(10-18-2016 10:19 PM)Cattle Rustler Wrote: Assamge being inside the Ecuadorian embassy is no different than us being guests in Roosh's forum. We have to abide by his rules and he has the right to administer it as he sees fit.
Yes it's just like that...if EcuadoRoosh was living in Grandma Hillary's basement, and she threw a shot glass at his head and told him to go downstairs and throw his fucking bum friend Assange out before both of them ended up in a river after suiciding themselves with two to the back of the head.
I've been wondering what the Clinton campaign's next move will be to smear Trump. Where do you go after calling someone "Hitler" and "rapist"?
Two possibilities:
1. Pedophile accusation. I've already seen some bizarre theories floating around that Trump had sex with a 13 year old. This could be the next line of attack-- Trump sexually targets children.
2. Stage attacks against minorities and pin them on "neo nazi Trump supporters." The Clinton campaign would stage a series of assaults around the country and claim that racist Trump supporters are targeting innocent people. Create a sense of panic and fear. This would likely include a burning cross and some swastika imagery for the media to blast for a week.
The Trump campaign should prepare for these possibilities. There are probably others too.
^My anti trump friends are always going on about how he wants to bang Ivanka because of the comment he made about her. Some people just can't take a joke
(10-19-2016 01:05 AM)CaptainChardonnay Wrote: ^My anti trump friends are always going on about how he wants to bang Ivanka because of the comment he made about her. Some people just can't take a joke
It's all projection because a lot of regressive left types are sexually frustrated weird motherfuckers. They are saying that because that's what they imagine that they would do if they were in Trump's shoes.
Not to mention prominent celebrities worshipped by people on the left actually *have* banged their own daughters or engaged in outright pedophilia.
(10-18-2016 11:50 PM)MMX2010 Wrote: Should Mr. Trump bring Jill Stein to the debate?
I bet Jill Stein was hot in her prime years.
I have tried but could not find a single picture of Stein from when she was young, is like she did not take a single picture before lat 5 years.
It looks like she was never fat, I give her that, If she let her hair grows and dye it, a better skin care combined with a good facelift, a nice boobjob and a better more feminine clothes and she will be better looking.
But I know her type, I used to have teacher like her, she was a ballet dancer in her youth, total grey hair like Stein, and same politics views.
(10-19-2016 04:21 AM)Belgrano Wrote: I'm shocked to hear that. I mean, I literally can't even.
Why, why god, why? Not Paul Ryan!
My worldview is shattered.
Classical Liberalism has much more in common with and is more similar to modern Republican & Libertarian ideas than those of the current Democratic/Progressive party, so it makes sense to describe himself as such.
Classical liberalism was all about free markets, limited and small government, private property rights, individual freedoms, free speech, press etc. From around the 1930's forward Liberalism has been flipped on its head to stand for the opposite of just about every one of those ideals.
Well, in Europe and the rest of the world, a liberal/classical liberal is still someone that defends free markets, small government and all those other things. The script has been flipped but mostly only in the US I believe. The word "Liberal" here has a positive connotation if you're on the Right.
Wikileaks: Huma Abedin Schedules Hillary Debate Prep Around ‘Body Clock’
Huma Abedin, top aide to Hillary Clinton, says that “evening is probably better on body clock” as her campaign staff schedules a debate prep session, according to the latest Wikileaks release of messages from John Podesta’s purported email accounts.
This is a great tactical nuke for the debate tonight. The Big Man, can come up with this and then reframe it to Benghazi, naturally mentioning wikileaks in the meanwhile.
"So the reason why you did not answer the phone in Benghazi was because your body clock only works in the evening? You are aware that a president's job is around the clock?" Shitlord mode:"It's ok if you want to take a small nap in the middle of the debate, just ask the "moderators" to make a recess".
Something along those lines would be golden
(10-19-2016 06:04 AM)LEMONed IScream Wrote: Well, in Europe and the rest of the world, a liberal/classical liberal is still someone that defends free markets, small government and all those other things. The script has been flipped but mostly only in the US I believe. The word "Liberal" here has a positive connotation if you're on the Right.
And if a lefty lemming calls you neoliberal, you know you're on the right track.
(10-18-2016 10:21 PM)CleanSlate Wrote: Reading through my facebook feed -- I've never seen libs so rattled and agitated before. When Romney did well in his first debate as Obama flubbed it, their level of anxiety, while palpatable, was nowhere close to the levels I'm seeing now.
They're scared. Deep down they know Hillary is a crook. I see statements like "yeah she's not perfect and a little shady, but I rather have her in the White House than Trump."
Hardly a ringing endorsement of support. A lot of dem voters will end up staying home. Let's hope for lots of bad weather across the country, or better, the swing states.
