(11-14-2018 10:47 PM)Sherman Wrote:  Exactly. The part he is missing is that the real communists aren't out there, even in China. They are in America. Stalin was big and bad but most of all he was a Soviet nationalist. He never believed in Marx's concept of the International Worker. However, Trotsky did believe in real International communism to take over the planet. Stalin had Trotsky assassinated. Where did Trotsky's followers go? Into the US government. That is what Joe McCarthy was trying to expose. The deep state killed him. Tail Gunner Joe was fighting the deep state before most of you were born. He was vilified by fake news before there was a Trump. International Communism has been rebranded as liberal democracy.

Stalin was a big player. Yet he was clearly not the big boss.

There's a reason why I refer to the likes of them as 'Soycialists' or 'subversives' or 'sinister swine'. Alliteration of a sort.
There's also a reason why their efforts appear to transcend countries, cultures & even centuries.

*cough* satan *cough*

delete

@realDonaldTrump
24m

Quote:The inner workings of the Mueller investigation are a total mess. They have found no collusion and have gone absolutely nuts. They are screaming and shouting at people, horribly threatening them to come up with the answers they want. They are a disgrace to our Nation and don’t...

@realDonaldTrump
7m

Quote:....care how many lives the ruin. These are Angry People, including the highly conflicted Bob Mueller, who worked for Obama for 8 years. They won’t even look at all of the bad acts and crimes on the other side. A TOTAL WITCH HUNT LIKE NO OTHER IN AMERICAN HISTORY!

Wait, what?

Did he just deny these accusations? But I'm not following the logic.

1) It was a woman who made the allegation
2) Women never lie

So, what gives?

This is why #metoo and #believeallwomen is really just a low-IQ test. Men who pander to it fail to realise that they could be next.

Brett Kavanaugh must be smoking a cigar, swirling a glass of whiskey & savouring each & every Avenatti moment.

(11-15-2018 08:22 AM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  Brett Kavanaugh must be smoking a cigar, swirling a glass of whiskey & savouring each & every Avenatti moment.

I picture him clinking glasses with Clarence Thomas.

“Brett, did you see the Avenatti story ? Come on over. You bring the cigars.. I’ve got this bottle of Dalmore I’ve been saving for a special occasion.”

Michael Sebastian called Trump's victory in March 2016 with this post. He's not exactly active as his last post was May 2018. TL;DR: The elites aren't going to let Trump proceed and post Trump is when his efforts will be undone. Other posters on RooshV have stated we're hanging on by a thread as liberals will not lose with dignity and will resort to cheating.

Like Black Knight pointed out with the TN move, Amazon and tech companies are going to continue their hellbent run on taking over the world:

"If Trump wins the election, these oligarchs won’t disappear. They will continue to use their money to buy influence to try to stop Trump from implementing his policy promises."

Some of the following have came true. We're engaging in trade wars to get better deals, Obamacare is pretty much dead, no foreign interventionalist wars yet, and we kind of addressed immigration through tactics like deportations and reducing migrant quotas. Aside from this we're not paying our "ransom" to the UN. All of this can be undone with a Democrat back in power.

"Building a wall and reducing the number of H1B visas will reduce the supply of cheap labor.
Ensuring that trade deals are fair will make it less attractive to use cheap labor abroad.
Doing away with Obamacare and increasing competition will reduce the profits of insurance companies.
Negotiating drug prices will hurt the profits of Big Pharma.
Then there are those foreign governments that use their influence to encourage the US to engage in foolish wars for their benefit. The drumbeat to get into a war with Russia over Syria or Ukraine (any excuse will suffice) is one example of this."


Cuckservative subversion and liberal traitors have harmed us in the past 2 years. They'll do it again for the next 2.

"The opposition may not be open—that would court the displeasure of the voters. But I would expect to see politicians like Paul Ryan oppose deporting illegals, building the wall, or stopping Muslim immigration. His public excuse will be that enforcing a border does not reflect the values of “the party of Lincoln.”

