I am not really sure how not getting support from establishment cucks like Jeb! and Paul Ryan is such a bad thing anyways, the American people are sick of the people we have currently in Washington that get nothing done.

(05-07-2016 12:35 AM)Horus Wrote:  ^^^ Jesus. Is he sick? It looks like he has AIDS.

He has to live with Hillary, you'd look like that too.

(05-07-2016 01:18 AM)Canopus Wrote:  

OMG, that is just, like, so totally clever. That's, like, a whole two syllables longer than the insults Trump uses. #HillaryForAmerica

(05-07-2016 12:35 AM)Horus Wrote:  ^^^ Jesus. Is he sick? It looks like he has AIDS.

He had a come to Jesus moment and became a health nut. Vegetarian or Vegan. Its his life now.

I remember someone said he looks like a skeleton with a Bill Clinton mask on. I got a laugh out of that.

Maybe he looks like an AIDS patient with a Bill Clinton mask on.

I like "Loopey Liz" for Warren the native Indian.

The Thor God Trump has to just keep his focus on the prize - wiping out Corrupt Hillary in the general election...

Shrillery is just jealous that Melania is getting what Huma Abadien can't give her as her fister sister.

True Trump brillance:

http://www.americanpatriotdaily.com/late...n-hillary/

Donald Trump Shut Down A Liberal TV Host With This Attack On Hillary

Donald Trump provided a glimpse of the “always-stay-on-offense” attitude many of his supporters hoped he would bring into a general election race against Hillary Clinton.

He has refused to play the media’s “gotcha” games — and that makes him a true wild card as a candidate.

But it was when he spun the liberal media’s attacks on him into a zinger against Hillary that turned heads across the political spectrum.

In an interview with CNN’s Wolf Blitzer, Blizter tried to tar Trump with his past statements about Barack Obama not being born in the United States.

However, rather than accept the left-wing host’s premise, Trump fired back.

Trump pointed out that the origins of the “birther” movement came from the Hillary Clinton campaign in 2008.

USA Today reports:

“Do you know who started the birther movement?” Trump responded after the clip aired. “Do you know who questioned his birth certificate? One of the first, Hillary Clinton. She’s the one that started it, she brought it up years before it was brought up by me.”

It’s a fact the media has long ignored.

The accusations that Barack Obama was born in Kenya originated with supporters of Hillary Clinton during her 2008 primary campaign against then Senator Obama.

Politico reports:

Then, as Obama marched toward the presidency, a new suggestion emerged: That he was not eligible to serve.

That theory first emerged in the spring of 2008, as Clinton supporters circulated an anonymous email questioning Obama’s citizenship.

“Barack Obama’s mother was living in Kenya with his Arab-African father late in her pregnancy. She was not allowed to travel by plane then, so Barack Obama was born there and his mother then took him to Hawaii to register his birth,” asserted one chain email that surfaced on the urban legend site Snopes.com in April 2008.

The liberal media sweeps this theory under the rug and pretends that Republicans were the originators of the attack.

But the truth of the matter is Democrats cooked up the theory Obama was ineligible to serve because he was allegedly born in Kenya.

And in his CNN interview, Trump refused to take the bait and instead turned the tables on the Democrats.

If Hillary tries to attack him for his past “birtherism” statements, he is going to turn it right around on her.

Media members routinely ask Republicans to answer for outlandish statements by even their most obscure supporters, and they usually curl up in a fetal position and absorb the attacks.

If this interview is any indication, Trump will not back down in the face of any smears by Hillary or the liberal media — and instead will hit back twice as hard.

It’s been a generation since the GOP had a nominee who wasn’t afraid to stand up and take the fight to the Democrats.

Now this is some funny shit:

(04-17-2016 07:27 PM)TheBMan Wrote:  My guess was he was going to use "Corrupt Hillary." Crooked Hillary works for me.

you're not wrong.

I wish Trump had gone with "Say Anything Hillary". Every thing from then on would be an affirmation that she'll say anything from having hot sauce in her purse to "it was a video that caused the attacks".

Then of course any attack from her would be viewed through the lens of "She's probably lying she'll say anything".

Bill Kristol is looking to put together a 3rd party candidate:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2...atism.html

Quote:Weekly Standard founder Bill Kristol called for a third party candidate to launch a challenge against presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump and the Democratic party's eventual nominee in an interview on MSNBC. Kristol floated Republican Nebraska Sen. Ben Sasse as a possible candidate.

