(03-19-2016 12:48 PM)mpr Wrote:  

(03-19-2016 12:34 PM)Deepdiver Wrote:  

(03-19-2016 12:21 PM)mpr Wrote:  

Scumbag Protesters Block Highway Leading To Trump Rally!

Another attempt at censorship by Trump protestors in Arizona! Get out there Sherrif Joe Arpaio! Arrest those criminals and throw them in your desert detention camp!

Threatening Public Safety by shutting down a Public Highway blocking Trump supporters from attending a Trump Rally... by a bunch of George Soros funded MoveOn.org and #BLM Black Panthers and Bernie Commies along with many Illegal Alien protestors - time to roll in the prison buses and tear gas to give these criminal thugs an attitude correction and an overnight stay in one of Sheriff Joe's open air desert Prisons.

Curious Hillary nowhere to be seen today - her Clinton Crime Syndicate fingerprints all over this.

Bernie at the Nogales Border protesting in favor of Illegal Aliens - this election is for nothing less than the survival of the USA as a free democracy versus totalitarian Marxist Socialist radical Communist Cuba del Norte.

Totally agree. Hopefully the police on scene are just waiting for the riot squad to suit up. Then they'll break out the tear gas and billy clubs. I don't at all advocate police brutality. But when a group is breaking the law so flagrantly, and refuse to stop even after the police show up; then using legal force to arrest them is totally warranted. If someone dies because an ambulance is unable to leave the area they should all be charged with manslaughter, and reckless endangerment as well.

With an eye for the longer game, I hope this doesn't happen. I hope these protesters are given free reign to cause as much disruption as possible, until every single undecided voter hops on the Trump train in disgust. The only time I hope the police intervene is if they physically assault Trump supporters, and I hope their response is as restrained as humanly possible.

When everyone was despondent, wondering whether Trump had finally been 'stumped' after the Chicago protests shut his rally down, my thoughts were "a few repeats of this will see Trump to the White House." Protests like these helped get Reagan into office.

The general public has a short attention span, and responds to visceral imagery above all else. If they see traffic being blocked and american flags being burned by rioting animals, they feel contempt for the protesters, and instinctively align themselves with whatever is being protested against. If they see young students being hit with tear gas and fire hoses, they think "how horrible!" and their empathy is with the students, regardless of what disruption they have caused. They can get what's coming to them after November, when Soros pays them to storm the White House or something.

(03-19-2016 04:58 PM)Emancipator Wrote:  

(03-19-2016 04:45 PM)_GQ_ Wrote:  Just as the Trump movement grew in momentum, the Trump protest is growing in momentum. Wonder which side will come out on top in November.

GQ back from his ban

Those protesters support Bernie yet can't even be bothered to vote for the old dude against Hillary, they won't be voting in November. Exactly the same as BLM whining about Ferguson's city council being majority white yet their turn out at the polls was 11%

Prediction: Prior to November, GQ continues to concern troll and gets perma-banned

Can you submit this to a betting site? I'd like to win some money. $5000 dollars on your prediction. Tell me where to wire the money.

Counter-protesting would only give them power. There would be different ways to hit Trump by using examples of crazy supporters taking it too far. Also, we're better than those punks. Remain calm and professional and instead argue/make fun of them by written word or argument.

(03-19-2016 04:48 PM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  

(03-19-2016 04:45 PM)_GQ_ Wrote:  Just as the Trump movement grew in momentum, the Trump protest is growing in momentum. Wonder which side will come out on top in November.

Protesting does not equal voting. Quite the opposite, actually.

True, this was the case in Wisconsin when they tried to recall Governor Scott Walker. Huge protests occupying the capitol building for days, combined with union and teacher walkouts.

The teacher walkouts enraged working people to no end. They were like "fuck you teachers, you want to protest an now our kids can't go to school?"

There were zero opposition protests but guess what happened when it came time to vote? Massive turnout on both sides and the protestors lost the vote. There is a 'silent majority' of people that have jobs and families to attend to, that get inspired to vote every time they see a protest that indirectly targets them.

SO HERE'S THE STORY.

I went to Trump Tower and got there around 15 minutes before the "protesters" arrived. NYPD was already cordoning off two whole busy 5th Avenue streets:

https://i.imgur.com/21ucaLY.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/LCWpjVa.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/0Bmyatd.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/p3oWR7O.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/21ucaLY.jpg

The protesters arrived. They were about what you would expect. The first one I saw was a pink-haired freak. As they started to come in they chanted "NYPD/KKK, how many kids did you kill today?"

Then they began to circle around the block.

https://i.imgur.com/x8QPXtJ.jpg

Had a talk with a guy observing. He didn't like Trump but really disliked these people. The pendulum is swinging back in our direction. As we were talking, we saw an angry girl that looked like a man because of her hair climbing the streetpost and shouting "Trump's a racist."

