馃搫 Rendered from the archive database (the original static capture of this page wasn't kept). Content is complete; styling is simplified.
I wonder if he's aware of our support here.
Laner 路 2015-07-21 17:21:00 路 #655
For the first time in my adult life I am actually excited about a US election.
I am even a bit jealous, and now think that Kevin O'Leary should run for Prime Minister just to get a bit of old world Anglo Saxon, take no bullshit, tell it like it is north American brotherhood happening.
![[Image: giphy.gif]](http://media.giphy.com/media/JAPecwy7jd8is/giphy.gif)
(07-21-2015 05:21 PM)Laner Wrote: For the first time in my adult life I am actually excited about a US election.
I am even a bit jealous, and now think that Kevin O'Leary should run for Prime Minister just to get a bit of old world Anglo Saxon, take no bullshit, tell it like it is north American brotherhood happening.
![[Image: giphy.gif]](http://media.giphy.com/media/JAPecwy7jd8is/giphy.gif)
I was kinda excited back in 2000. I'd had enough of the Clintons and 9/11 hadn't entered the lexicon yet.
Samseau 路 2015-07-21 17:38:00 路 #657
(07-21-2015 02:25 PM)TheWastelander Wrote: ![[Image: cXE3H9J.gif]](http://i.imgur.com/cXE3H9J.gif)
This should be turned into a new "game recognized" forum gif. Because if there is any model for being an alpha male, it is Donald Trump. Look at the girl on the right. She nods her head at the audience, if as to say, "I got to share the bed with him last night, it's okay if you other girls are jealous."
I'd put him up there with Arnold Schwarzenegger levels of alpha. Pretend Trump's bank account is as big as Arnold's muscles in his prime you get a similar picture: both share screen performance practice, immense success with women, and a natural charisma that any straight-blooded male can respect.
(07-21-2015 03:12 PM)samsamsam Wrote: ![[Image: image.png]](http://s21.postimg.org/sxqwesshj/image.png)
![[Image: whiteflag.png]](http://www.theabsurdreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/whiteflag.png)
(07-21-2015 01:02 PM)kosko Wrote: His trolling is top notch! If he wrote a book on this I would buy it.
In The Art of the Deal, published way back in the 80's, he says he goes on the offensive against those that attack him. Basically whatever it takes and go for the jugular.
Yes, he certainly does.
And the fucksticks opposing him are getting pummeled like the French against Rommel.
![[Image: oib4r.jpg]](https://i.imgflip.com/oib4r.jpg)
(07-21-2015 07:32 PM)Hotwheels Wrote: (07-21-2015 01:02 PM)kosko Wrote: His trolling is top notch! If he wrote a book on this I would buy it.
In The Art of the Deal, published way back in the 80's, he says he goes on the offensive against those that attack him. Basically whatever it takes and go for the jugular.
Yes, he certainly does.
And the fucksticks opposing him are getting pummeled like the French against Rommel.
![[Image: oib4r.jpg]](https://i.imgflip.com/oib4r.jpg)
Going on the offensive only works if you have huge balls and don't need anything. The reason for this post is the younger guys here can't pull it off. I can't pull it off.
Trump is bitchslapping the RINO-bitch-loser GOP wing with a ferocity unseen since, who, Joe McCarthy? It's a GREAT thing. He鈥檚 operatng like a general and he鈥檚 brought the party鈥檚 balls back that have been missing for more than 2 decades.
Way too long since a man has been in charge of the country.
(07-18-2015 11:56 AM)komatiite Wrote: http://t.co/nGwxriq390
And that's all she wrote
Edit for video impaired: 'McCain was a war hero because he was captured. I like people who weren't captured'
Well I for one am stoked my prediction was so wrong, Donald just is steamrolling through the doubters!
Collide 路 2015-07-21 21:17:00 路 #663
(07-21-2015 03:12 PM)samsamsam Wrote: ![[Image: image.png]](http://s21.postimg.org/sxqwesshj/image.png)
![[Image: vZN2PL6.png]](http://i.imgur.com/vZN2PL6.png)
The screenshot you see below is from Google News today, July 21, 10:50 p.m. Several media outlets are reporting Trump has "surged into the lead" in the GOP race.
