(03-22-2016 12:53 PM)getdownonit Wrote:  Cuck 11.5%
Cuck 9.5%

LMAO ! my day has been made.

Disgusted by today's events in Brussels - further proof that Islamic radical scum arent going anywhere and the best way to fight back is to shut down Muslim immigration indefinitely. I don't know how many more attacks they need to commit before SJW cucks realize it's not a "religion of peace" - it's a religion of random unmitigated violence.

Quote:Donald Trump reneged his claim that if elected president, he won’t take a salary.

Back in 2015, Trump said he is “totally self funding his campaign” and won’t take a cent of the president’s $400,000 annual compensation.

However, on Monday, Trump told The New York Times’ Maggie Haberman he’ll be charging a “nominal $1” fee for his services, an infinitely larger sum than he referenced in the past.

I laughed.

The comments, though... sigh. So many people who don't understand math. Yeah okay it's not perfectly correct as stated, but:

   

For what it's worth, the Washington Post was all over that white Trump supporter who decked the black protester back on March 10, repeatedly mentioning the incident in the days since then.

It has been several days now since the black Air Force NCO punched out the white protestor at that Trump rally. Not one mention about it in the Post. Not ONE.

@ captain shame

Respectfully disagree. Here is why:

Quote:Bring in a mass of multiculturalism to the USA

What Israel, as a state, gains from that exactly?

Quote:Sign a shitty deal with iran, so that USA cucks will want to bomb them the fuck out in the future

.

Why did they complain about that deal then?

Quote:Take out Ghadafi

I do not believe he was a threat to anyone but the Islamists.

Quote:Bomb the shit out of secular syria

A lot of parties other parties wanted to turn Syria into what is today, not just Israel. I am talking about Turks, Saudis, Qataris... .

Quote: Build the hatred of muslims so much that it looks foolish not to support Israel against the boogie men in the desert.

There was continuous hatred from the Muslims towards the West since inception of Islam in the 7th century - which predates Israel. They are not some boogie man - today's bombing in Bruxelles is proof of that. Supporting Israel can, at least, help in the fight against that "boogeyman".

Quote:Allow and facilitate Isis to get so large, that a full scale intervention in the middle east is inevitable.

Then why is Israel chasing ISIS cells in West Bank left and right?
Assisting Kurds in Iraq (probably even Syria)?

Quote:The Jews are playing chess and Obama knows exactly what he's doing. He isn't anti-israel at all. He's tried to systematically take out all of their regional threats.

They own his bitch ass.

Au contraire.

Why did Obama's puppet masters cause the protests in Israel in 2009 (I think)? Yes, at the beginning, the goal was to reduce living expenses (perfectly legitimate), but later on, the aim was to overthrow Likud (Bibi)?

Why did Bibi endorse Mittens instead of Obola in 2012 elections?

Why did Obola tried to oust Bibi in 2015 Isreali elections (he brought his fucking PR team - called V15) in favor of Lapid?


Your comment, at first glance make sense, but...when you take many other things into account (many which do not go to the MSM), they do not.

I'm at the point now where I openly believe progressivism is a mental disorder, it's that bad.

Four-year-olds can come up with political and social ideologies that are more logical.

https://twitter.com/NashBeliyNarod/statu...7114924032

Just a reminder that we've been fighting off Islamic invasions for 1400 YEARS and the crusades were a reaction to yet another invasion. And they STILL keep coming!

(03-22-2016 11:40 AM)Deepdiver Wrote:  The USA is paying 70 FREAKING PERCENT of the Cost of Supporting the Defense of Europe are you freaking kidding me?????

You should be mad about that but mostly for a different reason.

It's not that America is being ripped off by Europe and other allies.

It's that American tax payers are being ripped off by American corporations via corrupt politicians that give hugely profitable contracts to these companies, and are later hired or reimbursed by them.

Too much is spend on bullshit with massive waste and it is justified by starting unnecessary wars for disingenuous reasons. The money isn't going to other countries, sure they benefit, but to private companies.