"I would like to have a conservative to vote for," Kristol said in an interview with NBC's Andrea Mitchell this afternoon. "I think an awful lot of people in the country would including a lot of moderates and conservatives... We have two candidates who are viewed by considerable majorities in an unfavorable way, not a favorable way, as the major party nominees."

"Can't we do better?" Kristol asked. "I think we can and I hope a serious, independent candidate steps forward and I think that candidate can surprise, that candidate can do well."

Kristol was asked who that candidate would be and threw out the name Sen. Ben Sasse.

"Maybe someone who's a senior statesman type. But I think Ben Sasse, a young Senator, a conservative Senator, but who's really an independent-minded conservative Senator. If he can launch, there will be a lot of money, a lot of operatives, a lot of legal services volunteered to get him on the ballot across the country," he answered.

"Imagine a debate with Hillary Clinton, and Donald Trump, and somebody like Ben Sasse," Kristol said. "I think an awful lot of Americans could look up and say, wait a minute, can't we do better. We can do better than Hillary and Donald. What about Sasse and what about others like him?"

When asked if he would support Clinton, Kristol said "I really don't think I would."

"I think nominating Donald Trump will likely elect Hillary Clinton, and I don't think Donald Trump should be president. So the argument that, gee, you might hurt Donald Trump. Well, fine. I'm not adverse to helping stop Donald Trump from becoming president. I prefer that not result in a Hillary Clinton presidency," Kristol said Thursday.

"I've voted for Republicans in every election in my entire adult lifetime," Kristol said. "I think 11 times. The idea that Donald Trump will be the Republican nominee for six months, unchallenged as the spokesman for the Republican party. And in a way unchallenged as the face of conservatism in America. This is a movement and a party that I have been pretty proud to be part of and I think lots of people are proud of. Its made mistakes, it has had its ups and downs."

"It's really important that Trump not be the face of American conservatism or the Republican party," Kristol told Mitchell.

Bill Kristol is a giant self-serving snake whose loyalty does not lie with America.

Guys, Facebook instructed me to discuss this with friends:



What's your advice? How can we help this poor guy?

(05-07-2016 01:37 AM)Horus Wrote:  OMG, that is just, like, so totally clever. That's, like, a whole two syllables longer than the insults Trump uses. #HillaryForAmerica

I'm guessing it's already being described as an 'amazing' and 'hilarious' nickname by liberal girls.

Today's random thoughts after catching up:

1. Paul Ryan and the rest of the GOP cucks better get the fuck on the Trump Train ASAP. Malcontents should not be tolerated. Trump has extended an olive branch to everyone to get on board. If they slap him in the face, the Trump Train should run them over. These fuckers don't even deserve a shot at redemption.

2. Elizabeth Warren's Native American "heritage" gives me a good laugh. I use to know white looking chicks like her who would play up their NA "heritage" strictly to get a boost in college admissions/college money and/or access to government benefits. They made no qualms about what the intended purpose was. They gave zero fucks about the tribe, Indian affairs, or cultural history. I just did some brief research and she claims she is like 1/32 Cherokee or something but doesn't even have the proof to back it up. What a joke. I guarantee you too that Sanders will pick her as his VP candidate if the democrat primaries drag out far enough or Hillary gets eliminated for whatever reason.

3. I love the libtards/SJWs threatening to move to Canada. I really hope they go through with it. As someone else said in this thread way back, the best response when you hear that "threat" from someone is: "Why not move to Mexico?"

3. I'm pretty much on cruise mode until the convention and particularly, the first general election debate. The first GE debate will be HUGE and any democrat vs Trump polls are largely pointless until that debate happens. The first debate typically marks when the nation as whole gets really involved in the Presidential election process and if Trump massacres the likely democrat candidate (Hillary) on live TV, it's going to destroy every preconceive notion about bullshit stuff people are bringing up now like demographic percentages and Trump's alleged tough uphill battle in a general election.

I think the real battle is the GOP's Reformation pre and even post-general election. We need more Jeff Sessions' and Duncan Hunter's and less Paul Ryan's and Lindsey Graham's in Congress. A President Trump is still not a King and he will need Congressional allies; not faggot traitors working against him who would passively or actively side with democrats.

Personally, I think Trump has this in the bang already (winning the general election, I mean) and he will crush any opponent thrown this way. Hillary, Biden, Sanders, Warren, a tranny hispanic, who gives a fuck. It's going to be a BLOODBATH regardless who the democrat candidate is. If Hillary is his opponent, we will be privilege to witness probably the greatest political smackdown in modern history.

