Post: #51

This happened in 2014:

NY State blesses ‘incest’ marriage between uncle, niece

Quote:The state’s highest court has toppled a cultural taboo — legalizing a degree of incest, at least between an uncle and niece — in a unanimous ruling.

While the laws against “parent-child and brother-sister marriages . . . are grounded in the almost universal horror with which such marriages are viewed . . . there is no comparably strong objection to uncle-niece marriages,” Tuesday’s ruling reads.

Judge Robert Smith of the Court of Appeals wrote that such unions were lawful in New York until 1893 and Rhode Island allows them.

The decision stems from a case brought by Vietnamese citizen Huyen Nguyen, 34, a woman who had appealed a ruling by an immigration judge.

The judge had tried to boot her from the United States after declaring that her 2000 marriage in Rochester to her mother’s half-brother was invalid.

Nguyen and her husband, Vu Truong, 38, appealed and won.

“I’m very happy for my clients,” said their lawyer, Michael Marszalkowski.

“They’ve been married 14 years now, but unfortunately, for half the time, there has been this concern over their heads about whether [the immigration issue] could be resolved. Thankfully, now it has been,” Marszalkowski said.

Marszalkowski said he won the case by zeroing in on the language of the state’s domestic-relations law.

The statute reads that “a marriage is incestuous and void whether the relatives are legitimate or illegitimate between either: 1. An ancestor and a descendant; 2. A brother and sister of either the whole or half blood; 3. An uncle and niece or an aunt and nephew.”

Incest is a crime punishable by a $50 to $100 fine and up to six months in jail.

Marszalkowski determined that as a matter of consanguinity, or blood relations, half-uncles and nieces share the same level of genetic ties as first cousins — or only one-eighth the same DNA.

“It really was the equivalent of cousins marrying, which has been allowed in New York state for well over 100 years,” Marszalkowski said.

Those on the six-person judicial panel acknowledged that they are not scientists, but noted that the “genetic risk in a half-uncle, half-niece relationship is half what it would be if the parties were related by the full blood.”

Nguyen and her husband, a truck driver, still live in Rochester and do not have any children.

She sued the US Attorney General Eric Holder, who enforces the country’s immigration laws.

A spokesman from his office did not return a message.

Family law expert Michael Stutman of the firm Mishcon de Reya, who is not involved in the case, said the ruling is in synch with today’s modern families.

“As people are more mobile and living longer marriages are ending and people remarry and you get blended families with step children and half children,” Stutman reasoned.

“There are plenty of other societies that allow so-called intermarriage without worrying about genetic defects. And frankly we have a long history of cousins marrying each other, take FDR and Eleanor Roosevelt,” he said.

The president and his wife were fifth cousins once removed.

Post: #52

(10-05-2015 03:58 PM)Horus Wrote:  

(10-05-2015 03:46 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  Pedophilia will start harmless with the lowering of the age of consent to legitimate levels of 16, but then those psychos will continue until age zero - that's where McKinsey tested too - he actually paid pedophiles to sexually arouse toddlers.

What's this about? I couldn't find anything on Google.

It's Kinsey of course - I just saw that Youtube deleted most of the documentaries I saw some time ago, but some are still up:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVC-1d5ib50

http://www.whale.to/b/kinsey.html
http://www.whale.to/b/reisman3.html
http://www.whale.to/b/keith3.html

Especially Dr. Judith Reisman (Jewish, but working for the good side - in the alternative scientific movement there are plenty of Jews who fight against the authorities) researched Kinsey in great detail - she did a documentary later on.

His research is not only flawed and manipulated - for example his promiscuity data was inflated by prostitutes and his homosexuality claims by male prisoners - absolutely ridiculous and fraudulent. When I read the data I saw the spreadsheets showing sexual experiments on ages 0-6 - crying was seen as an orgasm with a toddler. Also interesting that he was financed by the Rockefellers, but those guys have their hands in all kinds of evil crap.

