(04-10-2018 01:34 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  Didn't know you were into women who were packing in their pants.

Did you just assume my sexual orientation??

1840 - 1919 Immigration to the US was almost 90% European immigration.

1965 - 2015 Immigration to the US 12% European, 51% from Latin America (28% being Mexican) and 25% Asian.



Those immigration rates helped to lead to this:



This is what Pew Research says we have to look forward to concerning future immigration to the US:



And those projected immigration patterns are projected to lead to this:

Quote:The country’s overall population will feel the impact of these shifts. Non-Hispanic whites are projected to become less than half of the U.S. population by 2055 and 46% by 2065. No racial or ethnic group will constitute a majority of the U.S. population. Meanwhile, Hispanics will see their population share rise to 24% by 2065 from 18% today, while Asians will see their share rise to 14% by 2065 from 6% today.

At a time when the world wide population in 2050 is projected to be this:



And already in 2017 we see that 50% or more sub-Saharan Africans would leave their countries if they had the mean to do so:



Oh well. As long as all these Asians, Africans and Hispanics immigrants are conservative, we should be fine. If they serve in the military they will become more Western than any whites could ever be anyways.

And I mean really, non whites in the USA shouldn't be concerned with these statistics, no, not at all.

After all, look at the Mexican telenovelas featuring asians, blacks and even the Mestizos that make up the ethnic majority in that country. You wouldn't even know that the Spaniards had colonized the land hundreds of years ago by watching Mexican TV and newscasts.

Look at The Middle East, they treat those Pakistanis with the utmost respect over there and certainly pay them the fairest of wages with more then adequate living conditions. In fact, black people loved The Middle East so much that they wanted to preserve the ethnic makeup of the region by willingly choosing not to reproduce after being brought in as slaves.

Oh and then Asia, what a beacon of hope that region of the world is, especially the behemoth of the region in China. The Chinese are building a "One Belt One Road" that is in line with their worldview of Chinese civilization being the center of the world all throughout history. You can bet your bottom dollar they will allow the whites, blacks and other asian ethnic groups to retain our mother tongues and and be included as equals among them.

Then we get to Africa. Well, by God, one only has to look at how well race relations have improved on the continent in the transition from colonialism to democracy. Africa is a true testament to the tolerance in that continent that shines like a beacon burning bright throughout the world, reminding us what is to become of racial minorities under black African rule.

My point - Trump bought us time, nothing more. He is but one man. I don't see how these trends can be reversed.

Are any minorities really going to be advocating in any meaningful numbers to keep a white majority in the US or advocate in any meaningful numbers to maintain the ethnic majority makeup in Europe, our ancestral homelands? Even after I just provided evidence of what life is like for non white minorities in non white parts of the world? Does anybody really believe this is all going to lead to everybody sitting around the campfire singing kumbayah?

Who knows, maybe this all will work out and we'll truly identify as one single "human race" if we can get out to space in the next several centuries. Honestly, I would like nothing more then for that to happen and I imagine that must be what heaven is like.

But if shit hits the fan - Well, anybody who looks at the world as it truly is today should not be surprised. The advice to wisely use the time that Trump gives to us all should not go unheeded.

You see all these "new americans" show their flags when they like Nimrata Hailey don't give two shits that Europe will be eternally destroyed in a war with Syria. Why should she care? She is not of European heritage. Greece, Rome, Holy Roman Empire, none of this is her history.

The events of the last few days have shown that the real agenda is to get the west to fight another devastating war to further corrode the foundation of our civilization. The first two meat grinders of the 20th century were not enough. Somehow Russia managed to survive the wars and the evil of ruthless communists.

Not this time. The set up is nearly complete and this time the west will certainly destroy itself if our current corrupt political elites prevail. Lets hope cool heads prevail and there is some semblance of honor among those in Washington and London.

< Russia is not going to go to WWIII over Syria. If the onslaught is too heavy from the US side, then they will withdraw completely and let Syria fall. Syria too wants to enjoy slave markets like in Libya and daily terrorist attacks led by various factions within.