Democrats, who are also owned by the oligarchs, will oppose Trump because his immigration policy will slow down the conversion of the US of a majority white, conservative country into a multicultural, left-wing nation."

The After Trump section is a must read. Here's a teaser:

"A similar process happened after Reagan. George H.W. Bush ran on Reagan’s platform to get elected, but he governed in such a way that almost none of Reagan’s policies survived."

http://honoranddaring.com/if-trump-wins/

(11-14-2018 11:56 PM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  

(11-14-2018 10:47 PM)Sherman Wrote:  Exactly. The part he is missing is that the real communists aren't out there, even in China. They are in America. Stalin was big and bad but most of all he was a Soviet nationalist. He never believed in Marx's concept of the International Worker. However, Trotsky did believe in real International communism to take over the planet. Stalin had Trotsky assassinated. Where did Trotsky's followers go? Into the US government. That is what Joe McCarthy was trying to expose. The deep state killed him. Tail Gunner Joe was fighting the deep state before most of you were born. He was vilified by fake news before there was a Trump. International Communism has been rebranded as liberal democracy.

Stalin was a big player. Yet he was clearly not the big boss.

There's a reason why I refer to the likes of them as 'Soycialists' or 'subversives' or 'sinister swine'. Alliteration of a sort.
There's also a reason why their efforts appear to transcend countries, cultures & even centuries.

*cough* satan *cough*

He was for a bit. All the major factions has major connections, but they needed a lot of local front men to not appear to be what they were. One of those front men figured out what was going on and got away from them for a while. And it took a TERRIBLE cost on the him and the Russian people. When you're fighting literally the best consprirators in history, you're going to have to be paranoid to survive even briefly.

Please note, I'm not suggesting he wasn't a horrible monster, but he was a horrible monster with ambitions that went further than being another tool. They try to gloss it all together for obvious reasons, but some of the conspiracies he was fighting were real. And in the end, they did kill him by either poison, or denying him medical attention.

(11-14-2018 07:13 PM)Praetor Lupus Wrote:  

(11-14-2018 06:34 PM)Canopus Wrote:  

The Curse does not fuck around.

And the sequel: The Curse does not fuck around, Part II.

Let's bring in a game principal. When I first saw this tweet and looked at the photo I thought to myself, "who is this guy?" It barely looks like Avenatti, and its not just the hair. This pic in isolation makes the guy look like a shitlord. That pic should be on his online dating profile when he gets out of jail for beating his wife

Saw this on Anonymous Conservative. Are we due for another mass shooting in a couple days? I got my trauma kit on hand and am on standby.

ROBERT DE NIRO IN THE HEADLINES IS A SIGNAL FOR CABAL FUCKERY

When Robert De Niro is in the headlines complaining about the President, a false flag follows 2-3 days later. It’s part of pattern.
2/12/18: Robert De Niro is in the headlines for complaining about the President’s claimate change policy. Parkland happens two days later.
10/25/18: Robert De Niro is in the headlines for receiving a mail bomb. Pittsburgh synagogue shooting happens two days later.
Bonus: 6/10/18: Robert De Niro yells “fuck Trump” on live TV. Q reveals later that there was an attempted rogue missile assassination on the President earlier that day.
I suspect they put him in the news at strategic times as a signal to sleeper cells or MKULTRA’d shooters (perhaps Taxi Driver is used in the brainwashing).
Today’s (11/14) headline: Robert De Niro Bashes Trump Again: ‘Down With This Motherf—er!”
Expect a false flag in the next 2-3 days, Anons.
https://variety.com/2018/scene/news/robe...203027278/

https://www.anonymousconservative.com/bl...-11152018/



Also mentioned on AC:

"President Donald Trump warned violent leftists and Antifa members that an opposition to them may “mobilize,” and it would mean “big trouble” for the leftist group."