So yeah - the movie KINSEY is about as real as a feminist talking about men's rights.

Post: #53

(11-12-2012 02:07 PM)Roosh Wrote:  Don't forget pedophilia. The original feminists wanted this to be normal behavior too.

Do you have a link pertaining to this? I was trying to figure out which feminists those were. First wave feminism came about in the 19th century, and ultimately a lot of those feminists ended up becoming part of a coalition that successfully lobbied to raise the age of consent. Then in the 20th century, second wave feminists successfully lobbied to raise the age of consent even higher. And now third wave feminists and their allies continue to use this issue in their attacks on their critics, for example when they note New Hampshire politician Robert Fisher's (alleged?) answer to a question posed on Reddit about 15-year-old girls.

(By the way, Fisher didn't say being attracted to them was "good"; he just said it was "natural" and "evolutionarily advantageous". He could've been talking about prehistoric times, though; who knows. But I guess even making objective observations on that topic is forbidden by political correctness.)

Post: #54

Samseau and his fucking prophecies!

Post: #55

(04-29-2017 06:56 PM)Jean Valjean Wrote:  

(11-12-2012 02:07 PM)Roosh Wrote:  Don't forget pedophilia. The original feminists wanted this to be normal behavior too.

Do you have a link pertaining to this? I was trying to figure out which feminists those were. First wave feminism came about in the 19th century, and ultimately a lot of those feminists ended up becoming part of a coalition that successfully lobbied to raise the age of consent. Then in the 20th century, second wave feminists successfully lobbied to raise the age of consent even higher. And now third wave feminists and their allies continue to use this issue in their attacks on their critics, for example when they note New Hampshire politician Robert Fisher's (alleged?) answer to a question posed on Reddit about 15-year-old girls.

(By the way, Fisher didn't say being attracted to them was "good"; he just said it was "natural" and "evolutionarily advantageous". He could've been talking about prehistoric times, though; who knows. But I guess even making objective observations on that topic is forbidden by the feminists.)

Without a long look into it, we can start with our frequent flyer Andrea Dworkin, per Wikipedia. The last chapter of her book Woman Hating in 1974 said:

Quote:The parent–child relationship is primarily erotic because all human relationships are primarily erotic", and that "The incest taboo, because it denies us essential fulfillment with the parents whom we love with our primary energy, forces us to internalize those parents and constantly seek them. The incest taboo does the worst work of the culture... The destruction of the incest taboo is essential to the development of cooperative human community based on the free-flow of natural androgynous eroticism".

This is basically reheated Freudian Oedipal Complex -- and just as flawed given the Westermarck Effect proves Freud entirely wrong.

That said, it got amusing because Larry Flynt in Hustler said that Dworkin endorsed incest. She sued him for libel. And lost. The court dismissed Dworkin's complaint on the grounds that regardless of whether Hustler's interpretations of her reflections on incest were valid, even a faulty interpretation of a work placed into the "marketplace of ideas" could not amount to defamation in the legal sense.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #56

(10-05-2015 04:32 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

(10-05-2015 03:58 PM)Horus Wrote:  

(10-05-2015 03:46 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  Pedophilia will start harmless with the lowering of the age of consent to legitimate levels of 16, but then those psychos will continue until age zero - that's where McKinsey tested too - he actually paid pedophiles to sexually arouse toddlers.

What's this about? I couldn't find anything on Google.

It's Kinsey of course - I just saw that Youtube deleted most of the documentaries I saw some time ago, but some are still up:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVC-1d5ib50

http://www.whale.to/b/kinsey.html
http://www.whale.to/b/reisman3.html
http://www.whale.to/b/keith3.html

Especially Dr. Judith Reisman (Jewish, but working for the good side - in the alternative scientific movement there are plenty of Jews who fight against the authorities) researched Kinsey in great detail - she did a documentary later on.

