A Yale professor who supports Trump was on O'Reilly tonight.

He says Yale is an intellectual ghetto where all they do is read the NYT and circle jerk .

Our great universities aren't totally dead. Of course, he's a computer science professor and not in the humanities or social sciences.

This debate tomorrow is going to potentially change the course of this election - Trump has a brand new window now after announcing his support of banning political hacks from circling back to Washington to work as lobbyists, he can hammer Hillary on her cronyism and her insider relationship with Wall Street.

Also, I'd love to see Trump push the same narrative we've seen from JILL STEIN of all people, that being if Hillary wins we will fall into a world war scenario with Russia.

tomorrow is going to be absolutely insane, again.

Yup, when I read "A Yale professor who supports Trump...", my immediate thought was "I guarantee he teaches something useful like math, engineering, or comp sci".

(10-18-2016 07:59 PM)YossariansRight Wrote:  Ecuador admits it cut off Assange's internet due to his use of it to interfere in the U.S. election.

https://mobile.twitter.com/ericgeller/st...8918810624

If Assange read this forum, he would have been warned two weeks ago (and yes, by yours truly):

https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-48360...pid1408792

Anyone with knowledge of South American politics, and especially Chavistas, knew it was coming to Assange, hard and fast! Well, maybe Assange himself knew it, and had kind of a death wish?

(10-18-2016 09:34 PM)Lucky Wrote:  A Yale professor who supports Trump was on O'Reilly tonight.

He says Yale is an intellectual ghetto where all they do is read the NYT and circle jerk .

Our great universities aren't totally dead. Of course, he's a computer science professor and not in the humanities or social sciences.

Weaponized Autism just came out of the closet.

I realize that this is probably insane, but I want this guy to open for Milo Yiannopoulos at one of his speeches ... preferably the Halloween one at Yale.

(10-18-2016 08:51 PM)kbell Wrote:  http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/10/18...-campaign/


The facebook connection from wikileaks. Not sure if this will effect anything though. Cuckerberg wants to meet with clinton campaign.

Read between the lines in that email, they say Cuckerberg is wanting to spend his money and needs "guidance" on where to put it and they say "philanthropy" about 8 times coupled with "policy".

Why would you reach out to a campaign manager to spend money on worthy charities?

You think this faggot doesn't have the ability to find a charity?

He's paying to play.

(10-18-2016 08:03 PM)weambulance Wrote:  Per CNN, Hillary is bringing Mark Cuban and Meg Whitman as guests to the debate. Mr. Trump is bringing Obama's half brother and Patricia Smith, the mother of one of the men killed in the Benghazi fiasco.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/18/politics/h...index.html

Maybe they think Mr. Trump was actually rattled by Cuban at the first debate, rather than holding himself back. Or they're using Cuban as a sort of living voodoo fetish item.

Lefty are trying to use Cuban as a democrat equivalent of Trump, everytime Trump says something about economy the MSM get Cuban all over the news. Cuban has always been a Trump wannabe, trying to copy his style with one reality show.

I'm glad she was thinking the same thing I was. Hillary is just so unlikeable, keep her appearances to a minimum... they'll thaw her out of storage for 2 hours tomorrow night and then go right back under.

I like how they have Kaine focusing on "rust belt" countries, like people will consider him one of their own for being based out of Virginia? Any man who listens to him talk knows he's hardly a man.

(10-18-2016 09:34 PM)Lucky Wrote:  A Yale professor who supports Trump was on O'Reilly tonight.

He says Yale is an intellectual ghetto where all they do is read the NYT and circle jerk .

Our great universities aren't totally dead. Of course, he's a computer science professor and not in the humanities or social sciences.

Can confirm. I have 3 siblings who are all Ivy league educated and they treat the NYT as gospel, yet are fervently in denial about it. I myself went to a top uni in the UK and over there, it's the Guardian. The brain washing is rife. For people unbeknownst to the Guardian, this site will give you a good chuckle : http://somuchguardian.tumblr.com/

(10-18-2016 09:55 PM)Going strong Wrote:  

(10-18-2016 07:59 PM)YossariansRight Wrote:  Ecuador admits it cut off Assange's internet due to his use of it to interfere in the U.S. election.

https://mobile.twitter.com/ericgeller/st...8918810624

If Assange read this forum, he would have been warned two weeks ago (and yes, by yours truly):

https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-48360...pid1408792

Anyone with knowledge of South American politics, and especially Chavistas, knew it was coming to Assange, hard and fast! Well, maybe Assange himself knew it, and had kind of a death wish?

