There's a Twitter post putting Nuzzi looking upward from low angle, next to two medieval paintings of long-faced women.

Message: Those attacking Nuzzi need to be careful! She's the rightful heir to the Austro-Hungarian throne! (or something like that).

I didn't see it but it sounds like it happened exactly the way it should have happened.

How many times do these dipshit reporters have stuff backfire on them.

Do you really think blacks that are interested in this story are going to appreciate a bunch of white bitches jumping on a humble black country boy?

I follow Nuzzi on twitter and harass her daily with comments.

She says all sorts of stupid shit so it's easy.

(10-19-2016 07:26 PM)iop890 Wrote:  "Blond" "women" with visible dark roots should be sent to camps.

This is unrelated to the thread but I feel it's important.

EDIT: After seeing that fucking anvil of a jaw I had to put "women" in quotes too.

(10-19-2016 07:33 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  Message: Those attacking Nuzzi need to be careful! She's the rightful heir to the Austro-Hungarian throne! (or something like that).

Is this what the Habsburg family is reduced to?

(10-19-2016 07:34 PM)Fisto Wrote:  I didn't see it but it sounds like it happened exactly the way it should have happened.

How many times do these dipshit reporters have stuff backfire on them.

Do you really think blacks that are interested in this story are going to appreciate a bunch of white bitches jumping on a humble black country boy?

If she wasn't jumping on him they may not have been interested. Remember many blacks are always looking for a reason to pull out a victim card or a race card. That card is more valuable than who they want to vote for most of the time. Some Blacks are fickle like that. Some might stay home instead of voting after seeing that, if they just hate Trump that much.

Some may not believe him or have a cold heart towards him, but that probably won't be most that see this video. Like I said before, he sounded humble and very believable. If you go look up his claims of trying to get answers two years ago, he is telling the truth. Just Drudge or other fringe news cared to report it.

I'm watching MSNBC. The pre debate coverage has tons of people in the background chanting something. I can't figure out what they are saying though. Any ideas?

Cucks on my Facebook are now pointing to the "only 31 counts of election fraud found in billion cases" post as a reaction to me posting the EVIDENCE through James O'Keefe videos.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk...lots-cast/

What faggots.

We don't trust these investigations anymore!

(10-19-2016 07:59 PM)AntiTrace Wrote:  I'm watching MSNBC. The pre debate coverage has tons of people in the background chanting something. I can't figure out what they are saying though. Any ideas?

Do you have Rudy guiliani on?

It seriously sounded like they were saying "recount" but the channel dropped it out.

Aloha!

(10-19-2016 10:19 PM)Slim Shady Wrote:  Cucks on my Facebook are now pointing to the "only 31 counts of election fraud found in billion cases" post as a reaction to me posting the EVIDENCE through James O'Keefe videos.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk...lots-cast/

What faggots.

We don't trust these investigations anymore!

This is so fucking retarded.

IT'S AN UNKNOWABLE NUMBER YOU RETARDS. It's only detectable when they FUCKED UP and left a TRAIL. This is as dumb as estimating the number of illegal immigrants in a country based on the number it has deported.

The people who come up with these statistics aren't ignorant, they're outright liars, like the "0.1% of rape accusations is false" people. Anybody who cites them is either intellectually or morally bankrupt.

(10-19-2016 10:19 PM)Slim Shady Wrote:  Cucks on my Facebook are now pointing to the "only 31 counts of election fraud found in billion cases" post as a reaction to me posting the EVIDENCE through James O'Keefe videos.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk...lots-cast/

What faggots.

We don't trust these investigations anymore!

1100 felons voted in the 2008 Minnesota election, according to this.