His research is not only flawed and manipulated - for example his promiscuity data was inflated by prostitutes and his homosexuality claims by male prisoners - absolutely ridiculous and fraudulent. When I read the data I saw the spreadsheets showing sexual experiments on ages 0-6 - crying was seen as an orgasm with a toddler. Also interesting that he was financed by the Rockefellers, but those guys have their hands in all kinds of evil crap.

So yeah - the movie KINSEY is about as real as a feminist talking about men's rights.

Who performed those and on whom, children that age have 0 interest in sexuality.
More importantly are those experimenters still breathing? Few things can change my mood so fast but now I'm pretty enraged just from reading that.

Post: #57

When I try to google those experiments about ages 0-6, all I find is Kinsey's 0-6 scale of homosexuality/heterosexuality.

Oh, I forgot to mention one other thing feminists have been doing lately, which is raise the age of marriageability to 18, to match (or exceed) the age of consent. This will tend to encourage abortions, since the option of the shotgun wedding is no longer available.

The Dworkin quote is interesting. I've been theorizing for awhile now that male-female relationships tend to take on either a father-daughter or mother-son dynamic, depending on which party is dominant. (The problem with the latter is that, while men might desire the kind of unconditional love their mom offered, women are not going to provide that to anyone but their offspring.)

Girls are attracted to cuteness, so a "cute guy" can sometimes get laid on that basis alone, but at some point in the relationship he's going to need to act like a "real man" to sustain the attraction.

Post: #58

It's odd that this thread was bumped. I was going to put this in the robococksucker thread but it's far more fitting here.

See, thing is, the neighbours cat jumped through an open window at my place while I was making coffee between shitposts, and it walked over the keyboard, apparently opening a new firefox panel and tapping out dubydubyadubyayoujizzdotcom.

Upon returning I of course shut the panel down immediately, but in the brief moment I glanced at it I couldn't help but notice that probably two thirds of the videos were labelled "fucking my sister" or "does his mom" or "fucks her dad" or "blows her son" or some variation of those core concepts.

Anyone want to venture into conspiracy theories over whether the major porn distributors are operating on market pressures or "made to order for the (((site sponsors)))".

Frankly I'm not sure which is more disturbing, though probably the former.

Post: #59

This bumped thread...how the hell does one bump this thread from almost 2 years ago?

And i bet the neighbors cat was trained.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/a...-CATS.html
Actual headline...

Quote:How the CIA tried to turn a CAT into a cyborg spy by implanting it with a microphone and antenna

So Leonard D Neubache, corner the cat and demand if he/she is working for the CIA. If it licks its paws.....flee.

Anyways, where was i? Oh yes legalizing incest.





but really its...

Post: #60

A great way to challenge "pro gay marriage" advocates is ask them if they have a problem with Poly marriage.

They usually always do, but when they try and explain why its a bad moral idea, you hit them with all the insults, accusations of narrow minded thinking etc they they use to justify gay marriage.

Its love, what multiple people do in private is their business etc etc

Great fun, try this out yourself.

Post: #61

(04-29-2017 10:02 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  It's odd that this thread was bumped. I was going to put this in the robococksucker thread but it's far more fitting here.

See, thing is, the neighbours cat jumped through an open window at my place while I was making coffee between shitposts, and it walked over the keyboard, apparently opening a new firefox panel and tapping out dubydubyadubyayoujizzdotcom.

Upon returning I of course shut the panel down immediately, but in the brief moment I glanced at it I couldn't help but notice that probably two thirds of the videos were labelled "fucking my sister" or "does his mom" or "fucks her dad" or "blows her son" or some variation of those core concepts.

Anyone want to venture into conspiracy theories over whether the major porn distributors are operating on market pressures or "made to order for the (((site sponsors)))".

Frankly I'm not sure which is more disturbing, though probably the former.