Let's stick to simple key facts - one of the current reality and one based on 2012 election past reality

Current reality: GOP primary numbers are WAY up; democrat primary numbers are way down.

Past reality: Colorado, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Ohio, and Florida in the general were all states that went for Obama in 2012 with less than 5 point leads against a weak GOP candidate. Trump could flip those states GOP VERY easily based on the aforementioned current reality of high GOP/low democrat turnout.

Combine that all with the fact that a Hillary vs Trump election clearly and obvious represents, even to many simpletons, the following:

1. Globalism vs nationalism
2. Militant feminism vs masculinity
3. More job losses vs job creation
4. Establishment vs anti-establishment
5. Nepotism/cronyism vs meritocracy
6. Political correctness vs political incorrectness
7. Illegal invasion and subversion of host culture vs preserving the host culture
8. Stupid high taxes for earners vs low taxes for earners
9. Stupid ass wars vs avoiding stupid wars
10. Incentivizing losers vs incentivizing winners

I ain't really that worry about the general election. The hardest battle has already been won (the GOP nomination).

camille paglia had some interesting quip about trump:
http://www.salon.com/2016/05/05/its_not_...he_elites/

Quote:In our current campaign, the obvious strategy by Democratic operatives to disrupt Donald Trump’s rallies and link him to brewing fascism (via lurid media images of wild-eyed brawlers) has backfired with a bang. The seething demonstrators who blocked Trump’s motorcade at last week’s state GOP convention in Burlingame, California, forcing him and his retinue to ditch their vehicles and sprint to a rear entrance on foot, managed to alienate mainstream voters, boost Trump’s national momentum, and guarantee his sweeping victory in this week’s Indiana primary. With the withdrawal of Ted Cruz, Trump is now the presumptive GOP nominee. Great job, Dem wizards!

The helicopter TV footage of Trump and his Secret Service detail on the move was certainly surreal. All those beefy men in shiny, dark suits rapidly filing through narrow concrete barriers (like cattle chutes at a rodeo) and then scrambling up a grassy knoll! It reminded me of the flight through the woods by scores of elegantly dressed Mafiosi after police raided the 1957 gangland convention in Apalachin, New York. (True, I have a special interest in that colorful event: Bartolo Guccia, who told the cops he was just delivering fish, ran his store out of the ground floor of my paternal grandparents’ house next to the Sons of Italy in nearby Endicott, my home town.) The optics of the aerial photos made Trump look like a late Roman emperor being hustled to safety by the Praetorian Guard, which over time had become a kingmaker, supplanting the authority of the Senate and the old patrician class.

Trump has knocked the stilts out from the GOP establishment and crushed the pretensions of a battalion of political commentators on both the Left and Right. Portraying him as a vile racist, illiterate boob, or the end of civilization as we know it hasn’t worked because his growing supporters are genuinely motivated by rational concerns about border security and bad trade deals. Whether Trump, with his erratic impulses and gratuitous crudities, can morph toward statesmanship remains to be seen. We don’t need another bumbling rube like George W. Bush, who bizarrely ambushed German chancellor Angela Merkel by grabbing and massaging her shoulders from behind as she was seated at a G8 Summit meeting in St. Petersburg in 2006.

The aerial view of Trump at Burlingame gave me a moment of gender vertigo. His odd, brassy blonde hairdo, which I normally think of as a retro Bobby Rydell quiff, looked from behind like a smoothly backcombed 1960’s era woman’s bouffant. Shelley Winters flashed into my mind, and then it hit me: “It’s all about his mother!” I had never seen photos of Mary MacLeod Trump (who died at 88 in 2000) and immediately looked for them. Of course, there it was—the puffy blonde bouffant to which Trump pays daily homage in his impudent straw thatch.


In their focus on Trump’s real-estate tycoon father, the media seem to have missed that the teetotaling Trump’s deepest connection was probably to his strong-willed, religious mother. Born in the stark, wind-swept Hebrides Islands off the western coast of Scotland (the next North Atlantic stop is Iceland), she was one tough cookie. She and her parents were Gaelic speakers, products of a history extending back to the medieval Viking raids. I suddenly realized that that is Trump’s style. He’s not a tribal Highlander, celebrated in Scotland’s long battle for independence from England, but a Viking, slashing, burning, and laughing at the carnage in his wake. (Think Kirk Douglas flashing his steely smile in the 1958 Hollywood epic, The Vikings.) Trump takes savage pleasure in winning for its own sake—an attribute that speaks directly to the moment, when a large part of the electorate feels that the U.S. has become timid and uncertain and made far too many humiliating concessions to authoritarian foreign powers like China, Saudi Arabia and Iran.

trump is possibly a descendant of the vikings raiding scottland and possibly got his haircut from his mom - paglia speculated.

is this the haircut that inspired trump?

