Im really wary about the cucks cheating in the ohio/florida election. This is their last chance to stump trump and i have a sneaking suspicion they will be going balls to the wall.

Not really anything we can do about it, im getting a little anxiety though. How stupid are people that this isnt a trump landslide in every state.

Trump Native Hawaiian campaign manager tearing up

MAhalo !

The silver lining in all of this is that Trump will be able to paint himself in a very positive light come the general election against Hillary. He'll show he fought tooth and nail against corrupt elites and their neocon allies and that Hillary is a part of that elite and it would all be very true.

We should all thank Bernie for fighting so hard against Clinton, he's keeping her busy instead of allowing her to work on the general election. Of course that wouldn't be necessary if the party would just give up it's fight against Trump, but of course they won't.

They know this is it, this is their last stand to survive with their delusional conservative movement.

iCarly endorses St. Rafael:

http://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics...story.html

All 12 of her voters have a place to go now.

She never did get over Trump calling her ugly.

As I thought, Romney's speech swung a lot of Mormon voters to Cruz, so that's likely a big reason that Trump lost Idaho. If true, he'll likely lose Utah and maybe Wyoming. He might lose some votes in Arizona, but Arizona voters are so anti-illegal immigration that may mitigate the Romney effect with the Mormon voters there.

I heard about him yelling at a protestor at one of his rallies recently, "Do you need to be tucked in by your Mommy?" That unapologetic, aggressive, T-shaming of a progressive keyboard jockey must be sending a cold shiver through the ranks of the SJWs. The have got to be scared to death.

Here's a question;

There's a lot of talks about how the neocons and other people loyal to Israel and indeed Israeli leaders themselves want to destabalize gentile societies and in particular the US and also use the US to further their interests.

Can anyone explain to me why to the first part and how do these conflicting things (the first and second things) make sense?

Samseau could answer this better than me, but our Talmudic friends don't seem to be very good at seeing the inevitable blowback of their actions, or they're just too arrogant.

Which is why they've been expelled from various kingdoms/nations hundreds of times throughout history, and are always getting blown the fuck out by monsters of their own creation(ex: Stalin).

(03-09-2016 11:28 AM)Fisto Wrote:  There's a lot of talks about how the neocons and other people loyal to Israel and indeed Israeli leaders themselves want to destabalize gentile societies and in particular the US and also use the US to further their interests.

Can anyone explain to me why to the first part and how do these conflicting things (the first and second things) make sense?

I wouldn't say that they want to destabilize gentile societies.

If you look up Sheldon Adelson, Bill Kristol, Paul Wolfowitz and just start reading about Neoconservatism in general, everything revolves around Israel.

It's not that they want to destabilize the US, it's that the US doesn't matter to these people longterm. The future and survival of the US is secondary to the future and survival of Israel.

Here's a quote pulled from the Neocon page on wikipedia:

Quote:As I’ve documented previously, the very same right-wing advocates who scream "anti-semitism" at anyone, such as Klein, who raises the issue of devotion to Israel themselves constantly argue that American Jews do — and should — cast their votes in American elections based upon what is best for Israel. They nakedly trot out the "dual loyalty" argument in order to manipulate American Jews to vote Republican in U.S. elections (e.g.: "the GOP supports Israel and Obama doesn't; therefore, American Jews shouldn’t vote for Obama"), while screaming "anti-semitism" the minute the premise is used by their political opponents.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoconservatism

Neocons have tried to push other American Jews to vote in the interests of Israel over the United States and that really says it all.

You ever read the Bible? That would answer all your questions about the jews right there, especially Exodus.

(03-09-2016 11:28 AM)Fisto Wrote:  Here's a question;

There's a lot of talks about how the neocons and other people loyal to Israel and indeed Israeli leaders themselves want to destabalize gentile societies and in particular the US and also use the US to further their interests.

Can anyone explain to me why to the first part and how do these conflicting things (the first and second things) make sense?

The first thing to realize if you want to understand this is to look at jews as being a nation outside Israel, which is what they were for 2000 years. What that means is that jews generally act - as if - they were a nation. That means you have your Royalty (Rothschilds, Warburg, others) and your government (Neo-Cons), you have your intelligentsia (cultural-marxists) and so on.

