Post: #26

(07-14-2015 07:33 AM)Geomann180 Wrote:  Seeing that image is quite surreal. One of my best friend's father is good friends with that man and even sold his truck my friend (we'll call him George). He came to speak to my university on his experiences.

George told me that Kristen Beck was doing this as an experiment and plans to retire from the spotlight at some point and go be a monk. K. Beck is an alum of my university too and set PT records back in the day.

G

Well - as I said. You will have the strongest and fastest "women" in military history soon.

When they allow trannies to start in the Olympics and sports like tennis or soccer - that will be the starting day when the floodgates open and most female top athletes will be transgenders.

Post: #27

Fine, send them to the frontline. Letting them in is just setting the Military up for more problems, like it wasn't fucked up enough as it is.

Post: #28

(07-14-2015 07:38 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

(07-14-2015 07:33 AM)Geomann180 Wrote:  Seeing that image is quite surreal. One of my best friend's father is good friends with that man and even sold his truck my friend (we'll call him George). He came to speak to my university on his experiences.

George told me that Kristen Beck was doing this as an experiment and plans to retire from the spotlight at some point and go be a monk. K. Beck is an alum of my university too and set PT records back in the day.

G

Well - as I said. You will have the strongest and fastest "women" in military history soon.

When they allow trannies to start in the Olympics and sports like tennis or soccer - that will be the starting day when the floodgates open and most female top athletes will be transgenders.

This will be one of those moments when women may actually realize how they fucked themselves by going over board with their righteousness and victim thinking. Then they can fight the trannies who have taken over their sports and other areas that were supposed to be only for women.

Post: #29

My main concern with this is that there is pretty decent evidence to suggest that transgender-ism is a mental disorder. In order words, these people are ill and need treatment, not acceptance and enabling. And they certainly do not need to be trained in combat, armed and sent into actual battle.

Post: #30

It's hard for me to accept that this is actually happening. They just go on and on, and none of these top generals do anything to try to stop it.

I'm just speechless.

And the worst thing about it is that it is a pure fraud, a sham. It's not about "equality" or "fairness". It's about certain groups getting special privileges, and about making the true workers work harder to support the frivolities of some unbalanced people.

Because that's what's going to happen. The real workers are going to carry these dorks. The military becomes one big social welfare-social engineering experiment, and the heavy lifting is done by a small few.

.

Post: #31

With our military promoting the Fags and Trannies lifestyle as morally normal and acceptable behavior the Russians, ISIS and the Chinese Red Army must be laughing their arses off in astonishment and disgust - great way to take one of the strongest militaries in human history and turn it into a global laughing stock among our adversaries - instead of a US Navy Nuclear Aircraft Carrier task force instilling shock, awe and fear into the hearts of our enemies they will have visions of rump riding conga lines when the order "attention on deck" is given.

It would be laughable if the Marxist Feminist SJW LGBTQstds agenda was not so degenerate and damaging to our national defense.

Now it is only a matter of time before patriotic military men are prosecuted and court marshalled for pummeling or even terminating some ram rodding rump riding butt blasters who could not control their inner urges and fondled a fellow soldier, sailor, airman or marine and were given a severe corrective response in return.

I was taught to shoot in the Boy Scouts, I was taught to kill on Nuclear Submarines.

They are redesigning Nuke Subs to accommodate women so they will not have to hot rack with the men and now they are adding Fags and Trannies to the hot rack rotation - nah can't possibly see how this will end badly nope not a bit!

Post: #32

I see two agendas here. Maybe there are more.

Trannies want into any institution that they can milk for benefits. They need someone else to pay for their suicide attempts and surgeries.

The powers that be want to broaden the range of people who can be conscripted if the draft is instituted again. This is a step in eliminating the gender barrier to conscription.

Post: #33

Does this mean that TRICARE and my tax dollars will be covering their surgeries? I hate to say it, but we need a real conservative to walk back all this liberal bullshit thats being shoved down our throats.

Post: #34

The military seems to be falling apart gradually.

Post: #35

I'm glad the US military is becoming a pile of shit. Should Americans need to revolt, there won't be anything to stop them.

Post: #36

I'm now voting for Schzophrenics to be allowed to serve in all branches, and in the highest forces of the military.

Why discriminate against them? While we're at it, let's get rid of the vision exam to get into the air force too.

I'd like to see more of these guys become snipers. Chase your dreams.

Post: #37

(07-14-2015 11:59 AM)Slim Shady Wrote:  I'm now voting for Schzophrenics to be allowed to serve in all branches, and in the highest forces of the military.

Why discriminate against them? While we're at it, let's get rid of the vision exam to get into the air force too.

I'd like to see more of these guys become snipers. Chase your dreams.

