Post: #376

Zipidizuba - Golddiggers: 1-0

Post: #377

Once again the court of public opinion convicts and the Court of law disagrees. Every time with these bullshit cases -Duke Lacrosse,Jian Ghomeshi, Kobe Bryant, and Mattress Girl (police declined to investigate and school kangaroo court declined to punish). They are going to retry Cosby and we will see how it goes.....

Post: #378

Quote:And look, I am not sitting here saying that every time a woman claims “rape” she has to be reflexively believed. I’m a father or two boys who will (hopefully) grow up to be black men.

TRANSPHOBE ALERT!!!



DIE PATRIARCHAL CIS SCUM

Post: #379

(06-06-2017 06:26 PM)Chowder Head Wrote:  Jesus Christ!! This broad looks like Howard Stern or the guy from REO Speedwagon. Cosby is innocent!

If the bitch not fit, you must acquit.

Post: #380

(06-06-2017 06:26 PM)Chowder Head Wrote:  Jesus Christ!! This broad looks like Howard Stern or the guy from REO Speedwagon. Cosby is innocent!

Post: #381

Constand's lawyers issued a statement:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/17/arts/...mille.html

Quote:“We are confident that these proceedings have given a voice to the many victims who felt powerless and silenced. We commend those prosecutors who raised awareness that one of the hallmarks of drug-related sexual assaults is the effect the drug has on the victim’s memory and ability to recall and were nonetheless willing to present this evidence to the jury.”

Constand's inconsistent/inaccurate statements, not to mention her palling around with Cos like old friends well after the alleged "assault," are a result of the drugs he gave her. The pills done messed up her memory!

But if that's the case, how can she be sure of what happened now?

Post: #382

They're actually going to waste millions more of the taxpayers dollars to retry this dog of a case. Absolutely pathetic and unconscionable.

I think Cosby's lawyers need to start thinking about going on the offense. A civil case for malicious prosecution could probably be made here.

If the prosecutor is "actuated by an improper motive" (i.e., malice, public grandstanding, etc.) then the prosecution is malicious and the prosecutor is civilly liable.

.

Post: #383

(06-18-2017 12:12 AM)Quintus Curtius Wrote:  They're actually going to waste millions more of the taxpayers dollars to retry this dog of a case. Absolutely pathetic and unconscionable.

I think Cosby's lawyers need to start thinking about going on the offense. A civil case for malicious prosecution could probably be made here.

If the prosecutor is "actuated by an improper motive" (i.e., malice, public grandstanding, etc.) then the prosecution is malicious and the prosecutor is civilly liable.

.

Damn QC that link to your website lead to a damn good article, you can write your ass off! You must have booked legal writing, I know you are more of a historian but you need to do a straight legal blog-I would read it everyday if it was the same quality as the linked article I just read.

Post: #384

Well, it's obvious - the jury was paid off in Jell-O Pudding pops.

Zip zop zoobity bop.

Post: #385

Post: #386

I don't get the support for Cosby. He is a disgusting scumbag and I have no doubt he raped dozens if not hundreds of women over the years. He is worse than the rapist Bill Clinton. He admits he drugged women before raping them. His reasoning is that it wasn't rape because they didn't say no.

There are plenty of nasty women who lie about being raped but I've never read a convincing argument that any of Cosbys accusers are like that. I have no respect for the people attacking Cosbys accusers. There are plenty of legit battles to fight against false rape charges and the campus kangaroo courts that always support women over men as part of the SJW agenda.

Bill Cosby derverves to die in jail and I hope he does.

Post: #387

(06-18-2017 09:19 AM)Abe Lincoln Wrote:  I don't get the support for Cosby. He is a disgusting scumbag and I have no doubt he raped dozens if not hundreds of women over the years. He is worse than the rapist Bill Clinton. He admits he drugged women before raping them. His reasoning is that it wasn't rape because they didn't say no.

There are plenty of nasty women who lie about being raped but I've never read a convincing argument that any of Cosbys accusers are like that. I have no respect for the people attacking Cosbys accusers. There are plenty of legit battles to fight against false rape charges and the campus kangaroo courts that always support women over men as part of the SJW agenda.