For what it's worth, my ... uh ... informal experiments conducted on this subject reveal much the same thing. Hell of a lot of stepson fucking, stepdaughter fucking, brother/sister, etc. etc. on the front page of xhamster and xvideos.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #62

(04-29-2017 10:45 PM)Paracelsus Wrote:  

(04-29-2017 10:02 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  It's odd that this thread was bumped. I was going to put this in the robococksucker thread but it's far more fitting here.

See, thing is, the neighbours cat jumped through an open window at my place while I was making coffee between shitposts, and it walked over the keyboard, apparently opening a new firefox panel and tapping out dubydubyadubyayoujizzdotcom.

Upon returning I of course shut the panel down immediately, but in the brief moment I glanced at it I couldn't help but notice that probably two thirds of the videos were labelled "fucking my sister" or "does his mom" or "fucks her dad" or "blows her son" or some variation of those core concepts.

Anyone want to venture into conspiracy theories over whether the major porn distributors are operating on market pressures or "made to order for the (((site sponsors)))".

Frankly I'm not sure which is more disturbing, though probably the former.

For what it's worth, my ... uh ... informal experiments conducted on this subject reveal much the same thing. Hell of a lot of stepson fucking, stepdaughter fucking, brother/sister, etc. etc. on the front page of xhamster and xvideos.

Same here, damn near entire front of (((pornhub)))

Post: #63

(04-29-2017 08:18 PM)Jean Valjean Wrote:  The Dworkin quote is interesting. I've been theorizing for awhile now that male-female relationships tend to take on either a father-daughter or mother-son dynamic, depending on which party is dominant. (The problem with the latter is that, while men might desire the kind of unconditional love their mom offered, women are not going to provide that to anyone but their offspring.)

I would be kinda careful of accepting Dworkin's theory, mainly because

(a) she reckons she was sexually abused as a child, which generates a fucked-up worldview of itself
(b) the Westermarck Effect essentially disproves what she says. It appears a hardwired epigenetic rule, that is, literally human nature, that people don't fuck the close relatives they grew up with. You have to be really fucked up to still be channelling Freud in this day and age.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #64

(04-29-2017 10:48 PM)godfather dust Wrote:  

(04-29-2017 10:45 PM)Paracelsus Wrote:  

(04-29-2017 10:02 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  It's odd that this thread was bumped. I was going to put this in the robococksucker thread but it's far more fitting here.

See, thing is, the neighbours cat jumped through an open window at my place while I was making coffee between shitposts, and it walked over the keyboard, apparently opening a new firefox panel and tapping out dubydubyadubyayoujizzdotcom.

Upon returning I of course shut the panel down immediately, but in the brief moment I glanced at it I couldn't help but notice that probably two thirds of the videos were labelled "fucking my sister" or "does his mom" or "fucks her dad" or "blows her son" or some variation of those core concepts.

Anyone want to venture into conspiracy theories over whether the major porn distributors are operating on market pressures or "made to order for the (((site sponsors)))".

Frankly I'm not sure which is more disturbing, though probably the former.

For what it's worth, my ... uh ... informal experiments conducted on this subject reveal much the same thing. Hell of a lot of stepson fucking, stepdaughter fucking, brother/sister, etc. etc. on the front page of xhamster and xvideos.

Same here, damn near entire front of (((pornhub)))

imagefap as well, albeit with more sissy/cuckold material

Post: #65

The answer is here:

Quote:PORNOGRAPHY AS A SECRET WEAPON
Lasha Darkmoon
May 9, 2014

Pornography is deployed today as a psyop or mind weapon: to pacify, control, brutalize, and ultimately enslave the masses. How do you take a nation of free and independent citizens and turn them into slaves? How do you do this slowly and imperceptibly, without violence, and with the willing participation of the slaves-to-be? The answer is simple. You corrupt them, undermine them, deprave them, demoralize them, until they have acquired all the characteristics of slaves. As the sorceress Circe, with a wave of her magic wand, turned the followers of Ulysses into grunting swine, you can wield your weapon of mass hypnosis, the media, over a nation and transform its citizens into willing slaves. You can learn to roboticize man and turn him into a living machine. This is power. This is what it must feel like to be God — or the Devil. Is there a secret weapon or “magic wand” for turning men into swine? Yes, there is. Sex is the secret weapon, the magic device, that turns men into swine.