We also saw an ANTIFA faggot:

https://i.imgur.com/bNH4ynd.jpg

This was definitely coordinated with the marches in London today, or that's what I heard from Newt Gingrich.

Again they circled around the block.

https://i.imgur.com/WwaACSW.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/ZJ5O8KW.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/tHIWkxQ.jpg

Of course we have to have the obligatory faggot Guy Fawkes anon mask:

https://i.imgur.com/xLmSfIG.jpg

They circled around the block once more and they left.

However, we did find a telling example among the remnant:

https://i.imgur.com/TzDayg6.jpg

But but but I thought Trump was the one with violent undertones?

The gist?

1. A few dozen, maybe 100, showed up. They couldn't even stretch across the entirety of the block. 5,000 is a lie. That's how many "going" or likes it got on Facebook. SJW's always lie.
2. They circled around the block a couple of times, got their dopamine up by showing how good they were as people, and left. There were no jumping barricades. They couldn't even nearly fill out the space the NYPD cordoned off for them.
3. The few Trump supporters that were there didn't strike me as the brightest guys, but they were the ones I'd want on my side in a fight.
4. Despite that, the protesters were the ones that could be argued to promote violence.

I have videos also. There you have it.

Soft, weak, and pathetic protest.

Low-energy protest.

(03-19-2016 05:58 PM)Dr. Howard Wrote:  

(03-19-2016 04:48 PM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  

(03-19-2016 04:45 PM)_GQ_ Wrote:  Just as the Trump movement grew in momentum, the Trump protest is growing in momentum. Wonder which side will come out on top in November.

Protesting does not equal voting. Quite the opposite, actually.

True, this was the case in Wisconsin when they tried to recall Governor Scott Walker. Huge protests occupying the capitol building for days, combined with union and teacher walkouts.

The teacher walkouts enraged working people to no end. They were like "fuck you teachers, you want to protest an now our kids can't go to school?"

There were zero opposition protests but guess what happened when it came time to vote? Massive turnout on both sides and the protestors lost the vote. There is a 'silent majority' of people that have jobs and families to attend to, that get inspired to vote every time they see a protest that indirectly targets them.

This election cycle has a lot of similarities with the attempted Walker recall. A small, extreme, vocal minority 'poking the bear' of normal, rational people who normally have better shit to do. Eventually the bear is going to wake up and bite back, which is what we are seeing in the voting booths.

Love it when Trump reads the snake poem

For your reading pleasure. Omitted images 2&3 because there is a 10 image limit.

(03-19-2016 05:59 PM)Libertas Wrote:  SO HERE'S THE STORY.

I went to Trump Tower and got there around 15 minutes before the "protesters" arrived. NYPD was already cordoning off two whole busy 5th Avenue streets:


https://i.imgur.com/LCWpjVa.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/0Bmyatd.jpg



The protesters arrived. They were about what you would expect. The first one I saw was a pink-haired freak. As they started to come in they chanted "NYPD/KKK, how many kids did you kill today?"

Then they began to circle around the block.



Had a talk with a guy observing. He didn't like Trump but really disliked these people. The pendulum is swinging back in our direction. As we were talking, we saw an angry girl that looked like a man because of her hair climbing the streetpost and shouting "Trump's a racist."

We also saw an ANTIFA faggot:



This was definitely coordinated with the marches in London today, or that's what I heard from Newt Gingrich.

Again they circled around the block.





Of course we have to have the obligatory faggot Guy Fawkes anon mask:



They circled around the block once more and they left.

However, we did find a telling example among the remnant:



But but but I thought Trump was the one with violent undertones?

The gist?

1. A few dozen, maybe 100, showed up. They couldn't even stretch across the entirety of the block. 5,000 is a lie. That's how many "going" or likes it got on Facebook. SJW's always lie.
2. They circled around the block a couple of times, got their dopamine up by showing how good they were as people, and left. There were no jumping barricades. They couldn't even nearly fill out the space the NYPD cordoned off for them.
3. The few Trump supporters that were there didn't strike me as the brightest guys, but they were the ones I'd want on my side in a fight.
4. Despite that, the protesters were the ones that could be argued to promote violence.

I have videos also. There you have it.

(03-19-2016 02:53 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

Quote:Do not think of a HAG victory, should it happen, as a tragedy. It would not be a tragedy; it would be, merely, the resumption of regular programming, it would be what we could have always reasonably expected to happen. It would mean that certain social trends will have quite a while longer to go before they exhaust themselves and are reversed or altered in the face of FACTS. No, it will not mean "civil war", "societal collapse", or any of those things.

This is completely out of touch. A Hillary win, a woman who is a criminal herself, is going to give citizenship to millions of people who broke the law, and import millions of rapefugees who also will break the law.