Bill Cosby derverves to die in jail and I hope he does.

Have you read any of the actual court reporting? A number of his accusers couldn't even get their stories straight or stop seeing him after the alleged "rape".

If there was legitimate cases they were drowned out because the lawyers got greedy and didn't sift away the golddiggers. They choose to gamble on the accusations alone and hoping the numbers would intimidate the jury. Seeing the number of women in the suit just out looking for a meal ticket there was no option to let Cosby go.

Post: #388

@Abe Lincoln:

It's not about blindly supporting Cosby. It's not about the man, it's about the law.

It's about holding the prosecution to the correct legal standards. These cases they're bringing are extremely old. The evidence is lacking in reasonable corroboration.

And it's absolutely clear that the only reason these cases are being brought is because of the feminist PC pressure that permeates the entire society today. There is absolutely no reason to re-try the Cosby case. None at all. They should just let it be.

It's funny how the media sings an entirely different tune when the victim is a man and the perpetrator is a woman. On Monday I'll be dropping an article about the Michelle Carter case: this sadistic, evil angel of death who essentially coerced her "boyfriend" into killing himself.

Why are no editorials being written about this in the mainstream press? Yeah, there are a few, but nothing on the scale that this crime deserves. We all know the reason. Women in the US press are protected classes. We aren't allowed to talk about their depravity, evil, and malice as a social problem. We aren't allowed to talk about the fact that they have no social controls imposed on them at all: none by society, none by religion, none by families, none by schools.

So, you'll just have to pardon me if I don't pick up a pitchfork or a firebrand and rush off to join the anti-Cosby lynch mob.

.

Post: #389

The Facts:

1) These women were all buddies with Cosby and were in some kind of pseudo-romantic relationship with him despite knowing he was a married man
2) Many of the women engaged voluntarily in his romantic pursuit of them, involving dinners and trips up to his hotel room
3) Crucially, none of the drugs were administered without their knowledge
4) Many of the women continued their friendship with Cosby after the alleged incident

Post: #390

(06-18-2017 09:19 AM)Abe Lincoln Wrote:  I don't get the support for Cosby. He is a disgusting scumbag and I have no doubt he raped dozens if not hundreds of women over the years. He is worse than the rapist Bill Clinton. He admits he drugged women before raping them. His reasoning is that it wasn't rape because they didn't say no.

There are plenty of nasty women who lie about being raped but I've never read a convincing argument that any of Cosbys accusers are like that. I have no respect for the people attacking Cosbys accusers. There are plenty of legit battles to fight against false rape charges and the campus kangaroo courts that always support women over men as part of the SJW agenda.

Bill Cosby derverves to die in jail and I hope he does.

Post: #391

Good points about the weakness of the case and the delight in the media of taking down Cosby. The crux of the issue is that he drugged these women and then raped them. Even if they freely take the pills they are not consenting to being raped. I don't think they all got drugged though. I recall some modeling agency madame who would lock Bill and some young model in a room for an hour or two and guard the door.

Too me this is truly sick stuff and Bill Cosby is preying on innocent people like a mugger or anyone else. There is nothing these women could do before or after that changes the situation -- unless they were consenting which I don't believe for a second. Way too many women with similar stories and there were plenty of witnesesses through the years. I agree with Quintus that the cases are maybe too old to prosecute and there is an agenda there but the white knighting for Cosby is wrong. Force the gov't to prove the case. If they can't that's the brakes and I'm fine with it. Whether he gets convicted not, Cosby deserves to rot in jail for what he did. There is way too much male hamstering going on trying to exonerate and pass the blame on this monster.

I understand the gold digging hoes that prey on celebs and no doubt a few of these women were like that. If were talking about campus "rapes," what happens to professional athletes, what happened to Tyson, etc. then I'm on board with attacking the accusers. The athletes are actually the victims. People defending Cosby though? I'm not buying it.

The people defending him are doing it for political or emotional reasons. Even if he walks free you aren't convincing me that he didn't rape (rape rape) probably over 100 women give or take? That's wrong and it's not some tricky grey area. How can someone ruffie a chick, give her qualuudes or whatever, bang her when she passes out and then do it over and over for like 30-40 years? How can that be defended by attacking the women who got raped?

