Post: #51

This isn't about special rights for trannies in the military. It is about Federally redefining who we are as human beings in other to further control us via language and breaking down the family uint. This is about Totalitarianism. (It isn't a coincidence that this is coinciding with the legalization of homosexual marriage but I digress.)

When transsexual darling Laverne Cox said, "”When a trans woman is called a man, that is an act of violence.” it was quoted all over the media. Control the language, control the people. Soon it really will be hate speech and then a criminal act. Voila, an end run around the constitution.

Look at Sweden, they are far ahead of us in the gender agenda.

Here is an article from a few years ago, about their push towards gender neutrality.

Quote:A "core mission" of the national curriculum in Swedish preschools is to eradicate gender roles, according to CBS News. Many preschools have hired "gender pedagogues" to help teachers "identify language and behavior that risk reinforcing" traditional male/female behaviors.

Forcing private companies to change in order to do business:

Quote:This year, Top-Toy -- one of Europe's largest toy companies --submitted to gender-neutrality training after censure for sexism from Sweden's advertising ombudsman. The result: a Christmas catalog featuring boys blowdrying a girl's hair or playing with a Barbie Dream House, and girls playing with gruesome action figures.

If You Could Rid the World of Gender, Would You?

Slate wrote an article around the same time. Surprisingly, the article ended as such, the cold hard truth. This is what is coming for the US:

Quote:Ironically, in the effort to free Swedish children from so-called normative behavior, gender-neutral proponents are also subjecting them to a whole set of new rules and new norms as certain forms of play become taboo, language becomes regulated, and children's interactions and attitudes are closely observed by teachers. One Swedish school got rid of its toy cars because boys "gender-coded" them and ascribed the cars higher status than other toys. Another preschool removed "free playtime" from its schedule because, as a pedagogue at the school put it, when children play freely "stereotypical gender patterns are born and cemented. In free play there is hierarchy, exclusion, and the seed to bullying." And so every detail of children's interactions gets micromanaged by concerned adults, who end up problematizing minute aspects of children's lives, from how they form friendships to what games they play and what songs they sing.

Hen: Sweden's new gender neutral pronoun causes controversy

Post: #52

(07-13-2015 07:11 PM)Eskhander Wrote:  All seven of the transsexuals who wanted to join the military rejoice.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/commis...le/2552448

Quote:Having already lifted the “don’t ask, don’t tell” ban on gays in the military, the Pentagon “likely will” allow transgendered Americans to serve openly in the military where 15,500 now secretly serve, according to a new report issued by top former generals.

Three of the top brass, endorsing the deployment of transgendered troops, also said their effort has the support of Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel and President Obama.

In a statement accompanying the 29-page report issued Tuesday, they said, “Our conclusion is that allowing transgender personnel to serve openly is administratively feasible and will not be burdensome or complicated. Three months have passed since Defense Secretary Hagel announced a willingness to review the military's ban on transgender service, an effort the White House indicated it supports.”

Here's a link to the referenced report:

http://www.palmcenter.org/files/Report%2...ervice.pdf

Post: #53

Well, the Saudi's are always looking for paramedics... Is Riyadh a poosy paradise?

Post: #54

Why would any normal straight man let himself get drafted to defend this country at this point? The evidence is full on for display that your country doesn't give a shit about you.

Post: #55

Like QC I'm speechless too. Although sadly I'm not terribly surprised as we've seen the writing on the wall for a while. First gays openly serving, trying to get women to integrate into subs, special warfare, etc.

I recently got out after 10 years, and reading stuff like this makes it even better that I broke away when I did.

I'd bet small percentage of people who want a sex change will join the military ONLY to get the procedure for free, because I have no doubt SJWs will push for this being the type of procedure that's not deemed elective.

Why is it that the WEAK and small percent are continuing to lead and influence the strong? Where I used to only be disgusted by these kinds of SJW types of news articles every so often, it seems it's every week some new bullshit is being pushed though. This, Oregon allowing 15 year olds to get sex changes, sanctuary cities not giving a fuck some girl was killed, etc.

My prediction with the military is that fewer and fewer normal and good people will join, and the good ones currently in will get out. The freak shows will continue to pile on their agendas and increase in numbers, and in the end we'll lose the next major war. I used to get a kick out of that show Doomsday Preppers, but now I think they're making more and more sense.

Post: #56

I have posted on this subject several times. As a veteran and a guy who took pride in being a professional soldier it has been sad and truly disturbing to watch the emergence of the super sensitive, politically correct U.S. military that is more concerned with appeasing the media and liberals than fighting. I am to the point where I accept that it is what it is. It will be interesting to watch the Special Operations community try to defend it's standards (they are already under attack). Additionally, it will be interesting to watch stronger, tougher countries take advantage. The United States will maintain a tech edge over the next 20 years due to the powerful defense industry but other nations are gaining ground fast.

Post: #57

(07-15-2015 06:17 PM)mbare Wrote:  Why is it that the WEAK and small percent are continuing to lead and influence the strong? Where I used to only be disgusted by these kinds of SJW types of news articles every so often, it seems it's every week some new bullshit is being pushed though. This, Oregon allowing 15 year olds to get sex changes, sanctuary cities not giving a fuck some girl was killed, etc.

