Donald trump's numbers went up the last time this happened, lets see what happens this time. I think its 2-4%+ for every scenes of thugs causing shit like this. He should keep going to New Mexico, California anywhere he can to grab attention.

A lowlife scum throwing eggs at a woman and then waiving a mexican flag = 80 Million$ of free advertising.

(06-03-2016 12:02 AM)8ball Wrote:  Donald trump's numbers went up the last time this happened, lets see what happens this time. I think its 2-4%+ for every scenes of thugs causing shit like this. He should keep going to New Mexico, California anywhere he can to grab attention.

A lowlife scum throwing eggs at a woman and then waiving a mexican flag = 80 Million$ of free advertising.

There's a reason he says he'll keep coming back to California and he thinks he can win it.

He probably knows it's a lost cause, but he wants to bring awareness of Mexican nationalism to the rest of America and the Mexicans attacking Trump supporters does exactly that. The drama created guarantees endless talk and controversy about Trump Trump Trump.

I keep saying Trump is going to swing his votes over from women who resist him... but what is the best way past LMR? Persistence, persistence, persistence. 24/7 media saturation does exactly that.

Wasn't the reason Prop 187 passed in 94 because of the Mexico flag waving thugs pissed off a large chunk of Californians?

Hillary Clinton mentions Trump 62 times during her foreign policy speech

I find it troubling that relatively small crowds of protesters are able to attack much larger crowds of Trump supporters and meet with little resistance from the Trump guys. Questions of how it would play in the media aside, I think it shows to what extent the "silent majority" has been cucked into submission. Imagine going to Mexico city with your band of 300 misfits and starting to beat up individual Mexicans attending a 5000+ rally. Wouldn't end well for you, nor should it.

The West has really become extremely pussified.

On the plus side, the Washington Post is at least reporting this without their usual bias. Where they lead, other political papers tend to follow. So this is a good sign in terms of media coverage.

As of early Friday, their headline was: "Ugly, bloody scenes in San Jose as protesters attack Trump supporters outside rally." The story doesn't contain any blame directed at Trump and actually questions why police are reluctant to get involved when protesters were getting violent, intimidating Trump supporters, and even "throwing up gang signs."

It's probably worth it to give them a link for what seems like an honest, factual first-hand account that uses an impressive array of sources. Maybe they'll do more of it.

For those who don't want to click on the news story, which is by Sean Sullivan and Michael E. Miller, it begins:

SAN JOSE, Calif. —Protests outside a Donald Trump rally in downtown San Jose spun out of control Thursday night when some demonstrators attacked the candidate’s supporters.

Protesters jumped on cars, pelted Trump supporters with eggs and water balloons, snatched signs, and stole “Make America Great” hats off supporters’ heads before burning them and snapping selfies with the charred remains.

Several people were caught on camera punching Trump supporters. At least one attacker was arrested, according to CNN, although police did not release much information.

“The San Jose Police Department made a few arrests tonight after the Donald Trump Rally,” police said in a statement. “As of this time, we do not have specific information on the arrests made. There has been no significant property damage reported. One officer was assaulted.”

***

I agree this violence is going to have a backlash effect and move more people move to Trump's side. Few things are more repugnant to Americans than having their viewpoints shut down by force. We used to look down on other countries for that. Now it's come to us.

(Addendum: The WashPost evidently agrees with this. They just ran an editorial titled "Trump Protesters Hurting Their Cause," and it's been syndicated into other papers, like Newsday.)

Holy shit the things happening on the Trump rallies are just unbelievable. You got your hands full over there in the US. Things really getting crazy really fast....

I saw one person over on r/the Donald claim that a teen girl trump supporter was followed after the rally and gang raped. The guy said he would find the link but hasn't posted back yet.

Any of you nimble navigators hear anything about those?

I haven't found anything in my search yet. The front page is r/ the Donald is crawling with links to videos of these terrorists. Fucking crazy, and it will only get crazier.

I think we could potentially end up with an actual civil war with the way things are going. It's one thing to protest and riot, quit another to hunt and assault political opposition.

(06-03-2016 05:46 AM)Glaucon Wrote:  Holy shit the things happening on the Trump rallies are just unbelievable. You got your hands full over there in the US. Things really getting crazy really fast....