Full article here:

https://www.darkmoon.me/2014/pornography...-darkmoon/



Porn warps your mind and causes brain damge.
If you want to give up fake sex, head over to this thread:

NoPorn / NoFap Google Group - For Those Who're Serious
/thread-12879-page-121.html

Post: #66

Has anyone noticed that over the years in pornorgraphy, there has been a massive emphasis placed on 'incest'. 'Mother and son' stuff, although it is blatantly obvious that the pornstars are not mother and son, but still disturbing nevertheless. The whole Psyop theory, would explain why.

Post: #67

(04-30-2017 09:27 AM)Constitution45 Wrote:  Has anyone noticed that over the years in pornorgraphy, there has been a massive emphasis placed on 'incest'. 'Mother and son' stuff, although it is blatantly obvious that the pornstars are not mother and son, but still disturbing nevertheless. The whole Psyop theory, would explain why.

Definitely. Also the rise of cuckold pornography and all things nasty.

It's wicked stuff and it must be easy to subvert since most men watch porn and being turned on is a whole different mindset.

If you were to stop consuming porn, mainstream news, pop science, social media, smartphone-ADHDing and hollywood entertainment, in 10 years you would find yourself alone but a totally different man from western cucks.

Post: #68

(04-30-2017 09:46 AM)loremipsum Wrote:  ...
If you were to stop consuming porn, mainstream news, pop science, social media, smartphone-ADHDing and hollywood entertainment, in 10 years you would find yourself alone but a totally different man from western cucks.

Already there (for the most part).

I sometimes get stuck in a waiting room where there's free-to-air television playing and I'm not even exaggerating when I say that I feel my mind being numbed in real-time by the screaming idiots advertising useless shit and yet more inane programs at twice the volume of the shitty, inane program they're advertising during.

Even radio sets me on edge now. I could never go back to that life. Neeeeeever.

Post: #69

^^ It is all poison. It just pollutes the mind and neuters us. I feel like you need to constantly exercise your masculinity to stay head above water, when you are living in the Anglosphere. Expectations are so low, when it comes to everything as well. Being a simple nice guy and plodding along, is seen as achieving some state of worthiness.

I don't wish to turn this thread racial, as males in all ethnic groups seem to be having their own problems. But I see particularly white English and American guys subsuming to this Lotus flower eating position. Where they seem to believe their submissiveness and feminity is some next stage of evolution.

Post: #70

(04-30-2017 09:46 AM)loremipsum Wrote:  

(04-30-2017 09:27 AM)Constitution45 Wrote:  Has anyone noticed that over the years in pornorgraphy, there has been a massive emphasis placed on 'incest'. 'Mother and son' stuff, although it is blatantly obvious that the pornstars are not mother and son, but still disturbing nevertheless. The whole Psyop theory, would explain why.

Definitely. Also the rise of cuckold pornography and all things nasty.

It's wicked stuff and it must be easy to subvert since most men watch porn and being turned on is a whole different mindset.

If you were to stop consuming porn, mainstream news, pop science, social media, smartphone-ADHDing and hollywood entertainment, in 10 years you would find yourself alone but a totally different man from western cucks.

Don't get me started on that, the cuckold fetish and incest fetish seems to be on the top listings of all the porn sites. Receiving millions of views, says it all really.

Post: #71

All porn except teen (18/19 yo) lesbian porn is deviant and pathetic

Post: #72

(04-29-2017 07:24 PM)cascadecombo Wrote:  Who performed those and on whom, children that age have 0 interest in sexuality.
More importantly are those experimenters still breathing? Few things can change my mood so fast but now I'm pretty enraged just from reading that.