The Weak aren't leading and influencing the Strong. The Strong are using the Weak - the useful idiots (trannies, feminists, homosexuals) - in order to control society - we Normals. Trannies will kill themselves or be killed eventually so handing them rights is an easy decision to the Strong. The benefit is further opportunity to destroy the family, to clamp down on free speech. Just like homosexual marriage, just like

Example: a feminism believes that slut-shaming is wrong, casual sex is empowering.

"Catcalling" a woman who looks attractive to you should be illegal and does not run afoul of free speech according to our media -- which we should all know by now is controlled by the Strong. The global Elite. This will be criminalized within a matter of 2-3 years.

OK so she is an empowered slut who fucks a guy in the bathroom of the local saloon and gets knocked up. She has the baby. She posts "A real man would take care of his kids" meme on Facebook day after day and her fellow single mom friends agree and they all complain that their one night stand didn't step up. What happens to all of the people in this "we had offspring but have no actual family" drama?

Most singles moms have no money so she goes on welfare.

Who tells her what she can eat? The State. They are the ones giving out the WIC vouchers which tell you what you can and cannot have.

Who tells her where she can live? The State. She gets Section 8, which must approve all housing choices

Who tells her how to raise her child, who can pop in anytime to make sure all is well? The State.

And what happens to the dude who knocked her up?

He is tracked for 18 years and forced to pay child support. By whom? The State?
He cannot sell his house because The State has put a iien on it. When he does sell it they take his money to give to her... but of course there are administrative fees.
The State send letters to his job informing them of his predicament and garnish his wages.

And who control The State? Not our government officials. The Global Elites. They are marching us towards Totalitarianism. They used Clinton, then Bush, and now Obama in different ways. They next POTUS will be a stooge too.

The tranny thing I don't have a full handle on as of yet. But for sure I see the language tyranny which tells me I am being screwed. And for sure I see a movement towards reproductive rights for people who weren't meant to produce. This is a Brave New World indeed.

Post: #58

(07-15-2015 03:34 PM)Medic42 Wrote:  Well, the Saudi's are always looking for paramedics... Is Riyadh a poosy paradise?

It's a poo-y paradise, if Dubai is anything to go by.

Post: #59

(07-15-2015 07:02 PM)Gimlet Wrote:  

(07-15-2015 06:17 PM)mbare Wrote:  Why is it that the WEAK and small percent are continuing to lead and influence the strong? Where I used to only be disgusted by these kinds of SJW types of news articles every so often, it seems it's every week some new bullshit is being pushed though. This, Oregon allowing 15 year olds to get sex changes, sanctuary cities not giving a fuck some girl was killed, etc.

The Weak aren't leading and influencing the Strong. The Strong are using the Weak - the useful idiots (trannies, feminists, homosexuals) - in order to control society - we Normals. Trannies will kill themselves or be killed eventually so handing them rights is an easy decision to the Strong. The benefit is further opportunity to destroy the family, to clamp down on free speech. Just like homosexual marriage, just like

Example: a feminism believes that slut-shaming is wrong, casual sex is empowering.

"Catcalling" a woman who looks attractive to you should be illegal and does not run afoul of free speech according to our media -- which we should all know by now is controlled by the Strong. The global Elite. This will be criminalized within a matter of 2-3 years.

OK so she is an empowered slut who fucks a guy in the bathroom of the local saloon and gets knocked up. She has the baby. She posts "A real man would take care of his kids" meme on Facebook day after day and her fellow single mom friends agree and they all complain that their one night stand didn't step up. What happens to all of the people in this "we had offspring but have no actual family" drama?

Most singles moms have no money so she goes on welfare.

Who tells her what she can eat? The State. They are the ones giving out the WIC vouchers which tell you what you can and cannot have.

Who tells her where she can live? The State. She gets Section 8, which must approve all housing choices

Who tells her how to raise her child, who can pop in anytime to make sure all is well? The State.

And what happens to the dude who knocked her up?

He is tracked for 18 years and forced to pay child support. By whom? The State?
He cannot sell his house because The State has put a iien on it. When he does sell it they take his money to give to her... but of course there are administrative fees.
The State send letters to his job informing them of his predicament and garnish his wages.

And who control The State? Not our government officials. The Global Elites. They are marching us towards Totalitarianism. They used Clinton, then Bush, and now Obama in different ways. They next POTUS will be a stooge too.

The tranny thing I don't have a full handle on as of yet. But for sure I see the language tyranny which tells me I am being screwed. And for sure I see a movement towards reproductive rights for people who weren't meant to produce. This is a Brave New World indeed.

Yes, a Brave New World. I see your point, and wouldn't argue it. For sure the global elite are always pulling the strings in some way or another.