I'm pumped man. I've been asking my self "WWTD" (What would Trump do) for months now.

Just landed a deal where I'll make 2 months of wages in 2 weeks. And I'm using my employer and hes getting nothing.

Chaahoo! What a time to be alive!

Had this female on my clipboard so may as well put her here.

I have been telling people this for a while, but yesterday confirmed it enough to share this advice here...

Gentlemen, it is time to invest in ammo. Forget gold coins, forget the rigged stock market bubble, ammo will have multiple purposes and will skyrocket in value if Hillary wins. Much less if it is eventually outlawed.

We can see how dangerous the left is, and we can see the Democrats encourage and even support it. It is time to get prepared to defend ourselves and our loved ones.

Earlier this morning the news site sfgate.com had an article up with the headline "Trump supporters attacked at San Jose rally".

It's now gone from the site and the only article about the San Jose rally I see is one with the headline "Trump at campaign rally in San Jose calls for jailing Clinton".

I guess this better fits the narrative.

Fucking journalist scum.

(06-03-2016 04:21 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  On the plus side, the Washington Post is at least reporting this without their usual bias. Where they lead, other political papers tend to follow. So this is a good sign in terms of media coverage.

As of early Friday, their headline was: "Ugly, bloody scenes in San Jose as protesters attack Trump supporters outside rally." The story doesn't contain any blame directed at Trump and actually questions why police are reluctant to get involved when protesters were getting violent, intimidating Trump supporters, and even "throwing up gang signs."

It's probably worth it to give them a link for what seems like an honest, factual first-hand account that uses an impressive array of sources. Maybe they'll do more of it.

The imagery could not be more alarming or stark in its implications.

You have gangmembers and thug trash throwing up gang signs waving mexican flags physically assaulting mostly white Trump supporters wearing the nation's colors and with U.S flags.

It's literally a Mexican invasion force attacking people because they don't like the politics of a country in which they live in but detest.

I said before these people would resort to violence eventually. I've seen it before many times in CA. This is just a protest rally.

Now imagine if the illegal floodgates were opened up and they start flipping neighborhoods to their demographics. It will happen on a national scale that you wouldn't believe could happen.


Edit: You know what would create a suitable counter optic that might wake up America from its cultural malaise? Is if a bunch of military veterans showed up in their class A's and directly went up to some of these Mexican flag waving faggots and dared them to use violence. Footage of idiots waving Mexican flags assaulting men in uniform would seal the deal in my opinion.

To those who are interested in the way the media is handling all this, here is an addition to my Washington Post comment (above).

The New York Times covered the same violent San Jose rally. But their headline was "Violence reemerges outside a Donald Trump rally."

Notice anything different? Where the Post came out and said the protesters were violent, the Times simply says the violence "reemerged," so casual readers might think Trump's supporters wreaked havoc. Or maybe even Trump himself caused the trouble.

This is media sleight-of-hand. A lot of thought goes into these headlines. This type of thing isn't an accident.

Below is their lead. Notice how they shaped this story, starting with jarring emotional images. Take note of the word choices (which I highlighted). This is in direct contrast to the matter-of-fact Washington Post report:

By Nick Corasaniti and Jonah Engel Bromwich

SAN JOSE, Calif. — With escalating vitriol, Donald J. Trump unleashed an attack on Hillary Clinton on Thursday in response to her speech earlier in the day criticizing his foreign policy positions.

Speaking at a campaign rally here, he began by calling her speech “pathetic,” dismissing it as a stunt and saying, “It had nothing to do with foreign policy.”

Outside the event, protesters, some brandishing Mexican flags, clashed violently with Trump’s supporters.

That's quite a leap there, isn't it? By juxtaposing those images, they make it seem like Trump caused this mayhem -- when it's doubtful any protesters heard any of it. This isn't reporting. It's storytelling. Had I done this years ago in my old newsroom, the article would have been turned back to me for a rewrite along with a curt "Get your shit together" note from one of the editors.

The bias today in news reporting boggles my mind. It was always there, but it was at least implicit. This is totally in-your-face.

Here is a link to the story as it ran in the Boston Globe, so you don't have to give the Times the Web hit.

Quote:... If a bunch of military veterans showed up in their class A's and directly went up to some of these Mexican flag waving faggots and dared them to use violence. Footage of idiots waving Mexican flags assaulting men in uniform would seal the deal in my opinion.

