Hillary is toast. Not too long ago, I have mentioned that she is fighting a war on three fronts. Right now, as of this moment, the amount of fronts has increased to FIVE:


1. Bernie. Self explanatory.

2. Trump. Self explanatory.

3. Very likely that she will answer to someone about the e mail leak.

4. Clinton Foundation scams/money laundering

5. Billy boy's sexual escapades. This is probably the MOST important thing. Why I am saying this? Because she tries to make women vote for her. But, if you are married to a husband that is a womanizer, can you REALLY court women? I do not think so.


Oh, one more thing.


Take a look at Hillary - especially at her body language, tactics she is using and tone.

She is afraid, and very very tired. A woman her age is enjoying being with her grandchildren at home, and watching Mexican soap operas reruns, not running for office.

Her PR tactics are desperate, as we saw. She tried everything, and failed, most recently in NYT.

And tone? Just listen to her, and you will notice (remember the constant coughing in one of her videos).


She is done. She knows it, Palpatine knows it and Trump knows it.

So do we.

One more scandal, and I would not be suprised if she drops out.

That Fox Poll also showed Trump's "unfavoribility" rating dropped, and Clinton's rose.

But of course, remember this is still very early on. Things get a lot different after the convention.

Let's hope Trump doesn't peak too early.

Rapist isn't the right word. Not an insignificant number of women fantasize about rapists.

Sex offender is much better.

PS. Would take Jeff Epstein's plane to his private island.

(05-18-2016 06:19 PM)Irenicus Wrote:  Hillary is toast. Not too long ago, I have mentioned that she is fighting a war on three fronts. Right now, as of this moment, the amount of fronts has increased to FIVE:


1. Bernie. Self explanatory.

2. Trump. Self explanatory.

3. Very likely that she will answer to someone about the e mail leak.

4. Clinton Foundation scams/money laundering

5. Billy boy's sexual escapades. This is probably the MOST important thing. Why I am saying this? Because she tries to make women vote for her. But, if you are married to a husband that is a womanizer, can you REALLY court women? I do not think so.

Don't forget a potential SIXTH front, that Trump can re-ignite at any moment of his chosen: the Benghazi front.

A front that will expose her on:
Blatant disregard for American civil and military servants' lives and survival. Dissimulation of guilt by scheming and lying with complicity from MSM. Taking the American public for a ride. Incapacity of recognizing foreign threats. Absolute coldness of heart...

Ann Coulter did some classic trolling:
Trump’s Problem with Women

Quote:The New York Times’ front-page article last Saturday on Donald J. Trump’s dealings with women forced me into a weekend of self-examination. As much as I support Trump, this isn’t a cult of personality. He’s not Mao, Kim Jong-un or L. Ron Hubbard. We can like our candidates, but still acknowledge their flaws. No one’s perfect.
I admit there are some things about Trump that give me pause. I’m sure these will come out eventually, so I’m just going to list them.

First — and this is corroborated by five contemporaneous witnesses — in 1978, Trump violently raped Juanita Broaddrick in a Little Rock, Arkansas, hotel room, then, as he was leaving, looked at her bloody lip and said, “Better put some ice on that” — oh wait, I’m terribly sorry. Did I say Trump? I didn’t mean Trump, I meant Bill Clinton.

Hang on — here we go! Knowing full well about Bill Clinton’s proclivity to sexually assault women, about three weeks after that rape, Trump cornered Broaddrick at a party and said, pointedly, “I just want you to know how much Bill and I appreciate the things you do for him. Do you understand? Everything you do.”

No! My mistake! That wasn’t Trump either. That was Hillary Clinton… But this next one I’m sure was Trump.

In the early 1990s, Trump invited a young female staffer to his hotel room at the Excelsior Hotel in Little Rock, dropped his pants and said, “Kiss it” — WAIT A SECOND!

I don’t know how this keeps happening. That was Bill Clinton. Please bear with me — it’s late at night and my notes are jumbled.

As CEO of an organization, Trump had a female employee, just months out of her teens, perform oral sex on him while he made business calls. That girl’s name was Monica Lewin– No! Wrong again! That was Bill Clinton, too! Please don’t stop reading. Let me find my Trump notes…

What I meant was that Trump was the one who later smeared that girl as a delusional stalker. She may have volunteered for the sex — at around age 20 — but Monica Lewinsky didn’t volunteer to be slandered! And yet this fiend, this user-of-women, this retrograde misogynist, Donald Trump, deployed his journalist friends, like Sidney Blumenthal, to spread rumors that Monica was a stalker, trying to blackmail the president.

Oh, boy — this is embarrassing. This must seem very sloppy. That wasn’t Trump either; it was Hillary Clinton.

There must be something here that was Trump… Here! I have one.

When an attractive woman desperately in need of a job came to Trump’s office in 1993, instead of helping, he lunged at her, kissed her on the mouth, grabbed her breast and put her hand on his genitals. He later told a mistress that the claim was absurd because the woman, Kathleen Willey, had such small breasts.

Uh-oh — you’re not going to believe this, but — yep, that was Bill Clinton.