Gotta call a spade a spade. Cosby wasn't lying to them to get consensual sex. It wouldn't suprise me if he walks because they can't prove the case and that's fine because that's how our system works. But we all know the truth and white knighting for Cosby is wrong. It's just like what the libs do for the rapist Bill Clinton because he's part of the tribe so it don't matter who he rapes, they will defend him and attack his victims regardless.

Post: #392

(06-19-2017 10:06 AM)Abe Lincoln Wrote:  You guy make some good points about the weakness of the case and the delight in the media of taking down Cosby. The crux of the issue is that he drugged these women and then raped them. Even if they freely take the pills they are not consenting to being raped. I don't think they all got drugged thought. I recall some modeling agency madame who would lock Bill and some young model in a room for an hour or two and guard the door.

Too me this is truly sick stuff and Bill Cosby is preying on innocent people like a mugger or anyone else. There is nothing these women could do before or after that changes the situation -- unless they were consenting which I don't believe for a second. Way too many women with similar stories and there were plenty of witnesesses through the years. I agree with Quintus that the cases are maybe too old to prosecute and there is an agenda there but the white knighting for Cosby is wrong. Force the gov't to prove the case and if they can't that's the brakes and I'm fine with it.

Whether he gets cinvuctedor not, Cosby deserves to rot in jail for what he did and there is way too much male hamstering going on trying to exonerate this monster.

I understand the gold digging hoes that prey on celebs and no doubt a few of these women were like that. If were talking about campus "rapes," what happens to professional athletes, what happened to Tyson, etc. then I'm on board with attacking the accusers. The athletes are actually the victims. People defending Cosby though? I'm not buying it.

The people defending him are doing it for political or emotional reasons. Even if he walks free you aren't convincing me that he didn't rape (rape rape) probably over 100 women give or take? That's wrong and it's not some tricky grey area. How can someone ruffie a chick, give her qualuudes or whatever, bang her when she passes out and then do it over and over for like 30-40 years? How can that be defended by attacking the women who got raped?

Quote:Gotta call a spade a spade.

Cosby wasn't lying to them to get consensual sex. It wouldn't suprise me if he walks because they can't prove the case and that's fine because that's how our system works. But we all know the truth and white knighting for Cosby is wrong. It's just like what the libs do for the rapist Bill Clinton because he's part of the tribe so it don't matter who he rapes, they will defend him and attack his victims regardless.

Do you understand the context of all the accusations?

So according to you he's guilty. You know he's "a monster", Even though you weren't there, dont know what happened other than what the media has chosen to tell. You understand the concept of "beyond a reasonable doubt"?


While it very often doesn't play out properly the concept of "innocent until proven guilty" was enacted specifically as a safeguard against reactionary low information middletards such as you.

By the way

Quote:Gotta call a spade a spade.

You're a racist . I know it

Post: #393

The mere fact that someone is reporting a very serious crime after 30 years makes it obvious that there was no crime.

Post: #394

Papaya I have read up on this case that's how I know he's a monster. You don't have to misstate me to make your point --- I agree that it's very likely he won't get convicted because of the evidence standard and the time that has passed.

I'm also aware that the media is full of shit and loves to push cases like this. Imagine if was some gay hollywood actor who preyed on other men? Would Hollywood even report on it? Would they push the truth to power angle if a gay man was the perp?

I'm talking about what I think about Cosby's behavior. I believe he did these things and it doesn't even matter who the victim is. Were talking about long term behavior here and a lot of accusations were brought up back in the day. A lot of it was mishandled and the cases were not prosecuted and went nowhere ... maybe because Bill Cosby was involved.

If I were on the jury I would consider the actual evidence presented. All we have to go on here is what we read in the media and I'm saying guilty as charged.

Post: #395

All this "he drugged them" is bullshit.

He did quaaludes with women back in the 70s. Back then, that was the sex drug of choice. In the 80s it was coke, and now it's Mollys. Don't be so naive. Hollywood types and other types do crazy sex shit and a lot of times it involves drugs.