Sound like an old fashioned Zoot Suit Riot.

I just found this list of links:

https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comm...video_and/

And posted it to r/the_donald. Anyone have any to add to it?

Thanks.

What dickless faggots.

Attacking a built man that clearly has put a lot of work in from behind with a weapon? Then prancing around like a bunch of 3rd world idiots?

(06-03-2016 06:53 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  To those who are interested in the way the media is handling all this, here is an addition to my Washington Post comment (above).

The New York Times covered the same violent San Jose rally. But their headline was "Violence reemerges outside a Donald Trump rally."

Notice anything different? Where the Post came out and said the protesters were violent, the Times simply says the violence "reemerged," so casual readers might think Trump's supporters wreaked havoc. Or maybe even Trump himself caused the trouble.

This is media sleight-of-hand. A lot of thought goes into these headlines. This type of thing isn't an accident.

Below is their lead. Notice how they shaped this story, starting with jarring emotional images. Take note of the word choices (which I highlighted). This is in direct contrast to the matter-of-fact Washington Post report:

By Nick Corasaniti and Jonah Engel Bromwich

SAN JOSE, Calif. — With escalating vitriol, Donald J. Trump unleashed an attack on Hillary Clinton on Thursday in response to her speech earlier in the day criticizing his foreign policy positions.

Speaking at a campaign rally here, he began by calling her speech “pathetic,” dismissing it as a stunt and saying, “It had nothing to do with foreign policy.”

Outside the event, protesters, some brandishing Mexican flags, clashed violently with Trump’s supporters.

That's quite a leap there, isn't it? By juxtaposing those images, they make it seem like Trump caused this mayhem -- when it's doubtful any protesters heard any of it. This isn't reporting. It's storytelling. Had I done this years ago in my old newsroom, the article would have been turned back to me for a rewrite along with a curt "Get your shit together" note from one of the editors.

The bias today in news reporting boggles my mind. It was always there, but it was at least implicit. This is totally in-your-face.

Here is a link to the story as it ran in the Boston Globe, so you don't have to give the Times the Web hit.

Yes, violence "emerged" at the Trump rally, as if it appeared randomly from a cloud of mist. The use of the passive voice is definitely intentional. It's a trick to conceal the identity of the aggressive parties who initiated violence. You see the same thing in pretty much every article on violence committed by members of the protected classes, most egregiously in coverage of black violence in cities like Detroit and Baltimore.

And then we see the protestors "clashing violently" with Trump supporters. The image here is of a pitched battle, as if there was some agreement between the two sides for a little fisticuffs. It provides the reader a false equivocation: both sides wanted a fight, so they fought. The reality of peaceful Trump supporters being violently assaulted by Mexican thugs (who are literally waving Mexican flags as a battle standard) is entirely swept under the rug.

The exact opposite technique is employed endlessly in those rare cases where white men are responsible for committing (not necessarily even initiating!) violence against a minority. The reader is reminded explicitly, over and over, that the white man attacked the minority, who is invariably portrayed as defenseless, meek, a good person, etc... (The media coverage of the Mike Brown shooting and subsequent black riots were one of the all-time great examples of this rank distortion).

Mike Cernovich just released an article that can shut any Trump hater up. Every paragraph is on point.

http://www.dangerandplay.com/2016/06/02/...-humility/

Is any of this stuff playing on TV in the States? Checked CNN.com and it's completely buried in the sidebar as a small headline named "Protesters target Trump in California" which is not exactly designed to elicit interest or clicks compared to what is really going on.

(06-02-2016 08:32 PM)wi30 Wrote:  Thanks Isaac Jordan, that thread has great info.

But the site wont accept my identity after I submit my correct name, birth date, and address. It wants me to scan and upload a government issued ID. Seems sketchy.

Should I actually scan and forward my driver's license or use other avenues?

That's strange... I live in the States and I was good to go after putting in my name/birth date/address. I even signed up using my mom's info so I could double down in a few markets, no problem. Just used her name and email but my personal credit card.

I trust the site, they paid out promptly after I won a bunch of the primary markets and my friends that I've referred haven't had any trouble either. If you're really worried about it, maybe try getting a friend or relative to sign up and see if you can go through them.