(03-22-2016 10:51 AM)Ocelot Wrote:  

(03-22-2016 07:12 AM)Going strong Wrote:  If Salah Abdeslam, arrested 2 days ago, had been quickly water-boarded, 30 lives would have been saved.



... if Salah had been waterboarded yesterday, he would have revealed the names and places of his accomplices, and the Brussels attacks would have been thwarted!

To not enhance-question terrorists, is a folly, a crime in itself against society!
____________________________
People willing to trade their freedom for temporary security deserve neither and will lose both*

*Signature quoted for ironic impact.

I understand it's immensely frustrating seeing lives lost and actions that could have been taken to prevent such a tragedy, but hold on a fucking minute. This guy was a citizen, and you want the government to torture him within a day of his arrest?

I feel a lot of guys here would have a very different perspective on the importance of due process, and how much power the government should have, if they were on the wrong end of a miscarriage of justice, or an abuse of power. My family had their mail gone into and their phones tapped for pissing off the wrong person in England; for all my criticisms of the place, I'm immensely thankful we have some semblance of due process, and the most some over-zealous official can do is authorise a wire tap, not instigate a torture session.

Since Salah Abdeslam was a citizen, and since we can safely assume his hatred for his own country didn't come from "becoming radicalised" via the internet (it came from his parents, and whichever McJihadis mosque his family attended, regardless of what front they put on for the cameras) the question shouldn't be whether discarding his human rights would have prevented this attack, it should be this: why the fuck were his parents, and the entire communities of muslims who hate the country, welcomed in in the first place?

Attacks like these are the aggregate result of decades of stupidity and downright treachery, and are now difficult to prevent, but it can still be done without throwing out the Magna Carta (you'll have to excuse me, I have no idea what the Belgian equivalent is). Stop importing these people. Shut down terrorist-producing mosques. Stop destabilising nations in the middle East, and creating the exact conditions in which organisations like ISIS are able to flourish. But for God's sake, keep a sense of perspective when deciding what the government can or can't do to naturalised citizens.

Terrorists can kill hundreds, thousands, even tens of thousands of people. Overbearing governments have the capacity to kill millions. It's therefore of a far higher priority to keep governments in check than terrorists, however horrifying scenes like this morning are.

*Signature quoted for ironic impact

Ok man, you got me there: I have double standards . I want respect and freedom for most people, but, I deny any rights to terrorist leaders and am ready to trade their freedom and physical integrity for whatever gain. It makes me a bad people, no doubt.

hold on a fucking minute. This guy was a citizen, and you want the government to torture him within a day of his arrest?

Are you serious?? The guy (Abdeslam) was the remaining terrorist leader for Paris attack, and you are saying his presumption of innocence should have been preserved?? Man...

I'm all for respecting presumption of innocence and other like Miranda laws, but not when you catch, alive, a well-known terrorist leader of worldwide fame!!

quoting you: "discarding his human rights would have prevented this attack": my point exactly!

Why are you, quite dishonestly, implying that waterboarding could be applied to you or your family for some small perceived stuff you may or not have done?? Of course, waterboarding is for hardcore terrorist leaders, not for random dudes having downloaded 100 Hollywood movies on the net...

Now, friend, the rest of your post I totally agree with: the problem is having let those people and their families enter by millions!

But anyway, the good part of your post does not contradict mine! We should close our borders to islamic immigration, and, we should waterboard any terrorist leader we catch.

(Also, anecdotally, please refrain from using the word torture applied to waterboarding. Many people do not categorize waterboarding as torture. Would you call something worse than waterboarding, for example, super max incarceration, as torture? No? so...)

Errr...folks...don't we have a thread concerning this terror attack already?

Trump will not be pleased.

And when he is not pleased...coats tend to...disappear.

(03-22-2016 01:14 PM)C-Note Wrote:  For what it's worth, the Washington Post was all over that white Trump supporter who decked the black protester back on March 10, repeatedly mentioning the incident in the days since then.

It has been several days now since the black Air Force NCO punched out the white protestor at that Trump rally. Not one mention about it in the Post. Not ONE.

We should get black Trump supporters to act as enforcers... problem solved. Gotta beat the media at their own twisted game.