Anyone doing game on Scando chicks has a death wish. He knew that he was playing with false rape accusations when he banged those 2 Swedish broads. Admittedly, he could not have expected that they would meet/knew each other and one had CIA connections.

God damn.

This news is awesome. Newt saying there should be an FBI investigation into voter fraud TOMORROW.

Chaffetz wrecking the shit out of ShillWolf Blitzer.

Conspiracy to frame Julian Assange Exposed.

More videos coming.

More leaks coming.

Can you imagine Don, having to deal with all of these nasty people over the years? Knowing? Being disgusted? Hating them?

Just being in that position where you finally have the cash, attention, and following to actually DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT?

It must feel amazing.

MAGA

(10-18-2016 09:45 PM)Peregrine Wrote:  Yup, when I read "A Yale professor who supports Trump...", my immediate thought was "I guarantee he teaches something useful like math, engineering, or comp sci".

Of course, and reason is, he can afford to go public with his support of D. Trump, because if he is ultimately fired from Yale, no big deal - he can find another job the following day. Because he actually has useful in real (private) life technical knowledge - as opposed to pseudo-intellectual public-sector diploma.

Whereas, a dude teaching I don't know, social studies, public health or vaguely defined stuff like that, if he gets fired from a University, he'd be lucky to find work at Mc Donalds.

Anyway, I am glad to notice that, like myself, this (based) professor, refuses to use the word "Liberals" alone, adding "Leftists" to it. (I use "so-called Liberals", but in any case, never give them the semantically positive label of being just Liberals. They are So-called Liberals or Liberal Reds.... never put a positive tag on your adversaries)

(10-18-2016 05:32 PM)Gmac Wrote:  Going to assist. Wish me luck.

https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/788497150833401856


http://periscope.tv/GmacGame/

Got some footage and pics of the traitorous cucks.

   
   

https://twitter.com/GeorgeMcIntyre_/stat...5746379776

(10-18-2016 09:55 PM)Going strong Wrote:  

(10-18-2016 07:59 PM)YossariansRight Wrote:  Ecuador admits it cut off Assange's internet due to his use of it to interfere in the U.S. election.

https://mobile.twitter.com/ericgeller/st...8918810624

If Assange read this forum, he would have been warned two weeks ago (and yes, by yours truly):

https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-48360...pid1408792

Anyone with knowledge of South American politics, and especially Chavistas, knew it was coming to Assange, hard and fast! Well, maybe Assange himself knew it, and had kind of a death wish?

They have the sovereign right to do this. One can't get mad at Ecuador for this.

But.

They they are cucks as the President has shown preference to Hillary Clinton and from a Government standing have not been impartial into not choosing a side.

If you choose to be non-intervationist as to now allow communications from your State that are to influence another States policies that is cool. But you gotta walk with both feet then and be in the middle with no outward preferences towards any candidate. That is true neutrality.

Assamge being inside the Ecuadorian embassy is no different than us being guests in Roosh's forum. We have to abide by his rules and he has the right to administer it as he sees fit.

Reading through my facebook feed -- I've never seen libs so rattled and agitated before. When Romney did well in his first debate as Obama flubbed it, their level of anxiety, while palpatable, was nowhere close to the levels I'm seeing now.

They're scared. Deep down they know Hillary is a crook. I see statements like "yeah she's not perfect and a little shady, but I rather have her in the White House than Trump."

Hardly a ringing endorsement of support. A lot of dem voters will end up staying home. Let's hope for lots of bad weather across the country, or better, the swing states.

Let's keep the pedal to the metal, and don't let up! MAGA!

EDIT: Putting my money where my mouth is. Just donated $50 to the big Don.

I think it's a dumb strategy on their part (good for us though) for them to try and silence Assange. It just brings more attention to him and the documents will get out anyways. Seems desperate.