Jean Valjean - there is no 0-6 age scale that Kinsey published in his books.

If you watch the long documentary of Dr. Judith you will find her going through the data.

Kinsey did not perform the child sexual tests himself, but he hired actual pedophiles who supposedly gave him the results later. You can tickle or stimulate their genitals I guess and crying was seen as sexual excitement. Don't know what they called orgasm .

Either way - it is all sick shit.

Post: #73

(04-30-2017 05:18 AM)Mercenary Wrote:  Porn warps your mind and causes brain damge.
If you want to give up fake sex, head over to this thread:

NoPorn / NoFap Google Group - For Those Who're Serious
/thread-12879-page-121.html

I might give a shout out to Mercenary who helps guys along in the No-Fap thread.

Porn is a weapon in the form used.
It will get much worse with the 3D-goggles and blowjob-dolls.

They can even steer the interest away to further disintegration.

Currently it seems that they promote en masse Interracial porn - mostly black men with white women and now incest. It is permeating every nook and cranny of the net.

I still remember some scientific elite comments written in the 1930s - he said that Necrophilia is going to be promoted. I think it was Bernays who said this.

Either way - porn is the perfect tool for that. Maybe they will legalize incest in the future. And while you may think that it may be fun to fuck your hot daughter.

In reality such activities are warping our minds, destroying our family relations. Paracelsus is right - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westermarck_effect - there is a human factor of people growing up together not being interested in each other sexually. The Jewish Kibbutz experiences proved it beyond a shadow of a doubt to the great disappointment of the people who moved there. If we raise our children up together day in and day out, they will have imprinted each other as brother and sister and will not be interested in each other.

We humans can be somewhat conditioned sexually towards sick perversions of sexuality - interracial sex, cuckoldry, pedophilia, incest, necrophilia, bestiality - everything is coming - brace yourself. The first 2 points are already there.

Homesexuality itself is also a perversion of the biological sexuality. I would not promote it, I would offer therapy to those who want to let it go (not by praying - better ways to do it), but I would not punish it - some have that desire. The same goes for interracial sex. I would not punish it, but I would not promote it either as something great. Any race should have the freedom to stay the same. I will not even comment the rest of the sexual activities because they are just sick and demented.

Actual comic promoting cuckoldry:

Post: #74

(04-30-2017 05:18 AM)Mercenary Wrote:  The answer is here:

Quote:PORNOGRAPHY AS A SECRET WEAPON
Lasha Darkmoon
May 9, 2014

Pornography is deployed today as a psyop or mind weapon: to pacify, control, brutalize, and ultimately enslave the masses. How do you take a nation of free and independent citizens and turn them into slaves? How do you do this slowly and imperceptibly, without violence, and with the willing participation of the slaves-to-be? The answer is simple. You corrupt them, undermine them, deprave them, demoralize them, until they have acquired all the characteristics of slaves. As the sorceress Circe, with a wave of her magic wand, turned the followers of Ulysses into grunting swine, you can wield your weapon of mass hypnosis, the media, over a nation and transform its citizens into willing slaves. You can learn to roboticize man and turn him into a living machine. This is power. This is what it must feel like to be God — or the Devil. Is there a secret weapon or “magic wand” for turning men into swine? Yes, there is. Sex is the secret weapon, the magic device, that turns men into swine.

Full article here:

https://www.darkmoon.me/2014/pornography...-darkmoon/



Porn warps your mind and causes brain damge.
If you want to give up fake sex, head over to this thread:

NoPorn / NoFap Google Group - For Those Who're Serious
/thread-12879-page-121.html

(04-30-2017 09:27 AM)Constitution45 Wrote:  Has anyone noticed that over the years in pornorgraphy, there has been a massive emphasis placed on 'incest'. 'Mother and son' stuff, although it is blatantly obvious that the pornstars are not mother and son, but still disturbing nevertheless. The whole Psyop theory, would explain why.