What incentive, with such flagrant disrespect of the law, on top of a collapsing economy, will there be to follow the law for millions upon millions of American citizens? None. And Hillary will pull the Merkel by intruding upon our liberties to hunt down "White supremacism," and cops will be ordered to terrorize normal citizens which only intensifies more unrest. Eventually cops will be murdered for carrying out Hillary's insane orders, and then the cops will revolt and stop following orders as well. Normal citizens will start robbing banks, military compounds for guns, killing federal workers, and it will occur all over the USA.

It will be de facto anarchy and civil war, because you cannot run a government that does not respect law and order. It will be rule by fiat and force, something that cannot sustain itself against a revolting population. Moreover, a Hillary win will not carry any legitimacy because most revolters will believe that illegal immigrants were given a vote.

A Hillary win is the beginning of the end of America, guaranteed.

None of that will happen. There will be no "millions" of "refugees" coming here, there will not be a hunt for "white supremacists", there will be no revolts, anarchy or civil war, the economy is not "collapsing" and is not about to "collapse". These are just 'sphere fairy tales, the flip side of SJW fairy tales about Trump's fascist internment camps for Muslims and Mexicans or whatever other atrocities they imagine will be perpetrated in an unimaginably sinister Trumpland. Two sides of the same bad penny.

What will happen under a HAG presidency is exactly what I said: the continuation of the current business as usual. Certain negative societal trends -- particularly everything having to do with feminism and its implications for the day-to-day lives of normal men -- will continue and worsen. More of the worst boomer and Xer SJW Year Zero cadres will gain access to power, and use it to make our lives more unpleasant in various ways; in some contexts, such as sexual assault laws, false rape accusations, and the witch hunts on college campuses, they will use it for outright evil. How long that trend will last is unknown and unknowable -- it will not last forever, but it may well have the better part of a decade still to run.

Like I said, the continuation of business as usual would be what we should have expected all along. A Trump victory would be the real surprise -- a stunning rebuke to a cultural class whose ascendance so far has gone completely unchecked. It is never right to count on such amazing reversals -- they should be welcomed and embraced if they do happen, but the baseline expectation should always be that they will not. The fulfillment of one's baseline expectation is no tragedy -- it simply means that you get up the next morning and go to what you imagine to be your "dead end job", instead of having won the lottery. Men always live with the tender hopes and dreams of sudden and complete change, but reality is a Monday morning with the HAG holding court, cackling and grinning from ear to ear. Yet life goes on just the same.

(03-19-2016 01:05 PM)Emancipator Wrote:  

Protester chaining herself to a car

And another one getting arrested: https://twitter.com/Jacobnbc/status/711242817440329729

Quote:None of that will happen. There will be no "millions" of "refugees" coming here, there will not be a hunt for "white supremacists", there will be no revolts, anarchy or civil war, the economy is not "collapsing" and is not about to "collapse". These are just 'sphere fairy tales, the flip side of SJW fairy tales about Trump's fascist internment camps for Muslims and Mexicans or whatever other atrocities they imagine will be perpetrated in an unimaginably sinister Trumpland. Two sides of the same bad penny.

Do you hear that clicking? It's the sound of a dozen RVF guys bookmarking this post.

(03-19-2016 04:20 PM)Emancipator Wrote:  Didn't work

If that was her vehicle, they should have ripped the door off and towed the vehicle, leaving her standing there with a door tied to her neck.

Trump nicknamed Kelly 'crazy Megyn'. It's going down with Low-energy Jeb, Little Marco and Lying Ted.

Bonus:

(03-19-2016 04:20 PM)Emancipator Wrote:  Didn't work

WNB

Apparently some white liberals were dressed as the KKK to protest the rally and a Black Trump supporter beat the shit out of them. Bizzaro world


https://twitter.com/frankthorpNBC/st...23229399298048

So I guess the small, sad showing that I saw in Columbus Circle really was all there was to it. Most of the people standing around were mildly curious bystanders, mixed in with visibly irritated locals and tourists trying to get around the circle or into the park.

Low energy indeed.

(03-19-2016 05:59 PM)Libertas Wrote:  

I did see the police had these belts of pre-made plastic handcuffs, hadn't noticed those before.

Might have to get a set to keep by the bed.

Is it me or does it look like there were more cops than protesters?

Talk about a "resting bitch face." Dayum....

(03-19-2016 06:59 PM)eradicator Wrote:  WNB

Agree. She looks like a real angry fucking cunt and not in a good way.

(03-19-2016 07:01 PM)EuphoricWizard Wrote:  Apparently some white liberals were dressed as the KKK to protest the rally and a Black Trump supporter beat the shit out of them. Bizzaro world


https://twitter.com/frankthorpNBC/st...23229399298048

Video: https://streamable.com/cfna


The media must be sweating trying to figure out how to spin this

(03-19-2016 07:15 PM)username Wrote:  

(03-19-2016 06:59 PM)eradicator Wrote:  WNB

Agree. She looks like a real angry fucking cunt and not in a good way.