(03-22-2016 12:15 PM)Requiem Wrote:  It's been a while since I have opposed such popular views here, but I feel like it's time for me to say something again. So be prepared, it won't be a nice reading. I'm prepared to get called a leftist SJW:

(03-21-2016 10:08 PM)DamienCasanova Wrote:  Christians need allies right now to go against the Muzzzies, and it's OK to have the Jews on our side because at least our societies are more compatible. I think the smartest thing right now is to join together to fight a common threat, and then reassess our relationship afterwards.

You're falling right into the Zionist trap. They make you believe the Muslims were your enemies so you should ally with the Jews in order to kill the Muslims. What is the Israeli part in this? Using some of the military equipment you donate to them and blowing it from afar on some desert-dudes with a rocket launcher. The dirty work will always be done by you. The scheme is simple - Step 1: Let the Gentiles (Christians and Muslims) fight against each others; Step 2: profit. Divide and conquer. That's always been their game and I'm astonished by how well it's still working. Aren't people able to see through the scheme by now?
Israel is the country that's having issues with Muslim countries, not the US/Europe. It simply isn't our problem, although many have been convinced it was.
Yes, I know about Paris. I know about Brussels, San Bernadino, etc. I don't want Muslims to come here for a number of reasons, including the fact that some are likely going to detonate. But this doesn't prove that "we're at war with Islam". There are radicals amongst every people, just some are put into a situation where they don't have much to lose (by constantly bombing their countries and funding terrorists), then provoked and stoked, provided with knowledge/equipment and possibly allowed to operate. If Europe would bomb Israel, kill many of their citizens, occupy them, make their infrastructure and economy collapse, then leave and provide the most angry Jews among them with weapons and money - do you really believe there wouldn't be Jews blowing stuff up?
You know, I've read a couple of times here how Germans can't be let to themselves because they always go to extremes. Regardless of what I think of such statements or the members posting them, let's not get ahead of yourselves and believe you guys are completely immune to this. To me it seems like many here also think in absolutes that don't match reality. I too don't want to have Muslims in Europe or America. But I also don't want the Jews.
Do you even have a plan for your "fight against the Muzzies"?
Here's the deal: Muslims have a problem with Israel. Whether that is justified or not (it is) is a topic for another discussion. Muslims hate the West because we support Israel and blow up their countries, not "because our freedumbs". The more you bomb them, the more radicals you produce (they hate you for ruining their lives and killing their relatives/countrymen AND they don't have anything to lose anymore because you took it all). So you're basically left with only two options: A) genocide every Muslim alive or B) don't bomb their countries anymore, protect your borders (especially until they've calmed down) and leave Israhell to the wolves.

I'm no fan of Israel either, but you can't fight a war on all fronts. In a fight with multiple enemies, you take out the most clear and present danger FIRST (Radical Islamic Terrorism), then reassess and continue fighting. So in this situation I think the phrase "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" holds true. The real deal is Muslims have a problem with EVERYONE who isn't Muslim; Jews, Christians, Mormons, Aliens, whatever. Maybe we didn't start the problem thousands of years ago, but we did stir the hornet's nest more recently though, and it's the whole world's problem now no matter what. So if we leave Israel to fend for themselves it will only strengthen Islam, and we will face a tougher opponent in the future with less allies. No I don't have battle plans to combat them, nor am I a qualified military expert, but the message i've gotten from their relentless violence upon society is that it's either us or them, and this world might not be big enough anymore for Islam to co-exist peacefully with the rest of the world religions.

(03-22-2016 11:44 AM)HD668B Wrote:  

(03-22-2016 10:51 AM)Ocelot Wrote:  This guy was a citizen, and you want the government to torture him within a day of his arrest?

Salah Abdeslam, citizen of the Kingdom of Belgium

L
O
L

Wanna take a bet? If we would have jailed or at least interrogated for more than 24 hours all the people arrested with non-european names, a lot of lives would have been saved.

WTF We all need to Man the Phuck Up and realize that we are now engaged in an ongoing 1,000 year clash of cultures with Murderous RADICAL Islam and all ISLAM is RADICAL when judegment time comes.