My own theory on his popularity is that it's only half about what he's saying. The other half is that his attitude is attracting people -- something all disciples of game should take note of.
People are tired of the Media Masters making everyone grovel before them when they commit a politically incorrect "sin." People are tired of thinking they can't voice an opinion or they'll be run out of their job or community.
They're attracted to Trump because he's behaving like they wish they could behave. Trump is the man people wish they could be. And not just because of his money. There's a lesson there.
PS: Heartiste
put out a treatise on Trump today that's very worth reading.
Well, I've gotta hand it to him for bringing some fun back into U.S. politics.
LeBeau 路 2015-07-21 22:26:00 路 #666
(07-21-2015 07:44 PM)el mechanico Wrote: Going on the offensive only works if you have huge balls and don't need anything. The reason for this post is the younger guys here can't pull it off. I can't pull it off.
I'm curious what you guys think it takes to be able to get to this level?
Is it just a large amount of "Fuck You" money?
Or could a small amount work if you were an entrepreneur or otherwise not dependent on a typical corporate job?
For example, Roosh doesn't seem to have anything holding him back from speaking his mind, and he's not making millions. kbell 路 2015-07-21 22:35:00 路 #667
Some more trump gems.
![[Image: I4wevpu.jpg?1]](http://i.imgur.com/I4wevpu.jpg?1)
^No analysis of the Barney Frank tweet necessary
![[Image: Barney-Frank-with-Boobs-and-Nipples-on-House-Floor.jpg]](http://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/watchwomanonthewall/files/2012/05/Barney-Frank-with-Boobs-and-Nipples-on-House-Floor.jpg)
Bruce Jenner should start taking whatever hormones he is on.
Roosh 路 2015-07-21 23:55:00 路 #670
The media is blatantly organizing on how to stop Trump receiving attention through the media:
Quote:"After watching and listening to Donald Trump since he announced his candidacy for president, we have decided we won't report on Trump's campaign as part of The Huffington Post's political coverage," top editors at The Huffington Post wrote last week. "Instead, we will cover his campaign as part of our Entertainment section. Our reason is simple: Trump's campaign is a sideshow. We won't take the bait. If you are interested in what The Donald has to say, you'll find it next to our stories on the Kardashians and The Bachelorette."
Jay Rosen, a journalism professor at New York University, defended The Huffington Post move.
"What is the logic of this candidacy? Who is a serious candidate for president? Who is not capable? These are exactly the assessments editors and reporters have to be making as they review the field and decide how to 'spend' scarce coverage units," he wrote. "They're not deciding who we vote for. They're deciding how best to render the field. Who is a serious foreign policy candidate? Who has proposals for addressing inequality that are worthy of more discussion? Campaign journalists should be able to tell us."
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-ele...gn-n395821I have never voted, but fuck it, I'm voting for Trump. Just listened to his speech he did in Las Vegas.
Slandered is the best word to describe what the media has done to him. He's not perfect, but he's only telling the truth. Illegal immigrants are on a crime rampage and they get better treatment than people who were born here and aren't criminals!
If he is this much of a shitlord running for President, what will he do when he is president?
Dusty 路 2015-07-22 00:29:00 路 #673
(07-22-2015 12:26 AM)Eskhander Wrote: If he is this much of a shitlord running for President, what will he do when he is president?
![[Image: 78WrbYS.gif]](https://i.imgur.com/78WrbYS.gif)
(07-22-2015 12:26 AM)Eskhander Wrote: If he is this much of a shitlord running for President, what will he do when he is president?
Can we leave the "shitlord" comments on reddit?
It seem to be a SJW label.
(07-22-2015 01:14 AM)Hotwheels Wrote: (07-22-2015 12:26 AM)Eskhander Wrote: If he is this much of a shitlord running for President, what will he do when he is president?
Can we leave the "shitlord" comments on reddit?
It seem to be a SJW label.
Weird. Could have sworn people were using it here. As a term of endearment.
Altering the question: If he is this brazen running for president, what we will he do as President. Now that would be spectacular.