No clue why he doesn't just RICO the group. Is he A/B testing to gauge the right's response? Is this just another bone to throw at the right?

https://dailycaller.com/2018/11/14/trump...-mobilize/

To understand communist conspiracy, which is very real, I find this video to be among the most informative out there.





Most important excerpt from the video above.

(11-15-2018 09:45 AM)ChicagoFire Wrote:  Michael Sebastian called Trump's victory in March 2016 with this post. He's not exactly active as his last post was May 2018. TL;DR: The elites aren't going to let Trump proceed and post Trump is when his efforts will be undone. Other posters on RooshV have stated we're hanging on by a thread as liberals will not lose with dignity and will resort to cheating.

Like Black Knight pointed out with the TN move, Amazon and tech companies are going to continue their hellbent run on taking over the world:

"If Trump wins the election, these oligarchs won’t disappear. They will continue to use their money to buy influence to try to stop Trump from implementing his policy promises."

Some of the following have came true. We're engaging in trade wars to get better deals, Obamacare is pretty much dead, no foreign interventionalist wars yet, and we kind of addressed immigration through tactics like deportations and reducing migrant quotas. Aside from this we're not paying our "ransom" to the UN. All of this can be undone with a Democrat back in power.

"Building a wall and reducing the number of H1B visas will reduce the supply of cheap labor.
Ensuring that trade deals are fair will make it less attractive to use cheap labor abroad.
Doing away with Obamacare and increasing competition will reduce the profits of insurance companies.
Negotiating drug prices will hurt the profits of Big Pharma.
Then there are those foreign governments that use their influence to encourage the US to engage in foolish wars for their benefit. The drumbeat to get into a war with Russia over Syria or Ukraine (any excuse will suffice) is one example of this."


Cuckservative subversion and liberal traitors have harmed us in the past 2 years. They'll do it again for the next 2.

"The opposition may not be open—that would court the displeasure of the voters. But I would expect to see politicians like Paul Ryan oppose deporting illegals, building the wall, or stopping Muslim immigration. His public excuse will be that enforcing a border does not reflect the values of “the party of Lincoln.”

Democrats, who are also owned by the oligarchs, will oppose Trump because his immigration policy will slow down the conversion of the US of a majority white, conservative country into a multicultural, left-wing nation."

The After Trump section is a must read. Here's a teaser:

"A similar process happened after Reagan. George H.W. Bush ran on Reagan’s platform to get elected, but he governed in such a way that almost none of Reagan’s policies survived."

http://honoranddaring.com/if-trump-wins/

Yes. There was a massive societal shift after World War 2, to give a lot of power to employees, away from the stockholders. CEOs considered "welfare of employees" to be above "welfare of stockholders". This was because, the employees were mostly men who had fought in WW2 and the CEOs were their former commanders. Men protecting men.

In the 1980s those WW2 commanders started getting replaced by baby boomers, who as we know, are the most selfish morons on the planet. They switched to a philosophy of "Fuck the employees" and converted the economy to a stockholder-driven model. That caused the collapse of the middle class and the huge wealth disparities in society. Plus, women/Chinese trade.

Of course, libertarian fanatics love this kind of "freedom". Unfortunately, that type of society leads unerringly towards war. Where do you think the Nazis came from? Unemployed men.

Disenfranchised middle class men with guns will rip society apart so quickly, it will make your head spin. Then the rich capitalists take their private jets off to their bunkers in New Zealand, which would be great except that the US has drones can that take them out rather easily.

(11-14-2018 11:56 PM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  

(11-14-2018 10:47 PM)Sherman Wrote:  Exactly. The part he is missing is that the real communists aren't out there, even in China. They are in America. Stalin was big and bad but most of all he was a Soviet nationalist. He never believed in Marx's concept of the International Worker. However, Trotsky did believe in real International communism to take over the planet. Stalin had Trotsky assassinated. Where did Trotsky's followers go? Into the US government. That is what Joe McCarthy was trying to expose. The deep state killed him. Tail Gunner Joe was fighting the deep state before most of you were born. He was vilified by fake news before there was a Trump. International Communism has been rebranded as liberal democracy.