Anything short of quotas would be ableist

Post: #38

(07-14-2015 11:40 AM)Cyclone419 Wrote:  Does this mean that TRICARE and my tax dollars will be covering their surgeries? I hate to say it, but we need a real conservative to walk back all this liberal bullshit thats being shoved down our throats.

Sorry, ain't happening. The Republican President we get next will just send the Trannies the Democratic President put in the military overseas to go to war to make their banking buddies rich. Washington is dead and its not coming back.

Post: #39

(07-14-2015 10:54 AM)Quintus Curtius Wrote:  It's hard for me to accept that this is actually happening. They just go on and on, and none of these top generals do anything to try to stop it.

What do you expect? You can't expect people who got to be generals by winning a 30 year, single elimination suck up marathon to suddenly show a backbone now.

Quote:I'm just speechless. Because that's what's going to happen. The real workers are going to carry these dorks. The military becomes one big social welfare-social engineering experiment, and the heavy lifting is done by a small few.

.

The military's been that way for some time now....promotions based on sycophancy and tenure, same pay for different performance, all life requirements provided by the government, and so on. Life in the Army is very much an experience in socialism. Take a look at the advocacy from groups like the American Leigion and MOAA: they're focused almost entirely on keeping the military a welfare state and actively resist any attempts to introduce elements of meritocracy into the organization.

Again, people like that aren't going to resist SJW-ism when it's pushed for by the White House. If anything they're going to become rabid supporters because they think that doing so is a way to ingratiate themselves with Congress and the Executive.

Post: #40

I may be the lone voice of dissent here, but just a few points to keep in mind:

- The days of large-scale combined operations are over. The wars of today and tomorrow will be fought with Special Forces units, drones, stealth bombers, and computer networks.
- It's common for militaries to drastically reform social policy following years of unpopular wars. During the early 1970's for example, roughly half of all U.S. military personnel were using heroine and opium, which redefined post-war readiness policies. Additional downsizing, budget cuts, and changes to foreign policy reflected the social consciousness of the general public, even though these changes weren't in the best interest of military capability. And all this, during the height of the Cold War.
- Since the Roman Empire and the formation of the first truly professional armies, military policy has been defined by civilian culture. Without conscription, implementing policies reflective of the civilian mindset & culture is critical to maintaining adequate numbers and keeping morale high. You may see it as evidence of decline, but to the average 18 year old brainwashed SJW high school graduate, a "progressive" military is a more welcoming option than an old fashioned boys club. The public is becoming more liberal, and the military is adapting to it.
- It's ludicrous to assume our generals don't know what's going on, or that they're complicit in these policy changes. We're talking about hardened motherfuckers who spent years patrolling the Mekong Delta in Special Forces and Airborne units.
- Policies detrimental to combat effectiveness are quickly repealed and reformed during conflict. The entire U.S. Army training manual and leadership structure went out the window following the Battle of Kasserine Pass (first battle between Germans/Americans) during WW2. The U.S. military also implemented physical fitness following the Eighth Army retreat in Korea.
- The U.S. Army has, as you can probably imagine, its fair share of pussies, shitbags, and lowlifes. But our pussies, shitbags, and lowlifes are still of higher quality than Chinese or Islamic pussies, shitbags, and lowlifes.
- And to repeat for the millionth time, women, gays, and trannies are a miniscule portion of both the U.S. population and military manpower. An even smaller percentage will opt for infantry or other combat roles. Why does everyone here seem to think the 101st Airborne Division or 75th Ranger Regiment will be as diverse and equal opportunity as a human resources department?

The Blue Cord is the closest thing to my heart. Having poured more blood, sweat, and tears into the brotherhood than anything else in my life, I care deeply about what happens to the U.S. military, and share the outrage many of you are expressing. But even at the risk of coming off as an arrogant prick, I think many of you are completely overthinking the issue, as if a collapse of the military is something you secretly hope happens. In my opinion, it's simply a projection of bitterness towards U.S. society and culture as a whole. And said as directly as possible, I think it's extremely difficult for civilians who never served to appreciate the complexities of military politics.

Just relax. It's for show, it's a symbolic, peacetime political maneuver to keep numbers and public approval high in an increasingly liberal and war-fatigued society.

Post: #41

(07-14-2015 02:55 AM)Blick Mang Wrote:  

Quote:When I was in basic the gay-boys immediately made themselves clear. Never took shit serious and were always crying about the DS yelling at them or how they missed their fucking mommy and friends. At sensing sessions (Mandated meeting between commanders and recruits to identify any problems) These were the buddy fuckers that would whine about how mean every one is and fake injuries just to shitbag out of training, unknowingly undermining the quality of training for many cycles to come. You can't have an effective soldier if he doesn't have a strong foundation to fall on.