Quote:This was very typical of Trump’s behaviour. One moment sunny, the next dark. I could feel a nervous tension in all those around him.
This fear contrasted sharply with his mother, Mary Macleod, brought up a crofter on the Hebridean island of Lewis.
Trump boasted she was so poor that when she arrived in America in the 1930s she was barefoot, and still barefoot when she met his father Fred Trump, the son of German immigrants, at a dance. Trump clearly worshipped her.
He took me to meet her in his Trump Tower penthouse. She was perfectly and expensively groomed. Now the shoes were by Chanel.
Her fingernails were a shiny scarlet, the hair coiffeured, her manner impeccable – the perfect wealthy American matron, all trace of the humble Scottish lass airbrushed away. A trophy mother.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...z47xk0ehMv

female game recognized.

----------
paglia rips hillary

Quote:And is there anything creepier than that current Hillary meme, the campaign slogan “I’m with her”? The blurred borderlines of those pronouns (“I” numbly dissolving into “her”) and that ambiguous preposition (“with” her like a child, a lover, or a nurse’s aide with a geriatric patient?) are close to pathological. The Hillary acolytes are joined at the hip to “her”, the Great Leader Who Needs No Name, the Maternal Tit daubed in wormwood, the bitter toxin left by men–those spoilers of the universe who created the master structures of modern civilization that provide us put-upon gals with jobs, transportation, abundant food, clean water, housing, electricity, and a magical disease-spurning municipal sewage system that only men seem required to clean and repair.

Hillary’s anti-male subtext, to which so many women voters are plainly drawn, flared into view last week when she crowed to CNN’s Jake Tapper about her proven skills in sex war: “I have a lot of experience dealing with men who sometimes get off the reservation in the way they behave and how they speak….I’m not going to deal with their temper tantrums or their bullying or their efforts to try to provoke me.” The prestige media tried to suppress Hillary’s gaffes here (which breezily insulted both men and Native Americans) by simply not reporting them. Her campaign deflected initial criticism, but she made no personal response until the issue kept escalating. Five days later, she sat down with MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell and incredibly claimed that she had been referring to Mayor Rudy Giuliani, Rep. Rick Lazio and Vladimir Putin—none of whom have had perceptible “temper tantrums” about her.

Conservative radio hosts like Rush Limbaugh, analyzing Hillary’s remarks as most mainstream journalists refused to do, interpreted them as a cloaked reference to her embattled life with her philandering husband. However, I assumed from the start that “temper tantrums” (a term applied to small children) was another of Hillary’s odd childhood flashbacks and that it described her ranting father’s abusive behavior toward his wife and family (detailed in Carl Bernstein’s 2007 biography, A Woman in Charge). It was her stoical mother who trained Hillary in the art of contemptuous endurance of men’s squalling infantilism. Women are noble, superior creatures; men are yapping dogs.

And as for “off the reservation”, wow—I guess Hillary should take a gander at John Ford’s classic Western, Fort Apache (1948), where John Wayne tangles with Henry Fonda as a U.S. Cavalry martinet vengefully pursuing the Native American “savages,” led by the famous Chiricahua Apache chief Cochise, who refuse to stay on the reservation decreed for them by the government during Westward expansion. The bloody Apache wars in Arizona were one of the darkest chapters in American history. But there you have Hillary’s gender theory in a nutshell: men are bums and bullies who belong in internment camps under female lock and key.

(05-07-2016 12:35 AM)Horus Wrote:  ^^^ Jesus. Is he sick? It looks like he has AIDS.

Hillary has a bad aura.

If we put Gary Coleman next to her, in a year, he would look like like he just got out from a gulag.

Crooked Hillary is absolutely horrible with optics, all her social media anti Trump plays comes across as retarded autism (whereas 4chan's Donald support is weaponized autism)

She's courting the neo-cons antitrump goofs, point this out to the bernbots and they'll switch to trump

(05-07-2016 12:33 AM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

(05-07-2016 12:03 AM)MMX2010 Wrote:  Would Rapist Bill Clinton work as a nickname?