Stalin was a big player. Yet he was clearly not the big boss.

There's a reason why I refer to the likes of them as 'Soycialists' or 'subversives' or 'sinister swine'. Alliteration of a sort.
There's also a reason why their efforts appear to transcend countries, cultures & even centuries.

*cough* satan *cough*

Not as simple as "Satanic". The answer that I believe is correct lies at the intersection of the JQ and human origins threads.....

Look at it this way. The higher "initiated" castes of that tribe believe themselves to be doing God's work. They don't necessarily view the nature of that "God" the same way that the profane interpret the god of the Old Testament.

See translations of ancient texts. e.g. Atrahasis.

(11-15-2018 08:22 AM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  Brett Kavanaugh must be smoking a cigar, swirling a glass of whiskey downing mugs of beer & savouring each & every Avenatti moment.

Fixed it for you.

In all seriousness though, I was quite surprised to hear that Avenatti had a girlfriend and not a boyfriend.

(11-14-2018 10:30 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

(11-14-2018 02:28 PM)Deepdiver Wrote:  ACTING AG WHITAKER: ‘SPECIAL COUNSEL IS REQUIRED’ TO INVESTIGATE CLINTON FOUNDATION
...

I would speculate that the main reason The Hag is making it clear she'll run in 2018 is because it buys her 2 years worth of get-out-of-jail-free cards plus at least a 6 month grace period afterward, or lifetime immunity if she or another Democrat wins 2020.

As I've said before. It's ride or die for the deep state henchmen. They are guilty of such heinous misdeeds that if held accountable they would go away for life.

Using another run at the presidency to put her off limits for legal action is a no-brainer for someone as depraved as her. Once you're an official candidate then it doesn't even matter if someone drops footage of you curbstomping an orphan. The earliest you get charged is 6 months after your candidacy ends, which if you recall is about the amount of time that passed after 1Q2017 before we started asking why Hillary wasn't in cuffs yet.

Its little moments like this that make me grateful Trump is president besides what he has accomplished. Look at the photo the girl has, its of him shaving Vince McMahon hair. We will probably never have as an exciting of a president like him.

What ever happened to investigative journalism? It doesn't exist anymore. I saw a youtube video of a panel of Fox News morons discussing the caravan. One of the talking head idiots said "what do we know about the caravan?" . Where are they sleeping? Who is feeding them? Who is their leader. Well, fuck. Fox news is suppose to be a news organization. Why don't they send a journalist there to find out. Do you notice that the media posing as news organizations don't send journalist anymore to any location (with the possible exception of when they are doing a propaganda piece). I even searched YouTube and couldn't find any real facts. The news on this and most other events doesn't exist.

Do you realize we never get any real facts about what is happening? You just get a story presenting a spin of what you are suppose to believe. There is very little: who, when, where, or what. No basic facts. Your world view is like a hazy mosaic, a blob of false reality. The only thing we can say about anything is that "George Soros did it". We say that because we have no real facts and so have to make something up to fill the void. In this world of YouTube where everyone owns a camera on their cell phone, why can't we get one picture of a check signed to someone from George Soros? We know nothing.

We are told nothing, know nothing but are then sold the illusion that we are in control in a Democratic society. Well, you can't have any control of anything if you don't even have the basic facts. It is like trying to drive a car blind folded. So, how is this contradiction resolved? Simple: we are not in control so it doesn't matter what we know.