(06-03-2016 03:09 AM)Latinopan Wrote:  Hillary Clinton mentions Trump 62 times during her foreign policy speech

Comments disabled on a video posted up by PBS..you don't say. The establishment narrative isn't interested in your input.










A large establishment party that posts a video up by a mainstream candidate who only gets 4k views of which a third are thumbs down.

Read the comments it's not even Trump supporters but mostly Bernie supporters lighting Hillary up.

(06-03-2016 06:40 AM)It_is_my_time Wrote:  I have been telling people this for a while, but yesterday confirmed it enough to share this advice here...

Gentlemen, it is time to invest in ammo. Forget gold coins, forget the rigged stock market bubble, ammo will have multiple purposes and will skyrocket in value if Hillary wins. Much less if it is eventually outlawed.

We can see how dangerous the left is, and we can see the Democrats encourage and even support it. It is time to get prepared to defend ourselves and our loved ones.

http://www.sgammo.com/
Family Owned and Operated Ammo Sales, Stillwater OK

I just bought a case of .223 after the Costa Mesa rally, and I might buy another case after seeing these gangland savages running wild in the streets while the cops allow them to assault peaceful Trump supporters and deny us our right to have peaceful assemblies. They won't try this kind of shit in open carry states though, let them try this kind of violence in a stand your ground state and see what happens.

I tried to search for news/video about the Trump rally aftermath on Facebook and received the following result:

Quote:Sorry, something went wrong while we were doing this search. Please try later.

I tried several times and same result. Either so many people are doing that search at the same time that it's overwhelming the server, or Facebook is trying to cover it up.

After the rally, the San Jose mayor (who is reportedly a Clinton supporter) tried to blame the violence on Trump.

After Cher saw the video of the white woman being assaulted outside the Marriott, she tweeted a condemnation of the protestors. So, there should now be some mainstream media changing their tune on who was instigating the violence. When Hollywood takes a side, much of the media likes to mimic it.

How great is this election? It's easy to become pessimistic about everything, from the demographic and cultural destruction of our homelands to the treasonous governments that have sold out their people for short-term monetary gains, but that is too easy. Life has always been about conflict and the temporary peace time bliss we all thought would last forever is ending. We can now wake up and be alive.

We have an extremely entitled nation-wrecking politician who has destroyed everything in her path, who thought she could now claim her birth right and become the first female president, and continue to fuck over the silly, dumb sheep she hates.

But wait! Along came a ballsy brawler billionaire who loves to fight and loves to win. He has dominated real estate, he has dominated the media, and instead of retiring with his billions and live the remainder of his life in unlimited luxury, he decided to fuck up the entire treasonous political establishment and the power structures behind the scenes. Why? Because fuck them, that's why.

As the embarrassing clown candidate that could not possibly win has demolished his competitors, has driven them from their ivory towers and taken full control of the levers of power, the shock-and-awed heir to the throne is left stumbling and becoming increasingly unhinged. Bernie is still fighting, and fighting well. Trump should not be successful but he is. He is fucking up all her plans and she does not understand what the hell is going on. He loves this and there is nothing she can do about it. Being used to destroying her political opponents, big and small, she feels utterly impotent. And the rage is only making it worse.

So men, take some time to enjoy this:

What a great time to be alive! We are living it!

Freedom and comfort are pleasures that can be enjoyed but they also have to be earned. We have forgotten that simple rule of nature as our freedom and comfort was a gift from our ancestors. And now we are reminded again.

A great man, in much more uncertain times, once said:

We have before us an ordeal of the most grievous kind. We have before us many, many long months of struggle and of suffering. You ask, what is our policy? I can say: It is to wage war, by sea, land and air, with all our might and with all the strength that God can give us; to wage war against a monstrous tyranny, never surpassed in the dark, lamentable catalogue of human crime. That is our policy. You ask, what is our aim? I can answer in one word: It is victory, victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror, victory, however long and hard the road may be; for without victory, there is no survival. Let that be realised; no survival for the West, no survival for all that the Western world has stood for, no survival for the urge and impulse of the ages, that mankind will move forward towards its goal. But I take up my task with buoyancy and hope. I feel sure that our cause will not be suffered to fail among men. At this time I feel entitled to claim the aid of all, and I say, "come then, let us go forward together with our united strength."