Most jews do not think much about such issues, they are not religious, but they still have a strong sense of belonging to the jewish group. Very strong. That is the only way they've survived as a distinct ethnic group without a country for 2000 years.

Israel is important to jews, but most jews do not want to move there. 2000 years as a middleman minority has made them unfit and unwilling for productive work. They prefer and always have, the trades, money business, entertainment and so on. They need to live in countries with a strong productive base.

When jews act, they act as if a nation, which means that they see the United States and other countries they live in as a foreign nation to their own jewish nation. Any country has allies, friends and foes, but even friendly nations act in their own self interest compared to allies. Jews therefore look solely and primarily of 'is this good for the jews'? If you go to Israeli newspapers they ask this question all the time: "Is it good for the jews"? That is their main concern about everything from foreign policy to cultural policy.

What is good for the jews is not usually good for the country they live in. Since jews are not 100% loyal to their host countries, they fear ethnic nationalism because it invariably leads to someone asking the questions about jewish loyalty.

Therefore, jews have an interest in promoting multi-culturalism and decreasing the influence of christianity. They prefer countries that are divided and ethnically fractured, where they can act as the middleman minority that is their true identity.

Weakening the US is of no concern to them as long as they have their white collar jobs and that they retain control of the US military. By flooding Europe with immigrants, their victory is twofold, they create ethnically divided countries in which they can hide easier and second they bring the Palestinian question to Europe, hoping that animosity against muslims will allows them to eradicate the Palestinians.

In the news, Trump is dropping innuendo that he'll choose Queerio for VP as long as Queerio drops out. No good. Tomorrow night's debate will be a Rubio/Cruz slugfest for the shenanigans in Hawaii.

^ I hadn't seen this. Link?

I think he's working a bit of reverse psychology. He has to know head-to-head against Cruz so soon would not advantage him when his maximum in most states is in the 30s and 40s (with the odd near 50% thrown in).

I doubt Rubio would tolerate for a second being Trump's VP. He'd be way too wounded in the pride department to cow-tow to an non-establishment outsider who beat him at his own game. Trump knows this and is baiting him to motivate him to stay in for now.

Guys, these are interesting topics, and indeed essential to our understanding of politics and the current direction of the world, but let's keep this thread about Trump and discuss neoconservatism and ethnocentric conflict (the latter is what such subversive movements and ideologies are about) in a different thread.

Hint: It's advantageous to advocate for open borders globalism in countries where your ethnic group is a minority, and to advocate for nationalism in countries where your ethnic group is the majority. And indeed, this is what we observe.

He's called him little Marco, a liar, a choke artist and has mocked him relentlessly for sweating.

Zero chance.

This is a very good thread about Jews: https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-34751.html

There are a couple of Jews in that very thread and it's funny how they react to the facts and arguments that are written down by Samseau, scorpion and many others. Enjoy.

A photo from that thread:

I'll start sharing more content on the computer, there's only so much one can do on the phone. The Donald Trump Thread, for all intents and purposes, has become The Politics Thread.

The truth is, all of his republican opponents are viable choices for VP cause the situation is so dire. Although, Fagio is definitely the worst choice because cozying up to the globalist slime would be out of character for The Donald.

I'd like to hear people's predictions on this forum for who the VP would be backed by logical reasoning.

In general, paying attention to negativity of nobodies is not smart. But this low-life bitch should get sued and ruined for this disgusting open letter in Huffington Post:

"An Open Letter to Donald Trump's Sex Harassment Victims"

Quote:One important story, though, has drawn surprisingly little attention during this presidential campaign: Donald Trump's illegal sexual harassment of women.

It is based on absolutely nothing. It's why she's asking women to come forward. They haven't. She talks about some bullshit events and interprets them as vicious sexual violence.

Quote:On January 31, 2016, the Washington Post reported that a 26-year-old Iowa campaign worker filed a complaint with the Davenport Civil Rights Commission claiming that when she and another female coworker met Trump last summer, he looked them over and said "You guys could do a lot of damage," implying that their physical appearances could be very helpful to his campaign.

Really?

Quote:Regardless of his denials, you can be virtually certain he did it, because he has demeaned and sexually harassed women openly for years. These kinds of behaviors don't just end on their own nor has Trump suffered any consequences that might deter future sex offenses. Those two things combined almost guarantee that there are other victims of whom we are simply unaware.