(10-19-2016 10:35 PM)iop890 Wrote:  http://fox13now.com/2016/10/19/poll-who-...ald-trump/

http://fox2now.com/2016/10/19/poll-who-i...p-clinton/

http://fox8.com/2016/10/19/donald-trump-...te-so-far/

http://fox61.com/2016/10/19/who-won-the-...al-debate/

http://www.mcall.com/opinion/polls/mc-wh...story.html

http://www.mediaite.com/online/poll-who-...al-debate/

http://heavy.com/news/2016/10/poll-who-w...al-debate/

http://therightscoop.com/poll-won-third-...p-hillary/

http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/201...al_de.html

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidenti...al-debate/

http://www.wxyz.com/news/national/poll-w...ial-debate

http://www.10news.com/news/national/poll...ial-debate

http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/nat...ial-debate

http://www.turnto23.com/news/national/po...ial-debate

http://www.oxfordeagle.com/2016/10/19/po...-or-trump/

http://drudgereport.com/flashlas.htm

VOTE

Something I've been wondering for a while now that I was just reminded of by the first question in tonight's presidential debate... Why does Donald Trump never mention his sister, Maryanne Trump Barry, when it comes to questions on judicial appointments? She's been a federal judge since 1983, yet I never hear Trump ever mention her as being a resource for advice on what he'd look for in his judicial appointments as president.

(10-19-2016 10:39 PM)iop890 Wrote:  

(10-19-2016 10:35 PM)iop890 Wrote:  http://fox13now.com/2016/10/19/poll-who-...ald-trump/

http://fox2now.com/2016/10/19/poll-who-i...p-clinton/

http://fox8.com/2016/10/19/donald-trump-...te-so-far/

http://fox61.com/2016/10/19/who-won-the-...al-debate/

http://www.mcall.com/opinion/polls/mc-wh...story.html

http://www.mediaite.com/online/poll-who-...al-debate/

http://heavy.com/news/2016/10/poll-who-w...al-debate/

http://therightscoop.com/poll-won-third-...p-hillary/

http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/201...al_de.html

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidenti...al-debate/

http://www.wxyz.com/news/national/poll-w...ial-debate

http://www.10news.com/news/national/poll...ial-debate

http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/nat...ial-debate

http://www.turnto23.com/news/national/po...ial-debate

http://www.oxfordeagle.com/2016/10/19/po...-or-trump/

http://drudgereport.com/flashlas.htm

VOTE

Am I the only one who can't get any of the polls to work?

(10-19-2016 11:03 PM)Shrodax Wrote:  Something I've been wondering for a while now that I was just reminded of by the first question in tonight's presidential debate... Why does Donald Trump never mention his sister, Maryanne Trump Barry, when it comes to questions on judicial appointments? She's been a federal judge since 1983, yet I never hear Trump ever mention her as being a resource for advice on what he'd look for in his judicial appointments as president.

She keeps such a low profile a submarine cant find her.

(10-19-2016 11:18 PM)LeoneVolpe Wrote:  

(10-19-2016 10:39 PM)iop890 Wrote:  

(10-19-2016 10:35 PM)iop890 Wrote:  http://fox13now.com/2016/10/19/poll-who-...ald-trump/

http://fox2now.com/2016/10/19/poll-who-i...p-clinton/

http://fox8.com/2016/10/19/donald-trump-...te-so-far/

http://fox61.com/2016/10/19/who-won-the-...al-debate/

http://www.mcall.com/opinion/polls/mc-wh...story.html

http://www.mediaite.com/online/poll-who-...al-debate/

http://heavy.com/news/2016/10/poll-who-w...al-debate/

http://therightscoop.com/poll-won-third-...p-hillary/

http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/201...al_de.html

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidenti...al-debate/

http://www.wxyz.com/news/national/poll-w...ial-debate

http://www.10news.com/news/national/poll...ial-debate

http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/nat...ial-debate

http://www.turnto23.com/news/national/po...ial-debate

http://www.oxfordeagle.com/2016/10/19/po...-or-trump/

http://drudgereport.com/flashlas.htm

VOTE

Am I the only one who can't get any of the polls to work?

Hill shill bots are flooding them with fake votes and slowing them down.

(10-19-2016 11:21 PM)iop890 Wrote:  Hill shill bots are flooding them with fake votes and slowing them down.

Did you say hillbot?

look the women Trump surround himself with.

Quote:The IBD/TIPP tracking poll has been cited as the most accurate in predicting actual election results in the past three presidential elections.

http://www.investors.com/politics/trump-...king-poll/

(10-19-2016 11:26 PM)Latinopan Wrote:  look the women Trump surround himself with.

Man, he really knows how to grab that pussy.

I can't even give a complete tally but this fucking media, always doing this shit - person doesn't buy into their frame and give the answer they want, and they tear them apart.

