Post: #26

Post: #27

That's exactly what I want to do. I want them to think they are used goods. I want to increase their slut shame, that's the purpose of it. Feminism tells them slut shame is shameful and that they should fuck as many cocks as they feel like, and have no shame for it. I get them to tell me what their dating life is like, and then I reject them after putting in a subtle hint that I think they're far too promiscuous for me to consider them quality.

(11-09-2015 03:20 PM)Pareto Wrote:  I feel like trolling them like this will just hurt us in future - that it gives girls more of an impression that we're just dickheads that use and abuse them.

But really, I think we should treat them with a modicum of respect. Be gentlemanly about it (to a degree). If not, then you just spoil the goods ahead of the next guy.

Post: #28

Sorry but you're a lawyer and instead of just name calling, you do name calling in slightly more difficult words than what you think the average section of the American population uses? I am "marginally interesting because of my acute lack of awareness"? Acute lack of awareness? Acute? Acute is a synonym for "immediate" in medical terms. So my lack of awareness is "immediate"? As opposed to what? Latent? I have an acute lack of... awareness? Awareness of what? And what does any of this have to do with infantility? Do you think an infant can comprehend societal problems? Do you think infants can understand male/female relationships?

If you're going to call people names, then you can't just look up slightly-more-difficult words in a dictionary and copy paste them into a sentence. They actually have to add meaning.

Also, I don't think money is king. I realize that I can get laid with just the clothes on my back. You missed my point completely. Lawyer my ass.

Oh and "whose not-so-subtle superiority complex bleeds into his interactions with others"? Of course it does, red pill awareness always leaks out of red pill aware individuals, even Roosh stated that. He said "red pill truths tend to leak out". It's normal, and it doesn't mean a person has a "superiority complex". For example, I do think I am superior to any American who can't even spell the only language they speak, which is the vast majority, but I don't consider myself superior to the doctors in physics I used to work with at an aircraft manufacturer when I was a test pilot there. Everyone feels better than someone, and everyone feels lesser than some other group. Being red pill aware has no relation to a "superiority complex".

When you reply, make sure you look up lots of descriptive words that you can add to sentences and separate them with commas, people will think: "someone who can make a simple thing sound complicated must be intelligent". Except it's actually the other way around: someone who can make something complicated sound simple, and in multiple languages, that's intelligence.

Oh and: my "horribly underdeveloped world view"? What horribly underdeveloped world view? I didn't say anything about my world view, apart from the fact that I am annoyed with North American women, which is pretty much what every guy on this forum's opinion is, including, and especially, Roosh's. If you think that's horribly underdeveloped, then you think every member on this forum has a horribly underdeveloped world view, and if you're so intelligent, using difficult words from the dictionary and such, then what are you doing on here?

(11-09-2015 03:25 PM)2Wycked Wrote:  

(11-09-2015 01:33 PM)Barwin Wrote:  I think I am the dictionary definition of a misogynist

No, "misogynist" is a nauseatingly over-broad catch-all term for men who disagree with mainstream approaches to male/female relations. The "misogynist" net catches some foul, hateful miscreants and a whole bunch of disaffected, infantile men who are angry at society and they can't exactly explain why. You fall into the latter camp.

Quote:I'm moderately accomplished and moderately handsome and well dressed for my age and I was telling her, without bragging and in subtle ways, about my job and my real estate and so forth...

There is a strong, undeniable overlap between the camp of "disaffected" men and men who think that money is king or the only tool a man has to prying a woman's legs apart.

Quote:I take far more pleasure in my real estate, my job as an airline pilot, reading someone's amazing life story in an amazing book and in my Benz and moderate success in life than I do in banging any of these retarded North Americunts. Fuck, they're so incredibly annoying.

There is a saying in law school: if you don't know who the asshole is in class, it's you.

If everybody around you is a dull, annoying blue-pill drone, it is probably because you, yourself, are a dull, caustic "red-pill" individual whose not-so-subtle superiority complex bleeds into your dealings with others. Your perception of "trolling women" is most likely a preemptive defense -- Thank God I'm only here to troll. Bitches are so dumb -- against the fact you are actively turning women off with your personality. You aren't trolling on them bruh, you are, at best, marginally interesting because of your acute lack of self-awareness, or at worst just another "red-pill" dude who thinks his jaded, horribly under-developed worldview makes him "above it all."

EDIT -- looks like this might be a former banned member trolling for attention. Message received.

Post: #29

Alright alright, I get it already. I'm an idiot and I'm wasting my time bringing down women's egos and putting them in their places.

I will instead repeat every hour of every day: "Fucking is glorious and it should be everyone's end goal and it is skillful and it is what gives all life meaning and life all meaning". Fucking is what I'll do, then. Keep boosting those sluts' egos, guys. Never put in any effort to change anything. God forbid you may actually make a change.