I suppose collapsing social norms will march them forward with whatever agenda they're wanting...1984 kind of situation for the entire world. I haven't put any major thought into it, but it is interesting to think about why they'd want to get to that point. The powerful will always remain powerful, and it seems this phony capitalist/consumerist environment at the moment is benefiting them greatly. Why wouldn't they want to keep that going? I suppose because it's unsustainable so they're making the next "chess" move.

This is me speculating of course, but I really think as artificial intelligence increases we're going to see a massive societal shift towards zero jobs for many. http://www.techrepublic.com/article/ai-i...n-stop-it/ Perhaps that has something to do with powerful trying to break down social norms. As you said, inching towards a Totalitarian gov.

My better point is that I can't stand that social media and blogs have given a voice to the weak, fat, lazy, idiotic, and of course SJWs as well as everyone in between. What's worse is the "media" picks up stories from these bloggers and puts it out in world as if it's truth. It just boggles the mind. Years ago no one would have paid any attention to a fat chick complaining about Victoria Secret models being skinny. Now they have a massive platform and whether or not it's a grand orchestration by the powerful or not, it still pisses me off these people get any recognition for their comments. Utter bullshit.

At any rate, now that that's all said...until things get really bad we can keep tipping back on a good glass of scotch, fucking chicks, stacking cash and enjoying other pleasures of life.

cheers gents

Post: #60

(07-13-2015 09:12 PM)Paracelsus Wrote:  This was the experience in World War 2: when they ran out of volunteers (and they ran out pretty quickly, despite the fact the US had been directly attacked) they started drafting. Overwhelmingly conscripts made up (and won) World War 2. This is not to say career or volunteer troops did not do their part, but the notion of a "career" serviceman at the time was nothing like the public servant "career" military type who is sadly prevalent in the middle to upper ranks these days, the sort that is determined to punch the clock for 20 years and then retire with benefits at the ripe old age of 40 or so.

Well, interestingly enough, about 40% of American soldiers in WWII were volunteers. That's a fairly significant number, when you consider that the US had 16,000,000 in uniform. As for the "transgender ban" being lifted, has anyone (in the armed services) ever considered that instead of making every single person feel welcome, the Army should work on winning wars again?

I can just see it now:
"Sir, we have reports of two mechanized battalions preparing to advance in our sector."

"We can't do anything about that right now. We have to have 'sensitivity training' so all our troops can feel welcome."

When it comes down to it, it's pretty simple: the Army isn't run by soldiers anymore. It's run by petty careerists who've never commanded anything outside of a desk.

Post: #61

(07-14-2015 01:08 PM)Blick Mang Wrote:  Why does everyone here seem to think the 101st Airborne Division or 75th Ranger Regiment will be as diverse and equal opportunity as a human resources department?

Because that is EXACTLY what is being pushed, incrementally as it may be. If you wore that blue cord, as I did once upon a time, you know well enough that the 101st "Airborne" isn't anything more than just another regular infantry unit, which will, by hook or by crook, be forced to accept female "leadership" one way or another. They will do the same thing to the Ranger Regiment, though it may take more time. The SJWs have the wind at their back with Washington and the crop of fools dressed as Generals we have nowadays who more than ever only care about their careers, both active and post-military.

I most definitely am not happy about what's happening, in fact I consider it a genuine threat to national security. The situation is worse than you think.

Post: #62

Imagine how bad it will get once Hillary is elected?

Post: #63

If you can't fly a plane without 20/20 vision then you shouldn't be allowed to serve without a 20/20 sexual identity.

Post: #64

Post: #65

Post: #66

Post: #67

They may not be in the military and firing real weapons, but they for sure will be trigger happy after reading that.

Post: #68

CNN reports US military training video thats just been scrapped since Trumps tweet

Post: #69

Quote:This is me speculating of course, but I really think as artificial intelligence increases we're going to see a massive societal shift towards zero jobs for many. http://www.techrepublic.com/article/ai-i...n-stop-it/ Perhaps that has something to do with powerful trying to break down social norms. As you said, inching towards a Totalitarian gov.

Thats an important conneXion to make, but "zerO jobs" should be the least of your worries.

PM me and I'll send you some stuff.

Post: #70

Post: #71

Joining the military is an attractive option for a transsexual who needs the government to pay for their extremely expensive operations. Like everything else in America, this is a money scam.

Post: #72

The trannys are waving signs about this in front of Trump Waikiki.

If anyone is around that area, and a crack/meth dealer, there's a large quantity of customers for you.

Aloha!

Post: #73

(07-26-2017 06:01 PM)Sherman Wrote:  Joining the military is an attractive option for a transsexual who needs the government to pay for their extremely expensive operations.

Not anymore!

Post: #74

Talked to a friend who is a Captain in the Army. Apparently they get out of all real duty once they claim to be Transgender as they go through the process (I guess for injury reasons) so that if they have a 3 year contract they may only do a couple months of work and get hundreds of thousands in medical benefits.

(07-26-2017 06:26 PM)eradicator Wrote:  

(07-26-2017 06:01 PM)Sherman Wrote:  Joining the military is an attractive option for a transsexual who needs the government to pay for their extremely expensive operations.

Not anymore!

Post: #75

Klinger would be so proud