyone's end goal and it is skillful and it is what gives all life meaning and life all meaning". Fucking is what I'll do, then. Keep boosting those sluts' egos, guys. Never put in any effort to change anything. God forbid you may actually make a change.
Well thank you Barwin for taking a stand for us men, since your dick is so great that when you reject women, you change the course of our culture. Only by becoming incels will anything change. That'll really show those women.
Barwin—The MGTOW troll.
|
|
| 11-09-2015 09:04 PM |
|
|
Anabasis to Desta
Banned
Posts: 1,118
Joined: Oct 2015
|
RE: Chatting Up and then Rejecting Women for Fun
(11-09-2015 07:06 PM)Suits Wrote: Obvious troll, but for the uninitiated outside observer, this isn't what we are about here on the forum.
First, many of us are nauseated by many women in the West (and elsewhere), so being self-improvement focused, we find ways to connect with women that we do like. For example, I've relocated my entire life to China, where the women are ugly, but at least many of them do not have sucky personalities.
Second, a healthy male knows that contact with (the right women) is a good part of a balance lifestyle. Men are for conversations, but spending time with a sweet female is a very humanizing experience. Sure, that doesn't mean that we should marry them and the reality is that even the best of women need to be cycle out of our life when they start making unrealistic demands of us, but that doesn't mean that their company cannot be temporarily enjoyed and benefitted from.
Third, any guy who would prefer to wasting his time try to hurt women instead of finding people he actually enjoys the company of, is either lying or mentally ill.
I agree but is there such a thing as love without possession?
There's a Red Pill Theme along this lines of " She's not yours, it's just your turn". How is it possible to pairbond, open yourself up and love without a feeling she is "yours" in the longterm?
|
|
| 11-09-2015 09:59 PM |
|
The following 1 user Likes Anabasis to Desta's post:1 user Likes Anabasis to Desta's post
Built to Fade
|
Suits
Innovative Casanova
      
Posts: 9,726
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation: 239
|
RE: Chatting Up and then Rejecting Women for Fun
(11-09-2015 09:59 PM)Anabasis to Desta Wrote: (11-09-2015 07:06 PM)Suits Wrote: Obvious troll, but for the uninitiated outside observer, this isn't what we are about here on the forum.
First, many of us are nauseated by many women in the West (and elsewhere), so being self-improvement focused, we find ways to connect with women that we do like. For example, I've relocated my entire life to China, where the women are ugly, but at least many of them do not have sucky personalities.
Second, a healthy male knows that contact with (the right women) is a good part of a balance lifestyle. Men are for conversations, but spending time with a sweet female is a very humanizing experience. Sure, that doesn't mean that we should marry them and the reality is that even the best of women need to be cycle out of our life when they start making unrealistic demands of us, but that doesn't mean that their company cannot be temporarily enjoyed and benefitted from.
Third, any guy who would prefer to wasting his time try to hurt women instead of finding people he actually enjoys the company of, is either lying or mentally ill.
I agree but is there such a thing as love without possession?
There's a Red Pill Theme along this lines of " She's not yours, it's just your turn". How is it possible to pairbond, open yourself up and love without a feeling she is "yours" in the longterm?
I don't believe in love.
I need a certain amount of affection each week to continue feeling human. Once I get that, I'm good for a while.
Pair-bonding no longer even enters my thinking.
I treat sexual relationships the same way I do friendships. I enjoy friendship with many different people at one time. The fact that they have, had and will have other friends doesn't bother me at all.
Only one thing matters. Right now, the girl wants to be in my arms and I get to hold her and not feel rejected by the entire world.
I'm the King of Beijing!
|
|
| 11-09-2015 11:50 PM |
|
The following 3 users Like Suits's post:3 users Like Suits's post
Anabasis to Desta, Tex, Built to Fade
|
PapayaTapper
International Playboy
     
Posts: 4,783
Joined: Mar 2014
Reputation: 144
|
RE: Chatting Up and then Rejecting Women for Fun
(11-09-2015 09:04 PM)Barwin Wrote: (11-09-2015 09:01 PM)Barwin Wrote: Incels? What? What's an incel? And why wouldn't I try to change women for the better, even if it be one at a time? Do you hate on Roosh for fighting feminism? Do you hate on him for exposing the true nature of women? Then why do you hate on me for giving them a taste of their own medicine? Why does this call for me being "banned"?
Oh and, it actually does show them. You should try it some time, and watch their faces. They are not faces of anger, but of genuine self loathing.
(11-09-2015 08:55 PM)Tex Wrote: (11-09-2015 05:51 PM)Barwin Wrote: Alright alright, I get it already. I'm an idiot and I'm wasting my time bringing down women's egos and putting them in their places.
I will instead repeat every hour of every day: "Fucking is glorious and it should be everyone's end goal and it is skillful and it is what gives all life meaning and life all meaning". Fucking is what I'll do, then. Keep boosting those sluts' egos, guys. Never put in any effort to change anything. God forbid you may actually make a change.
Well thank you Barwin for taking a stand for us men, since your dick is so great that when you reject women, you change the course of our culture. Only by becoming incels will anything change. That'll really show those women.
Barwin—The MGTOW troll.
Responding to one's own posts...
_______________________________________
- Does She Have The "Happy Gene" ?
-Inversion Therapy
-Let's lead by example
"Leap, and the net will appear". John Burroughs
"The big question is whether you are going to be able to say a hearty yes to your adventure."
Joseph Campbell
(This post was last modified: 11-10-2015 01:58 AM by PapayaTapper.)
|
|
| 11-10-2015 01:54 AM |
|
The following 1 user Likes PapayaTapper's post:1 user Likes PapayaTapper's post
Built to Fade
|