Shes got that Ronda Rousey resting bitch face.

(03-19-2016 06:57 PM)Liberty Sea Wrote:  Trump nicknamed Kelly 'crazy Megyn'. It's going down with Low-energy Jeb, Little Marco and Lying Ted.

Bonus:

Anecdotally, and since she changed her haircut, 'crazy Megyn' looks, a lot, like the evil female character in the Hellboy-1 movie (the short-haired, blonde assistant to the devil himself, and killed in a Russian crypt).

Interesting if you consider the thread here ( https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-53191.html ), on Hollywood and media people being actually involved in satanic cults... Maybe Megyn unconsciously remembered the movie and its diabolical female character.





Anyway, more interestingly:

Have you noted the amount of racist attacks on Trump's physical features? Like, Trump being mocked because he supposedly (and in any case everybody appearing on TV, Obama included, does it) wears make-up, for example... people calling him "a white-faced clown of orange skin"?? Even the NY post put a picture of Trump in clownish white-face mask on its paper edition, after the first primaries victories of Trump...

So my question is: how come, if you wrote that Obama wears a lot of make-up, which he does, you're a rayciss!... if you publish a picture of Obama in black-face (which would be dumb) you're a rayciss, but if you publish pics of Trump in a white-clown face, it's okay, it's fun!...
Double standard here! Our SJW leftist friends should understand that mocking the features of White men is, just like mocking the features of Black men, very unsavory.

My sister and her kids just came for dinner. Being a hot girl who works for a living and has kids, she's a little naturally shitlordy while having zero clue about politics nor history beyond headline regurgitation.

After dinner, I broached the topic of the election and asked her if she was going to vote for Trump. She replied: "No! They say Trump is like Hitler"! Which was disappointing but unsurprising. I asked her "Like Hitler"? and she applied in the affirmative: "That's what they say, like Hitler". I asked her if she knew who Hitler was, to make a rhetorical point about the actual comparison being made. I then made a couple of low key remarks about what Trump was going to do, and about how "most people, in the world and as a general rule, were idiots" and then let it drop as she seemed surprised by my voting choice and she seemed like she didn't want to get into it.

A little more unsettling was when my six year old nephew, after the first couple of sentences exchanged between me and my sister, immediately looked at me, pointed to my face, and said "You're a monster"! (for voting for Trump) and he then scampered off.

Now, I'm close with this kid. He's super-cool and we get along. My sister asked him where he got such a notion, and he said his "own brain". He hasn't a clue about politics or who Trump is and so, assuming that he didn't just pick up on my sister's reactionary tone, he got the "monster" bit from either the media or some other kids household. My sister and I let it drop with my nephew and I was teasing him about being a monster himself a little bit later.

I did troll my sister a little bit more, later, in my first steps toward getting her on the Trump train. First, I made jokes about the Trump train and her being on it. I interjected with a bit of truth about how, as a married woman with kids, she shouldn't be voting liberal (this is the type of thing that would have her start to reconsider, in addition to humor). I ended with some more Trump train humor and told her that our deceased father would have voted for Trump (true). She's a daddy's girl.

I'll get her there.

I ended the night by teaching my nephew about the difference between monkeys and apes, with the help of the Ipad.

I brought up a suborder tree that had monkeys and apes on it. It also had a human mixed in with the apes. I saw an opening to make a point.

I told him that some people think that we come from apes. He immediately said "That's not true! We come from God"!

I told him that I agreed, but that he will learn things in school that aren't always true but that he had to tell his teachers the answers that he learned in school.

He replied incredulously "Even if they aren't true? But why?" I told him that that was the way the world worked, and that he should always question everything that he learns and ask himself why he believes that it is true. However, he always needed to present the answers that his teacher wants until he gets older. I told him to ask himself if he has evidence for what he is told to believe.

The smart little bugger immediately replied "Like evidence for God"? Which made me laugh. I told him it was complicated and that we would have a further discussion about "God" when he was older. He told me he would collect the evidence when he died and went to heaven. Too funny. He saw the apes and neanderthals and was incredulous that he could come from them, with no further instruction on my part.

I think that I turned his media or otherwise cucked environment indoctrination into a win for the good guys.

*note that his and my views on evolution were beside the point on this one. He will learn both views in full and make his own decision later. I only care that he considers the strength of each position when he does. I didn't even necessarily believe what I was insinuating on evolution, but I saw it as a golden opportunity to give a critical thinking lesson as revenge against whomever before programmed my nephew in my absence. At six, he now knows to question his teachers and environment but to do it stealthily.