(10-18-2016 10:22 PM)Eastside Wrote:  I think it's a dumb strategy on their part (good for us though) for them to try and silence Assange. It just brings more attention to him and the documents will get out anyways. Seems desperate.

The more Trump wins, MSM polls notwithstanding, the more the libs panic. When they panic, they make dumb decisions.

(10-18-2016 10:19 PM)Cattle Rustler Wrote:  Assamge being inside the Ecuadorian embassy is no different than us being guests in Roosh's forum. We have to abide by his rules and he has the right to administer it as he sees fit.

Not so simple...:

What about the Human Rights the Left is always jerking to, sorry, talking about

Well yes, by cutting Assange from the world and removing his work ability, Correa is infringing on Assange's human rights.

Also, by the way, by refusing to condemn the unlawful imprisonment and torture of (Conservative martyr and White Mandela) Leopoldo Lopez, Correa is disrespecting the conventions on Human Rights and political prisoners.

Especially funny if you know South American leftist politicians, who have one favorite word in their lying mouths: Dignidad (pronounced Dignidaa'): they always talk (with no action though) about how the right to work is necessary to the dignity of a person, but then, they remove Assange's only work tool (internet). Where is Assange's dignidaa' now?

Idea for D. Trump: ask Hillary why she and Obama are letting the White-Mandela Leopoldo Lopez suffer in jail (US army could free him and take control of Venezuela in 36 hours)... guaranteed gain of "White latinos" votes, especially in Florida.

This man is a hero of the fight against communism, and is latino: D. Trump should bring up his name and current pledge:


I'd love seeing D. Trump ask Hillary: why Obama and you are letting the Nelson Mandela of our times, Leopoldo Lopez, rot in jail? Why isn't the US Army purging the world of commie dictator monster Maduro, who has no functional army and would be defeated in 36 hours tops (or half a second by drone hit), with no human loss for US soldiers?
(Would bring in many latino votes)

By the way... if you are a Conservative man, look closely at the ^photo above, memorize it, and think about it. Because, if D. Trump is not elected, this is how we all will end up someday. The Left will go pol-pot on us, just wait. Only a D. Trump's victory can save us.

So, if you are a Conservative man, put your face on Leopoldo's face in the pic above, and think hard of what the future has in store for us, if D. Trump is defeated (through rigging)...

Dude, Leopoldo is brown. Not sure where you've been getting this idea that he's European or white. I've spent quite a while in LatAm and my fam is from there.

It sucks that his interwebs access got cut off but that's how the game is. Maybe Duerte can provide protection.

Should Mr. Trump bring Jill Stein to the debate?

(10-18-2016 11:50 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  Should Mr. Trump bring Jill Stein to the debate?

I bet Jill Stein was hot in her prime years.

(10-18-2016 09:28 PM)beta_plus Wrote:  

(10-18-2016 08:51 PM)Tactician Wrote:  Fellow Deplorables,

I decided to skim a few articles claiming that a Hillary landslide is incoming (comment sections DISABLED).
...

She only has support in CANADA and the bluest of blue cities. Make America Great Again!

As an American who spend 5 years in Canada studying, I really hope that her support is only in Toronto-Occupied-Ontario and the Vancouver Metro Area. I'd like to think that there are parts of Canada that are sick of her and Cuck Trudeau's Cultural Marxist Pro MigRapist Garbage.

For the country that gave us the liberation of the Netherlands and other astonishing "punching above their weight" accomplishments, I hope that a Trump victory will lead to MAKING CANADA GREAT AGAIN.

Everyone here must know I despise Hillary Clinton, so count this Canadian out as any kind of supporter.

The Canadian MSM is in full Trump derangement mode. Our largest papers and broadcasters are ignoring the crumbling of the Canadian economy and spending most of their time lying about Trump.

Unhappily, globalist MSM trash still plays a huge role on the life of most Candians who are desperate to virtue signal to the world.

(10-18-2016 11:50 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  Should Mr. Trump bring Jill Stein to the debate?

Courtesy of Chuck J.

   

Seriously? Malik?

This is so delicious.