Anyway, I wanted to know if there is anybody else out there who has swung this far to the other side of game, and my question was answered: there isn't.

Post: #30

baltysp and JayRock.

(11-09-2015 04:25 PM)Snowplow Wrote:  

(11-09-2015 03:12 PM)Barwin Wrote:  Ok so first of all, there are guys on this forum who know me in person. They can attest that I'm not a troll, that I have no case of oneitis and that I have no beta rage. They can also attest that I'm not lying.

However, your critics are your best friends, so I'll go back to banging women instead of rejecting them for fun. I just don't see it as "stooping down to a woman's level". It's the players that elevate women's value, players are the reason why women have it so easy getting laid, they are the ones that empower women, that make them the cunts they are. And it's that part of the player life I couldn't stand anymore. In addition, I said I'm very red pill, but I never said I'm very alpha, there's a difference.

I feel like I'm doing something that takes their value away instead of giving them value, which is what players do, and I find it a more noble cause than fucking them. Once you've had enough vaginas, it's really nothing special anymore. I get pussy-fatigue.

But fine, back to the animal stage of fucking it is.

Who? Cause you aren't repped.

So like others pointed out, you are probably a formerly banned member.

Post: #31

Okay what's a TL;DR? Is that semicolon supposed to be there? Even if it's not, what does TLDR mean? I'm not on here much, I'm not up to speed on the abbreviations.

(11-09-2015 01:37 PM)The Beast1 Wrote:  Barwin,

This post is better suited for the game forum. Also you need a TL;DR.

Post: #32

Petty and stupid, I guess it is. Okay, back to fucking then.

(11-09-2015 02:09 PM)SamuelBRoberts Wrote:  "I've been doing this a lot lately, no matter how good looking they are. I love offending them and making them feel worthless."

Why do you enjoy doing this? That's weird. Were you hurt very badly by women when you were younger?

When I talk to a girl I'm not sexually attracted to, and who's clearly attracted to me, I don't go out of my way to shoot her down or make her feel bad. I'll make it clear I'm not interested, of course, but I don't get any joy out of it. Neither does anybody I know. What you're doing is petty and stupid.

Find a new hobby, man.

Post: #33

Why would I not waste two hours of my time on seducing a chick and then rejecting her? I was gonna go to that bar to have a beer anyway. When I get there, instead of sitting down by myself at the bar, I sit down next to a good looking pair of chicks, if there is a seat available next to them, and if you go early enough, there normally is. So, if I'm going to spend 2 or 3 hours at the bar anyway by myself, I may as well spend the time lowering their egos a bit. If you can't do something en masse, you have to do it one at a time.

(11-09-2015 02:14 PM)achromaticmike Wrote:  Must be a troll. No way anyone wastes up to two hours of their time at a crack to lead a chick on before blowing her off and then wastes more time coming here to post about how red pill they are.

Post: #34

Who's Stan? And good quote by the way. In your signature that is.

(11-09-2015 02:20 PM)LINUX Wrote:  Whats up Stan?

Post: #35

No, having sex doesn't make me feel like a little bitch, but hitting on many women, which is what game is - a numbers-game - boosts the egos of many women. THAT'S what makes me feel like a little bitch.

(11-09-2015 02:21 PM)Tex Wrote:  

(11-09-2015 02:16 PM)Barwin Wrote:  Sorry but I have rejected women at home. And yes it does give me a power trip, but I'm happier doing this than mindlessly running around banging chicks like I did a few years ago. When I was doing that I felt like I was a little bitch. And I'm not afraid of closing, I still bang ONS on a regular bases.

Having sex makes you feel like a little bitch?

Quote:And I'm not afraid of closing, I still bang ONS on a regular bases.

Quote:Sorry but I have rejected women at home.

Quote:I think I am the dictionary definition of a misogynist, but I'm glad I am, I'm very happy with the life I've created for myself, and I pick up a chick once in awhile to empty my bag, but apart from that I take far more pleasure in rejecting them before even banging them.

Post: #36

Post: #37

Troll job, almost certainly written by a feminist (either male or female).

Post: #38

Genre: Informal
Female = 2427
Male = 2187
Difference = -240; 47.39%
Verdict: Weak FEMALE

Weak emphasis could indicate European.

Genre: Formal
Female = 1344
Male = 1229
Difference = -115; 47.76%
Verdict: Weak FEMALE

Weak emphasis could indicate European.

Ban hammer awaits!

Post: #39

I've never seen a male forum member follow up so consistently in their own thread. You just posted 8 times in a row.

I think OP is a female trying to bring out the worst in us by asking if we take time out of our day to reject girls for fun and for pleasure. No, we are not psychos.

Post: #40

Obvious troll, but for the uninitiated outside observer, this isn't what we are about here on the forum.