(07-31-2015 10:51 AM)Disco_Volante Wrote: (07-31-2015 10:29 AM)DannyAlberta Wrote: 
Jesus Christ. Please tell me you are not serious.
There is officially no hope to stem the tide against corrupt statist-leftism in North America.
Hardly anyone wants to work for anything anymore and they all want "free" stuff (free = paid for by "rich" people, rich = everyone else).
I'm not looking down on my American cousins because I'm Canadian either. We are about to elect our own supreme government of socialist destruction in October when "Trotsky Tom" Mulcair takes his rightful place as dictator for life of the Democratic Republic of Canadastan.
It's all over, Trump will lose to Hillary. Polls show Hillary is favored against Trump, and women think Trump is too 'mean'. Women don't want true independence, just a government sugar daddy.
The reality is women will vote for bigger government. They are unconcerned with any big picture systemic problems, they just want their fucking birth control and safety nets so they can go on with their mindless existence and force men to white knight via taxes (and pay for their shitty slow-paced sports with Title IX).
Even if Trump somehow manages to win, long-term the demographics will give dems the majority every time anyways. I'm already starting to get nostalgic and sentimental about the old U.S.A., when I'm riding my bike I wave at elderly people I see walking by, because once the old boomers die off it's game over. They were the only ones with any goddamn sense in them compared to today.
I have plans to leave the country.
I hate to say it, but I think you are right. Once women get the right to vote it is over for a society. There is no turning back unless you take this right away from them. Hillary, as we all know, will be a complete disaster. The worse of Bush (war hawk for Israel, no protection at the border for the American people) and the worse of Obama (terrible economic policy, low troop morale) combined.
I just want Trump to stay in as long as possible to help wake up more young men. If we can get enough young men to wake up, maybe we can peacefully get women out of the voting booth and get the country back on the right track.
Wow.
Any polls, especially national ones D vs. R ones (irrelevant anyway due to the electoral college) taken this early are not to be taken seriously. Stop throwing your hands up. Go read what Scorpion and Samseau wrote earlier in the thread. Hillary is such a horrible candidate that I'm not even sure why the democrats aren't frantically trying to get her out like the cucks are trying to get Trump out. She can't even energize her own base (Scorpion), Trump would smash her in any debate, and because he oozes game enough women will vote for him in key areas.
Sanders at least can energize his own base. And he's also against trade deals like the TPP so at least there's that.
The Democrats will never achieve a permanent majority. Neither will the Republicans.
The American two-party system is reaching critical mass and will buckle within the next 3-5 election cycles if current partisan infighting and social trends are any indication. The very thing that solidified the Democrats and Republicans as exclusive powers in America - identity politics - has ironically proven to be the nail in the coffin.
Simply put, there are too many people shouting in the same room. The Democrat / Republican dynamic can only survive when competing political interests are kept in broad concrete terms (big government vs. small government, rich vs. poor, isolationist vs. interventionist). World War II and the Cold War gave us common ideological and economic enemies as a nation, keeping discourse broad and inclusive.
The "sexual revolution" and other 1960's movements split America into competing or allied personal identity factions (feminists, gays, atheists, religious right) while the 1965 Immigration Act divided America along three main ethnic lines (Whites, Blacks, Hispanics) also in competition. These two things fundamentally altered the cultural and demographic makeup of the United States and rendered the two-party system obsolete. Academia and the media later reinforced the post-60's fragmentation of society using "state policy" political correctness, a topic of much discussion here.
The Democrats cannot indefinitely maintain the loyalty of three competing ethnic factions under a single roof, itself broken down into smaller personal identity factions. "Diversity" and the spread of information via the internet will continue to polarize the country along ethnic lines (police shootings, riots, immigration concerns, etc.) And in a display of complete political impotency, the Republicans are incapable of capitalizing on this turmoil due to ideological conflicts within their own party.
As I mentioned, there are too many people shouting in the same room. Too many groups, too many battles, too many slices of bread to be buttered. The 2016 election is the beginning of the end; both parties are on life support. I would expect a 4-6 party European-style system within the next two decades based on ethnicity, economic policy, or some combination of the two.