Yet we have our western Liberal Anti American Globalists wringing their hands over "TORTURE"...

Torture has somehow morphed into not serving radical muslim murderers Halal meals while imprisoned.

Time to clue everyone in... the defininitin of torture has morphed along with the definition of Manspreading, Mainslpaining, and consensual sex morphing into voluntary RAPE.

So time for a Red Pill Masculine reality check...

Enhanced interrogation is Enhanced Interrogation.

Torture is Torture.

Consensual Sex with a Sober Woman over 18 is NOT Voluntary RAPE.

Enhanced Interrogation is not TORTURE! Period.

Enhanced interrogation:

http://usmilitary.about.com/od/navytrng/a/sere.htm
It was a blistering day on Oct. 3, 1993, during Operation Restore Hope when Chief Warrant Officer Michael Durant, a UH-60 Black Hawk helicopter pilot, crashed in Mogadishu, Somalia.
The Special Forces officer was captured and held captive as portrayed in the movie, “Black Hawk Down.” According to Durant, in his book, In the Company of Heroes, if it were not for a survival-training course, he would have not returned home 11 days later with honor.

The Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape (SERE) course held at the Navy’s remote training site in the mountains of Maine is similar to the course Chief Warrant Officer Durant credits with having saved his life.

SERE is actually an advanced code-of-conduct course. All military personnel get their initial code-of-conduct instruction during basic training in which they are taught an American service member’s moral and legal responsibilities if captured by enemy forces.

But SERE goes way beyond that.

“We teach individuals what to do when things go from bad to worse,” said Hospital Corpsman 1st Class Harry Haug, a SERE instructor assigned to Fleet Aviation Specialized Operational (FASO) training Group, Brunswick, Maine.

“The students who attend the course have a greater risk of being stranded behind enemy lines,” said Haug. “They come here to learn how to stay alive and the values behind the code of conduct. When the situation is real, the threat is real, so these students need to be ready to handle it.”

Aviators, aircrewmen, Special Forces and force reconnaissance personnel are the types of jobs that require SERE school training.

“With today’s ever-changing battlefield, I believe most military personnel are at risk of being captured,” said Haug.

“Hopefully what I teach here on the mountain is enough to give someone the courage and know-how to survive if they are ever in that situation.”

###

Perhaps the greatest article ever written on S.E.R.E. Training:
http://humanevents.com/2007/11/05/waterb...personnel/

Deepdiver: Torture is when you are irreperably harmed by the treatment of your enemies... Broken bones without proper setting and drugs that turn you into a permanent blithering idiot, having your limbs or genitals hooked up to a high voltage at increasing intensity causing your muscels to rip from your sinews, being exposed to the elements to the extremes of heat stroke or hypothermia, extreme starvation and malnutrition, being exposed to the vicious bites of vicious or wild animals - having appendages cut off... these are all forms of torture whereby you are irreparably harmed and scarred physically or mentally for life.

S.E.R.E. enhanced interrogation techniques are a crucial part of training for US Military Members likely to come into direct combat with the enemy especially operating behind enemy lines. Water boarding, physical intimidation, sleep depravation, humiliation and hypnotic truth inducing drugs are NOT freaking torture.

This is what happens when we raise decades of special snowflakes and princes where 99% are exempt from serving and defending their countries, cultures, faiths and families.

If Donald J. Trump does not become our next president it is time for a plan B and planc C because the USA as we know it will be no different than Beirut, Sao Paolo, Ciudade Juarez or Nogales or any other drugs terrorist-ruled country.

Gated cities surrounded by crime corruption and random terror will be the future with an open borders POTUS, Hillary, Bernie, Ted, John Kasich are all dedicated open borders Globalists..

(03-22-2016 01:31 PM)Irenicus Wrote:  Errr...folks...don't we have a thread concerning this terror attack already?

Trump will not be pleased.

And when he is not pleased...coats tend to...disappear.