This one, I’m sure was Trump. In January 1992, Trump went on 60 Minutes to slime nightclub singer Gennifer Flowers, knowing full well she was telling the truth. He implied she belonged in a loony bin, telling millions of viewers “every time she called, distraught… she said sort of wacky things.”

Dammit! I don’t know how this keeps happening. That wasn’t Trump! That was Hillary, smearing one of her husband’s sexual conquests.

Let’s just go back to the Times‘ story, based on months of investigation and interviews with hundreds of women. I’ll give it to you straight: When Trump was at the New York Military Academy as a teenager, one person who knew him said — and this is corroborated by two other witnesses: “Donald was extremely sensitive to whether or not the women he invited to campus were pretty.”

I almost threw up reading that. I am physically ill.

==

Clinton Rape Accuser Juanita Broaddrick: NY Times Should Interview Bill’s Alleged Female Victims
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidenti...d-victims/

[quoe]I wish that they would use the same amount of energy to interview the hundreds of women that Bill Clinton has probably spoken bad words about and the many women that he has assaulted. I think a person’s own actions and what they do to women speaks much louder than a person’s hearsay and words.[/quote]

(05-18-2016 06:17 PM)redonion Wrote:  So Trump has swung this thing 10 points in ONE month? That poll is just registered voters too.

This is huge right?

I believe its pronounced YUGE!

There is a chance if Pantsuit keeps tanking much further that the establishment will yank her and send out Biden with Squaw Liz. I mean she's not going climb out of that hole, with all this baggage piling up.

http://dujour.com/news/melania-trump-interview/

Interview with Melania. She seems to truly be a "unicorn." Feminists are exploding at the prospect of her being the first lady.

(05-18-2016 06:11 PM)Liberty Sea Wrote:  Trump released a list of potential SCOTUS pick:
http://elections.ap.org/content/trump-un...t-justices

HOPEFULLY whoever the Emperor nominates will remain conservative and not "evolve" or "grow" a.k.a. veer radically left, like so many GOP judicial picks do.

I'd love to see Roberts ousted. Trump clearly doesn't like him. He needs to be told to retire. He can go out a hero and say "A SCOTUS judgeship ISN'T a lifetime job." Which is true.

Clinton surrogate on Trump: 'More ugly women in America than attractive women'
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/pres...in-america

Quote:A Hillary Clinton surrogate said Donald Trump’s controversial remarks regarding women will hurt him in November because "there are probably more ugly women in America than attractive women."

Ed Rendell, the former governor of Pennsylvania, is the chairman of the Philadelphia 2016 Host Committee for this July’s Democratic National Convention.

Rendell was speaking with The Washington Post about the appeal Trump may have with working-class Democrats in the Philadelphia suburbs.

He acknowledged Trump could win some of those voters but said he will ultimately lose among Republican female voters because of his past comments.

“For every one he’ll lose 1 1/2, two Republican women. Trump’s comments like ‘You can’t be a 10 if you’re flat-chested,’ that’ll come back to haunt him,” Rendell said in the interview. “There are probably more ugly women in America than attractive women. People take that stuff personally.”

Post reporter David Weigel, who penned the Wednesday story, tweeted that he “did not intend that” after The Associated Press first picked up Rendell’s quote, adding he thought the former governor “was making a funny point.”

Is he actively trying to ruin Hillary's campaign? Trump should hap on this.

(05-18-2016 08:06 PM)Liberty Sea Wrote:  Clinton surrogate on Trump: 'More ugly women in America than attractive women'
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/pres...in-america

Quote:A Hillary Clinton surrogate said Donald Trump’s controversial remarks regarding women will hurt him in November because "there are probably more ugly women in America than attractive women."

Ed Rendell, the former governor of Pennsylvania, is the chairman of the Philadelphia 2016 Host Committee for this July’s Democratic National Convention.

Rendell was speaking with The Washington Post about the appeal Trump may have with working-class Democrats in the Philadelphia suburbs.

He acknowledged Trump could win some of those voters but said he will ultimately lose among Republican female voters because of his past comments.

“For every one he’ll lose 1 1/2, two Republican women. Trump’s comments like ‘You can’t be a 10 if you’re flat-chested,’ that’ll come back to haunt him,” Rendell said in the interview. “There are probably more ugly women in America than attractive women. People take that stuff personally.”

Post reporter David Weigel, who penned the Wednesday story, tweeted that he “did not intend that” after The Associated Press first picked up Rendell’s quote, adding he thought the former governor “was making a funny point.”

Is he actively trying to ruin Hillary's campaign? Trump should hap on this.

Would be gold if Trump retweeted with a reply "There's a lot more attractive women than ugly women in the US, as you'll see when I win."

As a business owner with a degree in Economics, I think about the effects of a Trump presidency to our country's economy. At the top of the docket is his trade policies---right up there with the tax cuts of course---specifically in bringing manufacturing back to the US.

One of the specific things Trump has mentioned is bringing the manufacturing of iphones back into the US. I think this would be great for the economy and as a recent post in LinkedIn stated, is actually quite do-able:

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/donald-tr...vek-wadhwa

The post is not pro-Trump in a big way but gives Trump the benefit of the doubt. It postulates that this can be done by leveraging robotics and automation to do the lower level tasks. This means that this won't bring back all the jobs from China--it won't be a 1-to-1 move but if it brings back half of the manufacturing jobs that Apple has in China, it would be a significant boost to our economy.