What motivated this post was the news today that the US government wants to prosecute Julian Assange. There are only two people I am aware of who have ever given us REAL FACTS of what is actually happening in our world: Edward Snowden and Julius Assange. Both of them are being hunted down by the government and are marked for extermination. Now you know what happens to anyone who dares give you real information about your world, so you can walk with eyes wide open rather than a moron to your grave.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-is-opti...1542376108

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-46232609

We are told that Hillary Clinton is going to be locked up for all of her crimes. Whoops, we really meant Julian Assange.

Democracy is beautiful in theory; in practice it is a fallacy
- Benito Mussolini

My wife follows the Mexican news stories and other South American sources, the vast majority of it in spanish obviously. There's a shit-ton of information and footage about the "caravan" and much of it is scathing, not of Trump but of the assholes participating.

Tons of footage. Tons of eyewitness accounts. Yet we're supposed to believe that Fox can't afford to hire a single fucking person who speaks spanish to go digging on the internet for an hour a day? That they can't call out a single NGO or at least follow some of the funding bread-crumbs back to the DNC, despite team Beto admitting on camera that they were helping fund them?

It's shaping up to be entirely political theater. The reality is that Fox is salivating at the idea of America tipping blue in perpetuity because they know that when all conservative voices have been stripped from the internet that they'll once again have 100% of the market share and as long as they color inside the lines the globalists set out then they'll all get to stick their snouts in the trough again and forevermore.

Meanwhile the NYT has it's marching orders to nonsensically link Assange to the Mueller probe which gives cover for Trump to do nothing about the situation "for fear of appearing to be complicit" when in reality, and I never thought I'd be saying this, Sherman is right. Nobody in DC wants the people of America or the rest of the world see behind the curtain.

Not Fox. Not Trump. Nobody.

My only hope is that the momentum of the American revolutionary spirit can break through the ultimately doomed Trump-era paradigm.

(11-16-2018 01:16 PM)Malone Wrote:  These people are clowns.

What is the fucking due process for revoking a press pass? You say "fuck off, you're out."

Tim Pool had a lawyer on his podcast who explained that it would likely be reinstated, but there'd be nothing to stop them from just stripping it straight back away again, but there is a specific proceduyre for doing so.. I think the only part of the procedure that wasn't followed this time was that he didn't get the right to argue his side of the story before it was stripped.

(11-16-2018 05:02 PM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  

(11-16-2018 04:02 PM)Truth Tiger Wrote:  I found this excellent commentary from @drawandstrike.

-He mentions the glaring omissions of vital, probing questions of Comey (as one example) in Congressional 'investigations' and leaks by posturing political animals vs. thorough professional DOJ investigations where leaks don't happen.

-He gives examples and a chain of events illustrating how Spygate was 100x worse than Watergate (no one died in Watergate) due to multiple factors, including dismantling much of the intelligence apparatus within China / Iran that took decades to build and deliberate access of US classified information to foreign powers.

-He indicates that Trump has 2 years left to reveal the damage done by Clinton/Obama/Comey & team, and the revelations do NOT depend on having the House approval.

===

Thread by @drawandstrike: "BTW, y'all may have noticed I'm not all that broken up of the fact that the House investigations into SpyGate will be ending soon when Democrats take control"

Quote:BTW, y'all may have noticed I'm not all that broken up of the fact that the House investigations into SpyGate will be ending soon when Democrats take control.

That's because 30 years of watching them convinces me most Congressional investigations are useless.

The REAL investigations into SpyGate/FISA/Steele Dossier matters have been taking place inside the DOJ for the past 2 years. Congress got stuff handed off to it when DOJ IG Horowitz was done, either with witnesses or documents.

Even when they get a witness passed off to them the grandstanding lushes of Congress often have no clue what to ask them.

Allow me to now demonstrate this.

After going back over former FBI Director Jame's Comey's testimony in front of the Senate Intelligence Committee on June 8th, I noticed something amazing.

Comey was brought in SPECIFICALLY to discuss the memos he took with him from the FBI. He spent HOURS testifying & taking questions from Senators about them.