Thing is, Trump once again was right, a few weeks ago, when he said that waterboarding, though bad, can indeed save lives. We have a case and proof at hand: 5 minutes of waterboarding, and this Salah suburban terrorist would have spoken and given names and places.

I'll tell you something else. I grew up near Paris, quite geographically close (though usually separated, walls and fences do work!) to young muggers from the suburbs, people exactly like Salah Abdeslam. I have seen them caught and interrogated by the French Police: they break down, easily, within 5 minutes max (some roughing up, some threats, some light slapping, some phone-book head taps, it's enough). So this Salah dude, I am absolutely sure that within 10 minutes of being in a room with 2 right-wing French police officers, he would have told everything. And the first waterboarding session would have broken him, I am positive about it. He would have told names and places, faaast!

Now, I agree that this thread is not the best place to talk about that, so I'll now only post on the Belgian-attack thread

(03-22-2016 10:29 AM)Irenicus Wrote:  So...if I understood correctly...Utah is a winner take all IF one candidate takes 50%+ of the vote?

And AZ is winner take all?

Correct for both states.

The Donald should win big in AZ and after the "Religion of Peace" did their thing earlier today, injuring/killing at least 3 Mormons, maybe St. Rafael gets less than 50% in UT and the delegates then get divided up.

The relevant discussion is about Trump's insistence on enhanced interrogation to protect our country and citizens. Belgium just happens to be the latest consequence of NOT defending our Country and Citizens at home or abroad.

(03-22-2016 01:31 PM)Irenicus Wrote:  Errr...folks...don't we have a thread concerning this terror attack already?

Trump will not be pleased.

And when he is not pleased...coats tend to...disappear.

It's all melting together....Trump, Islam invasions, Migrants in Europe, MAGA, PC

(03-22-2016 12:53 PM)getdownonit Wrote:  http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/...-4222.html

Trump on track to take all 95 New York delegates

Trump 54.5%
Cuck 11.5%
Cuck 9.5%

They fuckin better vote for Trump.

You can bet your ass the terrorists would LOVE another 9/11 to hit New York.

No one will fight harder to keep that from happening than Trump.

(03-22-2016 12:15 PM)Requiem Wrote:  It's been a while since I have opposed such popular views here, but I feel like it's time for me to say something again. So be prepared, it won't be a nice reading. I'm prepared to get called a leftist SJW:

Muslims hate the West because we support Israel and blow up their countries, not "because our freedumbs". The more you bomb them, the more radicals you produce (they hate you for ruining their lives and killing their relatives/countrymen AND they don't have anything to lose anymore because you took it all).

You're not an SJW Requiem, you're a Ron Paul libertarian. There's a YUGE difference between the two but the fallacy of Ron Paul's "blowback" theory has been soundly debunked, yet you buy into it hook, line, and sinker.

You need to watch the following two videos:









Educate yourself son before you presume to talk at us as if we've never researched Islam, as you clearly have not.

Muslims hate us because the doctrine of Islam ORDERS THEM to hate us, to lie to us, to steal from us, to rape our women, and to kill us by chopping off our heads with dull rusty butter knives. As Dr. Bill Warner proves beyond a shadow of a doubt, the most stark contrast about Islam and EVERY OTHER world religion is that it does not have the Golden Rule. What's the Golden Rule? Glad you asked kid. The Golden Rule is the rule that says, "Do unto others as you would have others do unto you." Pretty simple stuff, n'est-ce pas? But Islam doesn't have that rule. Christianity has it. Judaism has it. Buddhism has it. Hinduism has it. All the religions have it. Except Islam. That is illustrative and important. Now, it is true that, if you repeat this fact often enough, some fancy schmancy Islamic scholar will saunter up to you and say, "Of course Islam has the Golden Rule!" and he will produce some Islamic text in support of his claim. However, what Mr. Slick Islamic Scholar is doing at that moment is called "taqiyya" in the doctrine of Islam. Taqiyya says to Muslims that it is alright to lie to non-Muslims (i.e. the infidels, the "kuffar", which is the plural of "kafir", which is what you and I are) if the lie helps advance the goals of jihad. If you look closely at the text produced by the taqiyya-using Mr. Slick Islamic Scholar, however, you will notice a troubling detail... the text will say "Do unto other Muslims as you would have other Muslims do unto you." This little detail is important because it excludes you and I and all the other kuffar. In fact, there are special texts that dictate how a good Muslim is to treat the kuffar, and the treatment ain't very nice (refer to my comments above that include reference to dull rusty butter knives).