The post also mentions that Apple is planning to build an iPhone manufacturing plant in India. This lines up with Tim Cook's trip to India this week and the mention in the media that India is going to be the next huge market for Iphones since China's iPhone sales are tanking. Iphones were never a bestseller in China or the rest of the world for that matter. The US is the biggest iPhone market with 50% of smartphones while Android phones take up 90-93% of smartphone sales in the rest of the world.

Which brings me to something that isn't really mentioned in these trade discussions--if a company manufactures products in other countries to sell these products outside the US, trade tariffs won't make a difference in bending that company's decision to bring back manufacturing to the US.

The Apple example is good because iPhones manufactured in China (or wherever) get mostly shipped to the US as we are the largest buyers of iPhones. But Apple can still keep some manufacturing done in China or India because these units would be sold outside the US and tariffs won't affect their sale.

He is right though. There are A LOT more ugly women than attractive women in America. Probably 10-15% are attractive.

Apparently Megan wrote a book about her and Trump. "Settle for more".

delete

I know I am not supposed to be posting in here. I did not see anyone mention this however. Joni Ernst is one of the co-sponsors of the Campus Accountability and Safety Act along with Cuck Rubio.

(05-18-2016 08:55 PM)captain_shane Wrote:  He is right though. There are A LOT more ugly women than attractive women in America. Probably 10-15% are attractive.

Of course....but all women think they are attractive and want to think of themselves as being beautiful, what percentage of women do you think consider themselves ugly....10-15%? It would be a masterful reframe for Trump to align himself with Truth&Beauty, and by calling his side the beautiful and attractive side, juxtaposed with Hillary's Island of Misfit LGBTQ bowling shoe ugly side, who wouldn't want to join?

(05-18-2016 06:30 PM)Enoch Wrote:  Rapist isn't the right word. Not an insignificant number of women fantasize about rapists.

Sex offender is much better.

PS. Would take Jeff Epstein's plane to his private island.

Pedophile works too. Bill Clinton is a pedophile.

(05-18-2016 09:33 PM)eskimobobseal Wrote:  

(05-18-2016 06:30 PM)Enoch Wrote:  Rapist isn't the right word. Not an insignificant number of women fantasize about rapists.

Sex offender is much better.

PS. Would take Jeff Epstein's plane to his private island.

Pedophile works too. Bill Clinton is a pedophile.

I'd say the tag applied to himpreviously is a good one -- "Creepy" Bill Clinton. Works better since he's looking ancient now, doesn't require proof, and goes for the female amydgala by accessing an emotional response. It's handy to use a SJW content-free epithet against one of their own for once.

Quote: “There are probably more ugly women in America than attractive women. People take that stuff personally.”

Yeah, tell me about it.

Nate Silver's mea culpa: "How I Acted Like A Pundit And Screwed Up On Donald Trump"

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-...ald-trump/

May 18, 2016. Somebody needs to update that image with the series of Nate Silver fuck-ups re: Trump to include this, I guess.

Article's not even worth reading, just worth laughing at him.

(05-18-2016 10:15 PM)Last Parade Wrote:  Nate Silver's mea culpa: "How I Acted Like A Pundit And Screwed Up On Donald Trump"

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-...ald-trump/

May 18, 2016. Somebody needs to update that image with the series of Nate Silver fuck-ups re: Trump to include this, I guess.

Article's not even worth reading, just worth laughing at him.

I can summarise the article: "I freely admit I didn't look at any statistical analysis whatsoever when I said Trump wouldn't win."

(05-18-2016 07:42 PM)Libertas Wrote:  http://dujour.com/news/melania-trump-interview/

Interview with Melania. She seems to truly be a "unicorn." Feminists are exploding at the prospect of her being the first lady.

Just got around to reading this, two pages later in case anyone missed it the first time - def worth checking out.

Love these parts (bolded emphasis is mine):

Quote:Of the GQ article, Melania says: “I have thick skin. It doesn’t bother me if they write about me because I know who I am. But what right does the reporter have to go and dig in court in Slovenia in 1960 about my parents? They’re private citizens. If they go after me, it’s different. But to do that, it’s a little bit nasty, it’s a little bit mean.” So if people put a swastika on my face once this article comes out, will she denounce them?

“I don’t control my fans,” Melania says, “but I don’t agree with what they’re doing. I understand what you mean, but there are people out there who maybe went too far. She provoked them.”

Quote:“He’s out there. He has so much going on. It isn’t about her yet. She has always said, when and if the time comes, she will step up. She’s a wife and a mother until that day comes.”

fuck yeah. Empress Melania, so good.

hey, page 1300... neat.

yay page 1300

   

Nate Silver is an example of someone who people with IQ of 100-120 think is brilliant. Nassim Nicholas Taleb is an example of someone who is actually brilliant, but the population of IQ 120+ people who can actually recognise this isn't large enough to make him a popular pundit.