I've been saying/suspecting some of this for a while.
You could argue that some of the basis for capitalism was "be rich, get pussy". How many men (and women) think money rather than game makes men attractive? A lot!

I suspect that the Establishment is now reviewing this. Because people are realising that not everyone can and will be a "rich sexually attractive winner".

So they're rewriting things.
Male homosexuality is being promoted. They are compliant even though they think they are "rebellious".
80s music seemed to be all about faggotry in England - so that anti Establishment politics didn't enter and dominate music. Lesbianism seems to be related to aggressive career women making more money for the elite. Rather than the feminine mother who concentrates on her kids that we saw in years gone by.

BDSM will be the next step. We see it with that Fifty Shades of Grey crap. I'm staggered at how many "males" are into being "dominated" by females and shit. Not just some sicko sexual stuff with whores. But actually the nature of their relationships with wives, female bosses etc. I'm certain that they plan a form of sexualised dominance in the workplace. Where feminised males actually ENJOY being bossed around by some skanky square jawed female boss. (Remember that vile "ban bossy" campaign - which attempted to legitmise "bullying" by skanky female bosses!) I've even seen this "female sexualised domiantion" in workplaces. They're clearly trying to eradicate the idea of males being dominant - in their homes, even dominating their OWN behaviour! Ultimately we could see a form of sexualised SLAVERY. Its the ideal system for a warped elite. Because the slaves WANT to be slaves.

I read an article on satanism. All this fag, incest, tranny, BDSM shit is promoted in it. But proper religions are ofcourse disgusted by it. Christians are portrayed as "intolerant bigots". OR Christianity is being "rewritten" by fags and the like.

I don't know how far incest can/will be promoted. But probably, along with paedophilia in some way or other. My guess its to create a sicko idea that ALL love is to be associated with sexuality. Whereas any normal people knows that the two are different eg no normal parent would do sicko shit with their kids, no matter how much they "loved them". Perhaps the idea is that groups are easier to control when they are in families? I don't know, the mind boggles at such weirdness!

____________________
There is the issue of psy-ops and the like. In one way, certain groups do seem to have shared aims. But I also think that we are heavily brainwashed. Ideas can spread like viruses without us realising we are infected. It reminds me of an article claiming that George Soros is involved in "red team v blue team" work where different methods of psy-ops are regularly explored and monitored for effectiveness. And also just to see how far they can go, and how quickly.

Finally, I could never understand why so much American porn was just... gross. Those vile football sized tits, the masses of tattoos on prematurely aged cokehead pornstars. The moronic "yeah do me harder baby" talking. I got the feeling it was conditioning people to separate relationship sex from "porn sex". And even stop men associating beautiful women with sex. Why? I'm not entirely sure. I used to say to people in a joking type way "American porn is run by religious fundamentalists".

Either way, I can't put my finger on it, but "Big Porn" ie the bigger companies, like news and advertising and much of the media, is clearly trying to play us. And ultimately to mold us. Hmmm. Weird stuff...

Post: #75

(04-30-2017 11:27 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

(04-30-2017 05:18 AM)Mercenary Wrote:  Porn warps your mind and causes brain damge.
If you want to give up fake sex, head over to this thread:

NoPorn / NoFap Google Group - For Those Who're Serious
/thread-12879-page-121.html

I might give a shout out to Mercenary who helps guys along in the No-Fap thread.

Thank you Zelcorpion.
I encourage everyone to try giving up porn & masturbation at least once in your life for 90 days. This is the minimum for a full reboot and healing of your brain. If you can't get to 90 days...try at least 30 days.

The numerous health benefits to both your mind and body are all documented by hundreds of RVF members who have already tried this in the over 120 pages of the NoFap thread.