Muslims don't hate us because we're wealthier and more beautiful than they are, as Ron Paul would have you believe. They hate us because their death cult demands that they hate us. And as for your comment that they hate us because we "blow up their countries"... no one blows up Muslims more than other Muslims. As Dr. Warner says, "Islam is bad for non-Muslims. Islam is bad for Muslims. Islam... is bad."

Give us a break on the Ron Paul autistic libertarianism. We've heard it and we ain't buying it.

(03-22-2016 01:38 PM)DamienCasanova Wrote:  

(03-22-2016 12:15 PM)Requiem Wrote:  It's been a while since I have opposed such popular views here, but I feel like it's time for me to say something again. So be prepared, it won't be a nice reading. I'm prepared to get called a leftist SJW:

(03-21-2016 10:08 PM)DamienCasanova Wrote:  Christians need allies right now to go against the Muzzzies, and it's OK to have the Jews on our side because at least our societies are more compatible. I think the smartest thing right now is to join together to fight a common threat, and then reassess our relationship afterwards.

You're falling right into the Zionist trap. They make you believe the Muslims were your enemies so you should ally with the Jews in order to kill the Muslims. What is the Israeli part in this? Using some of the military equipment you donate to them and blowing it from afar on some desert-dudes with a rocket launcher. The dirty work will always be done by you. The scheme is simple - Step 1: Let the Gentiles (Christians and Muslims) fight against each others; Step 2: profit. Divide and conquer. That's always been their game and I'm astonished by how well it's still working. Aren't people able to see through the scheme by now?
Israel is the country that's having issues with Muslim countries, not the US/Europe. It simply isn't our problem, although many have been convinced it was.
Yes, I know about Paris. I know about Brussels, San Bernadino, etc. I don't want Muslims to come here for a number of reasons, including the fact that some are likely going to detonate. But this doesn't prove that "we're at war with Islam". There are radicals amongst every people, just some are put into a situation where they don't have much to lose (by constantly bombing their countries and funding terrorists), then provoked and stoked, provided with knowledge/equipment and possibly allowed to operate. If Europe would bomb Israel, kill many of their citizens, occupy them, make their infrastructure and economy collapse, then leave and provide the most angry Jews among them with weapons and money - do you really believe there wouldn't be Jews blowing stuff up?
You know, I've read a couple of times here how Germans can't be let to themselves because they always go to extremes. Regardless of what I think of such statements or the members posting them, let's not get ahead of yourselves and believe you guys are completely immune to this. To me it seems like many here also think in absolutes that don't match reality. I too don't want to have Muslims in Europe or America. But I also don't want the Jews.
Do you even have a plan for your "fight against the Muzzies"?
Here's the deal: Muslims have a problem with Israel. Whether that is justified or not (it is) is a topic for another discussion. Muslims hate the West because we support Israel and blow up their countries, not "because our freedumbs". The more you bomb them, the more radicals you produce (they hate you for ruining their lives and killing their relatives/countrymen AND they don't have anything to lose anymore because you took it all). So you're basically left with only two options: A) genocide every Muslim alive or B) don't bomb their countries anymore, protect your borders (especially until they've calmed down) and leave Israhell to the wolves.

I'm no fan of Israel either, but you can't fight a war on all fronts. In a fight with multiple enemies, you take out the most clear and present danger FIRST (Radical Islamic Terrorism), then reassess and continue fighting. So in this situation I think the phrase "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" holds true. The real deal is Muslims have a problem with EVERYONE who isn't Muslim; Jews, Christians, Mormons, Aliens, whatever. Maybe we didn't start the problem thousands of years ago, but we did stir the hornet's nest more recently though, and it's the whole world's problem now no matter what. So if we leave Israel to fend for themselves it will only strengthen Islam, and we will face a tougher opponent in the future with less allies. No I don't have battle plans to combat them, nor am I a qualified military expert, but the message i've gotten from their relentless violence upon society is that it's either us or them, and this world might not be big enough anymore for Islam to co-exist peacefully with the rest of the world religions.