Are you sitting down? In *hours* of being questioned by Senators about his memos, Comey manages to NEVER tell them:

1) how many memos there were
2) how many memos contained classified info

and

3) how many memos he gave to Professor Daniel Richman.

Yes.

Really.

That actually happened.

NO Senator on that committee asked Comey the most BASIC foundational questions:

"How many memos did you take with you?"
"How many memos had class. info in them?
"How many did you give to Prof. Richman?"

Comey had mentioned he had 'nine' conversations with Trump that he summarized in his memos, so the Senators *assume* there must be nine memos. You can see this in some of the questions Comey is asked, like this one:

In HOURS of being exhaustively questioned by Senators, Comey is never pinneed down and asked exactly how many memos there are. Several Senators say there are 'nine' and COMEY NEVER SAYS A WORD.

At no point in his testimony does Comey volunteer just how many of his memos there actually are.

In fact, it's not until over a month later it's revealed in a report by The Hill that the number of Comey memos is SEVEN, not nine, as several of the Senators were assuming.

In that exchange above, Senator Heinrich kinda sorta MAYBE invites Comey to directly tell the Committee how many of these memos were written so as to be classified - that is, how many were written on classified devices and now many contained classified information.

Read Comey's answer again. You are watching a master of Bullshit use a word salad to avoid answering how many of the 'nine' memos he took were classified, either from having been written on a classified device or containint classified information.

In that highly lawyerly, convoluted answer, at best Comey seems to be saying perhaps maybe at least TWO of the 'nine' memos are classified. It's hard to tell.

Well in fact FOUR of the seven had classified info in them.

Naturally, the subject of just how many documents with classified information that he took without authorization from his last isn't an issue Comey wants to go into great detail about, so he doesn't.

In fact, according to The Hill's later report the following month, four of Comey's seven memos contained information that was classified at the 'Secret' & 'Confidential' levels.

Now, you remember how Comey had admitted he gave 'several' of these 'nine' memos to a friend named Daniel Richman, and that he had Richman leak part of the contents of one of these memos over the phone to the New York Times.

So. How hard would it be to get a straight answer from Comey as to HOW MANY OF HIS MEMOS DID HE GIVE TO RICHMAN?

Brace yourselves.

He never tells them, and they never pin him down.

So watching how Comey did a rope-a-dope with members of Congress for HOURS and they can't even pin him down by pressing him with BASIC QUESTIONS just reaffirmed what I already know: Senators & House Reps aren't investigators, they are politicians.

Senators questioning Comey for hours couldn't even establish BASIC NUMBERS involved in what they were trying to investigate. He of course, was NOT going to help them, so they had to ask him specific questions.

Which they never did.

I know people don't believe this when I tell them, they dismiss it without even seriously considering it when I bring it up but:

All the REAL MOVEMENT on SpyGate has come from DOJ Inspector General Horowitz.

Anything you think Congress is 'exposing' in SpyGate with either it's Senate or House investigations, was actually from evidence handed off to Congress when Horowitz & his investigative team were done with it.

And even then, since investigations & grand juries are seated - 1 of which was already revealed publicly about McCabe - the testimony of SpyGate witnesses & SpyGate docs given to Congress by the IG had to be tightly controlled.

AND SOME OF IT LEAKED ANYWAY.

Congress doesn't operate under the strictures and limitations that the DOJ does. Congress is full of grandstanding lushes who want face time on TV and to get reelected.

Career federal investigators/prosecutors aren't going to publicly discuss their cases or evidence until done.

The DOJ has serious business to conduct, and yes it's Congresses' job to exercise oversight over that business.

Which more than a few members of Congress use for grandstanding, not to mention partisan leaks to the news media to drive narratives.

"Oh no we lost the House!" they cried.

Yeah, that sucks.

But does that stop Horowitz and all the ongoing investigations at the DOJ? How?

Does that stop Trump from declassifying all the SpyGate docs? How?