Let's keep the pedal to the metal, and don't let up! MAGA!
EDIT: Putting my money where my mouth is. Just donated $50 to the big Don.
If any of you are religious, pray that the Great Lakes gets hit by at least a cold snap on election day.
Anyone or anything they don't like is either a neoliberal or a fascist. Easy enough.
(10-19-2016 06:39 AM)Wreckingball Wrote:
(10-19-2016 06:04 AM)LEMONed IScream Wrote: Well, in Europe and the rest of the world, a liberal/classical liberal is still someone that defends free markets, small government and all those other things. The script has been flipped but mostly only in the US I believe. The word "Liberal" here has a positive connotation if you're on the Right.
And if a lefty lemming calls you neoliberal, you know you're on the right track.
(10-19-2016 07:28 AM)philosophical_recovery Wrote: Good morning, gentlemen.
This is a reminder that WE'RE WINNING SO HARD AND WE'RE GETTING TIRED OF IT AND WE CAN'T TAKE IT ANYMORE. BUT WE'RE GONNA WIN MOOOOOORE
High energy post philosophical_recovery! In honour of that, I'd like to share a story about my daughter's high school soccer playoff victory last night. They were leading 8-0 at the half and their coach (a woman) felt bad for the opposing team and warned them that anyone else who scored a goal would be benched.
Game finished 9-0.
Because my daughter and her teammates had the MAGA Mindset!
Coach was saying, "Please! It's too much winning! We just can't take it any more! It's too much!"
My daughter and her teammates said, "No it isn't! We have to keep winning! WE HAVE TO WIN MORE! WE'RE GONNA WIN MORE!"
(10-19-2016 05:16 AM)GlobalMan Wrote: ...
Classical Liberalism has much more in common with and is more similar to modern Republican & Libertarian ideas than those of the current Democratic/Progressive party, so it makes sense to describe himself as such.
Classical liberalism was all about free markets, limited and small government, private property rights, individual freedoms, free speech, press etc. From around the 1930's forward Liberalism has been flipped on its head to stand for the opposite of just about every one of those ideals.
(10-19-2016 06:33 AM)GlobalMan Wrote: ...
Indeed, I was referring to American Liberalism only.
This is part and parcel of some of the most blatant psyops carried out on the American people. Make words take their opposite meanings and then when used in the new common context it creates a duality in intent and meaning.
Quote:The choice of colors reverses a long-standing convention of political colors whereby red symbols (such as the Red Flag or Red Star) are associated with left-wing politics, and right-wing movements often choose blue as a contrasting color.[3] Indeed, until the 1980s, Republicans were often represented by blue and Democrats by red. The current terminology of "red states" and "blue states" came into use in the United States presidential election of 2000 on an episode of the Today show on October 30, 2000. According to The Washington Post, the terms were coined by journalist Tim Russert, during his televised coverage of the 2000 presidential election.[4] That was not the first election during which the news media used colored maps to depict voter preferences in the various states, but it was the first time a standard color scheme took hold; the colors were often reversed or different colors used before the 2000 election
Never underestimate the collective political energy expended when an entire nation is forced to use back-to-front political jargon in order to convey simple ideas. This is the reason that all media outlets frame the Nazis (and now ISIS) as "right wing".
(10-19-2016 05:16 AM)GlobalMan Wrote: Classical Liberalism has much more in common with and is more similar to modern Republican & Libertarian ideas than those of the current Democratic/Progressive party, so it makes sense to describe himself as such.
Classical liberalism was all about free markets, limited and small government, private property rights, individual freedoms, free speech, press etc. From around the 1930's forward Liberalism has been flipped on its head to stand for the opposite of just about every one of those ideals.
(10-19-2016 06:04 AM)LEMONed IScream Wrote: Well, in Europe and the rest of the world, a liberal/classical liberal is still someone that defends free markets, small government and all those other things. The script has been flipped but mostly only in the US I believe. The word "Liberal" here has a positive connotation if you're on the Right.
As someone who has extensively read up on liberalism (in the European sense) and the Austrian school, I'm well aware of all that, but it just seems that my brain short-circuited at the sight of this cuck.
My bad, point taken.
Anyway, something tells me I would still disagree with his interpretation of classical liberal ideas. It's an ideology like any other, many of its followers tend to forget that words and ideas should never overrule or ignore the reality of life and basic human behavior.
Liberalism has a differant connotation outside of America, but these Non-US Liberal parties are slowly veering left as well. Globally, many Liberal parties are also linked with a national party.
It's coming time that the national component splits with the Liberal component and runs on it's own... Liberal politics and leftist politics are forming into one of the same.