First, many of us are nauseated by many women in the West (and elsewhere), so being self-improvement focused, we find ways to connect with women that we do like. For example, I've relocated my entire life to China, where the women are ugly, but at least many of them do not have sucky personalities.

Second, a healthy male knows that contact with (the right women) is a good part of a balance lifestyle. Men are for conversations, but spending time with a sweet female is a very humanizing experience. Sure, that doesn't mean that we should marry them and the reality is that even the best of women need to be cycle out of our life when they start making unrealistic demands of us, but that doesn't mean that their company cannot be temporarily enjoyed and benefitted from.

Third, any guy who would prefer to wasting his time try to hurt women instead of finding people he actually enjoys the company of, is either lying or mentally ill.

Post: #41

If it's psycho to reject women for pleasure, then all women are psychos, because they reject men for pleasure and to boost their egos.

(11-09-2015 06:57 PM)brob Wrote:  I've never seen a male forum member follow up so consistently in their own thread. You just posted 8 times in a row.

I think OP is a female trying to bring out the worst in us by asking if we take time out of our day to reject girls for fun and for pleasure. No, we are not psychos.

Post: #42

Can someone please tell me what OP is? Something "poster"? Original poster? Thanks.

(11-09-2015 06:57 PM)brob Wrote:  I've never seen a male forum member follow up so consistently in their own thread. You just posted 8 times in a row.

I think OP is a female trying to bring out the worst in us by asking if we take time out of our day to reject girls for fun and for pleasure. No, we are not psychos.

Post: #43

Where do these statistics come from? Why do you people resort to name calling rather than trying to be productive?

Weak emphasis could indicate European? I'm sorry but, an American who cannot even win a little war against a bunch of guys who are wearing robes, who are dressed in sandals, and who have light arms, and who have to go lie on their therapists' couches to complain about their pee-tee-ess-dee afterward and about "how it makes them feeeeeeel" is better than a European somehow? Why don't you guys put on some more padding and a helmet so you can play "rugby"? Call it American Football, why don't ya.

Roosh, please have someone ban me from this forum. Sorry man, but I've seen the nature of your followers. You are right, but they just don't get it.

(11-09-2015 06:42 PM)Guitarman Wrote:  Genre: Informal
Female = 2427
Male = 2187
Difference = -240; 47.39%
Verdict: Weak FEMALE

Weak emphasis could indicate European.

Genre: Formal
Female = 1344
Male = 1229
Difference = -115; 47.76%
Verdict: Weak FEMALE

Weak emphasis could indicate European.

Ban hammer awaits!

Post: #44

(11-09-2015 06:19 PM)Barwin Wrote:  Who's Stan?

(11-09-2015 02:20 PM)LINUX Wrote:  Whats up Stan?

He's the guy in the Eminem song who put his girl in a trunk and drove off a bridge.

Post: #45

(11-09-2015 06:19 PM)Barwin Wrote:  Who's Stan? And good quote by the way. In your signature that is.

(11-09-2015 02:20 PM)LINUX Wrote:  Whats up Stan?

Post: #46

OP posting on page 2 of this thread

Post: #47

What I'm saying is that I'm only getting laid with occasional one night stands. I can no longer go on 3 dates with some chick who continuously insults my intelligence by regurgitating every memorized line every other chick has told or asked me in the past. When I go to the bar and get drunk though, I can still pick up and fuck.

(11-09-2015 02:51 PM)RIslander Wrote:  

(11-09-2015 01:33 PM)Barwin Wrote:  I do this all the time now, and I'm not getting laid much anymore.

(11-09-2015 02:16 PM)Barwin Wrote:  And I'm not afraid of closing, I still bang ONS on a regular bases.

Post: #48

Rog

(11-09-2015 08:24 PM)LINUX Wrote:  

(11-09-2015 06:19 PM)Barwin Wrote:  Who's Stan?

(11-09-2015 02:20 PM)LINUX Wrote:  Whats up Stan?

He's the guy in the Eminem song who put his girl in a trunk and drove off a bridge.

Post: #49

(11-09-2015 05:51 PM)Barwin Wrote:  Anyway, I wanted to know if there is anybody else out there who has swung this far to the other side of game, and my question was answered: there isn't.

Hey man, you immediately shot out the gate with a questionable post that was clearly trolling the forum. Yet you still got legit answers to your questions, and you got the treatment of tough, honest, direct advice that makes this community's tradition of self-improvement so strong.

You got more than you should have. So don't act like you didn't get what you asked for. Of course there's guys who have swung that far in their game. At that point, though, it's not some transcendent "super alpha I-don't-need-sex" stage. It's straight anti-game.

That's the shit people grapple with when they recover from their beta rage. That's day 1 shit, and it doesn't belong here with you masquerading like the ultimate pussy god who gets laid at will.

Your trolling job was given far more attention than it should have. You'll soon feel the ban.

Post: #50

This thread is getting good