I hope he destroys her in court. She further cites his remarks on his TV show, about a woman dropping on her knees when she's getting fired. She talks about his victims coming forwards, implying the certainty of their existence and thereby the certainty of his sexual crimes.

I wonder what she wrote in the open letter to the many victims of Hillary and Bill Clinton. Can't seem to find that article right now...

(03-09-2016 12:18 PM)DannyAlberta Wrote:  I think he's working a bit of reverse psychology. He has to know head-to-head against Cruz so soon would not advantage him when his maximum in most states is in the 30s and 40s (with the odd near 50% thrown in).

Why do you say this? It seems very advantageous to me. I think if it gets 1-on-1 with Cruz, Trump wins easily. Trump only needs 54% of the remaining delegates, which is much easier 1-on-1 than 1-on-3.

That being said, I'd be shocked if Rubio was VP choice. He's done nothing productive in his life. Trump won't respect that.

I love how the Clintons get a pass for abusing women for decades but Trump says someone looks pretty on some TV show and he's a rapist. Fuck leftists - they are the lowest of the low. Id much rather deal with the wrong type of evangelical Ted Cruz cucks.

(03-09-2016 11:28 AM)Fisto Wrote:  Here's a question;

There's a lot of talks about how the neocons and other people loyal to Israel and indeed Israeli leaders themselves want to destabalize gentile societies and in particular the US and also use the US to further their interests.

Can anyone explain to me why to the first part and how do these conflicting things (the first and second things) make sense?

Israel does not need strong American nation. Israel needs strong US government.

(03-09-2016 11:57 AM)nomadbrah Wrote:  Most jews do not think much about such issues, they are not religious, but they still have a strong sense of belonging to the jewish group. Very strong. That is the only way they've survived as a distinct ethnic group without a country for 2000 years.

Yeah, but there are two kinds. I've mentioned this before. The first kind is as you say and they usually behave in a divided loyalty fashion as you say.

The second kind are just Jews that are just that by descent. It's just a fact of life, not an attachment. Many don't even think about it.

I've been in and out of circles with both types in it. There are tons of Trump supporters in the second. These are the ones that have to face Muslim ghettos in Europe.

Of course, the first is a lot more influential than the second.

Back to Trump - does anyone have the latest polling data from Ohio and Florida?

I've been pretty hard on Trump since the beginning but his integrity and character is pretty solid in my opinion. Here are the things i've noticed about him in the media and his past:

He keeps good friends even if he's completely politically split from them and socially outclasses them. Howard Stern comes to mind. He defends his friend and even name drops him occasionally. There's actually negative benefit for him to be attached to Howard Stern at this point.

He's absolutely willing to deal with a lot of different people and anywhere. He has a luxury development right in the heart of the Philippines. I'm sure though he's gaining some benefits from that.

He's hard on employees but he keeps people who are reliable and have good work ethic. This is 100% what I do as a businessman too. There's quite a few accounts of Trump riding employees but keeping the ones who show they are capable pretty much forever.

His children are solid. No crackheads, sex videos, tattoos, or other shit unlike the Bush's or Kennedy's. You don't raise children this solid without good parenting and solid character. The way Eric talks about his dad i'm certain is for real.. there's real admiration there from son to father. The children and even women in his life have total respect for him as the patriarch.

He's consistent with his political views even when you go way back. I don't see any major divergences there. He's always said a lot of the same things he's saying now.

Trump's campaign manager was apparently rough with a Breitbart reporter of all places last night.

I've been noticing that the media is really getting scared about Trump's disdain of them and his rhetoric about "opening up the libel laws." Of course, this is never going to happen, but they're getting frightened anyway.

They seem to blame everyone but themselves, of course.

I plan on writing up a history of Judaism and Christianity in the deep forum someday, which is where that discussion belongs. There is a lot to cover. But the short of it is that Jews split between Christianity and Talmudism around 200-400 AD. Christian Jews did not believe in racial supremacy, believed in converting others, and went on to build Western Civ as we know it. The Talmuds were insular, did not believe in mixed marriages, fought to preserve their racial heritage, and have only sought to gain strength relative to others. The results speak for themselves.

Charles Evers, the brother of civil rights icon Medgar Evers, endorses Trump and makes some good points.