(Not now, but in about two months when Bill Clinton's sexual past will be repeatedly discussed, as a weapon against Hillary Clinton.)

Creepy Bill Clinton.

Particularly as his SMV has plummeted since his days in the White House. No sexual attraction = no hamstering away his sexual misconduct.

From memory he's had some sort of heart surgery. But he's already got hand tremors, which is a symptom of any one of these:

- stroke
- traumatic brain injury
- Parkinson’s disease, a degenerative disease caused by loss of dopamine-producing brain cells
- multiple sclerosis, a condition in which your immune system attacks your brain and spinal cord
- alcoholism

Of them, Cigar Bill has only denied Parkinson's. Although living with the Iron Clit for thirty years in itself is likely to have been a traumatic brain injury.

Mitt Romney just met with Bill Kristol about a possible 3rd party challenge to Trump
http://www.bizpacreview.com/2016/05/07/m...ump-337587

(05-07-2016 12:03 AM)MMX2010 Wrote:  Would Rapist Bill Clinton work as a nickname?

(Not now, but in about two months when Bill Clinton's sexual past will be repeatedly discussed, as a weapon against Hillary Clinton.)

Alleged rapist would work, or "oft alleged rapist" if someone tries to say that Trump is against women somehow.

Edit,

Geez, Bill Clinton is vegan now, and lost a lot of weight. I am convinced that a vegan diet is not a healthy diet. You can have a lot of vegetables in your meals, but might want to mix in a piece of meat or chicken or fish as well.

Anti-Islamist Leader Geert Wilders Will Travel to GOP Convention to Support Donald Trump:

Now we're really cooking with gas. Let the fucking Bushes, Romneys, Ryans and the rest of their cuck ilk "boycott" the RNC. Wilders is the real fucking deal. This is big.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/05/...ald-trump/

(05-07-2016 09:48 AM)Liberty Sea Wrote:  http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/s...li=BBnb7Kz
Sanders says he will do everything in his power to prevent Trump from becoming president, even if he fails to become the nominee. If everything means everything, you can take it to mean that he would tell his voters not to vote for Trump, back Hillary or even serve as her VP if needed.

Of COURSE he will. Was there ever any doubt?

https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-54636...pid1257944

A few pages back we saw another cycle of pessimism and concern and I appreciate good criticism but this isn't it. Trump has been demolishing everything on his path from individual careers to entire companies' profit margins, and has given many people back their confidence to no longer submit to the chains of politically correctness.

Now, after becoming the presumptive nominee, he hires more people for his future fundraising. For this monumental challenge he needs money and he needs great people working the system to get that money. Who does he hire? Nobodies? If the entire system is rotten and you want to get the best people, you will obviously hire people that have worked for establishment institutions in the past.

Common sense.

He was just getting started. Now he wants to pull the whole thing down. He's gonna bring the whole fucking diseased corrupt temple down on their heads. It's gonna be biblical. For that he needs people that know how everything works, who have worked behind the curtains and understand who is really in charge there.

If you are ever worried again about Donald Trump being a phony, a trojan horse or a sell-out, remember these words. He has delivered a full-blown declaration of war and his opponents have certainly received that message loud and clear:

"We will no longer surrender this country, or its people to the false song of globalism. The nation-state remains -- the true foundation of peace and harmony."

This is not just some populist policies about trade and immigration control. This strikes at the very core of the internationalist elites that want to destroy all national borders, all cultural borders and have been working very diligently for years to accomplish that goal.

Trump, less than two weeks ago, has told them to go fuck themselves. That is what you need to remember because that shows you his loyalty without a doubt. Can he make bad decisions? Sure. But his intentions are crystal clear and he is on our side so we should be on his.

(05-07-2016 09:48 AM)Liberty Sea Wrote:  http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/s...li=BBnb7Kz
Sanders says he will do everything in his power to prevent Trump from becoming president, even if he fails to become the nominee. If everything means everything, you can take it to mean that he would tell his voters not to vote for Trump, back Hillary or even serve as her VP if needed.

Unfortunately for Bernie, he's already making you think past the sale when he said he'd do everything in the Senate to stop him.

What do you think?

You think of Sanders fighting President Trump.

As for his supporters, a ton of them really, really hate Hillary, so it's going to be a hard sell. Most will coalesce, but that number that doesn't is the crucial one.