"Hey, my 'religion' tells me to marry little girls, dress them in beekeeper outfits and kill everyone else that isn't EXACTLY the same as me!"

Islam IS NOT a religion; it's a death cult founded by a mass murdering pedophile.

(03-22-2016 02:01 PM)Ghost Tiger Wrote:  

(03-22-2016 12:15 PM)Requiem Wrote:  It's been a while since I have opposed such popular views here, but I feel like it's time for me to say something again. So be prepared, it won't be a nice reading. I'm prepared to get called a leftist SJW:

Muslims hate the West because we support Israel and blow up their countries, not "because our freedumbs". The more you bomb them, the more radicals you produce (they hate you for ruining their lives and killing their relatives/countrymen AND they don't have anything to lose anymore because you took it all).

You're not an SJW Requiem, you're a Ron Paul libertarian. There's a YUGE difference between the two but the fallacy of Ron Paul's "blowback" theory has been soundly debunked, yet you buy into it hook, line, and sinker.

You need to watch the following two videos:









Educate yourself son before you presume to talk at us as if we've never researched Islam, as you clearly have not.

Muslims hate us because the doctrine of Islam ORDERS THEM to hate us, to lie to us, to steal from us, to rape our women, and to kill us by chopping off our heads with dull rusty butter knives. As Dr. Bill Warner proves beyond a shadow of a doubt, the most stark contrast about Islam and EVERY OTHER world religion is that it does not have the Golden Rule. What's the Golden Rule? Glad you asked kid. The Golden Rule is the rule that says, "Do unto others as you would have others do unto you." Pretty simple stuff, n'est-ce pas? But Islam doesn't have that rule. Christianity has it. Judaism has it. Buddhism has it. Hinduism has it. All the religions have it. Except Islam. That is illustrative and important. Now, it is true that, if you repeat this fact often enough, some fancy schmancy Islamic scholar will saunter up to you and say, "Of course Islam has the Golden Rule!" and he will produce some Islamic text in support of his claim. However, what Mr. Slick Islamic Scholar is doing at that moment is called "taqiyya" in the doctrine of Islam. Taqiyya says to Muslims that it is alright to lie to non-Muslims (i.e. the infidels, the "kuffar", which is the plural of "kafir", which is what you and I are) if the lie helps advance the goals of jihad. If you look closely at the text produced by the taqiyya-using Mr. Slick Islamic Scholar, however, you will notice a troubling detail... the text will say "Do unto other Muslims as you would have other Muslims do unto you." This little detail is important because it excludes you and I and all the other kuffar. In fact, there is are special texts that dictate how a good Muslim is to treat the kuffar, and the treatment ain't very nice (refer to my comments above that include reference to dull rusty butter knives).

Muslims don't hate us because we're wealthier and more beautiful than they are, as Ron Paul would have you believe. They hate us because their death cult demands that they hate us. And as for your comment that they hate us because we "blow up their countries"... no one blows up Muslims more than other Muslims. As Dr. Warner says, "Islam is bad for non-Muslims. Islam is bad for Muslims. Islam... is bad."

Give us a break on the Ron Paul autistic libertarianism. We've heard it and we ain't buying it.

Amen, brother! That's why I worded this post the exact way I did:

https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-48360...pid1257344

Never thought I'd see the day...

(03-22-2016 10:28 PM)MiscBrah Wrote:  Never thought I'd see the day...

Feels like a Jeb thread.

Excellent stuff, a win in AZ.

Trump stays on track for the nomination, regardless of what happens in Utah. Stealing some delegates by keeping Cruz under 50% is the cherry on top.

^ it's going to get worse

one primary April 5
one primary April 19

then April 26 is a big night with five primaries

but yeah... Trump thread's going to be on neutral for a bit, i figure