(06-01-2016 09:48 AM)Enoch Wrote: Alright, let's get this straight. Bill Kristol couldn't find anyone to run for President so he asked the guy in the cubicle next to him?
PS Bill Kristol spent Memorial Day in Israel. What a Patriot.
I hope President Trump takes away his passport/visa/citizenship and lets him rot in Israel. It's obvious that Kristol's heart lies with Israel first so we may as well keep him there.
(06-01-2016 09:13 AM)Latinopan Wrote: And what exactly they call political expert? kissing the ass of the donors and being a puppet for the same people whom run both parties from behind the scene? spend time only apologizing for the party? kneeling before the press and Hollywood?
What do they define political expert? Jeb Bush is better in politics than Trump? one is a winner the other had 200 millions and still lose.
Yes that's entirely my point. They regard Trump as an unsuitable political novice based on his lack of experience, but completely ignore the utter domination of his political campaign. They don't seem to understand that just because Trump has no experience as an elected politician does not mean he can't be extremely skilled in politics.
Trump as a politician reminds me of Jon Jones as a fighter. When Jon Jones first debuted in the UFC he was running through guys in impressive fashion. His style was totally unique. No one had ever seen a fighter like this before. And yet the intelligent opinion at the time was that he was still too green to be champion. Maybe in a few years, they said. But a few months later Jones was champion after utterly demolishing the legendary Shogun Rua.
In hindsight, it seems obvious, but at the time people couldn't see it coming. They didn't recognize that the paradigm was changing under their feet. Trump, like Jones, is a unique phenomenon to whom the conventional wisdom does not apply. He is creating new rules that will be studied in years to come. I find it incredible that the media buffoons STILL do not recognize this fact. I have been pointing this out since last August. These people really are incredibly stupid.
They're like France in WWII relying on the Maginot Line. They're fighting the LAST war, not the new one.
Quote:The Maginot Line was impervious to most forms of attack, including aerial bombings and tank fire, and had underground railways as a backup; it also had state-of-the-art living conditions for garrisoned troops, supplying air conditioning and eating areas for their comfort. Nevertheless, it proved strategically ineffective during the Battle of France. Instead of attacking directly, the Germans invaded through the Low Countries, bypassing the Line to the north.
(06-01-2016 09:48 AM)scorpion Wrote: I find it incredible that the media buffoons STILL do not recognize this fact. I have been pointing this out since last August. These people really are incredibly stupid.
That interpretation rests on the idea that the media possess a modicum of honestly and "report" things based on their own honest assessment of the situation. I find it much more likely that the media recognizes Trump's brilliance and astounding success, but criticizes him for ineptitude and failure anyway in order to try and brainwash the public to be skeptical of him.
Let's face it, this is a battle and the media is on the other side, so of course it's going to attack Trump. As an example, if I'm a defense lawyer, I'm going to disparage and question the integrity of the prosecution's star witness regardless of whether I know him to be a paragon of moral virtue. My job is to destroy the witness, not to give the jury my honest assessment of him. The same thing with our bought and paid for media.
TLDR: It's possible the media really is stupid and thinks Trump is a buffoon, but even if the media thought Trump was the second coming of god they'd still try to convince the public he's a buffoon.
(06-01-2016 09:48 AM)scorpion Wrote: I find it incredible that the media buffoons STILL do not recognize this fact. I have been pointing this out since last August. These people really are incredibly stupid.
That interpretation rests on the idea that the media possess a modicum of honestly and "report" things based on their own honest assessment of the situation. I find it much more likely that the media recognizes Trump's brilliance and astounding success, but criticizes him for ineptitude and failure anyway in order to try and brainwash the public to be skeptical of him.
Let's face it, this is a battle and the media is on the other side, so of course it's going to attack Trump. As an example, if I'm a defense lawyer, I'm going to disparage and question the integrity of the prosecution's star witness regardless of whether I know him to be a paragon of moral virtue. My job is to destroy the witness, not to give the jury my honest assessment of him. The same thing with our bought and paid for media.
TLDR: It's possible the media really is stupid and thinks Trump is a buffoon, but even if the media thought Trump was the second coming of god they'd still try to convince the public he's a buffoon.
If you know any journalist types, then you'll know they're really actually that stupid. Maybe the guys at the top understand Trump's ability, but I have no trouble believing that the rank and file journalists think that they're more capable than Trump.