Does that stop new Acting AG Whitaker from doing his job? How?

There's now a 2 year window to roll out all the SpyGate stuff. And weather the national crisis that will result from it's being made fully public, so people can see the full extent of the crimes/damage caused

Watergate was bad, but when SpyGate is fully public people will see it is only about 100x worse than Watergate.

Watergate didn't get any body killed.

1) A SecState that insists on a off the books private server that likely exposed THE HIGHEST LEVEL OF CLASSIFIED SECRETS of both the St. dept and the INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES who work in concert with it.

2) By 2012 it's OBVIOUS there'd been a massive security breach, the CIA/Western intel networks in China and Iran are being rolled up

3) Clinton steps down as SecState to prepare for her 2016 Presidential run.

4) I believe by the time she did that. ALL THE MAJOR PLAYERS in Spygate knew by 2012 what she'd done, what resulted worldwide from the nat. sec. security breach she'd caused.

5) They all made the decision to COVER UP FOR HER so she could run for President

6) Then in the runup to 2016 Trey Gowdy's House committee finds out about the homebrew server while investigating Benghazi

7) Comey & McCabe & Co. go the extra mile to fix the FBI investigation to ensure Hillary can continue to run for President unimpeded

8) After finessing THAT, the Weiner laptop is then dropped on them. They find a way to fix THAT too.

9) But at this point these people are all increasingly nervous. They ony way they can TOTALLY ENSURE what they did covering for Clinton's crime is never exposed is to continue to ensure she wins the election.

10) And THAT'S why SpyGate happened. It was their 'insurance policy' in case a miracle happened and Trump won. If Trump wins, then the massive crimes they ignored/covered up so Clinton could run would be exposed.

So this wasn't just about protecting CLINTON because they think she's awesome or something. It's about protecting THEMSELVES and hiding what they did on her behalf.

11) Watergate didn't KILL anybody. DOZENS of CIA agents in Iran and China were dropped through trap doors with ropes around their necks or had bullets fired into their heads

CIA/Western intel networks in China and Iran that it took DECADES to build were rolled up in just a year or two.

12) There's no way Obama didn't know. This went right to the top. Trying to frame Trump so he could almost instantly be impeached or forced to resign or at the very least effectively sabotaged for his one and only term as President they used OFFICIAL GOV'T POWERS/AGENCIES.

So when I say NATIONAL CRISIS when the lid gets ripped off of this and the public airing of what these criminals did starts, I am not joking.
It's only recently been fully impressed on me just how STUPID it would have been for Trump to launch this national crisis just before a midterm election.

Now there's a 2 year window to publicly reveal it all. Trump's not going to waste the opportunity. When a national crisis of this magnitude has to happen, it has to be managed with the utmost care.

You don't like that?

I don't care.

/end

And if this doesnt come to light?

And if nobody gets sent to prison for the rest of their life?

These spectators are hanging onto the notion it will be revealed and big players will go down. I hope they do but at the moment they're free as a bird.

Relevant to Comey not being asked tough questions:

During the social media hearings with Jack Dorsey etc a couple months ago, there were little to no questions asked about censorship. It was all about "Russian bots."

Naturally, the GOP patted them on the back for dealing with the "Russian bots" so well.

(11-16-2018 05:49 PM)Thersites Wrote:  

(11-16-2018 05:05 PM)John Michael Kane Wrote:  Talk about an Enemy of the People! Pulling the nuke your own citizens card because we own guns that you don't like, and that threatens your power? Fuck you, traitor. I will go out and buy more ammo this weekend, and more guns once my tax return comes back. "Representatives" like these are a good reminder as to why the Right to Bear Arms is more important than ever. These fuckers are genocidal, given that their ideological roots are found in the Soviet Gulags.

They want complete control over the people. This is the reason why the 2nd amendment was implemented to avoid government's monopoly of force trampling the rights of citizen with every election. That tweet from Swalwell is just other meme or ad that Trump can use for 2020.