Your post has no basis in reality. I was a split-option 11B (Basic between junior/senior year of high school and AIT after graduation) and went through Ft. Benning with two different training cycles at Sand Hill, experiencing the complete opposite of what you described. They didn't out themselves or throw tantrums, they kept their heads low, did their jobs, and pulled their weight (or at least tried to) along with everyone else.

If you think shitbags and blue falcons have a specific sexual orientation, you're either willingly delusional or haven't spent much time in service. There are always bad policies in the military and bad people, but it's disappointing to see such a high number of armchair generals who never served completely writing off our fighting capabilities because of a fucking internet article.

The infantry is a brotherhood; if you're unwilling or unable to join that brotherhood, focus your outrage on gay wedding cakes and Twitter posts.

Unsurprisingly we experienced different things because I'm not infantry, I'm a pog. I went to Ft. Sill for my basic training where there wasn't 240+ young men motivated to become effective killers and hopped up on too much Full Metal Jacket. It was filled with National Guard and reservists, active duty was the minority. Males and females, young and old. These were people who wanted to become weekend warriors and work in a supply warehouse.

That is perfectly fine if that's the type of soldier you want to be, and the type of people jumping for joy to fill these positions were as you can imagine. I think was assessment is pretty accurate for what I observed.

You're absolutely right in that blue falcons have no orientation, though. They come in all shapes and sizes. My little tirade was coming off the top of my head as I was remembering my experience.

Post: #42

At least there's one bright side to all this. Imagine the terrifying message it sends to organizations like ISIS and other enemies of the U.S.:

"If we're willing to chop off our own dicks, what are we going to do to you?"

Post: #43

(07-14-2015 07:38 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

(07-14-2015 07:33 AM)Geomann180 Wrote:  Seeing that image is quite surreal. One of my best friend's father is good friends with that man and even sold his truck my friend (we'll call him George). He came to speak to my university on his experiences.

George told me that Kristen Beck was doing this as an experiment and plans to retire from the spotlight at some point and go be a monk. K. Beck is an alum of my university too and set PT records back in the day.

G

Well - as I said. You will have the strongest and fastest "women" in military history soon.

When they allow trannies to start in the Olympics and sports like tennis or soccer - that will be the starting day when the floodgates open and most female top athletes will be transgenders.

We already have them in Tennis

Post: #44

(07-14-2015 01:08 PM)Blick Mang Wrote:  I may be the lone voice of dissent here, but just a few points to keep in mind:

- The days of large-scale combined operations are over. The wars of today and tomorrow will be fought with Special Forces units, drones, stealth bombers, and computer networks.
- It's common for militaries to drastically reform social policy following years of unpopular wars. During the early 1970's for example, roughly half of all U.S. military personnel were using heroine and opium, which redefined post-war readiness policies. Additional downsizing, budget cuts, and changes to foreign policy reflected the social consciousness of the general public, even though these changes weren't in the best interest of military capability. And all this, during the height of the Cold War.
- Since the Roman Empire and the formation of the first truly professional armies, military policy has been defined by civilian culture. Without conscription, implementing policies reflective of the civilian mindset & culture is critical to maintaining adequate numbers and keeping morale high. You may see it as evidence of decline, but to the average 18 year old brainwashed SJW high school graduate, a "progressive" military is a more welcoming option than an old fashioned boys club. The public is becoming more liberal, and the military is adapting to it.
- It's ludicrous to assume our generals don't know what's going on, or that they're complicit in these policy changes. We're talking about hardened motherfuckers who spent years patrolling the Mekong Delta in Special Forces and Airborne units.
- Policies detrimental to combat effectiveness are quickly repealed and reformed during conflict. The entire U.S. Army training manual and leadership structure went out the window following the Battle of Kasserine Pass (first battle between Germans/Americans) during WW2. The U.S. military also implemented physical fitness following the Eighth Army retreat in Korea.
- The U.S. Army has, as you can probably imagine, its fair share of pussies, shitbags, and lowlifes. But our pussies, shitbags, and lowlifes are still of higher quality than Chinese or Islamic pussies, shitbags, and lowlifes.
- And to repeat for the millionth time, women, gays, and trannies are a miniscule portion of both the U.S. population and military manpower. An even smaller percentage will opt for infantry or other combat roles. Why does everyone here seem to think the 101st Airborne Division or 75th Ranger Regiment will be as diverse and equal opportunity as a human resources department?