Russia faces an existential threat if they allow the US to destroy Syria over a false flag. It would signal massive weakness and ultimately lead to their destruction at the hands of (((elites)) who have wanted them exterminated since at least the early 1900s.

(04-11-2018 02:25 AM)godfather dust Wrote:  Russia faces an existential threat if they allow the US to destroy Syria over a false flag. It would signal massive weakness and ultimately lead to their destruction at the hands of (((elites)) who have wanted them exterminated since at least the early 1900s.

Articles by people with strange names on obscure alt-right sites aside (I'm looking at you 'Saker'), a hot war with the US is also a serious existential threat to Russia.

That is obvious. They have the ability to cause mutually assured destruction right now however, Putin is smart enough to know the weapons technology balance could swing strongly away from that in the blink of an eye. AI superweapons are around the corner.

What is an "AI Superweapon"?

http://doyoutrustthiscomputer.org

Documentary about present and future AI development (mikeCF posted on Twitter worth checking out.)

Basically Terminator-style robots and other automated killing machines will be possible in the very near future, and will happen without world treaties banning the development and use of them.

I'm waiting to see what Trump does. Best case a bullshit strike like last year. His enemies have him by the balls (see Cohen raid) best thing he could do is be honest and forthcoming to the American people about exactly what is going on behind the scenes. I don't know if this is in his nature.

(04-11-2018 03:02 AM)SamuelBRoberts Wrote:  What is an "AI Superweapon"?

Poor example - these droids were even less effective than the infamous Stormtroopers. But your point stands.

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/stat...5440747520

Dire times. Is Trump about to launch a major attack, goaded by neocon hawks and tempted in "wag the dog" fashion to distract from what is effectively a soft coup by the FBI?

Some weird '4D chess' right here.
Tone still seems off as if it is either someone other than Trump tweeting or it's slightly disingenuous on purpose.

"Gas killing animal"?
Does not come across anywhere near as savvy as it normally would from Trump.

Better be 4D chess because that is the stupidest thing Trump has ever said.

(04-11-2018 06:22 AM)RawGod Wrote:  https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/stat...5440747520

Dire times. Is Trump about to launch a major attack, goaded by neocon hawks and tempted in "wag the dog" fashion to distract from what is effectively a soft coup by the FBI?

I'm still trying to keep my calm here but I can not say that I'm not starting to panic yet. I think there is a good chance America strikes. And a very small chance Russia strikes back. That leaves the nuclear war at a very slim chance that's right guys?

(04-11-2018 06:26 AM)username Wrote:  Better be 4D chess because that is the stupidest thing Trump has ever said.

indeed. That statement makes no sense at all. is it me or that's like an invitation for war?

(04-11-2018 06:23 AM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  Some weird '4D chess' right here.
Tone still seems off as if it is either someone other than Trump tweeting or it's slightly disingenuous on purpose.

"Gas killing animal"?
Does not come across anywhere near as savvy as it normally would from Trump.

Something tells me that Hillary would have done just the same as Donald Trump in this case. The omnibus spending bill would have been signed by both as well just as it was signed by president Trump.




Stronger together.

(04-11-2018 06:26 AM)username Wrote:  Better be 4D chess because that is the stupidest thing Trump has ever said.

Imagine still believing in those fantasies... Wasn't long ago before folks were convinced Sessions is running an under-cover investigation and Mueller is some sort of distracting MAGA hero.

Wake up and smell the coffee.

Trump for God's sake, this isn't why you were elected. You're the POTUS with all the power that entails, random judges in Hawaii notwithstanding. You don't need to be starting a nuclear apocalypse over the hurt feelings of a bunch of swamp creatures. Nothing bad will happen to you if you stick to your anti-war platform.

Bryan is a journalist for RT, working in Moscow.

All the events of last couple of weeks leading up to this moment ...

I wonder if gagging of Assange was part of the plan as well. He might have known something that would have been handy to reveal now.

(04-11-2018 06:37 AM)AManLikePutin Wrote:  

Bryan is a journalist for RT, working in Moscow.

Still kinda in denial here. I mean, duh, really? a war between russia and the US? anyone here has info what kinda army and bases the US has in the vicinity to Russia?