Coincidentally, yesterday on another thread, I was discussing ( https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-71298...pid1887208 ) the fact that an Islamist or Mugabe-like communist president would threaten the whole world if and when he took control of the French nuclear arsenal. And, we now have a Leftist politician in the US, openly contemplating the possibility of dropping nuclear bombs onto his own citizens!

So, it's something to keep in mind: if we let socialists, Islamists or tribal communists take control of the US, France or the UK, they might very well one day launch nuclear missiles onto us all. They even openly relish the idea!

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opini...i-nuke-you

"After conservatives criticized Swalwell for calling for the forcible confiscation of assault weapons, Swalwell responded by upping the ante.

Conservative commentator Joe Biggs charged Swalwell with wanting a war. Swalwell enthusiastically agreed in the most insane way possible.

Yes, Swalwell seriously proposed nuking his own constituents to take away their right to defend themselves from the government"

(11-16-2018 05:28 PM)Mr. Accuride Wrote:  

(11-16-2018 05:00 PM)redpillage Wrote:  

(11-16-2018 04:09 PM)Higgs Bosun Wrote:  The stupidest thing of it all? Trump's tax cuts heated up the already boiling economy to the point that the Fed is forced to hike rates up even faster. In other words, whatever stimulating effect the tax cuts have had on the economy will be completely neutered by the increase in Fed rates that they provoked. Not only will we be stuck with the extra debt for absolutely nothing, but we'll end up with higher interest rates than we'd have had if Trump had never passed the tax cuts at all, meaning that the entirety of the $20 trillion of accumulated national debt will have to be refinanced at the new rates.

But hey, as Team Wait and See/400D Chess Brigade told us, the tax cuts were just a way for Master Deal Maker Trump to get Paul Ryan what he wants so that Paul Ryan would give Trump the MAGA agenda in return. I'm sure Speaker Ryan and his House of Representative will give us the MAGA legislation any day now.

Oh...wait...

Trump didn't have a choice. He inherited an economic train wreck from Obama and he did what always does, go out and drum up business. The tax cuts were one low hanging fruit he had at his disposal and remember that there are many things he could have done theoretically but few that he could have done effectively. Drumming up the economy and lowering taxes were the two things he knew would boost his poll numbers plus provide him with ammunition for 2020.

The stock market should have crashed a long time ago during Obama's tenure, and it only survived for a decade after 2008 due to the extensive life support system put in place by the Fed via several rounds of quantitative easing. It's cute to be all smug about it and criticize Trump but I think many of you forget the political and economic shit sandwich the man was handed and the few available options available to him. And I'm not even talking about the daily dramarama that the Libtards are throwing at him on a daily basis.

Agreed that Trump didn't have much of a choice, especially with the spending cuts. Dems (though McConnell also) would not allow the house to pass a spending budget with the cuts that he wanted, so the only option was to pursue the nuclear option in the Senate if he was not going to get the votes to pass a budget in the House, and that didn't allow him to reduce spending. Note that when Trump took over, the national debt actually went down the first 6 months of his presidency as many employees resigned and Trump eliminated those positions.

I have to say the assertion that Trump "didn't have a choice" makes me pretty angry, because he did. He always had a choice. He always had a choice to do the right thing for the American and Western economy, which was to give it its big shot of medicine now to stop it basically falling over from the heart attack it's going to have later on. He was elected on a Fuck You platform to the big banks and the Hilary Clintons of the world. He could have at least tried.

That big shot of medicine is, or was: take as much drastic action as he can under his executive powers to cut America's debt if not outright default on it and reset the counter to zero, because if you think shit is bad now, wait until the world's bondholders have credible alternatives to the US dollar and start taking advantage of them.

He doesn't even have the choice on which reporters can ask him questions in the White House. I'm starting to wonder if we're all just wasting our time reading and posting this thread.