The Blue Cord is the closest thing to my heart. Having poured more blood, sweat, and tears into the brotherhood than anything else in my life, I care deeply about what happens to the U.S. military, and share the outrage many of you are expressing. But even at the risk of coming off as an arrogant prick, I think many of you are completely overthinking the issue, as if a collapse of the military is something you secretly hope happens. In my opinion, it's simply a projection of bitterness towards U.S. society and culture as a whole. And said as directly as possible, I think it's extremely difficult for civilians who never served to appreciate the complexities of military politics.

Just relax. It's for show, it's a symbolic, peacetime political maneuver to keep numbers and public approval high in an increasingly liberal and war-fatigued society.

The Media is throwing a barrage of Transgender shit at us with this Caitlyn crap and reality shows like " Becoming Us" and "I am Jazz". Makes it seem like we are being overrun. But the numbers say 1/100,000 people suffer from transgender disorder making what Blick is saying very true. The number of transgendered people is a low percentage, the number going into the Military is would be even smaller.

Post: #45

   
I'm all for transgender personnel.
That way, when war breaks out they all get sent to the front lines and have their numbers thinned out. Less to deal with.

Post: #46

(07-14-2015 03:11 PM)Hardy Daytona Wrote:  I'm all for transgender personnel.
That way, when war breaks out they all get sent to the front lines and have their numbers thinned out. Less to deal with.

Actually, it will be more like the transgendered dudes will be promoted to the top (for giving good sexual favors to the other faggots, of course) and then order the straight men to their doom as incompetent military leaders.

Post: #47

(07-14-2015 03:34 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(07-14-2015 03:11 PM)Hardy Daytona Wrote:  I'm all for transgender personnel.
That way, when war breaks out they all get sent to the front lines and have their numbers thinned out. Less to deal with.

Actually, it will be more like the transgendered dudes will be promoted to the top (for giving good sexual favors to the other faggots, of course) and then order the straight men to their doom as incompetent military leaders.

This. Do you honestly think the TGs (or whatever the alphabet soup is) will the ones up at the "front lines?"

Post: #48

(07-14-2015 03:34 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(07-14-2015 03:11 PM)Hardy Daytona Wrote:  I'm all for transgender personnel.
That way, when war breaks out they all get sent to the front lines and have their numbers thinned out. Less to deal with.

Actually, it will be more like the transgendered dudes will be promoted to the top (for giving good sexual favors to the other faggots, of course) and then order the straight men to their doom as incompetent military leaders.

I really can't even fathom how post like this even get acknowledged as valid.
You can't even make an argument because clearly you're mind is already twisted beyond reason.
At the same time, it's obvious that you have no idea what you're saying aside from radical comments.

Post: #49

(07-14-2015 05:41 PM)Sourcecode Wrote:  

(07-14-2015 03:34 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(07-14-2015 03:11 PM)Hardy Daytona Wrote:  I'm all for transgender personnel.
That way, when war breaks out they all get sent to the front lines and have their numbers thinned out. Less to deal with.

Actually, it will be more like the transgendered dudes will be promoted to the top (for giving good sexual favors to the other faggots, of course) and then order the straight men to their doom as incompetent military leaders.

I really can't even fathom how post like this even get acknowledged as valid.
You can't even make an argument because clearly you're mind is already twisted beyond reason.
At the same time, it's obvious that you have no idea what you're saying aside from radical comments.

I guess you cannot fathom evil like I can.

Post: #50

(07-14-2015 01:08 PM)Blick Mang Wrote:  I may be the lone voice of dissent here, but just a few points to keep in mind:

- The days of large-scale combined operations are over. The wars of today and tomorrow will be fought with Special Forces units, drones, stealth bombers, and computer networks.

Most likely incorrect. The most effective current-gen warfighting techniques involved a combination of unconventional and "conventional" tactics, similar to that used by the Vietnamese and the current Chinese Doctrine.

Quote:- It's ludicrous to assume our generals don't know what's going on, or that they're complicit in these policy changes. We're talking about hardened motherfuckers who spent years patrolling the Mekong Delta in Special Forces and Airborne units.

That paragraph right there is the single biggest misconception that people have about the US military

It's a statement you could only make if you haven't served a day as an officer Here's a few real facts:

1. Today's generals have not served as grunts in any major war. A few were in during desert storm which was a 3 day blitz. They either entered after Vietnam or were promoted to senior rank after the "War on Terror" started
2. Generals can be replaced almost instantly. It doesn't really matter if they object because said general will soon be "rotated" out of his command retire to "spend more time with family".
3. And most importantly. THE ARMY DOES NOT SELECT THE BEST COMBAT LEADERS FOR GENERALS. Promotion as an officer is dependent entirely on subjective evaluations written by one's superior officer. In practice this means that the most effective sycophants get promoted, where the more aggressive and "redpill" personalites that make good combat leaders typically don't have the skill at office politics to get promoted to General.