Journalism has largely gone the way of high school teaching as a job for talentless hacks.
Taking in account the fact that Bill Kristol probably sees Israel as his true Fatherland, it's easy to see that he's not really a cuck. He's a patriot, albeit an incredibly stupid Jewish patriot.
(06-01-2016 09:48 AM)scorpion Wrote: I find it incredible that the media buffoons STILL do not recognize this fact. I have been pointing this out since last August. These people really are incredibly stupid.
That interpretation rests on the idea that the media possess a modicum of honestly and "report" things based on their own honest assessment of the situation. I find it much more likely that the media recognizes Trump's brilliance and astounding success, but criticizes him for ineptitude and failure anyway in order to try and brainwash the public to be skeptical of him.
Let's face it, this is a battle and the media is on the other side, so of course it's going to attack Trump. As an example, if I'm a defense lawyer, I'm going to disparage and question the integrity of the prosecution's star witness regardless of whether I know him to be a paragon of moral virtue. My job is to destroy the witness, not to give the jury my honest assessment of him. The same thing with our bought and paid for media.
TLDR: It's possible the media really is stupid and thinks Trump is a buffoon, but even if the media thought Trump was the second coming of god they'd still try to convince the public he's a buffoon.
This explanation is much more likely. Liberals are overrepresented in the media so naturally you will have an anti-Trump bias and an anti-Republican bias in general, they are just spreading a (or their) political agenda.
That being said, most of them likely didn't foresee Trump's succes, regardless of which ideology they adhere to, because they live in a bubble and they are so used to the scripted, politically correct politicians, both on the Democratic and Republican side.
I recall that a reporter got money from the Clintons, I think it was that guy with the Greek name.
(06-01-2016 09:48 AM)Enoch Wrote: Alright, let's get this straight. Bill Kristol couldn't find anyone to run for President so he asked the guy in the cubicle next to him?
PS Bill Kristol spent Memorial Day in Israel. What a Patriot.
When I saw who Kristol had landed, my first instinct was that he should take a celebratory trip to Israel. Then I read in the same article that he was ALREADY in Israel
(06-01-2016 11:06 AM)Dusty Wrote: Some of David French's writings:
Wonder what he thinks about the ghetto black and Hispanic communities Dems are catering to with more budget spending and gibs. Of course he wouldn't talk about those, he's so scared of being called a racist he even adopted an african child to project his high morals. The tribe knows a traitor and a cuck when it sees one.
David French's writings remind me of my favorite Trump quote, "The pundits say the voters are stupid. Trump says he loves them. And the pundits are legitimately shocked that Trump is winning."
(06-01-2016 09:06 AM)scorpion Wrote: *Donald Trump, a political novice who has never before held elective office, wins the Republican primary in unprecedented fashion, totally vanquishing his 16 rivals, winning every debate and utterly dominating the news cycle for the entire past year*
Mainstream media response: "Donald Trump's campaign is totally inept!"
Is it possible to be more detached from reality?
When they tell you that, just reply:
Imagine then, the results if he was a seasoned politician. The show would have lasted only 2 primaries.
Imagine the results if his campaign was not "inept".
Even more perplexing than the journalists that think Trump is inept (which CLEARLY he is not) are the morons who think Trump is Crooked Hillary's controlled opposition. Seriously, who could be so stupid as to believe that?
Trump hasn't even started on Hillary yet (I can't wait for that to happen, though) but he's already raised some serious questions about the character (or lack thereof) of the Clintons and has brought attention (through Katrina Pierson) to an old interview of hers where she basically delights in getting a man off the hook on child molestation charges. Do you really think if he were under her control she'd be OK with anything like that being brought up?!
Trump plays second fiddle to no one, CERTAINLY not Crooked Hillary. It's obvious to anyone with half a brain that Trump is his own man.
(06-01-2016 09:48 AM)scorpion Wrote: I find it incredible that the media buffoons STILL do not recognize this fact. I have been pointing this out since last August. These people really are incredibly stupid.
That interpretation rests on the idea that the media possess a modicum of honestly and "report" things based on their own honest assessment of the situation. I find it much more likely that the media recognizes Trump's brilliance and astounding success, but criticizes him for ineptitude and failure anyway in order to try and brainwash the public to be skeptical of him.