-Trump is asked if he'd do muslim databases / Trump says "all options are on the table" / media says "Trump supports muslim databases"
-Trump gets asked to disavow David Duke / repeatedly did in the past, misses one time due to bad earpiece / Trump supports David Duke
-Trump jokingly asks Russia to provide Hillary's deleted e-mails to the press / media says "Trump encourages state-sponsored hacking"
-Trump points out NATO doesn't fulfill their obligations by paying, that's part of the deal to be protected, they gotta do their part / media says Trump is spurning NATO and breaking x years of tradition and blah blah blah

Just off the top of my head, but I know there are dozens upon dozens of instances like that.

And now, after tonight:
-Trump says Mexican drug kingpins are bad hombres (by virtue of being Mexican, per the setup, calling them hombres is more than appropriate you stupid fucks feigning outrage) / media says Trump is racist and this'll hurt him with latino voters
-Trump says Hillary is a "nasty woman" / she is nasty, and a woman / media says this is an attack on all women
-Trump doesn't play into their game re: accepting results before they happen / media says this is an attack on the foundations of democracy

I DO NOT ENDORSE VIOLENCE OF ANY KIND but I couldn't have helped but have spotted these tweets from Pax Dickinson - well-known shitlord and former Silicon Valley CTO who's been shit on big league by shitty media in the past - over the past week that all this shit reminded me of.





Wew lad.

Pax Dickinson is mad, and that's even before tonight's events (and the media chicanery to occur over the next few days as a result, while simultaneously spurning real news stories and relevant political topics)

I wish I wasn't such a little bitch getting blackpilled so easily, but I have no faith in random people who don't pay attention to politics, or for people who tune in to something like CNN for post-debate analysis that is overwhelming and all-encompassing negativity towards Trump, or for people without common sense like us RVFers. Like Scott Adams's piece earlier, all these people have been fooled by Hillary's narrative and it's so sad. For the U.S., for western civilizations, for democracy and the world in general.

Lugenpresse.

(10-19-2016 11:03 PM)Shrodax Wrote:  Something I've been wondering for a while now that I was just reminded of by the first question in tonight's presidential debate... Why does Donald Trump never mention his sister, Maryanne Trump Barry, when it comes to questions on judicial appointments? She's been a federal judge since 1983, yet I never hear Trump ever mention her as being a resource for advice on what he'd look for in his judicial appointments as president.

He mentioned her before, after Scalia died, that she's a judge and he jokingly said he'd nominate her, or that she'd be great on the Supreme Court but he wouldn't do that for obvious conflict of interest. The media de-humourized the comment and played it up as a corruption/nepotism narrative.

Hence, she doesn't get mentioned anymore.

Great News:

Emerson Polling: Clinton +4 Pennsylvania.

+11 Democratic skew. In Pennsylvania, Democrats have +6 registered voters. This means Trump is trending +1 in Pennsylvania. That is extremely promising for the electoral college.

http://media.wix.com/ugd/3bebb2_98fe8b35...c22ec9.pdf

Ya'll need to check out Malik Obama on twitter. Here are a few gems:


"If Russia is such a threat why did Hillary sell the Russians uranium for their nukes?"

"Hillary wants no fly zone? Why she not make it on her face?"

"Maybe if Hillary was a beauty pageant winner on Trump's show maybe she would be for world peace"

"I am a good Muslim. I believe we need to keep our shoes on at the airport and get rid of the bad Muslims. Trump is good on this."

"I am sad that my brother is not the man @realDonaldTrump is"

Solid truth talk from Scott Adams:

Quote:As a public service (and I mean that literally) I have been trying to unhypnotize the country on this matter for the past year. I don’t do this because I prefer Trump’s policies or because I know who would do the best job as president. I do it because our system doesn’t work if you think there is a pink elephant in the room and there is not. That isn’t real choice. That is an illusion of choice.

Trump represents what is likely to be a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to bring real change to a government that is bloated and self-serving. Reasonable people can disagree on policies and priorities. But Trump is the bigger agent for change, if that’s what you think the country needs. I want voters to see that choice for what it is.

http://blog.dilbert.com/post/15202452602...ial-debate