He wasn't shoving these drugs down their throats. He offered them pills, and they put them in their mouth and swallowed. These were all adults. This was all consensual and these women continued to chase after Cos after these events. These are star fuckers who had their hearts broken once the reality hit that Cos was using them as the cum dumpsters they are.

Post: #396

(06-19-2017 12:42 PM)Dusty Wrote:  All this "he drugged them" is bullshit.

He did quaaludes with women back in the 70s. Back then, that was the sex drug of choice. In the 80s it was coke, and now it's Mollys. Don't be so naive. Hollywood types and other types do crazy sex shit and a lot of times it involves drugs.

He wasn't shoving these drugs down their throats. He offered them pills, and they put them in their mouth and swallowed. These were all adults. This was all consensual and these women continued to chase after Cos after these events. These are star fuckers who had their hearts broken once the reality hit that Cos was using them as the cum dumpsters they are.

Well said Dusty.

How long till some women start accusing Drake or Bieber of drugging them with extasy or purple drank, and raping them, 20 or 30 years later? Dan Bilzerian? Has Charlie Sheen already been accused of rape yet? He's got something worse than rape, but still. This is all bullshit.

Post: #397

Post: #398

(06-18-2017 11:27 AM)griffinmill Wrote:  The Facts:

1) These women were all buddies with Cosby and were in some kind of pseudo-romantic relationship with him despite knowing he was a married man
2) Many of the women engaged voluntarily in his romantic pursuit of them, involving dinners and trips up to his hotel room
3) Crucially, none of the drugs were administered without their knowledge
4) Many of the women continued their friendship with Cosby after the alleged incident

Yes. It's quite possible Cosby stepped out of line one or more times. Maybe a bit too much drugs, girl wasn't quite into it, but didn't object. It's possible.

We all agree so it is preaching to the choir, but when a woman knowingly is alone with a man and they take drugs, then I am going to find it hard to trust her testimony. Just can't convict someone in such a case.

Post: #399

(06-19-2017 10:06 AM)Abe Lincoln Wrote:  Good points about the weakness of the case and the delight in the media of taking down Cosby. The crux of the issue is that he drugged these women and then raped them. Even if they freely take the pills they are not consenting to being raped. I don't think they all got drugged though. I recall some modeling agency madame who would lock Bill and some young model in a room for an hour or two and guard the door.
<SNIP>

Your verbal diarrhea doesn't even begin to prove anything about his innocence or guilt. Your "reading about it" and "knowing he's a rapist" is sure damn convincing.

The reality is that most of the accusers consented to drinking and taking drugs, whether he pressured them to or not has nothing to do with whether they consented to it or not. Further, as others have explained that was the sex drug of choice back then. Then those same women in most cases continued to have a relationship with Cosby (some of them for a long time afterwards and some of them physical), which puts these accusations in a very skeptical light.

Could Cosby have used his power and influence to keep these women from saying anything about their rapes? Sure. Is it likely? No, and further it's far from proven as shown in this case. Is it a shitty thing if he promised them success and stardom in exchange for having sex with him? Yeah, but if they agreed to it they were just as much whores as he was a sheister.

Post: #400

(06-19-2017 01:36 PM)TravelerKai Wrote:  

(06-19-2017 12:42 PM)Dusty Wrote:  All this "he drugged them" is bullshit.

He did quaaludes with women back in the 70s. Back then, that was the sex drug of choice. In the 80s it was coke, and now it's Mollys. Don't be so naive. Hollywood types and other types do crazy sex shit and a lot of times it involves drugs.

He wasn't shoving these drugs down their throats. He offered them pills, and they put them in their mouth and swallowed. These were all adults. This was all consensual and these women continued to chase after Cos after these events. These are star fuckers who had their hearts broken once the reality hit that Cos was using them as the cum dumpsters they are.

Well said Dusty.

How long till some women start accusing Drake or Bieber of drugging them with extasy or purple drank, and raping them, 20 or 30 years later? Dan Bilzerian? Has Charlie Sheen already been accused of rape yet? He's got something worse than rape, but still. This is all bullshit.

Charlie Sheen got accused of raping...a dude. He's the guy that allegedly molested Corey Haim. It's pretty rare for a straight non needle user to get AIDs no matter how many porn stars he's with.