Let's face it, this is a battle and the media is on the other side, so of course it's going to attack Trump. As an example, if I'm a defense lawyer, I'm going to disparage and question the integrity of the prosecution's star witness regardless of whether I know him to be a paragon of moral virtue. My job is to destroy the witness, not to give the jury my honest assessment of him. The same thing with our bought and paid for media.
TLDR: It's possible the media really is stupid and thinks Trump is a buffoon, but even if the media thought Trump was the second coming of god they'd still try to convince the public he's a buffoon.
This explanation is much more likely. Liberals are overrepresented in the media so naturally you will have an anti-Trump bias and an anti-Republican bias in general, they are just spreading a (or their) political agenda.
That being said, most of them likely didn't foresee Trump's succes, regardless of which ideology they adhere to, because they live in a bubble and they are so used to the scripted, politically correct politicians, both on the Democratic and Republican side.
I recall that a reporter got money from the Clintons, I think it was that guy with the Greek name.
The reason for the media bias is essentially economic. Traditional media companies like newspapers and TV networks are dying economically, and the new ones like Facebook and Twitter have failed to find a way to monetize. So what these companies have done is follow the model of the CBC up here in Canada. The CBC people understand that their economic survival depends on government subsidies, because they can't compete in the free market, so they pick a political side, and that side is the left side. They do this with the hope and faith that left-leaning politicians will throw them a bone after winning power, and their strategy always pays off. The media companies fear the right-leaning political parties because fiscal conservatives frown on government subsidies, so the choice is always clear to the media... the left is their only hope. The rise of independent individual media stars like Milo, Cerno, Roosh, Vox Day, and Trump himself has effectively countered this economic bias and it scares the shit out of both the old and the new media conglomerates. Their days are numbered now. The victory of the tag-team of Hulk Hogan and Peter Thiel is an especially frightening attack on these parasites, because it shows a new trend of free individuals TEAMING UP to combat their bias. The game is over. The reverence we once had for "The Media" is all but gone. The curtain is pulled back. There is no wizard. Only the old Luddite baby boomers still clinging to dinosaur television news and newspapers remain standing in resistance to the revolution, and they are old and weak and even they are vulnerable to the red-pill. It's all over for the left-leaning media but the crying.
22Kill $ 200,000
Achilles International Inc. 200,000
American Hero Adventures 100,000
Americans for Equal Living 100,000
America’s Vetdogs - The Veterans K9 Corps Inc. 75,000
AMVETS 75,000
Armed Services YMCA of the USA 75,000
Bob Woodruff Family Foundation Inc. 75,000
Central Iowa Shelter and Services 100,000
Connected Warriors Inc. 75,000
Disabled American Veterans Charitable Service Trust 115,000
Fisher House Foundation 115,000
Folds of Honor Foundation 200,000
Foundation for American Veterans 75,000
Freedom Alliance 75,000
Green Beret Foundation 350,000
Hire Heroes USA 75,000
Homes for Our Troops 50,000
Honoring America’s Warriors 100,000
Hope for the Warriors 65,000
Intrepid Fallen Heroes Fund 175,000
K9s for Warriors 50,000
Liberty House 100,000
Marine Corps- Law Enforcement Foundation 1,100,000
Navy Seal Foundation 465,000
Navy-Marine Corps Relief Society 75,000
New Englands Wounded Veterans Inc. 75,000
Operation Homefront 65,000
Partners for Patriots 100,000
Project for Patriots (*) 100,000
Puppy Jake Foundation 100,000
Racing for Heroes Inc. 200,000
Support Siouxland Soldiers 100,000
Task Force Dagger Foundation 50,000
The Mission Continues 75,000
The National Military Family Association Inc. 75,000
Veterans Airlift Command 100,000
Veterans Count 25,000
Veterans-In-Command Inc. 150,000
Vietnam Veterans Workshop Inc. 75,000
Warriors for Freedom Foundation 50,000
Total $ 5,600,000
Donald J. Trump Veteran Fundraiser
(*)The above has been earmarked for Project for Patriots, Inc. and will be released to them upon their receipt of their IRS determination letter.
Bill Kristol: A never was. Who gives a shit about him or anyone he backs?
Kristol's affection for French is a bit too romantic (he finds it beyond dreamy). I suspect a homosexual relationship, or at least lust on Kristol's part.
Come on guys, don't hate the player, hate the game. Bill Kristol and his kind have been wildly successful. They have managed to completely clip the nuts from the American right and pave the way for total leftist takeover of the world's most powerful nation, which was always their objective. And what did it cost them, a few million dollars over the course of a couple decades? They have taken down the leviathan for the price of one or two tomahawk cruise missiles. Sure they had a major (and prerequisite) assist from their tribal counterparts in finance and the mainstream media, but it's still pretty impressive.
So yeah, hate Kristol because he's your enemy, but don't hate him for being "stupid" because that's just sour grapes.
(06-01-2016 12:40 PM)Last Parade Wrote: Watch this all the way through (59 seconds). You won't be disappointed!
Univision and Telemundo inflate these people ego, they are told how powerful they are because they have big numbers, but when it comes down to reality, they are nothings, they can't vote, it does not matter how much they complain, Democrats have been pushing for illegals to vote for this same reason, they (illegals) are a active group but as you can see they protest all the time against Trump, but the lack of voting power make them useless at the end of the day.
(06-01-2016 10:12 AM)Fast Eddie Wrote: That interpretation rests on the idea that the media possess a modicum of honestly and "report" things based on their own honest assessment of the situation. I find it much more likely that the media recognizes Trump's brilliance and astounding success, but criticizes him for ineptitude and failure anyway in order to try and brainwash the public to be skeptical of him.
Let's face it, this is a battle and the media is on the other side, so of course it's going to attack Trump. As an example, if I'm a defense lawyer, I'm going to disparage and question the integrity of the prosecution's star witness regardless of whether I know him to be a paragon of moral virtue. My job is to destroy the witness, not to give the jury my honest assessment of him. The same thing with our bought and paid for media.
TLDR: It's possible the media really is stupid and thinks Trump is a buffoon, but even if the media thought Trump was the second coming of god they'd still try to convince the public he's a buffoon.
I don't disagree. Indeed, I think they would be doing that if needed. But I don't even think they have to force themselves to write bad things about Trump. It really just comes naturally due to a combination of stupidity and being trapped in the DC/NY media bubble where they are only exposed to other people like themselves (liberal, effete, snobbish, overeducated aka brainwashed by universities, Jewish/anti-white, atheist, feminist, etc...). They've so thoroughly ingested the liberal/SJW worldview (which is not based in reality) that they've lost touch with reality. In this case there isn't even a conspiracy required. These people are just so fucking high on their own supply that they've essentially lost their minds. They've basically been reduced to pointing and shrieking at Trump at this point.
(06-01-2016 09:48 AM)scorpion Wrote: I find it incredible that the media buffoons STILL do not recognize this fact. I have been pointing this out since last August. These people really are incredibly stupid.
That interpretation rests on the idea that the media possess a modicum of honestly and "report" things based on their own honest assessment of the situation. I find it much more likely that the media recognizes Trump's brilliance and astounding success, but criticizes him for ineptitude and failure anyway in order to try and brainwash the public to be skeptical of him.
Let's face it, this is a battle and the media is on the other side, so of course it's going to attack Trump. As an example, if I'm a defense lawyer, I'm going to disparage and question the integrity of the prosecution's star witness regardless of whether I know him to be a paragon of moral virtue. My job is to destroy the witness, not to give the jury my honest assessment of him. The same thing with our bought and paid for media.
TLDR: It's possible the media really is stupid and thinks Trump is a buffoon, but even if the media thought Trump was the second coming of god they'd still try to convince the public he's a buffoon.
Let’s dispel with this fiction that the media doesn’t know what they’re doing. They know exactly what they’re doing. They are undertaking a systematic effort to change this country, to make America more like the rest of the world.
Still trying to grasp the point of the RENEGADE!!!! movement. A bunch of last election's neocons choosing a failed candidate to derail Trump and do what exactly? Are they just bitter at Trump and want him to lose, or is this one last chance to steal foolish donors' money?
On a side note, I found this interesting fact about David French not letting his wife use facebook or speak to other men while he was deployed in Iraq. While his candidacy is laughable, I have to give red pill credit where it's due:
Quote:There would be no drinking during the year of separation. Nancy would not “have phone conversations with men, or meaningful e-mail exchanges about politics or any other subject.” Nor would she be on Facebook, where “the ghosts of boyfriends past” could contact her. When Nancy innocently started e-mailing about faith with a man associated with a radio show she was on, she told David about it, and he asked her to end the relationship. David knew, with his “stomach clenching,” that “the most intimate conversations a person has are about life and faith” — and that “spiritual and emotional intimacy frequently leads to physical intimacy.”